Patient involvement in assessment of postgraduate medical learners: A scoping review.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Khalife ◽  
Manika Gupta ◽  
Carol Gonsalves ◽  
Yoon Soo Park ◽  
Janet Riddle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Involvement

scholarly journals Patient involvement in surgical wound care research: A scoping review

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1462-1482
Author(s):  
Rachel Muir ◽  
Joan Julie Carlini ◽  
Emma Louise Harbeck ◽  
Brigid Mary Gillespie ◽  
Haitham Wadah Tuffaha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Surgical Wound ◽  
Care Research

scholarly journals Public and patient involvement (PPI) in health policy decisionmaking on the health system-level: protocol for a systematic scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e043650
Author(s):  
Lisa Ann Baumann ◽  
Anna Levke Brütt
Keyword(s):  
Health Policy ◽  
Health System ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
System Level ◽  
Macro Level ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Public And Patient Involvement

IntroductionPublic and patient involvement (PPI) in healthcare decisions at the health system-level (macro-level) has become increasingly important during recent years. Existing evidence indicates that PPI increase patient centredness and the democracy of healthcare decisions as well as patients’ trust and acceptance of these decisions. However, different methods for PPI exist, and an overview of the outcomes and influential contextual factors has not yet been conducted. Therefore, this scoping review aims to provide an overview of the different methods used for PPI in health system decisionmaking and the reported outcomes and contextual factors for these methods.Methods and analysisThe structure of this protocol is guided by the advanced scoping studies framework of Arksey and O’ Malley, developed by Levac, Colquhoun and O’Brien, and the PRISMA-ScR Statement. We will systematically search electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, PDQ-Evidence, Web of Science and PsycINFO) for peer-reviewed literature and screen the reference lists of included studies. Additionally, we will search for relevant grey literature and consult experts from the field to identify further information. Studies focusing on PPI in the context of health policy decision-making at the macro-level will be eligible for full-text screening. Studies focusing on decisions at the individual treatment-level (micro-level) and the organisational-level (mesolevel) as well as those dealing with PPI in health research will be excluded. A qualitative analysis will dissect how the included studies define PPI and its desirable outcomes, the achieved outcomes and reported contextual factors.Ethics and disseminationWe will present the results at relevant conferences and in an open-access journal. Additionally, we will share them with the experts involved in the research process and consider ways in which to transfer the findings into practice. As only secondary and previously published information will be used, ethical approval is not necessary.

scholarly journals Citizen-Patient Involvement in the Development of mHealth Technology: Protocol for a Systematic Scoping Review (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorunn Bjerkan ◽  
Bridget Kane ◽  
Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt ◽  
Marit Veie ◽  
Mariann Fossum
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Mobile Technology ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
System Development ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Mhealth Technology

BACKGROUND The development of mobile technology for information retrieval and communication, both at individual and health organizational levels, has been extensive over the last decade. Mobile health (mHealth) technology is rapidly adapting to the health care service contexts to improve treatment, care, and effectiveness in health care services. OBJECTIVE The overall aim of this scoping review is to explore the role of citizen-patient involvement in the development of mHealth technology in order to inform future interventions. By identifying key characteristics of citizen-patient involvement in system development, we aim to improve digital communication and collaboration between health care providers and citizen-patients, including sharing of health care data. METHODS The systematic scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews by searching literature in 3 steps. We will include literature reporting on the public, citizens, and patients participating in the development of mobile technology for health care purposes in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. A preliminary search was completed in MEDLINE and Scopus. The screening process will be conducted by 2 of the authors. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool prepared for the study. RESULTS The study is expected to identify research gaps that will inform and motivate the development of mHealth technology. The final report is planned for submission to an indexed journal in November 2020. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this review will be the first review to provide knowledge about how citizen-patients participate in system developments for mHealth tools and the value that such involvement adds to the system development process. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT PRR1-10.2196/16781

scholarly journals Patient involvement in the implementation of infection prevention and control guidelines and associated interventions: a scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e025824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heloise Fernandes Agreli ◽  
Michael Murphy ◽  
Sile Creedon ◽  
Cliodhna Ni Bhuachalla ◽  
Deirdre O’Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scoping Review ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Role Clarity ◽  
And Control

ObjectiveTo explore patient involvement in the implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines and associated interventions.DesignScoping review.MethodsA methodological framework was followed to identify recent publications on patient involvement in the implementation of IPC guidelines and interventions. Initially, relevant databases were searched to identify pertinent publications (published 2013–2018). Reflecting the scarcity of included studies from these databases, a bidirectional citation chasing approach was used as a second search step. The reference list and citations of all identified papers from databases were searched to generate a full list of relevant references. A grey literature search of Google Scholar was also conducted.ResultsFrom an identified 2078 papers, 14 papers were included in this review. Our findings provide insights into the need for a fundamental change to IPC, from being solely the healthcare professionals (HCPs) responsibility to one that involves a collaborative relationship between HCPs and patients. This change should be underpinned by a clear understanding of patient roles, potential levels of patient involvement in IPC and strategies to overcome barriers to patient involvement focusing ontheprofessional–patient relationship (eg, patient encouragement through multimodal educational strategies and efforts to disperse professional’s power).ConclusionsThere is limited evidence regarding the best strategies to promote patient involvement in the implementation of IPC interventions and guidelines. The findings of this review endorse the need for targeted strategies to overcome the lack of role clarity of patients in IPC and the power imbalances between patients and HCPs.

scholarly journals Citizen-Patient Involvement in the Development of mHealth Technology: Protocol for a Systematic Scoping Review

10.2196/16781 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e16781
Author(s):  
Jorunn Bjerkan ◽  
Bridget Kane ◽  
Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt ◽  
Marit Veie ◽  
Mariann Fossum
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Mobile Technology ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
System Development ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Mhealth Technology

Background The development of mobile technology for information retrieval and communication, both at individual and health organizational levels, has been extensive over the last decade. Mobile health (mHealth) technology is rapidly adapting to the health care service contexts to improve treatment, care, and effectiveness in health care services. Objective The overall aim of this scoping review is to explore the role of citizen-patient involvement in the development of mHealth technology in order to inform future interventions. By identifying key characteristics of citizen-patient involvement in system development, we aim to improve digital communication and collaboration between health care providers and citizen-patients, including sharing of health care data. Methods The systematic scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews by searching literature in 3 steps. We will include literature reporting on the public, citizens, and patients participating in the development of mobile technology for health care purposes in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. A preliminary search was completed in MEDLINE and Scopus. The screening process will be conducted by 2 of the authors. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool prepared for the study. Results The study is expected to identify research gaps that will inform and motivate the development of mHealth technology. The final report is planned for submission to an indexed journal in November 2020. Conclusions To our knowledge, this review will be the first review to provide knowledge about how citizen-patients participate in system developments for mHealth tools and the value that such involvement adds to the system development process. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/16781

scholarly journals Title Patient Involvement in the Encounter between General Practice and Patients with Chronic Diseases – A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Signe Beck Titlestad ◽  
Michael Marcussen ◽  
Marie Sandstød Rasmussen ◽  
Birgitte Nørgaard
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Work Load ◽  
Healthcare Research ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Relational Continuity ◽  
Area Of Interest ◽  
Study Characteristics

Abstract Background Globally, there is increasing interest in patient involvement in healthcare. Research has shown improved health outcomes when patients are involved in managing their own health conditions and when their individual needs are considered. The aim of this scoping review was to map the existing research regarding chronic disease patients’ involvement in their encounters with general practice, with a specific focus on patients with Type 2 diabetes (TD2) or (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Methods Studies of any design, date, and language reporting the involvement of adult patients with T2D or COPD were included. A systematic search was conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Psycinfo Scopus, and EMBASE. All databases were searched from August 2020 until October 2020. Data were systematically charted by the following study characteristics: Bibliographic aims; study aims; setting; area of interest; results; conclusion.Results 19 studies were included and published between 2001 and 2020 and conducted qualitative methods, survey, or mixed methods. Three and 17 studies contained knowledge on the involvement of patients with COPD and TD2, respectively. The patients reported the importance of being more involved in treatment discussions during consultations as well as a friendly environment. A good relationship and relational continuity make it easier for patients to be more involved in treatment decisions. The general practitioners(GP) mentioned their high work load, long-standing relationships, knowledge about the patients, and prepared patients as factors influencing their ability to involve patients in treatment discussions.Conclusion The existing knowledge within patient involvement in general practice clearly indicates that focus and action must be directed towards research exploring the perspectives of patients with COPD on their involvement in general practice.

Patient Involvement in Treatment Decision Making Can Help or Hinder Placebo Analgesia

2014 ◽  
Vol 222 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew L. Geers ◽  
Jason P. Rose ◽  
Stephanie L. Fowler ◽  
Jill A. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Cold Water ◽  
Prior Experience ◽  
Water Immersion ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Cold Water Immersion ◽  
Not Given ◽  
Placebo Analgesia ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Immersion Experience

Experiments have found that choosing between placebo analgesics can reduce pain more than being assigned a placebo analgesic. Because earlier research has shown prior experience moderates choice effects in other contexts, we tested whether prior experience with a pain stimulus moderates this placebo-choice association. Before a cold water pain task, participants were either told that an inert cream would reduce their pain or they were not told this information. Additionally, participants chose between one of two inert creams for the task or they were not given choice. Importantly, we also measured prior experience with cold water immersion. Individuals with prior cold water immersion experience tended to display greater placebo analgesia when given choice, whereas participants without this experience tended to display greater placebo analgesia without choice. Prior stimulus experience appears to moderate the effect of choice on placebo analgesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document