scholarly journals Control of Thioredoxin Reductase Gene (trxB) Transcription by SarA in Staphylococcus aureus

2009 ◽  
Vol 192 (1) ◽  
pp. 336-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anand Ballal ◽  
Adhar C. Manna
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Thioredoxin Reductase ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Oxidizing Agents

ABSTRACT Thioredoxin reductase (encoded by trxB) protects Staphylococcus aureus against oxygen or disulfide stress and is indispensable for growth. Among the different sarA family mutants analyzed, transcription of trxB was markedly elevated in the sarA mutant under conditions of aerobic as well as microaerophilic growth, indicating that SarA acts as a negative regulator of trxB expression. Gel shift analysis showed that purified SarA protein binds directly to the trxB promoter region DNA in vitro. DNA binding of SarA was essential for repression of trxB transcription in vivo in S. aureus. Northern blot analysis and DNA binding studies of the purified wild-type SarA and the mutant SarAC9G with oxidizing agents indicated that oxidation of Cys-9 reduced the binding of SarA to the trxB promoter DNA. Oxidizing agents, in particular diamide, could further enhance transcription of the trxB gene in the sarA mutant, suggesting the presence of a SarA-independent mode of trxB induction. Analysis of two oxidative stress-responsive sarA regulatory target genes, trxB and sodM, with various mutant sarA constructs showed a differential ability of the SarA to regulate expression of the two above-mentioned genes in vivo. The overall data demonstrate the important role played by SarA in modulating expression of genes involved in oxidative stress resistance in S. aureus.

scholarly journals Phosphatidylinositol-Specific Phospholipase C Contributes to Survival of Staphylococcus aureus USA300 in Human Blood and Neutrophils

2014 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 1559-1571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. White ◽  
Jeffrey M. Boyd ◽  
Alexander R. Horswill ◽  
William M. Nauseef
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Phospholipase C ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Positive Regulators

ABSTRACTStaphylococcus aureusis an important human pathogen that employs a large repertoire of secreted virulence factors to promote disease pathogenesis. Many strains ofS. aureuspossess aplcgene that encodes a phosphatidylinositol (PI)-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) capable of hydrolyzing PI and cleaving glycosyl-PI (GPI)-linked proteins from cell surfaces. Despite being secreted by virulent staphylococci, the contribution of PI-PLC to the capacity ofS. aureusto cause disease remains undefined. Our goal in these studies was to understand PI-PLC in the context ofS. aureusbiology. Among a collection of genetically diverse clinical isolates ofS. aureus, community-associated methicillin-resistantS. aureus(CA-MRSA) USA300 secreted the most PI-PLC. Screening a collection of two-component system (TCS) mutants ofS. aureus, we identified both theagrquorum-sensing system and the SrrAB TCS to be positive regulators ofplcgene expression. Real-time PCR and PI-PLC enzyme assays of the TCS mutants, coupled with SrrA promoter binding studies, demonstrated that SrrAB was the predominant transcriptional activator ofplc. Furthermore,plcregulation was linked to oxidative stress bothin vitroandin vivoin a SrrAB-dependent manner. A Δplcmutant in a CA-MRSA USA300 background exhibited a survival defect in human whole blood and in isolated neutrophils. However, the same mutant strain displayed no survival defect in murine models of infection or murine whole blood. Overall, these data identify potential links between bacterial responses to the host innate immune system and to oxidative stress and suggest how PI-PLC could contribute to the pathogenesis ofS. aureusinfections.

scholarly journals Deprivation of protein or amino acid induces C/EBPβ synthesis and binding to amino acid response elements, but its action is not an absolute requirement for enhanced transcription

2008 ◽  
Vol 410 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Thiaville ◽  
Elizabeth E. Dudenhausen ◽  
Can Zhong ◽  
Yuan-Xiang Pan ◽  
Michael S. Kilberg
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Activating Transcription Factor 3 ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Human Hepatoma Cells ◽  
Amino Acid Response

A nutrient stress signalling pathway is triggered in response to protein or amino acid deprivation, namely the AAR (amino acid response), and previous studies have shown that C/EBPβ (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β) expression is up-regulated following activation of the AAR. DNA-binding studies, both in vitro and in vivo, have revealed increased C/EBPβ association with AARE (AAR element) sequences in AAR target genes, but its role is still unresolved. The present results show that in HepG2 human hepatoma cells, the total amount of C/EBPβ protein, both the activating [LAP* and LAP (liver-enriched activating protein)] and inhibitory [LIP (liver-enriched inhibitory)] isoforms, was increased in histidine-deprived cells. Immunoblotting of subcellular fractions and immunostaining revealed that most of the C/EBPβ was located in the nucleus. Consistent with these observations, amino acid limitation caused an increase in C/EBPβ DNA-binding activity in nuclear extracts and chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed an increase in C/EBPβ binding to the AARE region in vivo, but at a time when transcription from the target gene was declining. A constant fraction of the basal and increased C/EBPβ protein was phosphorylated on Thr235 and the phospho-C/EBPβ did bind to an AARE. Induction of AARE-enhanced transcription was slightly greater in C/EBPβ-deficient MEFs (mouse embryonic fibroblasts) or C/EBPβ siRNA (small interfering RNA)-treated HepG2 cells compared with the corresponding control cells. Transient expression of LAP*, LAP or LIP in C/EBPβ-deficient fibroblasts caused suppression of increased transcription from an AARE-driven reporter gene. Collectively, the results demonstrate that C/EBPβ is not required for transcriptional activation by the AAR pathway but, when present, acts in concert with ATF3 (activating transcription factor 3) to suppress transcription during the latter stages of the response.

Regulation of segmentation and segmental identity by Drosophila homeoproteins: the role of DNA binding in functional activity and specificity

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (22) ◽  
pp. 4425-4433 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.D. Biggin ◽  
W. McGinnis
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Binding Model ◽  
Selective Binding ◽  
Recognition Sites

Recent advances have shed new light on how the Q50 homeoproteins act in Drosophila. These transcription factors have remarkably similar and promiscuous DNA-binding specificities in vitro; yet they each specify distinct developmental fates in vivo. One current model suggests that, because the Q50 homeoproteins have distinct biological functions, they must each regulate different target genes. According to this ‘co-selective binding’ model, significant binding of Q50 homeoproteins to functional DNA elements in vivo would be dependent upon cooperative interactions with other transcription factors (cofactors). If the Q50 homeoproteins each interact differently with cofactors, they could be selectively targeted to unique, limited subsets of their in vitro recognition sites and thus control different genes. However, a variety of experiments question this model. Molecular and genetic experiments suggest that the Q50 homeoproteins do not regulate very distinct sets of genes. Instead, they mostly control the expression of a large number of shared targets. The distinct morphogenic properties of the various Q50 homeoproteins may principally result from the different manners in which they either activate or repress these common targets. Further, in vivo binding studies indicate that at least two Q50 homeoproteins have very broad and similar DNA-binding specificities in embryos, a result that is inconsistent with the ‘co-selective binding’ model. Based on these and other data, we suggest that Q50 homeoproteins bind many of their recognition sites without the aid of cofactors. In this ‘widespread binding’ model, cofactors act mainly by helping to distinguish the way in which homeoproteins regulate targets to which they are already bound.

scholarly journals Genome-Wide Binding Analyses of HOXB1 Revealed a Novel DNA Binding Motif Associated with Gene Repression

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Narendra Pratap Singh ◽  
Bony De Kumar ◽  
Ariel Paulson ◽  
Mark E. Parrish ◽  
Carrie Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Binding Motif ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Histone Marks ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Hox Cofactors

Knowledge of the diverse DNA binding specificities of transcription factors is important for understanding their specific regulatory functions in animal development and evolution. We have examined the genome-wide binding properties of the mouse HOXB1 protein in embryonic stem cells differentiated into neural fates. Unexpectedly, only a small number of HOXB1 bound regions (7%) correlate with binding of the known HOX cofactors PBX and MEIS. In contrast, 22% of the HOXB1 binding peaks display co-occupancy with the transcriptional repressor REST. Analyses revealed that co-binding of HOXB1 with PBX correlates with active histone marks and high levels of expression, while co-occupancy with REST correlates with repressive histone marks and repression of the target genes. Analysis of HOXB1 bound regions uncovered enrichment of a novel 15 base pair HOXB1 binding motif HB1RE (HOXB1 response element). In vitro template binding assays showed that HOXB1, PBX1, and MEIS can bind to this motif. In vivo, this motif is sufficient for direct expression of a reporter gene and over-expression of HOXB1 selectively represses this activity. Our analyses suggest that HOXB1 has evolved an association with REST in gene regulation and the novel HB1RE motif contributes to HOXB1 function in part through a repressive role in gene expression.

scholarly journals Characterization of MazFSa, an Endoribonuclease from Staphylococcus aureus

2007 ◽  
Vol 189 (24) ◽  
pp. 8871-8879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhibiao Fu ◽  
Niles P. Donegan ◽  
Guido Memmi ◽  
Ambrose L. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Environmental Stress Response ◽  
Binding Studies ◽  
Cell Growth Arrest ◽  
Consensus Sequences ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Endoribonuclease Activity

ABSTRACT The mazEF homologs of Staphylococcus aureus, designated mazEFsa , have been shown to cotranscribe with the sigB operon under stress conditions. In this study, we showed that MazEF Sa , as with their Escherichia coli counterparts, compose a toxin-antitoxin module wherein MazF Sa leads to rapid cell growth arrest and loss in viable CFU upon overexpression. MazF Sa is a novel sequence-specific endoribonuclease which cleaves mRNA to inhibit protein synthesis. Using ctpA mRNA as the model substrate both in vitro and in vivo, we demonstrated that MazF Sa cleaves single-strand RNA preferentially at the 5′ side of the first U or 3′ side of the second U residue within the consensus sequences VUUV′ (where V and V′ are A, C, or G and may or may not be identical). Binding studies confirmed that the antitoxin MazE Sa binds MazF Sa to form a complex to inhibit the endoribonuclease activity of MazF Sa . Contrary to the system in E. coli, exposure to selected antibiotics augmented mazEFsa transcription, akin to what one would anticipate from the environmental stress response of the sigB system. These data indicate that the mazEF system of S. aureus differs from the gram-negative counterparts with respect to mRNA cleavage specificity and antibiotic stresses.

scholarly journals Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 9401
Author(s):  
Antonio Bouthelier ◽  
Florinda Meléndez-Rodríguez ◽  
Andrés A. Urrutia ◽  
Julián Aragonés
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Transactivation Domains ◽  
Relative Contribution

Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent genes using in vitro WT8 renal carcinoma cells and in vivo conditional Vhl-deficient mice models. Moreover, we generated chimeric HIF1/2 transcription factors to study the contribution of the HIF1α and HIF2α DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains to HIF target specificity. We show that the induction of HIF1α-dependent genes in WT8 cells, such as CAIX (CAR9) and BNIP3, requires both halves of HIF, whereas the HIF2α transactivation domain is more relevant for the induction of HIF2 target genes like the amino acid carrier SLC7A5. The HIF selectivity for some genes in WT8 cells is conserved in Vhl-deficient lung and liver tissue, whereas other genes like Glut1 (Slc2a1) behave distinctly in these tissues. Therefore the relative contribution of the DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains for HIF target selectivity can be different when comparing HIF1α or HIF2α isoforms, and that HIF target gene specificity is conserved in human and mouse cells for some of the genes analyzed.

scholarly journals Adenovirus E1B 55-Kilodalton Oncoprotein Inhibits p53 Acetylation by PCAF

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 5540-5553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Liu ◽  
April L. Colosimo ◽  
Xiang-Jiao Yang ◽  
Daiqing Liao
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Adenovirus E1b

ABSTRACT The adenovirus E1B 55-kDa protein binds to cellular tumor suppressor p53 and inactivates its transcriptional transactivation function. p53 transactivation activity is dependent upon its ability to bind to specific DNA sequences near the promoters of its target genes. It was shown recently that p53 is acetylated by transcriptional coactivators p300, CREB bidning protein (CBP), and PCAF and that acetylation of p53 by these proteins enhances p53 sequence-specific DNA binding. Here we show that the E1B 55-kDa protein specifically inhibits p53 acetylation by PCAF in vivo and in vitro, while acetylation of histones and PCAF autoacetylation is not affected. Furthermore, the DNA-binding activity of p53 is diminished in cells expressing the E1B 55-kDa protein. PCAF binds to the E1B 55-kDa protein and to a region near the C terminus of p53 encompassing Lys-320, the specific PCAF acetylation site. We further show that the E1B 55-kDa protein interferes with the physical interaction between PCAF and p53, suggesting that the E1B 55-kDa protein inhibits PCAF acetylase function on p53 by preventing enzyme-substrate interaction. These results underscore the importance of p53 acetylation for its function and suggest that inhibition of p53 acetylation by viral oncoproteins prevent its activation, thereby contributing to viral transformation.

scholarly journals BCL11A promotes myeloid leukemogenesis by repressing PU.1 target genes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Sunami ◽  
Takashi Yokoyama ◽  
Seiko Yoshino ◽  
Tomoko Takahara ◽  
Yukari Yamazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cell Interaction ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Hemoglobin Switching ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Adult Hemoglobin

The transcriptional repressor, BCL11A, is involved in hematological malignancies, B-cell development, and fetal-to-adult hemoglobin switching. However, the molecular mechanism by which it promotes the development of myeloid leukemia remains largely unknown. We find that Bcl11a cooperates with the pseudokinase, Trib1, in the development of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Bcl11a promotes the proliferation and engraftment of Trib1-expressing AML cells both in vitro and in vivo. ChIP-seq analysis showed that upon DNA-binding, Bcl11a is significantly associated with PU.1, an inducer of myeloid differentiation, and that Bcl11a represses several PU.1 target genes, such as Asb2, Clec5a, and Fcgr3. Asb2, as a Bcl11a target gene that modulates cytoskeleton and cell-cell interaction, plays a key role in Bcl11a-induced malignant progression. The repression of PU.1 target genes by Bcl11a is achieved by both sequence-specific DNA-binding activity and recruitment of corepressors by Bcl11a. Suppression of the corepressor components, HDAC and LSD1, reverses the repressive activity. Moreover, treatment of AML cells with the HDAC inhibitor, pracinostat, and LSD1 inhibitor, GSK2879552, resulted in growth inhibition both in vitro and in vivo. High BCL11A expression is associated with worse prognosis in human AML patients. Blocking of BCL11A expression upregulates the expression of PU.1 target genes, and inhibits the growth of HL-60 cells and their engraftment to the bone marrow, suggesting that BCL11A is involved in human myeloid malignancies via the suppression of PU.1 transcriptional activity.

scholarly journals Oncogenic hijacking of a developmental transcription factor evokes vulnerability toward oxidative stress in Ewing sarcoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aruna Marchetto ◽  
Shunya Ohmura ◽  
Martin F. Orth ◽  
Maximilian M. L. Knott ◽  
Maria V. Colombo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Transcriptome Profiling ◽  
In Vivo Experiments ◽  
Ets Family ◽  
Pdx Models

AbstractEwing sarcoma (EwS) is an aggressive childhood cancer likely originating from mesenchymal stem cells or osteo-chondrogenic progenitors. It is characterized by fusion oncoproteins involving EWSR1 and variable members of the ETS-family of transcription factors (in 85% FLI1). EWSR1-FLI1 can induce target genes by using GGAA-microsatellites as enhancers.Here, we show that EWSR1-FLI1 hijacks the developmental transcription factor SOX6 – a physiological driver of proliferation of osteo-chondrogenic progenitors – by binding to an intronic GGAA-microsatellite, which promotes EwS growth in vitro and in vivo. Through integration of transcriptome-profiling, published drug-screening data, and functional in vitro and in vivo experiments including 3D and PDX models, we discover that constitutively high SOX6 expression promotes elevated levels of oxidative stress that create a therapeutic vulnerability toward the oxidative stress-inducing drug Elesclomol.Collectively, our results exemplify how aberrant activation of a developmental transcription factor by a dominant oncogene can promote malignancy, but provide opportunities for targeted therapy.

scholarly journals Genome reading by the NF-κB transcription factors

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (19) ◽  
pp. 9967-9989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Carmen Mulero ◽  
Vivien Ya-Fan Wang ◽  
Tom Huxford ◽  
Gourisankar Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Response Elements ◽  
Target Binding

Abstract The NF-κB family of dimeric transcription factors regulates transcription by selectively binding to DNA response elements present within promoters or enhancers of target genes. The DNA response elements, collectively known as κB sites or κB DNA, share the consensus 5′-GGGRNNNYCC-3′ (where R, Y and N are purine, pyrimidine and any nucleotide base, respectively). In addition, several DNA sequences that deviate significantly from the consensus have been shown to accommodate binding by NF-κB dimers. X-ray crystal structures of NF-κB in complex with diverse κB DNA have helped elucidate the chemical principles that underlie target selection in vitro. However, NF-κB dimers encounter additional impediments to selective DNA binding in vivo. Work carried out during the past decades has identified some of the barriers to sequence selective DNA target binding within the context of chromatin and suggests possible mechanisms by which NF-κB might overcome these obstacles. In this review, we first highlight structural features of NF-κB:DNA complexes and how distinctive features of NF-κB proteins and DNA sequences contribute to specific complex formation. We then discuss how native NF-κB dimers identify DNA binding targets in the nucleus with support from additional factors and how post-translational modifications enable NF-κB to selectively bind κB sites in vivo.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document