Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflicts: A Nonlinear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy, and Dividend Policy

1999 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl R. Chen ◽  
Thomas L. Steiner
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 105
Author(s):  
Wahidahwati Wahidahwati

The purpose of this research to examine how managerial ownership relate to risk taking, debt policy and dividend policy. This research is based on the previous research by Chen and Steiner (1999), which found that risk tobe a significant and positive determinant of the level managerial ownership while managerial ownership is also significant and positive determinant of the level of risk. Chen and Steiner observed evidence of subtituons-monitoring effects between managerial ownership and debt policy, managerial ownership and dividend policy, and between managerial ownership and institutional ownership. The research is focused on manufacturing companies listed in BEJ for periode 1993-1996.The method of data collection is done by using pooling method and give 103 firm year observation. This research uses a non linear simultaneous equation methodology with use the statistical method two stage least square. The result of this research shows that risk tobe a significant and negative determinant of the level of managerial ownership while managerial ownership is also significant and negative determinant of the level of risk. The result not supports the argument that managerial ownership helps to resolve the agency conflicts between stock holder and manager. The result also indicate that there is not subtitutability between debt and managerial ownership dan between dividend and managerial ownership, but this research evidence of subtitutions-monitoring effect between managerial ownership and institutional ownership.


Author(s):  
Fatma Ben Moussa ◽  
Jameleddine Chichti

The agency relationship between managers and shareholders has the potential to influence decision-making in the firm which in turn potentially impacts on firm characteristics such as leverage. Prior evidence has demonstrated an association between ownership structure and firm value. This paper extends the literature by examining a further link between ownership structure and capital structure. Based on a system of simultaneous equations on the basis of a panel of Tunisian companies listed on the Tunisian stock exchange during the period 2000-2009, our results show that the ownership structure affects the capital structure and vice versa. In addition, the relationship between debt and managerial ownership is nonlinear.Keywords: Corporate governance, debt policy, ownership structure, free cash flow.


2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Wahidawati Wahidawati

The purpose of this research to estimates a simultaneous equations model with Tobin’s Q (firm value), managerial ownership and debt policy jointly determined within the system. This research is based on the pre¬vious¬ research by Chen and Steiner (2000), which found that managerial ownership tobe a significant and positive determinant of the level Tobin’s Q. Chen and Steiner (1999) observed evidence of subtituons-monitoring effects between managerial ownership and debt policy.The research is focused on manufacturing companies listed in BEJ for periode 1999-2002.The method of data collection is done by using pooling method and give 151 firm year observation.This research uses a non linear simultaneous equation methodology with use the statistical method two stage least square. The result of research provides empirical evidence : First, that managerial ownership has a non linear relation with Tobin’s Q (we find support for both an alignmenteffect and an entrenchment effectin the relationship between managerial ownership and Tobin’s Q. second, The result supports the argument that managerial ownership helps to resolve the agency conflicts between stock holder and manager. The result also indicate that there is not subtitu¬ta¬bi¬li¬ty between debt and managerial ownership.


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Luluk Muhimatul Ifada ◽  
Yunandriatna Yunandriatna

Debt policy is one of the most important decisions for the company. It is thus important to figure out the determinants of debt policy. The main purpose of this study is to examine the effect of the size, free cash flow, managerial ownership, dividend policy on debt policy of Indonesian manufacturing public listed firms. Data collected from 195 companies from 2012 to 2014 were analyzed using multiple regression. Current study found that free cash flow and managerial ownership have negative effect on the debt policy. Furthermore, the study also found that dividend policy and company size positively affects the debt policy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-59
Author(s):  
Luh Nik Oktarini ◽  
Putu Atim Purwaningrat

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of free cash flow to debt policy to determine the influence of investment opportunity set against debt policy to determine the effect of managerial ownership on debt policy  to determine the effect of free cash flow to the dividend policy to determine the effect of managerial ownership to dividend policy. This research was conducted on manufaktur companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2011-2015 period. Methods of data collection is done by using the method of documentation. Data analysis with path analysis with AMOS program version 20. The results showed  the effect of variable free cash flow to debt policy is significant, effect of variable investment opportunity set against debt policy is significant, the effect of managerial ownership variable against debt policy is not significantly, the effect of variable free cash flow toward dividend policy is not significant,  the effect of managerial ownership variable to dividend policy is a significant and indirect influence of the variable investment opportunity set against the dividend policy through debt policy is significant.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Ardhya Yudistira Adi Nanggala

This study aims to identify and examine empirically effect of free cash flows, managerial ownership and dividend policy on debt policy (empirical study on companies listed on Stock Exchange). This study uses secondary data in form of financial statements derived from annual financial statements of companies listed on Stock Exchange and available reporting consecutive years from 2012 to 2017. Samples were taken by purposive sampling with first criteria company's annual financial statement data available for consecutive reporting years from 2012 to 2017. Number of samples in this study 132 firm years. Data analysis methods used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. Results showed that: free cash flows and managerial ownership has a significant positive effect on debt policy. Dividend policy have a significant negative effect on debt policy. Keywords: Free cash Flows, Management Ownership Dividend Policy, Debt Policy


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Siti Siti ◽  
Ahalik Ahalik

Abstrak:Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang, profitabilitas, kepemilikan manajerial, dan komite audit terhadap nilai perusahaan. Teknik pemilihan sampel penelitian ini menggunakan purposive sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 75 perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI periode 2013-2017. Data penelitian ini menggunakan data dari laporan keuangan dari setiap perusahaan sampel. Analisis data penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda dengan pemakaian SPSS 24. Nilai perusahaan dalam penelitian ini diukur dengan rasio Tobin’s Q. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang, profitabilitas, kepemilikan manajerial dan komite audit secara bersama-sama berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. Variabel kebijakan dividen (DPR), kebijakan utang (DER), kepemilikan manajerial (KM) dan komite audit (KA) tidak berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan, sedangkan profitabilitas (ROE) berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan.   Kata Kunci:kebijakan dividen, kebijakan utang, nilai perusahaan, profitabilitas.              Abstract:This research was conducted with the aim to determine the effect of dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, managerial ownership, and audit committee on firm value. The technique of selecting this research sample using purposive sampling. The sample in this study were 75 manufacturing companies listed on the Stock Exchange in the period 2013-2017. This research data uses data from financial statements from each sample company. The data analysis of this study uses multiple regression analysis with the use of SPSS 24. The company value in this study is measured by Tobin’s Q ratio. The results of this study indicate dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, managerial ownership and audit committee jointly influence the firm value. The variable dividend policy (DPR), debt policy (DER), managerial ownership (KM) and audit committee (KA) did not affect the value of the company, while profitability (ROE) had a significant positive effect on firm value.   Keywords:dividend policy, debt policy, firm value, profitability


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-27
Author(s):  
Desi eka Ardiani ◽  
Sri Hermuningsih ◽  
Ratih Kusumawardani

Penelitian dilakukan guna menganalisis pengaruh kebijakan dividen, kebijakan hutang, profitabilitas dan kepemilikan manajerial terhadap nilai perusahaan subsektor industri barang konsumsi yang telah terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2015-2019. Populasi terdiri dari seluruh perusahaan industri barang konsumsi tahun 2015 hingga 2019. Sampel penelitian ini yaitu 8 perusahaan subsektor industri barang konsumsi dan seri waktu 5 tahun dari 2015 sampai 2019. Data didapatkan melalui laporan keuangan tahunan di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) memakai metode purposive sampling yakni didasarkan pada kriteria tertentu. Metode analisis memakai analisis regresi berganda, asumsi kalsik dan uji hipotesis dengan tingkat memakai program SPSS. Hasil yang telah diselesaikan kebijakan dividen(DPR) berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kebijakan hutang(DER) berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Profitabilitas(ROA) berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kepemilikan manajerial(KM) berpengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan terhadap nilai perusahaan. Kemudian bersama-sama kebijakan dividen, kebijakan hutang, profitabilitas dan kepemilikan manajerial berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan. AbstractThis study aims to analyze the effect of dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, and managerial ownership on the value of the consumer goods industry sub-sector companies that have been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2019. The population used is all consumer goods industrial companies from 2015 to 2019. The sample of this research is 8 companies in the consumer goods industry subsector and a 5-year time series from 2015 to 2019. Data is obtained from annual financial reports on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) using a purposive method. sampling that is based on certain criteria. The analytical method used is multiple regression analysis, calcic assumptions, and hypothesis testing using the SPSS program. The results that have been finalized dividend policy (DPR) have a positive and significant effect on firm value. Debt policy (DER) has a positive and insignificant effect on firm value. Profitability (ROA) has a positive and significant effect on firm value. Managerial ownership (KM) has a positive and insignificant effect on firm value. Meanwhile, collectively, dividend policy, debt policy, profitability, and managerial ownership affect firm value.


KINERJA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Taufik Akhbar

This study aims to examine the debt policy and managerial ownership as tools to control the agency conflict. Debt policy and managerial ownership used in controlling agency conflicts have several considerations such as the risk of the company, the company's growth and the presence of institutional ownership in a company. The variables used in this study include earnings volatility as a measure of corporate risk, growth companies, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, debt policy, and total assets as a control. Furthermore, an analysis by means of regression models with simultaneous Two Stage Least Square method was used. The results found in this study stated that the risk factors, the growth of the company, as well as the existence of institutional ownership affect debt policy and managerial ownership control of the company within the framework of the agency conflict. This indicates that the use of policies to control the agency conflict must consider these three factors. Keywords: agency conflict, debt policy, managerial ownership


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
ANWAR HARSONO

The objective of the research is to obtain empirical evidence on the effect of independent variables of firm size, cash, capital expenditure, dividend policy, debt policy, return on asset, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership to firm value.The population used in this study are non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013-2016. Intake of data in this research using purposive sampling method. There are 54 non-financial companies that fit the criteria and were selected as the final sample. This study uses multiple regression analysis to test the hypothesis. The value of firms in this study was measured using Tobins'Q.The empirical results of this study indicate that the variables independent debt policy and return on assets have an influence on firm value, while the variables of firm size, cash, capital expenditure, dividend policy, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership have no effect on firm value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document