Certification of Marine Energy Converters: The Experience So Far

Author(s):  
Claudio Bittencourt Ferreira

In the past few years, DNV has been involved in a variety of projects related to marine energy converters. All projects have been characterised for the handling of technical uncertainties due to the application of new technology or proven technology in different area of application. A systematic approach based on the DNV RP-A203 Qualification of New Technology [1] was applied combined with the Guidelines for Design and Operation of Wave Energy Converters [2] to steer the third party activity, but, more importantly, to allow developers to systematically identify and deal with the risks in a rational manner with traceability of decisions throughout the development of the energy converter. From the very start of our engagement, it was clear that the handling of technical uncertainties was affected, not only by the technical barriers, but also by financial and time constraints. The establishment of the safety and functional targets to be achieved by the energy converter are to be based, not only on the safety and asset integrity aspects, but also on the financial / business model. The experience of using the Qualification process and the Guidelines on these projects, achieving the right balance between the constraints, handling of uncertainties, financial targets and safety and functional requirements, are briefly described in this paper as well as the future steps to be taken to improve the process and consolidate the experience so far. In this paper, it is also addressed the use of the DNV OSS-312 [3] on the certification process of marine energy converters.

2008 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Bittencourt Ferreira

In the past few years, DNV has been involved in a variety of projects related to marine energy converters. All projects have been characterized for the handling of technical uncertainties due to the application of new technology or proven technology in different areas of application. A systematic approach based on the DNV RP-A203 Qualification of New Technology was applied combined with the Guidelines for Design and Operation of Wave Energy Converters (May 2005—work carried out by DNV under Commission of Carbon Trust as part of Marine Energy Challenge) to steer the third party activity, but, more importantly, to allow developers to systematically identify and deal with the risks in a rational manner with traceability of decisions throughout the development of the energy converter. From the very start of our engagement, it was clear that the handling of technical uncertainties was affected, not only by the technical barriers, but also by financial and time constraints. The establishment of the safety and functional targets to be achieved by the energy converter are to be based, not only on the safety and asset integrity aspects, but also on the financial∕business model. The experience of using the qualification process and the guidelines on these projects, achieving the right balance between the constraints, handling of uncertainties, financial targets, and safety and functional requirements, are briefly described in this paper as well as the future steps to be taken to improve the process and consolidate the experience so far. In this paper, the use of the DNV OSS-312 (Certification of Wave and Tidal Energy Converters) on the certification process of marine energy converters is also addressed.


Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Saulnier ◽  
Izan Le Crom

Located off the Guérande peninsula, SEM-REV is the French maritime facility dedicated to the testing of wave energy converters and related components. Lead by Ecole Centrale de Nantes through the LHEEA laboratory, its aim is to promote research alongside the development of new offshore technologies. To this end, the 1km2, grid-connected zone is equipped with a comprehensive instruments network sensing met-ocean processes and especially waves, with two identical directional Waverider buoys deployed on the site since 2009. For the design of moored floating structures and, a fortiori, floating marine energy converters, the knowledge of the main wave resource — for regular operation — but also extreme conditions — for moorings and device survivability — has to be as precise as possible. Also, the consideration of the multiple wave systems (swell, wind sea) making up the sea state is a key asset for the support of developers before and during the testing phase. To this end, a spectral partitioning algorithm has been implemented which enables the individual characterisation of wave systems, in particular that of their spectral peakedness which is especially addressed in this work. Peakedness has been shown to be strongly related to the groupiness of large waves and is defined here as the standard JONSWAP’s peak enhancement factor γ. Statistics related to this quantity are derived from the measurement network, with a particular focus on the extreme conditions reported on SEM-REV (Joachim storm).


Author(s):  
Pedro C. Vicente ◽  
Anto´nio F. O. Falca˜o ◽  
Paulo A. P. Justino

Floating point absorbers devices are a large class of wave energy converters for deployment offshore, typically in water depths between 40 and 100m. As floating oil and gas platforms, the devices are subject to drift forces due to waves, currents and wind, and therefore have to be kept in place by a proper mooring system. Although similarities can be found between the energy converting systems and floating platforms, the mooring design requirements will have some important differences between them, one of them associated to the fact that, in the case of a wave energy converter, the mooring connections may significantly modify its energy absorption properties by interacting with its oscillations. It is therefore important to examine what might be the more suitable mooring design for wave energy devices, according to the converters specifications. When defining a mooring system for a device, several initial parameters have to be established, such as cable material and thickness, distance to the mooring point on the bottom, and which can influence the device performance in terms of motion, power output and survivability. Different parameters, for which acceptable intervals can be established, will represent different power absorptions, displacements from equilibrium position, load demands on the moorings and of course also different costs. The work presented here analyzes what might be, for wave energy converter floating point absorber, the optimal mooring configuration parameters, respecting certain pre-established acceptable intervals and using a time-domain model that takes into account the non-linearities introduced by the mooring system. Numerical results for the mooring forces demands and also motions and absorbed power, are presented for two different mooring configurations for a system consisting of a hemispherical buoy in regular waves and assuming a liner PTO.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan G. Coe ◽  
Giorgio Bacelli ◽  
Sterling Olson ◽  
Vincent S. Neary ◽  
Mathew B. R. Topper

While some engineering fields have benefited from systematic design optimization studies, wave energy converters have yet to successfully incorporate such analyses into practical engineering workflows. The current iterative approach to wave energy converter design leads to suboptimal solutions. This short paper presents an open-source MATLAB toolbox for performing design optimization studies on wave energy converters where power take-off behavior and realistic constraints can be easily included. This tool incorporates an adaptable control co-design approach, in that a constrained optimal controller is used to simulate device dynamics and populate an arbitrary objective function of the user's choosing. A brief explanation of the tool's structure and underlying theory is presented. In order to demonstrate the capabilities of the tool, verify its functionality, and begin to explore some basic wave energy converter design relationships, three conceptual case studies are presented. In particular, the importance of considering (and constraining) the magnitudes of device motion and forces is shown.<br>


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (19) ◽  
pp. 8251
Author(s):  
Dongsheng Qiao ◽  
Rizwan Haider ◽  
Jun Yan ◽  
Dezhi Ning ◽  
Binbin Li

In recent decades, the emphasis on renewable resources has grown considerably, leading to significant advances in the sector of wave energy. Nevertheless, the market cannot still be considered as commercialized, as there are still other obstacles in the mooring system for wave energy converters (WECs). The mooring system must be designed to not negatively impact the WEC’s efficiency and reduce the mooring loads. Firstly, the overview of the types of wave energy converters (WECs) are classified through operational principle, absorbing wave direction, location, and power take-off, respectively, and the power production analysis and design challenges of WECs are summarized. Then, the mooring materials, configurations, requirements, and the modeling approaches for WECs are introduced. Finally, the design of mooring systems, including the design considerations and standards, analysis models, software, current research focus, and challenges are discussed.


Author(s):  
Matt Folley ◽  
Trevor Whittaker

The development of wave energy for utility-scale electricity production requires an understanding of how wave energy converters will interact with each other when part of a wave farm. Without this understanding it is difficult to calculate the energy yield from a wave farm and consequently the optimal wave farm layout and configuration cannot be determined. In addition, the uncertainty in a wave farm’s energy yield will increase the cost of finance for the project, which ultimately increases the cost of energy. Numerical modelling of wave energy converter arrays, based on potential flow, has provided some initial indications of the strength of array interactions and optimal array configurations; however, there has been limited validation of these numerical models. Moreover, the cross-validation that has been completed has been for relatively small arrays of wave energy converters. To provide some validation for large array interactions wave basin testing of three different configurations of up to 24 wave energy converters has been completed. All tests used polychromatic (irregular) sea-states, with a range of long-crested and short-crested seas, to provide validation in realistic conditions. The physical model array interactions are compared to those predicted by a numerical model and the suitability of the numerical and physical models analysed. The results are analysed at three different levels and all provide support for the cross-validation of the two models. The differences between the physical and numerical model are also identified and the implications for improving the modelling discussed.


Author(s):  
Jørgen Hals ◽  
Johannes Falnes ◽  
Torgeir Moan

The question of optimal operation of wave-energy converters has been a key issue since modern research on the topic emerged in the early 1970s, and criteria for maximum wave-energy absorption soon emerged from frequency domain analysis. However, constraints on motions and forces give the need for time-domain modeling, where numerical optimization must be used to exploit the full absorption potential of an installed converter. A heaving, semisubmerged sphere is used to study optimal constrained motion of wave-energy converters. Based on a linear model of the wave-body interactions, a procedure for the optimization of the machinery force is developed and demonstrated. Moreover, a model-predictive controller is defined and tested for irregular sea. It repeatedly solves the optimization problem online in order to compute the optimal constrained machinery force on a receding horizon. The wave excitation force is predicted by use of an augmented Kalman filter based on a damped harmonic oscillator model of the wave process. It is shown how constraints influence the optimal motion of the heaving wave-energy converter, and also how close it is possible to approach previously published theoretical upper bounds. The model-predictive controller is found to perform close to optimum in irregular waves, depending on the quality of the wave force predictions. An absorbed power equal to or larger than 90% of the ideal constrained optimum is achieved for a chosen range of realistic sea states. Under certain circumstances, the optimal wave-energy absorption may be better in irregular waves than for a corresponding regular wave having the same energy period and wave-power level. An argument is presented to explain this observation.


Author(s):  
Adam Brown ◽  
Robert Paasch ◽  
Irem Y. Tumer ◽  
Pukha Lenee-Bluhm ◽  
Justin Hovland ◽  
...  

Survivability is a term that is widely used in the ocean wave energy industry, but the term has never been defined in that context. The word itself seems to have an intrinsic meaning that people understand; this fact often leads to the term’s misuse and its confusion with “reliability”. In order to design systems that are capable of long term survival in the ocean environment, it must be clear what “survivability” means and how it affects the design process and ultimately the device being deployed. Ocean energy is relatively predictable over the span of months, days, and even hours, which makes it very promising as a form of renewable energy. However, the variation of the energy content of ocean waves in a given location is likely high due to the effect of storms and the seasons. Wave energy converters must be built to be reliable while operating and survivable during severe conditions. Therefore, probabilistic design practices must be used to insure reliability and survivability in conditions that are constantly changing. Reliability is used to numerically express the failures of a device that occur while the system is operational, and it is usually expressed in terms of the mean time between failure (MTBF). However, in the context of ocean wave energy converters, the devices are likely to be continuously deployed in conditions that push them beyond their operating limits. During these times it is likely that wave energy converters will be placed in some sort of “survival mode” where the device sheds excess power, reducing system loading. Survivability is focused specifically on failures that occur during these times, when the device is experiencing conditions that surpass its operational limits. Developing a highly survivable wave energy converter is an outstanding goal, but without a standard definition of the term survivability, progress towards that goal cannot be measured. The purpose of this paper is to provide an initial definition for survivability, and to introduce a simple metric that provides an objective comparison of the survivability of varying wave energy converter technologies.


Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao Li ◽  
Motohiko Murai ◽  
Syu Kuwada

A linear electrical generator can be used on wave energy converter for converting the kinetic energy of a floating structure to the electricity. A wave farm consists of multiple wave energy converters which equipped in a sea area. In the present paper, a numerical model is proposed considering not only the interference effect in the multiple floating structures, but also the controlling force of each linear electrical generator. In particular, the copper losses in the electrical generator is taken into account, when the electrical power is computed. In a case study, the heaving motions and electrical powers of the multiple wave energy converters are estimated in the straight arrangement and triangle arrangement. In addition, the average electrical power is analyzed in different distances of the floating structures. The aim of this paper is to clear the relationship between the interference effect and electric powers from wave energy converters. This will be useful for deciding the arrangement of multiple wave energy converters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document