scholarly journals FRI0268 REMISSION IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NSAIDS AND BIOLOGICS IN THE REAL LIFE?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 718.2-719
Author(s):  
C. Baert ◽  
C. Mouafo Toukam ◽  
T. Sokolova ◽  
A. Nzeusseu Toukap
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Real Life ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Real

Background:Randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) done in axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients have shown that remission in AxSpA and nonradiographic axial SpA patients treated without biologics (BIOL) occurs infrequently (Ref 1, 2). Few are known about remission rate (RR) in daily clinical practice.Objectives:Our aim was to assess the remission rate (RR) in AxSpA patients in Real life, and to compare the RR in AxSpA patients on NSAIDs to RR for those on Biologics (TNFα blockers or IL-17A blockers).Methods:This cross-sectional study reviewed clinical data from a single center (St-Luc university hospitals, UCLouvain, Brussels) from 01/2013 to 03/2019. Last visit available for clinical assessment was evaluated. Disease activity was measured using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), and the Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) using the C-reactive protein. Remission was defined as BASDAI < 4 and ASDAS < 1.3.Results:Data from 551 AxSpA patients were reviewed. 353 were men (64.3%). In the entire cohort, 478 BASDAI and 317 ASDAS were recorded. The RR according to the BASDAI was 46.7% (n = 223), and 17.3% for the ASDAS (n = 55). To look for the treatment-related RR, we stratified by the treatment (NSAIDs vs Biologics). We had 285 patients on NSAIDs (177 men, 62.5%) and 266 on BIOL (176 men, 66%). 245 BASDAI were available for NSAIDs and 233 for BIOL. 110 patients on NSAIDs (44.9%) and 113 on BIOL (48.5%) were in remission for BASDAI. Regarding ASDAS (table below), data from 172 patients on NSAIDs and 144 on BIOL were available. Out of them, 27 (15.7%) and 28 (19.4%) were in remission for NSAIDs and BIOL respectively. Chi-square test: p = 0.853.Table.Distribution of ASDAS values in both groups.ASDAS<1.3ASDAS≥ 1.3 < 2.1ASDAS≥ 2.1 < 3.5ASDAS> 3.5NSAIDs (n = 172)N = 27 (15.7%)N = 41 (23.8%)N = 70 (40.7%)N = 34 (19.8%)BIOL (n = 144)N = 28 (19.4%)N = 30 (20.8%)N = 57 (39.6%)N = 29 (20.1%)Conclusion:The real life RR in AxSpA seems to be higher on BIOL, even if compared to NSAIDs, the difference is not significant. However, many patients on NSAIDs achieve the remission.References:[1]Deodhar A. et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019 Jul;71(7):1101-1111. 2) Sieper J. et al. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016 Nov; 55(11): 1946-1953.Disclosure of Interests:Charlotte Baert: None declared, Charlene MOUAFO TOUKAM: None declared, Tatiana Sokolova: None declared, Adrien Nzeusseu Toukap Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB – grant/research support, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, UCB – advisory board member

scholarly journals POS0927 EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF SECUKINUMAB IN NAïVE OR TNF-INHIBITORS FAILURE AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS PATIENTS IN REAL LIFE: A 24-MONTHS PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRIC STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 726.1-726
Author(s):  
M. Lorenzin ◽  
A. Ortolan ◽  
M. S. Chimenti ◽  
A. Marchesoni ◽  
E. Lubrano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Activity Indices

Background:Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) can be distinguished in radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) and non-radiographic (nr-axSpA). Secukinumab (SEC) is a novel treatment for axSpA, but data from real-life are still missing.Objectives:1)to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a wide cohort of axSpA patients on SEC followed in 8 Italian Rheumatologic centers for 24-months;2)to compare the features and disease-activity indices of SEC-treated axSpA patients subdivided in naïve biological drugs (group A) and in TNF-inhibitors failure patients (group B).Methods:Consecutive patients with active axSpA (diagnosis according Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society ASAS criteria), who started SEC treatment, were evaluated prospectively.Data on disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments and imaging were collected. Disease-activity/functional/clinical scores and biochemical values were recorded at baseline (T0), at 6 (T6), 12 (T12), and 24 (T24) months. Effectiveness was evaluated over-time with descriptive statistics. Anova (Kruskal Wallis) and generalized linear models were used to compare variables over-time. Infections,adverse events were collected.Results:One-hundred-seven patients [49.53% men; median age 49years; median treatment duration 18.5years] were enrolled;53(49.53%) had HLA-B27, 47.66% were r-axSpA and 52.34% nr-axSpA. Signs of sacroiliitis were present on MRI in 97 (90.65%) and X-rays in 51 (47.66%). SEC was prescribed as first line biologic treatment in 32 (29.9%) patients and as second or more line biological treatment in 75 (70.1%) patients (Figure 1). In all population significant decrease was achieved in:Visual Analogue Scale of pain and general-health; Leeds Enthesitis Index;Health Assessment Questionnaire modified for spondyloarthritis (HAQ-s);Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI);C-reactive protein. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index and Erythrocyte-sedimentation-rate not significantly decreased. Effectiveness was associated to an improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) [T0=3.4 (2.9-3.9) vs T24=1.9 (1.2-2.7);p=0.02] and in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) [T0=6.6 (5.0-7.8) vs T24=3.2 (2.0-5.0);p=0.03].At T0 group B had a longer disease duration (p=0.04),a greater prevalence of peripheral arthritis (p=0.02),enthesitis (p=0.04) and psoriasis (p=0.05) and was mostly male (p=0.05),while no significant difference was observed for functional and disease-activity indices and signs of sacroiliitis on MRI/X-rays. At T24 group A showed better physical functioning and lower disease activity compared to group B [HAQs A vs. B=0.1(0.0-0.5) vs 0.3(0.1-0.8); BASFI A vs B=1.6(0.8-4.8) vs 4.0(2.5-4.6); BASDAI A vs B=2.2(1.0-3.8) vs 3.9(2.7-5.0);ASDAS A vs B=1.3(1.0-2.2) vs 2.1(1.6-2.9)].After T24 of treatment 70.2% of Group A and 68.4% of Group B had a low disease activity,accordingly to ASDAS<2.1. Twenty-three patients (21.5%) stopped the treatment during the follow-up mainly because of primary (7) or secondary loss of efficacy (9).Only 7 patients suspended SEC because of adverse events.A low number of episodes of mild infections (19) occurred;SEC was instead permanently discontinued in 4 cases for:oral refractory mucositis (2);recurrent aphthosis (1);recurrent broncopneumoniae (1).The retention rate at t24 was good in the whole population (73%).Survival curves for Group A and B were similar (log-rank test=0.81;p=0.69).Conclusion:In a real-life clinical setting,SEC was safe and effective in axSpA, as shown by a significant decrease of BASDAI and ASDAS over a 24-months follow-up.Disclosure of Interests:Mariagrazia Lorenzin: None declared, Augusta Ortolan: None declared, Maria Sole Chimenti: None declared, Antonio Marchesoni Grant/research support from: AM has received honoraria and speaker fees from Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Novartis, Janssen, Eli-Lilly., Ennio Lubrano: None declared, Leonardo Santo Speakers bureau: Speaker from Jansen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, MSD, Sanofi, Angelo Semeraro: None declared, Carlo Salvarani: None declared, Nicolò Girolimetto: None declared, Emanuela Praino: None declared, Giulia Lavinia Fonti: None declared, Rosario Foti: None declared, Antonio Carletto: None declared, Andrea Doria Grant/research support from: ADhas received honoraria and speaker fees from Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen., Roberta Ramonda Grant/research support from: RR has received honoraria and speaker fees from Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen.

scholarly journals THU0395 EFFICACY OF IXEKIZUMAB ON DISEASE ACTIVITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE NON-RADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS AND OBJECTIVE SIGNS OF INFLAMMATION, STRATIFIED BY BASELINE CRP/SACROILIAC JOINT MRI STATUS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 432-433
Author(s):  
W. P. Maksymowych ◽  
H. Marzo-Ortega ◽  
M. Ǿstergaard ◽  
L. S. Gensler ◽  
J. Ermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Physical Component Score ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Active Sacroiliitis

Background:Ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, is effective in patients (pts) with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA), who had elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).1Objectives:To determine if disease activity and patient-reported outcomes at Week 16 were similar between groups after stratifying pts by CRP/sacroiliac joint (SIJ) MRI status at baseline.Methods:COAST-X (NCT02757352) included pts with active nr-axSpA and objective signs of inflammation, i.e. presence of sacroiliitis on MRI (Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society [ASAS]/ Outcome Measures in Rheumatology criteria) or elevation of serum CRP (>5.0 mg/L). Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous 80 mg IXE every 4 weeks (Q4W) or Q2W, or placebo (PBO). Depending on the baseline values of CRP and MRI SIJ (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] score), pts in the intent-to-treat population (N=239) were divided into 3 subgroups (CRP >5 and MRI ≥2; CRP ≤5 and MRI ≥2; CRP >5 and MRI <2). Logistic regression analysis with treatment, subgroup, and treatment-by-subgroup interaction was used to detect treatment group differences in ASAS40, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <2.1 (low disease activity), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) responses at Week 16. Analysis of covariance model with baseline value, treatment, subgroup, and treatment-by-subgroup interaction was used to detect the treatment group difference in change from baseline in Short Form-36 physical component score (SF-36 PCS).Results:The proportion of pts achieving ASAS40 (primary endpoint), ASDAS <2.1, and BASDAI50 (secondary endpoints) was higher in IXE treatment groups compared to PBO at Week 16 (Figure 1). The response rates in IXE-treated subjects were higher in all subgroups (CRP >5 and MRI ≥2; CRP ≤5 and MRI ≥2; CRP >5 and MRI <2) without consistent differences in efficacy between the subgroups. Similarly, pts in the IXE groups showed improvement in SF-36 PCS scores (secondary endpoint) versus pts on PBO at Week 16 (Figure 2).Conclusion:Pts with active nr-axSpA and objective signs of inflammation at baseline who were treated with IXE showed an overall improvement in the signs and symptoms of the disease. The efficacy was not different between pts with both elevated CRP and active sacroiliitis on MRI and pts with either elevated CRP or active sacroiliitis on MRI.References:[1]Deodhar A, et al.Lancet.2020.Disclosure of Interests:Walter P Maksymowych Grant/research support from: Received research and/or educational grants from Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: WPM is Chief Medical Officer of CARE Arthritis Limited, has received consultant/participated in advisory boards for Abbvie, Boehringer, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Received speaker fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., Helena Marzo-Ortega Grant/research support from: Janssen, Novartis, Consultant of: Abbvie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB, Mikkel Ǿstergaard Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck, and Novartis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Lianne S. Gensler Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, UCB, Joerg Ermann Grant/research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis,Pfizer, Takeda, UCB, Atul Deodhar Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Denis Poddubnyy Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, David Sandoval Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Rebecca Bolce Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Andris Kronbergs Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Soyi Liu Leage Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Gabriel Doridot Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Vladimir Geneus Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Ann Leung: None declared, David Adams Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Martin Rudwaleit Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma

scholarly journals SAT0364 DATA TO BE COLLECTED FOR AN OPTIMAL MANAGEMENT OF AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS IN DAILY PRACTICE: PROPOSAL FROM AN EVIDENCE BASED AND CONSENSUAL APPROACHES

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1129.1-1129
Author(s):  
A. Baillet ◽  
X. Romand ◽  
A. Pfimlin ◽  
M. Dalecky ◽  
M. Dougados
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Periodic Review ◽  
Grade Scale

Background:Standardization of clinical practice has been proven to be effective in management of chronic diseases. This is particularly true at the time where the concept of treat to target is becoming more and more important in the field of axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA).Objectives:To propose a list of variables to be collected at the time of the diagnosis and over the follow-up of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) for an optimal management in daily practice.Methods:The process comprised (1) the evaluation of the interest of 51 variables proposed for the assessment of axSpA via a systematic literature research, (2) a consensus process involving 78 hospital-based or office-based rheumatologists, considering the collection of the variable in a 4 grade scale from ”potentially useful” to “mandatory”, (3) a consensus on optimal timeline for periodic assessment of the selected variables on a 5 grade scale from “at each visit” to “never to be re-collected”.Results:The systematic literature research retrieved a total of 14,133 abstracts, of which 213 were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Concerning the data to be collected at the time of the diagnosis and during follow-up, we proposed to differentiate the results based on a) the way of collection of the variables (e.g. questionnaires by the patient, interview by the physician, physical examination, investigations) b) the usefulness these variables in daily practice based on the opinion of the rheumatologists ” c) the optimal timeline between 2 evaluations of the variable based on the opinion of the rheumatologists. In the initial systematic review, symptoms of heart failure history of inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis or uveitis, patient global visual analogic scale, spine radiographs, modified Schöber test, coxo-femoral rotations, swollen joint count, urine strip test, BASDAI and ASDAS global scores were considered very useful and nocturnal back pain/morning stiffness, sacro-iliac joints radiographs and CRP were considered mandatory (Figure 1). Timeline between 2 evaluations of variables to collect in the periodic review are summarized inFigure 2.Figure 1.Core sets of items to collect and report in the systematic review in axial spondyloarthritis management in daily practice ASDAS=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, BASFI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functionnal Index, BASMI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, CRP=C Reactive Protein, CT=computerized tomography, FIRST=Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool, HLA=Human Leukocyte Antigen, MRI=Magnetic resonance imaging, PET=positron emission tomography.Figure 2.Periodic review timeline of variables to collectASDAS=Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, BASDAI=Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Spondylitis Metrology Index, CRP=C Reactive Protein, IBD = inflammatory bowel diseases, PRO = Patient Reported OutcomesConclusion:Using an evidence-based and an expert consensus approaches, this initiative defined a core set of variables to be collected and reported at the time of the diagnosis and during follow-up of patients with ax-SpA in daily practice.Acknowledgments:this study has been conducted in two parts: the first one (evidence-based) was conducted thanks to a support from Abbvie France. AbbVie did not review the content or have influence on this manuscript. The second part of this initiative (consensus) has been conducted thanks to a support from the scientific non-profit organization: Association de Recherche Clinique en RhumatologieDisclosure of Interests:Athan Baillet Consultant of: Athan BAILLET has received honorarium fees from Abbvie for his participation as the coordinator of the systematic literature review, Xavier Romand Consultant of: Xavier ROMAND has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Arnaud Pfimlin Consultant of: Arnaud PFIMLIN has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Mickael Dalecky Consultant of: Mickael DALECKY has received honorarium fees from Abbvie, Maxime Dougados Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma

scholarly journals AB0669 PARTICULARITIES OF TUNISIAN FEMALE AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1629.2-1629
Author(s):  
K. Ben Abdelghani ◽  
Y. Gzam ◽  
A. Fazaa ◽  
S. Miladi ◽  
K. Ouenniche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Age At Onset ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background:Axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) is a chronic rheumatic disease that mainly affects men. However, the female form of ax-SpA remains insufficiently studied.Objectives:The aim of this study was to determine the clinical characteristics, the disease activity and the functional impact of female ax-SpA in comparison with male ax-SpA.Methods:This is a retrospective study including patients diagnosed with ax-SpA fulfilling the criteria of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) 2009.Clinical parameters, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) and Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI) were compared between groups of female and male ax-SpA.Results:Two hundred ax-SpA patients were included with 31% of female (n=62) and a mean age of 43,3 ± 11,2 years.The mean age at onset of symptoms was 31,8 ± 8,9 years for women and 25,3 ± 9,1 years for men (p <0,0001). The mean age at diagnosis was 36,4 ± 9,6 years for women and 31,7 ± 10,4 years for men (p = 0,003). Ax-SpA with juvenile onset was noted in 1,7% of women and 12,1% of men (p = 0,02). Male ax-SpA were significantly more smokers (46.8% vs 5.4%; p <0.001). The mean duration of morning stiffness was 11,3 ± 9,2 minutes for women versus 21,6 ± 19,3 minutes for men (p = 0,005).The mean ESR was 42,4 ± 29,8 mm for women and 28,3 ± 23,4 mm for men (p = 0,001). Radiographic sacroiliitis was present in 69,3% of women versus 84,7% of men (p = 0,01). The use of anti-TNF alpha was less frequent in women (29% vs 48,5%; p = 0,01).Our study didn’t found a statistically significant difference in peripheral manifestations, extraarticular manifestations, CRP, BASDAI and BASFI between the two groups.Conclusion:Female ax-SpA seems to have a better prognosis than male with older age in disease onset, less inflammation, less radiographic sacroiliitis and less use of biological treatments.References:[1]Rusman T, et al. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018; 20(6).[2]Siar N, et al. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2019;Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Drug retention, inactive disease and response rates in 1860 patients with axial spondyloarthritis initiating secukinumab treatment: routine care data from 13 registries in the EuroSpA collaboration

RMD Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e001280
Author(s):  
Brigitte Michelsen ◽  
Ulf Lindström ◽  
Catalin Codreanu ◽  
Adrian Ciurea ◽  
Jakub Zavada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Life Data ◽  
Real Life Data ◽  
Time Since Diagnosis

ObjectivesTo explore 6-month and 12-month secukinumab effectiveness in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) overall, as well as across (1) number of previous biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs), (2) time since diagnosis and (3) different European registries.MethodsReal-life data from 13 European registries participating in the European Spondyloarthritis Research Collaboration Network were pooled. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test, Cox regression, χ² and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess 6-month and 12-month secukinumab retention, inactive disease/low-disease-activity states (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) <2/<4, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <1.3/<2.1) and response rates (BASDAI50, Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20/40, ASDAS clinically important improvement (ASDAS-CII) and ASDAS major improvement (ASDAS-MI)).ResultsWe included 1860 patients initiating secukinumab as part of routine care. Overall 6-month/12-month secukinumab retention rates were 82%/72%, with significant (p<0.001) differences between the registries (6-month: 70–93%, 12-month: 53–86%) and across number of previous b/tsDMARDs (b/tsDMARD-naïve: 90%/73%, 1 prior b/tsDMARD: 83%/73%, ≥2 prior b/tsDMARDs: 78%/66%). Overall 6-month/12-month BASDAI<4 were observed in 51%/51%, ASDAS<1.3 in 9%/11%, BASDAI50 in 53%/47%, ASAS40 in 28%/22%, ASDAS-CII in 49%/46% and ASDAS-MI in 25%/26% of the patients. All rates differed significantly across number of previous b/tsDMARDs, were numerically higher for b/tsDMARD-naïve patients and varied significantly across registries. Overall, time since diagnosis was not associated with secukinumab effectiveness.ConclusionsIn this study of 1860 patients from 13 European countries, we present the first comprehensive real-life data on effectiveness of secukinumab in patients with axSpA. Overall, secukinumab retention rates after 6 and 12 months of treatment were high. Secukinumab effectiveness was consistently better for bionaïve patients, independent of time since diagnosis and differed across the European countries.

scholarly journals Sexual Quality of Life in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis in the Biologic Treatment Era

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1075-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari Hansen Berg ◽  
Gudrun Elin Rohde ◽  
Anne Prøven ◽  
Esben Esther Pirelli Benestad ◽  
Monika Østensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Biologic Treatment ◽  
Sexual Quality Of Life

Objective.To examine the relationship between demographics, disease-related variables, treatment, and sexual quality of life (SQOL) in men and women with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).Methods.AxSpA patients were consecutively recruited from 2 rheumatology outpatient clinics in southern Norway. A broad spectrum of demographics, disease, treatment, and QOL data were systematically collected. SQOL was assessed using the SQOL-Female (SQOL-F) questionnaire (score range 18–108). Appropriate statistical tests were applied for group comparison, and the association between independent variables and SQOL-F was examined using multiple linear regression analysis.Results.A total of 360 (240 men, 120 women) axSpA patients with mean age 45.5 years and disease duration 13.9 years were included. Seventy-eight percent were married/cohabiting, 26.7% were current smokers, 71.0% were employed, 86.0% performed > 1-h exercise per week, and 88.0% were HLA-B27–positive. Mean (SD) values for disease measures were C-reactive protein (CRP) 8.5 (12.1) mg/l, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 3.1 (2.1), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global Score (BAS-G) 3.8 (2.5), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index 2.7 (2.2), and Health Assessment Questionnaire 0.6 (0.5). The proportion of patients using nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs was 44.0%, synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) 5.0%, and biologic DMARD 24.0%. Mean (SD) total sum score for SQOL was 76.6 (11.3). In multivariate analysis, female sex, increased body mass index, measures reflecting disease activity (BAS-G and CRP), and current biologic treatment were independently associated with a lower SQOL.Conclusion.Our data suggest that inflammation in patients with axSpA even in the biologic treatment era reduces SQOL.

Fibromyalgia in Spondyloarthritis: Effect on Disease Activity Assessment in Clinical Practice

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2056-2063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Wach ◽  
Marie-Claude Letroublon ◽  
Fabienne Coury ◽  
Jacques Guy Tebib
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Moderate Activity ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology

Objective.Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is the second most frequent inflammatory rheumatic disease, characterized by spinal involvement, peripheral arthritis, or enthesitis with marked pain, stiffness, and fatigue. Fibromyalgia (FM) may be associated with SpA, and shares some common symptoms. We aimed to determine how FM influences assessment of SpA disease activity, which is mainly dependent on patient-based outcome measures such as the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) or the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS).Methods.This single-center cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with SpA according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria. FM was diagnosed according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria. Patient characteristics, BASDAI, ASDAS/C-reactive protein (CRP), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 questionnaire were recorded and compared.Results.The study included 103 patients with SpA; 81 with axial and 22 with peripheral forms. Eighteen patients presented with concomitant FM, of whom 12 had axial SpA and 6 peripheral SpA. Demographic characteristics did not differ except for sex, with a female predominance in the FM group that was more marked in peripheral forms. BASDAI was higher in patients with FM [median (IQR): 4.2 (4.2) vs 2.2 (3.1); p = 0.0068], whereas ASDAS-CRP was not significantly different [median (IQR): 2.7 (2) vs 2 (1.3); p = 0.1264]. Nevertheless, median ASDAS-CRP corresponded to high disease activity in patients with SpA or FM compared with moderate activity in non-FM patients.Conclusion.FM is a frequent comorbidity in patients with SpA, especially in peripheral forms. In patients with SpA-FM, disease activity may be overestimated when measured by BASDAI and to a lesser extent by ASDAS-CRP, and this overestimation could lead to inappropriate treatment escalation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document