scholarly journals STK38 promotes ATM activation by acting as a reader of histone H4 ufmylation

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (23) ◽  
pp. eaax8214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Qin ◽  
Jia Yu ◽  
Somaira Nowsheen ◽  
Fei Zhao ◽  
Liewei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Hippo Pathway ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
The Hippo Pathway

The ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) kinase is rapidly activated following DNA damage and phosphorylates its downstream targets to launch DDR signaling. Recently, we and others showed that UFM1 signaling promotes ATM activation. We further discovered that monoufmylation of histone H4 at Lys31 by UFM1-specific ligase 1 (UFL1) is an important step in the amplification of ATM activation. However, how monoufmylated H4 enhances ATM activation is still unknown. Here, we report STK38, a kinase in the Hippo pathway, serves as a reader for histone H4 ufmylation to promote ATM activation in a kinase-independent manner. STK38 contains a potential UFM1 binding motif which recognizes ufmylated H4 and recruits the SUV39H1 to the double-strand breaks, resulting in H3K9 trimethylation and Tip60 activation to promote ATM activation. Together, STK38 is a previously unknown player in DNA damage signaling and functions as a reader of monoufmylated H4 at Lys31 to promote ATM activation.

scholarly journals Poly-glycine–alanine exacerbates C9orf72 repeat expansion-mediated DNA damage via sequestration of phosphorylated ATM and loss of nuclear hnRNPA3

2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Nihei ◽  
◽  
Kohji Mori ◽  
Georg Werner ◽  
Thomas Arzberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Repeat Expansion ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
C9orf72 Repeat Expansion ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Rna Transcripts ◽  
Lateral Sclerosis

Abstract Repeat expansion in C9orf72 causes amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Expanded sense and antisense repeat RNA transcripts in C9orf72 are translated into five dipeptide-repeat proteins (DPRs) in an AUG-independent manner. We previously identified the heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A3 as an interactor of the sense repeat RNA that reduces its translation into DPRs. Furthermore, we found that hnRNPA3 is depleted from the nucleus and partially mislocalized to cytoplasmic poly-GA inclusions in C9orf72 patients, suggesting that poly-GA sequesters hnRNPA3 within the cytoplasm. We now demonstrate that hnRNPA3 also binds to the antisense repeat RNA. Both DPR production and deposition from sense and antisense RNA repeats are increased upon hnRNPA3 reduction. All DPRs induced DNA double strand breaks (DSB), which was further enhanced upon reduction of hnRNPA3. Poly-glycine–arginine and poly-proline-arginine increased foci formed by phosphorylated Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (pATM), a major sensor of DSBs, whereas poly-glycine–alanine (poly-GA) evoked a reduction of pATM foci. In dentate gyri of C9orf72 patients, lower nuclear hnRNPA3 levels were associated with increased DNA damage. Moreover, enhanced poly-GA deposition correlated with reduced pATM foci. Since cytoplasmic pATM deposits partially colocalized with poly-GA deposits, these results suggest that poly-GA, the most frequent DPR observed in C9orf72 patients, differentially causes DNA damage and that poly-GA selectively sequesters pATM in the cytoplasm inhibiting its recruitment to sites of DNA damage. Thus, mislocalization of nuclear hnRNPA3 caused by poly-GA leads to increased poly-GA production, which partially depletes pATM, and consequently enhances DSB.

scholarly journals Histone chaperone Anp32e removes H2A.Z from DNA double-strand breaks and promotes nucleosome reorganization and DNA repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (24) ◽  
pp. 7507-7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu ◽  
Marina K. Ayrapetov ◽  
Brendan D. Price
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Nucleosome Dynamics ◽  
Chromatin Template ◽  
End Resection

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires open, flexible chromatin domains. The NuA4–Tip60 complex creates these flexible chromatin structures by exchanging histone H2A.Z onto nucleosomes and promoting acetylation of histone H4. Here, we demonstrate that the accumulation of H2A.Z on nucleosomes at DSBs is transient, and that rapid eviction of H2A.Z is required for DSB repair. Anp32e, an H2A.Z chaperone that interacts with the C-terminal docking domain of H2A.Z, is rapidly recruited to DSBs. Anp32e functions to remove H2A.Z from nucleosomes, so that H2A.Z levels return to basal within 10 min of DNA damage. Further, H2A.Z removal by Anp32e disrupts inhibitory interactions between the histone H4 tail and the nucleosome surface, facilitating increased acetylation of histone H4 following DNA damage. When H2A.Z removal by Anp32e is blocked, nucleosomes at DSBs retain elevated levels of H2A.Z, and assume a more stable, hypoacetylated conformation. Further, loss of Anp32e leads to increased CtIP-dependent end resection, accumulation of single-stranded DNA, and an increase in repair by the alternative nonhomologous end joining pathway. Exchange of H2A.Z onto the chromatin and subsequent rapid removal by Anp32e are therefore critical for creating open, acetylated nucleosome structures and for controlling end resection by CtIP. Dynamic modulation of H2A.Z exchange and removal by Anp32e reveals the importance of the nucleosome surface and nucleosome dynamics in processing the damaged chromatin template during DSB repair.

scholarly journals Sustained CHK2 activity, but not ATM activity, is critical to maintain a G1 arrest after DNA damage in untransformed cells

BMC Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iraia García-Santisteban ◽  
Alba Llopis ◽  
Lenno Krenning ◽  
Jon Vallejo-Rodríguez ◽  
Bram van den Broek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
G1 Arrest ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
G1 Checkpoint ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The G1 checkpoint is a critical regulator of genomic stability in untransformed cells, preventing cell cycle progression after DNA damage. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) recruit and activate ATM, a kinase which in turn activates the CHK2 kinase to establish G1 arrest. While the onset of G1 arrest is well understood, the specific role that ATM and CHK2 play in regulating G1 checkpoint maintenance remains poorly characterized. Results Here we examine the impact of ATM and CHK2 activities on G1 checkpoint maintenance in untransformed cells after DNA damage caused by DSBs. We show that ATM becomes dispensable for G1 checkpoint maintenance as early as 1 h after DSB induction. In contrast, CHK2 kinase activity is necessary to maintain the G1 arrest, independently of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PKcs, implying that the G1 arrest is maintained in a lesion-independent manner. Sustained CHK2 activity is achieved through auto-activation and its acute inhibition enables cells to abrogate the G1-checkpoint and enter into S-phase. Accordingly, we show that CHK2 activity is lost in cells that recover from the G1 arrest, pointing to the involvement of a phosphatase with fast turnover. Conclusion Our data indicate that G1 checkpoint maintenance relies on CHK2 and that its negative regulation is crucial for G1 checkpoint recovery after DSB induction.

scholarly journals Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks

2006 ◽  
Vol 172 (6) ◽  
pp. 823-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Kruhlak ◽  
Arkady Celeste ◽  
Graham Dellaire ◽  
Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo ◽  
Waltraud G. Müller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Living Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Limited Mobility ◽  
Energy Filtering ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Cell Biol

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is facilitated by the phosphorylation of H2AX, which organizes DNA damage signaling and chromatin remodeling complexes in the vicinity of the lesion (Pilch, D.R., O.A. Sedelnikova, C. Redon, A. Celeste, A. Nussenzweig, and W.M. Bonner. 2003. Biochem. Cell Biol. 81:123–129; Morrison, A.J., and X. Shen. 2005. Cell Cycle. 4:568–571; van Attikum, H., and S.M. Gasser. 2005. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:757–765). The disruption of DNA integrity induces an alteration of chromatin architecture that has been proposed to activate the DNA damage transducing kinase ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM; Bakkenist, C.J., and M.B. Kastan. 2003. Nature. 421:499–506). However, little is known about the physical properties of damaged chromatin. In this study, we use a photoactivatable version of GFP-tagged histone H2B to examine the mobility and structure of chromatin containing DSBs in living cells. We find that chromatin containing DSBs exhibits limited mobility but undergoes an energy-dependent local expansion immediately after DNA damage. The localized expansion observed in real time corresponds to a 30–40% reduction in the density of chromatin fibers in the vicinity of DSBs, as measured by energy-filtering transmission electron microscopy. The observed opening of chromatin occurs independently of H2AX and ATM. We propose that localized adenosine triphosphate–dependent decondensation of chromatin at DSBs establishes an accessible subnuclear environment that facilitates DNA damage signaling and repair.

Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Delisa E. Clay ◽  
Heidi S. Bretscher ◽  
Erin A. Jezuit ◽  
Korie B. Bush ◽  
Donald T. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Alternative End Joining

Cycling cells must respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Missegregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophilamelanogaster papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) and the Fanconi anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 to DSBs. These proteins persist as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a stepwise manner during mitosis. DSB repair kinetics depends on both monoubiquitination of Fancd2 and the alternative end-joining protein DNA polymerase θ. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis.

scholarly journals The chromatin remodeler p400 ATPase facilitates Rad51-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks

2012 ◽  
Vol 199 (7) ◽  
pp. 1067-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Courilleau ◽  
Catherine Chailleux ◽  
Alain Jauneau ◽  
Fanny Grimal ◽  
Sébastien Briois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Dependent Processes

DNA damage signaling and repair take place in a chromatin context. Consequently, chromatin-modifying enzymes, including adenosine triphosphate–dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes, play an important role in the management of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we show that the p400 ATPase is required for DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR). Indeed, although p400 is not required for DNA damage signaling, DNA DSB repair is defective in the absence of p400. We demonstrate that p400 is important for HR-dependent processes, such as recruitment of Rad51 to DSB (a key component of HR), homology-directed repair, and survival after DNA damage. Strikingly, p400 and Rad51 are present in the same complex and both favor chromatin remodeling around DSBs. Altogether, our data provide a direct molecular link between Rad51 and a chromatin remodeling enzyme involved in chromatin decompaction around DNA DSBs.

scholarly journals TOPBP1 takes RADical command in recombinational DNA repair

2016 ◽  
Vol 212 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Liu ◽  
Marcus B. Smolka
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Cell Biol ◽  
Recombinational Dna Repair

TOPBP1 is a key player in DNA replication and DNA damage signaling. In this issue, Moudry et al. (2016. J. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201507042) uncover a crucial role for TOPBP1 in DNA repair by revealing its requirement for RAD51 loading during repair of double strand breaks by homologous recombination.

scholarly journals Autophosphorylation at serine 1981 stabilizes ATM at DNA damage sites

2009 ◽  
Vol 187 (7) ◽  
pp. 977-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sairei So ◽  
Anthony J. Davis ◽  
David J. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) plays a critical role in the cellular response to DNA damage. In response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), ATM is autophosphorylated at serine 1981. Although this autophosphorylation is widely considered a sign of ATM activation, it is still not clear if autophosphorylation is required for ATM functions including localization to DSBs and activation of ATM kinase activity. In this study, we show that localization of ATM to DSBs is differentially regulated with the initial localization requiring the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 complex and sustained retention requiring autophosphorylation of ATM at serine 1981. Autophosphorylated ATM interacts with MDC1 and the latter is required for the prolonged association of ATM to DSBs. Ablation of ATM autophosphorylation or knock-down of MDC1 protein affects the ability of ATM to phosphorylate downstream substrates and confer radioresistance. Together, these data suggest that autophosphorylation at serine 1981 stabilizes ATM at the sites of DSBs, and this is required for a proper DNA damage response.

scholarly journals DNA damage and oxidizing conditions activate p53 through differential upstream signaling pathways

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Shi ◽  
Paulien E. Polderman ◽  
Boudewijn M.T. Burgering ◽  
Tobias B. Dansen
Keyword(s):  
Reactive Oxygen Species ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Oxygen Species ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Tumor Tissues ◽  
Cellular Stresses

AbstractStabilization and activation of the p53 tumour suppressor are triggered in response to various cellular stresses, including DNA damaging agents and elevated Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) like H2O2. When cells are exposed to exogenously added H2O2, ATR/CHK1 and ATM/CHK2 dependent DNA damage signaling is switched on, suggesting that H2O2 induces both single and double strand breaks. These collective observations have resulted in the widely accepted model that oxidizing conditions lead to DNA damage that subsequently mediates a p53-dependent response like cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, H2O2 induces signaling through stress-activated kinases (SAPK, e.g., JNK and p38MAPK) that can activate p53. Here we dissect to what extent these pathways contribute to functional activation of p53 in response to oxidizing conditions. Collectively, our data suggest that p53 can be activated both by SAPK signaling and the DDR independently of each other, and which of these pathways is activated depends on the type of oxidant used. This implies that it could in principle be possible to modulate redox signaling to stimulate p53 without inducing collateral DNA damage, thereby limiting mutation accumulation in both healthy and tumor tissues.

scholarly journals DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 190 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Giunta ◽  
Rimma Belotserkovskaya ◽  
Stephen P. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Histone H2ax ◽  
Mrn Complex ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Dependent Protein ◽  
Mitotic Cells

The signaling cascade initiated in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) has been extensively investigated in interphase cells. Here, we show that mitotic cells treated with DSB-inducing agents activate a “primary” DNA damage response (DDR) comprised of early signaling events, including activation of the protein kinases ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), histone H2AX phosphorylation together with recruitment of mediator of DNA damage checkpoint 1 (MDC1), and the Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 (MRN) complex to damage sites. However, mitotic cells display no detectable recruitment of the E3 ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168, or accumulation of 53BP1 and BRCA1, at DSB sites. Accordingly, we found that DNA-damage signaling is attenuated in mitotic cells, with full DDR activation only ensuing when a DSB-containing mitotic cell enters G1. Finally, we present data suggesting that induction of a primary DDR in mitosis is important because transient inactivation of ATM and DNA-PK renders mitotic cells hypersensitive to DSB-inducing agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document