Systematic comparison of three commercially available combination disc tests and zCIM for carbapenemase detection in Enterobacterales isolates
Detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacterales is crucial for patient treatment and infection control. Among others, combination disk tests (CDT) with different inhibitors (e.g. EDTA) and variations of the carbapenem inactivation method (CIM) are recommended by EUCAST or CLSI and are used by many laboratories as they are relatively inexpensive. In this study, we compare three commercially available CDT, faropenem disc testing (FAR) and the zinc supplemented CIM test (zCIM) for detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE). Rosco KPC/MBL and OXA-48 Confirm Kit (ROS-CDT), Liofilchem KPC&MBL&OXA-48 disc kit (LIO-CDT), Mastdiscs Combi Carba plus (MAST-CDT), FAR and zCIM were challenged with 106 molecularly characterized CPE and 47 non-CPE. Sensitivity/specificity was 86% (CI 78-92%)/98% (CI 89-100%) for MAST-CDT and ROS-CDT, 96% (CI 91-99%)/87% (CI 74-95%) for LIO-CDT and 99% (CI 95-100%)/81% (CI 67-91%) for FAR compared to 98% (CI 93-100%)/100% (CI 92-100%) for zCIM. The CDT showed great performance differences depending on the carbapenemase class, with MAST-CDT and LIO-CDT best detecting class B, ROS-CDT class A and LIO-CDT class D carbapenemases. Conclusion : The overall performance of commercially available CDTs was good but varied greatly for different carbapenemases and between manufacturers, compared with FAR and zCIM which performed well for all carbapenemase types. For reliable carbapenemase detection CDT should preferably not be used as the sole test, but can be part of a diagnostic strategy when combined with other assays (e.g. CIM-based, immunochromatographic or molecular tests).