Are corticosteroid injections more beneficial than anaesthetic injections alone in the management of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain? A systematic review

ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of corticosteroid injections to local anaesthetic injections in the management of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP).DesignSystematic review with best evidence synthesis.Data sourcesThe Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL Plus, PEDro and EMBASE electronic databases were searched (inception until 8 June 2017). Reference lists of included articles were also hand searched.Eligibility criteriaTwo reviewers independently evaluated eligibility. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared subacromial injections of corticosteroid with anaesthetic injections. Two reviewers independently extracted data regarding short-term, midterm and long-term outcomes for pain, self-reported function, range of motion and patient-perceived improvement.ResultsThirteen RCTs (n=1013) were included. Four trials (n=475) were judged as being at low risk of bias. Three studies of low risk of bias favoured the use of corticosteroid over anaesthetic-only injections in the short term (up to 8 weeks). There was strong evidence of no significant difference between injection types in midterm outcomes (12–26 weeks). There was limited evidence of no significant difference between injection types in long-term outcomes.ConclusionCorticosteroid injections may have a short-term benefit (up to 8 weeks) over local anaesthetic injections alone in the management of RCRSP. Beyond 8 weeks, there was no evidence to suggest a benefit of corticosteroid over local anaesthetic injections.Trial registration numberPROSPERO CRD42016033161.

Download Full-text

Specific versus Non-Specific Exercises for Chronic Neck or Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10245946 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (24) ◽

pp. 5946

Author(s):

Lirios Dueñas ◽

Marta Aguilar-Rodríguez ◽

Lennard Voogt ◽

Enrique Lluch ◽

Filip Struyf ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Shoulder Pain ◽

Pain Reduction ◽

Acute Effect ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Long Term Effects ◽

Specific Exercise ◽

Short Term ◽

Short Term Effects

The current systematic review aimed to compare the effect of injury-focused (specific) exercises versus more general (non-specific) exercises on pain in patients with chronic neck or shoulder pain. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Two reviewers screened and selected studies, extracted outcomes, assessed risk of bias, and rated the quality of evidence. A total of nine eligible studies, represented in 13 articles, were identified, with a considerable risk of bias. One article investigated the acute effect of single bouts of exercise on pain and reported an immediate pain reduction after non-specific exercise. Regarding short-term effects, seven out of the nine studies found no differences in pain between interventions, with inconsistent results among two other studies. Concerning the long-term effects, while pain reduction seems to be favored by specific exercises (two out of four articles), the best format is still unclear. Based on the acute effects, a single bout of non-specific exercise seems to be a better option for pain-relief for patients with chronic neck or shoulder pain. For short-term effects, there are no differences in pain between specific and non-specific exercises. Regarding long-term effects, specific exercises seem to be the best option. Nevertheless, more studies are warranted.

Download Full-text

Exercise interventions in lateral elbow tendinopathy have better outcomes than passive interventions, but the effects are small: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2123 subjects in 30 trials

British Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1136/bjsports-2020-102525 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. bjsports-2020-102525

Author(s):

Stefanos Karanasios ◽

Vasileios Korakakis ◽

Rod Whiteley ◽

Ioannis Vasilogeorgis ◽

Sarah Woodbridge ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Short Term ◽

Lateral Elbow ◽

Long Term Follow Up ◽

Wait And See ◽

Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of exercise compared with other conservative interventions in the management of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) on pain and function.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to grade the certainty of evidence. Self-perceived improvement, pain intensity, pain-free grip strength (PFGS) and elbow disability were used as primary outcome measures.Eligibility criteriaRCTs assessing the effectiveness of exercise alone or as an additive intervention compared with passive interventions, wait-and-see or injections in patients with LET.Results30 RCTs (2123 participants, 5 comparator interventions) were identified. Exercise outperformed (low certainty) corticosteroid injections in all outcomes at all time points except short-term pain reduction. Clinically significant differences were found in PFGS at short-term (mean difference (MD): 12.15, (95% CI) 1.69 to 22.6), mid-term (MD: 22.45, 95% CI 3.63 to 41.3) and long-term follow-up (MD: 18, 95% CI 11.17 to 24.84). Statistically significant differences (very low certainty) for exercise compared with wait-and-see were found only in self-perceived improvement at short-term, pain reduction and elbow disability at short-term and long-term follow-up. Substantial heterogeneity in descriptions of equipment, load, duration and frequency of exercise programmes were evident.ConclusionsLow and very low certainty evidence suggests exercise is effective compared with passive interventions with or without invasive treatment in LET, but the effect is small.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018082703.

Download Full-text

EP.WE.14Prognostic significance of metabolic syndrome in patients undergoing carotid artery revascularisation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab308.001 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽

Author(s):

Shahab Hajibandeh ◽

Shahin Hajibandeh

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Infarction ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Short Term ◽

All Cause Mortality ◽

Major Adverse Events

Abstract Aims to evaluate prognostic significance of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients undergoing carotid artery revascularisation. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in compliance with PRISMA standards to evaluate prognostic significance of MetS in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting. Short-term (<30 days) postoperative outcomes (all-cause mortality, stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction, major adverse events) and long-term outcomes (restenosis, all-cause mortality, stroke or TIA, myocardial infarction, major adverse events) were considered as outcomes of interest. Random effects modelling was applied for the analyses. Results Analysis of 3721 patients from five cohort studies showed no difference between the MetS and no MetS groups in terms of the following short-term outcomes: all-cause mortality (OR: 1.67,P=0.32), stroke or TIA (OR: 2.44,P=0.06), myocardial infarction (OR: 1.01,P=0.96), major adverse events (OR: 1.23, P = 0.66). In terms of long-term outcomes, MetS was associated with higher risk of restenosis (OR: 1.75,P=0.02), myocardial infarction (OR: 2.12,P=0.04), and major adverse events (OR: 1.30, P = 0.009) but there was no difference between the two groups in terms of all-cause mortality (OR: 1.11, P = 0.25), and stroke or TIA (OR: 1.24, P = 0.33). The quality and certainty of the available evidence were judged to be moderate. Conclusions The best available evidence suggest that although MetS may not affect the short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality outcomes in patients undergoing carotid revascularisation, it may result in higher risks of restenosis, myocardial infarction and major adverse events in the long-term. Evidence from large prospective cohort studies are required for more robust conclusions.

Download Full-text

Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

World Journal of Surgical Oncology ◽

10.1186/s12957-020-02080-7 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jianglei Ma ◽

Xiaoyao Li ◽

Shifu Zhao ◽

Ruifu Zhang ◽

Dejun Yang

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Robotic Surgery ◽

Laparoscopic Gastrectomy ◽

Resection Margin ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Short Term ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract Background To date, robotic surgery has been widely used worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate short-term and long-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy (RG) in gastric cancer patients to determine whether RG can replace laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). Methods The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was applied to perform the study. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, WanFang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and VIP databases were comprehensively searched for studies published before May 2020 that compared RG with LG. Next, two independent reviewers conducted literature screening and data extraction. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Random effects or fixed effects models were applied according to heterogeneity. Results A total of 19 studies including 7275 patients were included in the meta-analyses, of which 4598 patients were in the LG group and 2677 in the RG group. Compared with LG, RG was associated with longer operative time (WMD = −32.96, 95% CI −42.08 ~ −23.84, P < 0.001), less blood loss (WMD = 28.66, 95% CI 18.59 ~ 38.73, P < 0.001), and shorter time to first flatus (WMD = 0.16 95% CI 0.06 ~ 0.27, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference between RG and LG in terms of the hospital stay (WMD = 0.23, 95% CI −0.53 ~ 0.98, P = 0.560), overall postoperative complication (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.91 ~ 1.25, P = 0.430), mortality (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.24 ~ 1.90, P = 0.450), the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD = −0.96, 95% CI −2.12 ~ 0.20, P = 0.100), proximal resection margin (WMD = −0.10, 95% CI −0.29 ~ 0.09, P = 0.300), and distal resection margin (WMD = 0.15, 95% CI −0.21 ~ 0.52, P = 0.410). No significant differences were found between the two treatments in overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.76 ~ 1.18, P = 0.640), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.69 ~ 1.21, P = 0.530), and recurrence rate (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 ~ 1.21, P = 0.500). Conclusions The results of this study suggested that RG is as acceptable as LG in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes. RG can be performed as effectively and safely as LG. Moreover, more randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques with rigorous study designs are still essential to evaluate the value of the robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Download Full-text

Evaluation of earlier versus later dietary management in long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase or mitochondrial trifunctional protein deficiency: a systematic review

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases ◽

10.1186/s13023-019-1226-y ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Hannah Fraser ◽

Julia Geppert ◽

Rebecca Johnson ◽

Samantha Johnson ◽

Martin Connock ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Dietary Management ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Hydroxyacyl Coa Dehydrogenase ◽

Mitochondrial Trifunctional Protein ◽

Long Chain

Abstract Background Mitochondrial trifunctional protein (MTP) and long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (LCHAD) deficiencies are rare fatty acid β-oxidation disorders. Without dietary management the conditions are life-threatening. We conducted a systematic review to investigate whether pre-symptomatic dietary management following newborn screening provides better outcomes than treatment following symptomatic detection. Methods We searched Web of Science, Medline, Pre-Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library up to 23rd April 2018. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for eligibility and quality appraised the studies. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer and checked by another. Results We included 13 articles out of 7483 unique records. The 13 articles reported on 11 patient groups, including 174 people with LCHAD deficiency, 18 people with MTP deficiency and 12 people with undifferentiated LCHAD/MTP deficiency. Study quality was moderate to weak in all studies. Included studies suggested fewer heart and liver problems in screen-detected patients, but inconsistent results for mortality. Follow up analyses compared long-term outcomes of (1) pre-symptomatically versus symptomatically treated patients, (2) screened versus unscreened patients, and (3) asymptomatic screen-detected, symptomatic screen-detected, and clinically diagnosed patients in each study. For follow up analyses 1 and 2, we found few statistically significant differences in the long-term outcomes. For follow up analysis 3 we found a significant difference for only one comparison, in the incidence of cardiomyopathy between the three groups. Conclusions There is some evidence that dietary management following screen-detection might be associated with a lower incidence of some LCHAD and MTP deficiency-related complications. However, the evidence base is limited by small study sizes, quality issues and risk of confounding. An internationally collaborative research effort is needed to fully examine the risks and the benefits to pre-emptive dietary management with particular attention paid to disease severity and treatment group.

Download Full-text

Remnant pancreatic volume to predict short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e15713 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15713-e15713

Author(s):

Ryoichi Miyamoto ◽

Yukio Oshiro ◽

Nobuhiro Ohkohchi

Keyword(s):

Pancreatic Cancer ◽

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Short Term ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Pancreatic Volume

e15713 Background: Remnant pancreatic volume (RPV) is a well-known marker for short-term outcomes in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. However, in terms of the long-term outcomes, the significance of the RPV remains unclear. Here, we addressed whether the RPV is a predictor of long-term outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients by comparing various cancer-, patient-, and surgery-related prognostic factors and systemic inflammatory response markers in a retrospective cohort. Methods: The RPV was measured on the 3D image, revealing the actual pancreatic parenchymal remnant volume. Ninety-one patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were retrospectively enrolled. We divided the cohort into high- and low-RPV groups based on a cut-off value ( > 35.5 cm3, n = 66 and ≤ 35.5 cm3, n = 25, respectively). The patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes and median survival times (MSTs) were respectively compared between the two groups. Using multivariate analysis, the RPV and other well-known prognostic factors were independently assessed. Results: A significant difference in the RPV value was observed with respect to the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (high, 18 [55%] vs. low, 9 [16%], p < 0.001). The MSTs (days) were significantly different between the two groups (high, 823 vs. low, 482, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified the RPV (≤ 31.5 cm3) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.015; p = 0.011), lymph node metastasis (HR, 8.415; p = 0.002), adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 5.352; p < 0.001), presence of stage III/IV disease (HR, 2.352; p = 0.029), and pathological fibrosis (HR, 1.771; p = 0.031) as independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: The present study suggests that the RPV is an additional useful predictor of both long-term and short-term outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients after PD.

Download Full-text

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-84003/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Jianglei Ma ◽

Xiaoyao Li ◽

Shifu Zhao ◽

Ruifu Zhang ◽

Dejun Yang

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Robotic Surgery ◽

Laparoscopic Gastrectomy ◽

Resection Margin ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background To date, robotic surgery has been widely used worldwide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of robotic gastrectomy (RG) in gastric cancer patients to determine whether RG can replace laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG).Methods Pubmed, Cochrane Library, WanFang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and VIP databases were comprehensively searched for studies published before May 2020 that compared RG with LG. Next, two independent reviewers conducted literature screening and data extraction. The quality of the literature was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS),and the data analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software. Random effects or fixed effects models were applied according to heterogeneity.Results A total of 19 studies including 7275 patients were included in the meta-analyses, of which 4598 patients were in the LG group and 2677 in the RG group. Compared with LG,RG was associated with longer operative time (WMD=−32.96 min; 95% CI:-42.08~-23.84, P<0.00001),less blood loss (WMD=28.66 ml; 95% CI: 18.59~38.73, P<0.00001),and shorter time to first flatus (WMD=0.16days; 95%CI:0.06~0.27, P=0.003).There was no significant difference between RG and LG in terms of the hospital stay (WMD=0.23days, 95 % CI:-0.53~0.98, P=0.56),overall postoperative complication (OR=1.07, 95 % CI:0.91~1.25, P=0.43),mortality (OR=0.67, 95% CI=0.24~1.90, P=0.45),the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD=-0.96, 95% CI:-2.12~0.20, P=0.10),proximal resection margin (WMD=-0.10 cm,95% CI:-0.29~0.09, P=0.30),and distal resection margin (WMD=0.15cm,95% CI:-0.21~0.52, P=0.41).No significant differences were found between the two treatments in overall survival(OS) (HR=0.95, 95% CI:0.76~1.18; P=0.64), recurrence-free survival(RFS) (HR=0.91, 95% CI:0.69~1.21;P=0.53), and recurrence rate (OR=0.90, 95% CI:0.67~1.21; P=0.50). Conclusions The results of this study suggested that RG is as acceptable as LG in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes. RG can be performed as effectively and safely as LG. Moreover, more randomized controlled trials comparing the two techniques with rigorous study designs are still essential to evaluate the value of the robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Download Full-text

Conservative treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears and tendinopathy with platelet-rich plasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.1101/2020.12.19.20248575 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Xiao-Na Xiang ◽

Jie Deng ◽

Yan Liu ◽

Xi Yu ◽

Biao Cheng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Rotator Cuff ◽

Platelet Rich Plasma ◽

Weighted Mean Difference ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Rotator Cuff Tears ◽

Short Term ◽

Partial Thickness ◽

And Function

AbstractPurposeTo assess the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a conservative therapy on individuals with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCs) or tendinopathy in terms of pain, and function.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials were conducted. Short-term (6±1 months) and long-term (≥1 year) outcomes were analysed, including the visual analogue scale (VAS), Constant-Murley score (CMS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), as well as American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. The weighted mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used.ResultsTen studies were eligible in this review, nine studies with 561 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences in the decrease in short-term VAS (MD=-1.56; 95% CI -2.82 to -0.30), and increase in CMS (MD=16.48; 95% CI 12.57 to 20.40), and SPADI (MD=-18.78 95% CI -36.55 to -1.02). Nonetheless, no long-term effect was observed on pain and function, except CMS (MD=24.30). The results of mean important differences (MIDs) reached the minimal clinically important differences, except ASES. For subgroup analysis, short-term VAS scores were decreased in PRP-treated patients with double centrifugation (MD=-1.99), single injection (MD=-0.71) and post-injection rehabilitation (MD=-1.59).ConclusionPRP-treated patients with PTRCs and rotator cuff tendinopathy demonstrated improvements in pain and function, although the effect may not last for a long time. Overall, our results suggest that PRP may have positive clinical outcomes, but limited data, and study heterogeneity hinder firm conclusions.

Download Full-text