scholarly journals The pentapeptide motif of Hox proteins is required for cooperative DNA binding with Pbx1, physically contacts Pbx1, and enhances DNA binding by Pbx1.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 5811-5819 ◽  
Author(s):  
P S Knoepfler ◽  
M P Kamps
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Binding Ability ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Positional Identity ◽  
Methionine Residues ◽  
Anterior Posterior

The vertebrate Hox genes, which represent a subset of all homeobox genes, encode proteins that regulate anterior-posterior positional identity during embryogenesis and are cognates of the Drosophila homeodomain proteins encoded by genes composing the homeotic complex (HOM-C). Recently, we demonstrated that multiple Hox proteins bind DNA cooperatively with both Pbx1 and its oncogenic derivative, E2A-Pbx1. Here, we show that the highly conserved pentapeptide motif F/Y-P-W-M-R/K, which occurs in numerous Hox proteins and is positioned 8 to 50 amino acids N terminal to the homeodomain, is essential for cooperative DNA binding with Pbx1 and E2A-Pbx1. Point mutational analysis demonstrated that the tryptophan and methionine residues within the core of this motif were critical for cooperative DNA binding. A peptide containing the wild-type pentapeptide sequence, but not one in which phenylalanine was substituted for tryptophan, blocked the ability of Hox proteins to bind cooperatively with Pbx1 or E2A-Pbx1, suggesting that the pentapeptide itself provides at least one surface through which Hox proteins bind Pbx1. Furthermore, the same peptide, but not the mutant peptide, stimulated DNA binding by Pbx1, suggesting that interaction of Hox proteins with Pbx1 through the pentapeptide motif raises the DNA-binding ability of Pbx1.

scholarly journals Both Pbx1 and E2A-Pbx1 bind the DNA motif ATCAATCAA cooperatively with the products of multiple murine Hox genes, some of which are themselves oncogenes.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3786-3795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q Lu ◽  
P S Knoepfler ◽  
J Scheele ◽  
D D Wright ◽  
M P Kamps
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Structural Development ◽  
Cell Leukemia ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Hox Proteins

E2A-PBX1 is the oncogene produced at the t(1;19) chromosomal breakpoint of pediatric pre-B-cell leukemia. Expression of E2A-Pbx1 induces fibroblast transformation and myeloid and T-cell leukemia in mice and arrests differentiation of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor-dependent myeloblasts in cultured marrow. Recently, the Drosophila melanogaster protein Exd, which is highly related to Pbx1, was shown to bind DNA cooperatively with the Drosophila homeodomain proteins Ubx and Abd-A. Here, we demonstrate that the normal Pbx1 homeodomain protein, as well as its oncogenic derivative, E2A-Pbx1, binds the DNA sequence ATCAATCAA cooperatively with the murine Hox-A5, Hox-B7, Hox-B8, and Hox-C8 homeodomain proteins, which are themselves known oncoproteins, as well as with the Hox-D4 homeodomain protein. Cooperative binding to ATCAATCAA required the homeodomain-dependent DNA-binding activities of both Pbx1 and the Hox partner. In cotransfection assays, Hox-B8 suppressed transactivation by E2A-Pbx1. These results suggest that (i) Pbx1 may participate in the normal regulation of Hox target gene transcription in vivo and therein contribute to aspects of anterior-posterior patterning and structural development in vertebrates, (ii) that E2A-Pbx1 could abrogate normal differentiation by altering the transcriptional regulation of Hox target genes in conjunction with Hox proteins, and (iii) that the oncogenic mechanism of certain Hox proteins may require their physical interaction with Pbx1 as a cooperating, DNA-binding partner.

scholarly journals The HOX Homeodomain Proteins Block CBP Histone Acetyltransferase Activity

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 7509-7522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-fang Shen ◽  
Keerthi Krishnan ◽  
H. J. Lawrence ◽  
Corey Largman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Reporter Assays ◽  
Hox Protein

ABSTRACT Despite the identification of PBC proteins as cofactors that provide DNA affinity and binding specificity for the HOX homeodomain proteins, HOX proteins do not demonstrate robust activity in transient-transcription assays and few authentic downstream targets have been identified for these putative transcription factors. During a search for additional cofactors, we established that each of the 14 HOX proteins tested, from 11 separate paralog groups, binds to CBP or p300. All six isolated homeodomain fragments tested bind to CBP, suggesting that the homeodomain is a common site of interaction. Surprisingly, CBP-p300 does not form DNA binding complexes with the HOX proteins but instead prevents their binding to DNA. The HOX proteins are not substrates for CBP histone acetyltransferase (HAT) but instead inhibit the activity of CBP in both in vitro and in vivo systems. These mutually inhibitory interactions are reflected by the inability of CBP to potentiate the low levels of gene activation induced by HOX proteins in a range of reporter assays. We propose two models for HOX protein function: (i) HOX proteins may function without CBP HAT to regulate transcription as cooperative DNA binding molecules with PBX, MEIS, or other cofactors, and (ii) the HOX proteins may inhibit CBP HAT activity and thus function as repressors of gene transcription.

scholarly journals Axial skeleton anterior-posterior patterning is regulated through feedback regulation between Meis transcription factors and retinoic acid

Development ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. dev193813
Author(s):  
Alejandra C. López-Delgado ◽  
Irene Delgado ◽  
Vanessa Cadenas ◽  
Fátima Sánchez-Cabo ◽  
Miguel Torres
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Feedback Regulation ◽  
Axial Skeleton ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Skeletal Defects ◽  
Hox Protein ◽  
Anterior Posterior

ABSTRACTVertebrate axial skeletal patterning is controlled by co-linear expression of Hox genes and axial level-dependent activity of HOX protein combinations. MEIS transcription factors act as co-factors of HOX proteins and profusely bind to Hox complex DNA; however, their roles in mammalian axial patterning remain unknown. Retinoic acid (RA) is known to regulate axial skeletal element identity through the transcriptional activity of its receptors; however, whether this role is related to MEIS/HOX activity remains unknown. Here, we study the role of Meis in axial skeleton formation and its relationship to the RA pathway in mice. Meis elimination in the paraxial mesoderm produces anterior homeotic transformations and rib mis-patterning associated to alterations of the hypaxial myotome. Although Raldh2 and Meis positively regulate each other, Raldh2 elimination largely recapitulates the defects associated with Meis deficiency, and Meis overexpression rescues the axial skeletal defects in Raldh2 mutants. We propose a Meis-RA-positive feedback loop, the output of which is Meis levels, that is essential to establish anterior-posterior identities and patterning of the vertebrate axial skeleton.

scholarly journals Meis proteins are major in vivo DNA binding partners for wild-type but not chimeric Pbx proteins.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 5679-5687 ◽  
Author(s):  
C P Chang ◽  
Y Jacobs ◽  
T Nakamura ◽  
N A Jenkins ◽  
N G Copeland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Binding Partners

The Pbx1 and Meis1 proto-oncogenes code for divergent homeodomain proteins that are targets for oncogenic mutations in human and murine leukemias, respectively, and implicated by genetic analyses to functionally collaborate with Hox proteins during embryonic development and/or oncogenesis. Although Pbx proteins have been shown to dimerize with Hox proteins and modulate their DNA binding properties in vitro, the biochemical compositions of endogenous Pbx-containing complexes have not been determined. In the present study, we demonstrate that Pbx and Meis proteins form abundant complexes that comprise a major Pbx-containing DNA binding activity in nuclear extracts of cultured cells and mouse embryos. Pbx1 and Meis1 dimerize in solution and cooperatively bind bipartite DNA sequences consisting of directly adjacent Pbx and Meis half sites. Pbx1-Meis1 heterodimers display distinctive DNA binding specificities and cross-bind to a subset of Pbx-Hox sites, including those previously implicated as response elements for the execution of Pbx-dependent Hox programs in vivo. Chimeric oncoprotein E2a-Pbx1 is unable to bind DNA with Meis1, due to the deletion of amino-terminal Pbx1 sequences following fusion with E2a. We conclude that Meis proteins are preferred in vivo DNA binding partners for wild-type Pbx1, a relationship that is circumvented by its oncogenic counterpart E2a-Pbx1.

scholarly journals Pbx modulation of Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arms establishes different DNA-binding specificities across the Hox locus.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1734-1745 ◽  
Author(s):  
C P Chang ◽  
L Brocchieri ◽  
W F Shen ◽  
C Largman ◽  
M L Cleary
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Binding Specificity ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Cellular Assays ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity ◽  
Dna Binding Properties ◽  
Half Site

Pbx cofactors are implicated to play important roles in modulating the DNA-binding properties of heterologous homeodomain proteins, including class I Hox proteins. To assess how Pbx proteins influence Hox DNA-binding specificity, we used a binding-site selection approach to determine high-affinity target sites recognized by various Pbx-Hox homeoprotein complexes. Pbx-Hox heterodimers preferred to bind a bipartite sequence 5'-ATGATTNATNN-3' consisting of two adjacent half sites in which the Pbx component of the heterodimer contacted the 5' half (ATGAT) and the Hox component contacted the more variable 3' half (TNATNN). Binding sites matching the consensus were also obtained for Pbx1 complexed with HoxA10, which lacks a hexapeptide but requires a conserved tryptophan-containing motif for cooperativity with Pbx. Interactions with Pbx were found to play an essential role in modulating Hox homeodomain amino-terminal arm contact with DNA in the core of the Hox half site such that heterodimers of different compositions could distinguish single nucleotide alterations in the Hox half site both in vitro and in cellular assays measuring transactivation. When complexed with Pbx, Hox proteins B1 through B9 and A10 showed stepwise differences in their preferences for nucleotides in the Hox half site core (TTAT to TGAT, 5' to 3') that correlated with the locations of their respective genes in the Hox cluster. These observations demonstrate previously undetected DNA-binding specificity for the amino-terminal arm of the Hox homeodomain and suggest that different binding activities of Pbx-Hox complexes are at least part of the position-specific activities of the Hox genes.

scholarly journals Functional differences between HOX proteins conferred by two residues in the homeodomain N-terminal arm.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 5066-5075 ◽  
Author(s):  
M L Phelan ◽  
R Sadoul ◽  
M S Featherstone
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Functional Difference ◽  
Recognition Sequence ◽  
Embryonic Axes ◽  
Alpha Helices ◽  
Core Motif ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Positional Identity

Hox genes encode homeodomain-containing transcriptional regulators that function during development to specify positional identity along embryonic axes. The homeodomain is composed of a flexible N-terminal arm and three alpha helices, and it differentially binds DNA. A number of homeodomains recognize sites containing a TAAT core motif. The product of the murine Hoxd-4 (Hox-4.2) gene functions in a positive autoregulatory fashion in P19 cells that is dependent on two TAAT motifs in the Hoxd-4 promoter. This effect is specific in that murine HOXA-1 (HOX-1.6) is unable to activate transcription through the Hoxd-4 autoregulatory element. Here we show that this is due to an inability of the HOXA-1 homeodomain to bind a HOXD-4 recognition site effectively. We have produced chimeras between HOXD-4 and HOXA-1 to map specific residues responsible for this functional difference. When positions 2 and 3 in the N-terminal arm of HOXA-1 were converted to HOXD-4 identity, both strong DNA binding and transcriptional activation were rescued. This substitution appears to confer an increased DNA-binding ability on the HOXA-1 homeodomain, since we were unable to detect a high-affinity recognition sequence for HOXA-1 in a randomized pool of DNA probes. The contribution of position 3 to DNA binding has been implicated by structural studies, but this is the first report of the importance of position 2 in regulating homeodomain-DNA interactions. Additionally, specific homeodomain residues that confer major differences in DNA binding and transcriptional activation between Hox gene products have not been previously determined. Identity at these two positions is generally conserved among paralogs but varies between Hox gene subfamilies. As a result, these residues may be important for the regulation of target gene expression by specific Hox products.

scholarly journals Hox genes pattern the primary body axis of an anthozoan cnidarian prior to gastrulation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Q. DuBuc ◽  
Thomas B. Stephenson ◽  
Amber Q. Rock ◽  
Mark Q. Martindale
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Wnt Signaling ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Opportunity To Learn ◽  
Sister Group ◽  
Nematostella Vectensis ◽  
Sea Anemones ◽  
Positional Identity ◽  
Primary Body ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Hox gene transcription factors are important regulators of positional identity along the anterior-posterior axis in bilaterian animals. Cnidarians (e.g. sea anemones, corals and hydroids) are the sister group to the Bilateria and possess genes related to both anterior and central/posterior class Hox genes. In the absence of a conserved set of Hox genes among other early branching animal clades, cnidarians provide the best opportunity to learn about the emergence of this gene family. We report a previously unrecognized domain of Hox expression in the starlet sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis, beginning at early blastula stages. Functional perturbation reveals that two Hox genes not only regulate their respective expression domains, but interact with one another to pattern the entire oral-aboral axis mediated by Wnt signaling. This suggests an ancient link between Hox/Wnt patterning of the oral-aboral axis and suggest that these domains are likely established during blastula formation in anthozoan cnidarians.

Hox proteins have different affinities for a consensus DNA site that correlate with the positions of their genes on the hox cluster

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 4532-4545
Author(s):  
I Pellerin ◽  
C Schnabel ◽  
K M Catron ◽  
C Abate
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Binding Properties ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Hox Cluster ◽  
Dna Binding Properties

The hox genes, members of a family of essential developmental regulators, have the intriguing property that their expression in the developing murine embryo is colinear with their chromosomal organization. Members of the hox gene family share a conserved DNA binding domain, termed the homeodomain, which mediates interactions of Hox proteins with DNA regulatory elements in the transcriptional control regions of target genes. In this study, we characterized the DNA binding properties of five representative members of the Hox family: HoxA5, HoxB4, HoxA7, HoxC8, and HoxB1. To facilitate a comparative analysis of their DNA binding properties, we produced the homeodomain regions of these Hox proteins in Escherichia coli and obtained highly purified polypeptides. We showed that these Hox proteins interact in vitro with a common consensus DNA site that contains the motif (C/G)TAATTG. We further showed that the Hox proteins recognize the consensus DNA site in vivo, as determined by their ability to activate transcription through this site in transient transfection assays. Although they interact optimally with the consensus DNA site, the Hox proteins exhibit subtle, but distinct, preferences for DNA sites that contain variations of the nucleotides within the consensus motif. In addition to their modest differences in DNA binding specificities, the Hox proteins also vary in their relative affinities for DNA. Intriguingly, their relative affinities correlate with the positions of their respective genes on the hox cluster. These findings suggest that subtle differences in DNA binding specificity combined with differences in DNA binding affinity constitute features of the "Hox code" that contribute to the selective functions of Hox proteins during murine embryogenesis.

The lines gene of Drosophila is required for specific functions of the Abdominal-B HOX protein

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (7) ◽  
pp. 1269-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Castelli-Gair
Keyword(s):  
Hox Genes ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Normal Functions ◽  
Transcriptional Cofactors ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Direct Target ◽  
Hox Protein ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Anterior Posterior ◽  
Polarity Gene

The Hox genes encode homeobox transcription factors that control the formation of segment specific structures in the anterior-posterior axis. HOX proteins regulate the transcription of downstream targets acting both as repressors and as activators. Due to the similarity of their homeoboxes it is likely that much of the specificity of HOX proteins is determined by interaction with transcriptional cofactors, but few HOX cofactor proteins have yet been described. Here I present genetic evidence showing that lines, a segment polarity gene of Drosophila, is required for the function of the Abdominal-B protein. In lines mutant embryos Abdominal-B protein expression is normal but incapable of promoting its normal functions: formation of the posterior spiracles and specification of an eighth abdominal denticle belt. These defects arise because in lines mutant embryos the Abdominal-B protein cannot activate its direct target empty spiracles or other downstream genes while it can function as a repressor of Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A. The lines gene seems to be required exclusively for Abdominal-B but not for the function of other Hox genes.

Ubiquitin-Proteolytic Control of HOX Homeodomain Proteins.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1121-1121
Author(s):  
Jianxuan Zhang ◽  
Jae-Hung Shieh ◽  
Liren Liu ◽  
Magdalena Plasilova ◽  
Yue Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hox Genes ◽  
Human Umbilical Cord Blood ◽  
Human Umbilical Cord ◽  
Hematopoietic Differentiation ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Hox Proteins ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Myeloid Progenitor Cells ◽  
Cord Blood Cd34 ◽  
Biochemical Mechanisms

Abstract The HOX homeodomain proteins are key regulators of hematopoiesis. HOX genes are expressed in primitive hematopoietic cells, and their prompt downregulation is associated with hematopoietic differentiation and maturation. Although transcriptional inactivation of HOX genes during hematopoietic differentiation has been established, little is known about the biochemical mechanisms underlying the subsequent removal of HOX proteins. We have previously shown that the CUL-4A ubiquitin ligase controls the stability of HOXA9 by promoting its ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent degradation. Interfering with CUL-4A biosynthesis results in altered HOXA9 protein levels, which is mirrored by the impairment of myeloid progenitor cells to undergo proper terminal differentiation into granulocytes. Here we show that additional HOX proteins are also subjected to CUL-4A-mediated ubiquitination and destruction. Consistently, the HOX homeodomain, which is highly conserved among all HOX proteins, is responsible for controlling their stability. Silencing of CUL-4A by RNA-mediated interference in human umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells significantly perturbs their self-renewal, expansion, and differentiation properties. These results reveal a novel regulatory mechanism of hematopoiesis by ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Recent studies on the biochemical mechanisms underlying HOX ubiquitination and by which leukemogenic HOX fusions evade CUL-4A-dependent degradation will be presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document