scholarly journals Protocol for a meta-integration: investigating positive aspects of caregiving in dementia

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e021215
Author(s):  
Camille Branger ◽  
Megan E O’Connell ◽  
Shelley Peacock
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systematic Search ◽  
New Method ◽  
Current Work ◽  
Quantitative Studies ◽  
Positive Aspects Of Caregiving ◽  
Methodological Approaches

IntroductionThe current work describes the protocol for a meta-integration investigating the positive aspects of providing care to someone living with dementia. We aim to understand the position of positive aspects in the caregiver experience as well as identify how positive aspects are commonly conceptualised, investigated and measured in literature.Methods and analysesMeta-integration is a method of investigation that synthesises findings from meta-analysis or systematic review of quantitative studies and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies, to provide a coherent and holistic account of a phenomenon. As a relatively new method, terminology and methodological approaches are varied. The current work describes the process of conducting an advanced convergent meta-integration, including protocol for systematic search, inclusion/exclusion screening phases, intramethod analysis synthesis and intermethod synthesis on quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research pertaining to the positive aspects of providing care to someone living with dementia.Ethics and disseminationThere are no ethics or safety concerns about dissemination, which includes plans for a conference presentation and publication.

scholarly journals Team functioning and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: a systematic review protocol

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. McGuier ◽  
David J. Kolko ◽  
Mary Lou Klem ◽  
Jamie Feldman ◽  
Grace Kinkler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Human Service ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Implementation Outcomes ◽  
Services Implementation ◽  
Team Functioning

Abstract Background Healthcare and human services increasingly rely on teams of individuals to deliver services. Implementation of evidence-based practices and other innovations in these settings requires teams to work together to change processes and behaviors. Accordingly, team functioning may be a key determinant of implementation outcomes. This systematic review will identify and summarize empirical research examining associations between team functioning and implementation outcomes in healthcare and human service settings. Methods We will conduct a comprehensive search of bibliographic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC) for articles published from January 2000 or later. We will include peer-reviewed empirical articles and conference abstracts using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods. We will include experimental or observational studies that report on the implementation of an innovation in a healthcare or human service setting and examine associations between team functioning and implementation outcomes. Implementation outcomes of interest are acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, cost, feasibility, fidelity, penetration, and sustainability. Two reviewers will independently screen all titles/abstracts, review full-text articles, and extract data from included articles. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess methodological quality/bias and conduct a narrative synthesis without meta-analysis. Discussion Understanding how team functioning influences implementation outcomes will contribute to our understanding of team-level barriers and facilitators of change. The results of this systematic review will inform efforts to implement evidence-based practices in team-based service settings. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020220168

Mortality in adult patients with solid or hematological cancers and SARS-CoV-2 infection with a specific focus on lung and breast malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18608-e18608
Author(s):  
Marco Tagliamento ◽  
Elisa Agostinetto ◽  
Marco Bruzzone ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Kamal S. Saini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systematic Search ◽  
Total N ◽  
Diagnosis Of Cancer ◽  
Hematological Tumors

e18608 Background: Patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and a diagnosis of cancer are at high risk of severe symptomatic disease (COVID-19) and death. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies, to estimate the case-fatality rate (CFR) of patients with solid or hematological tumors and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed library up to 31 January, 2021, was performed in order to identify publications reporting the CFR among adult patients with solid or hematological tumors and SARS-CoV-2 infection. CFR was defined as the rate of deaths among SARS-CoV-2-positive cancer patients. Moreover, we separately assessed the CFR among patients with lung and breast cancer. Studies with at least 10 patients were included. The CFR was assessed through a random effect model, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The Higgins I2 index was computed to assess the heterogeneity between studies. Results: The systematic search of the literaturereturned 1,727studies. 1,551 were excluded on the basis of the title, 29 based on the abstract, and 3 were duplicates. A total of 144 studies were selected, including 35,725 patients with solid or hematological tumors and SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 46 and 32 studies reported the CFR among COVID-19 patients with lung (total N = 1,555) and breast (total N = 1.398) cancer, respectively. Overall, the CFR was 25.5% (95% CI 23.1%-28.1%, Egger test p < 0.001). A sensitivity analysis, after excluding studies with less than 100 patients, showed a CFR of 22.1% (95% CI 19.4%-25.2%). The CFR among patients with lung cancer and SARS-CoV2 infection was 33.4% (95% CI 28.1%-39.6%) when including all studies and 26.3% (95% CI 17.6%-39.2%) at the sensitivity analysis after excluding studies with less than 100 patients. The CFR among patients with breast cancer and SARS-CoV2 infection was 13.7% (95% CI 9.1%-20.7%) when including all studies and 13.0% (95% CI 7.6%-22.1%) at the sensitivity analysis after excluding studies with less than 100 patients. Conclusions: One year after the outbreak of the pandemic, this large meta-analysis reports the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with cancer. This population experienced a high probability of mortality, with a comparatively higher CFR in patients with lung cancer, and a comparatively lower CFR in patients with breast cancer. Patients with an underlying diagnosis of cancer require special attention with aggressive preventive measures that also include early access to COVID-19 vaccination.

scholarly journals Determinants of anxiety in elite athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 722-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon M Rice ◽  
Kate Gwyther ◽  
Olga Santesteban-Echarri ◽  
David Baron ◽  
Paul Gorczynski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Life Events ◽  
Female Athletes ◽  
Elite Athletes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adverse Life Events ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Quantitative Studies ◽  
Online Databases ◽  
Symptom Level

ObjectiveTo identify and quantify determinants of anxiety symptoms and disorders experienced by elite athletes.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesFive online databases (PubMed, SportDiscus, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane) were searched up to November 2018 to identify eligible citations.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesArticles were included if they were published in English, were quantitative studies and measured a symptom-level anxiety outcome in competing or retired athletes at the professional (including professional youth), Olympic or collegiate/university levels.Results and summaryWe screened 1163 articles; 61 studies were included in the systematic review and 27 of them were suitable for meta-analysis. Overall risk of bias for included studies was low. Athletes and non-athletes had no differences in anxiety profiles (d=−0.11, p=0.28). Pooled effect sizes, demonstrating moderate effects, were identified for (1) career dissatisfaction (d=0.45; higher anxiety in dissatisfied athletes), (2) gender (d=0.38; higher anxiety in female athletes), (3) age (d=−0.34; higher anxiety for younger athletes) and (4) musculoskeletal injury (d=0.31; higher anxiety for injured athletes). A small pooled effect was found for recent adverse life events (d=0.26)—higher anxiety in athletes who had experienced one or more recent adverse life events.ConclusionDeterminants of anxiety in elite populations broadly reflect those experienced by the general population. Clinicians should be aware of these general and athlete-specific determinants of anxiety among elite athletes.

To reduce or to cease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies on self-regulation of driving

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 243-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boon Hong Ang ◽  
Jennifer Anne Oxley ◽  
Won Sun Chen ◽  
Khai Khun Yap ◽  
Keang Peng Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Quantitative Studies

scholarly journals A systematic review of the literature in Europe relating to clinical legal education

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Rachel Dunn
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Legal Education ◽  
Review Of The Literature ◽  
European Network ◽  
European Literature ◽  
Basic Content

As my PhD research is European focused, looking at knowledge, skills and attributes development in live client clinics, I wanted to find all the European literature relating to clinical legal education. The aim of this research was to find all of the European literature surrounding clinical legal education available to me, to explore the kind of research published and to identify any gaps in knowledge. With an explosion of literature within the field, and more research undertaken every year, finding the literature which related to my research was challenging. To help aid this work I embarked on a systematic review, building on work by Tribe Mkwebu,<a title="" href="file:///S:/Academic%20Library%20Services/Research%20Support%20Team/Scholarly%20Publications/OJS/International%20Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Legal%20Education/24-2%20files/4.%20dunn%20lit%20review.docx#_ftn1">[1]</a> systematically searching for peer reviewed articles. This research was initially presented at the European Network of Clinical Legal Education<ins cite="mailto:Jonny%20Hall" datetime="2017-04-20T12:31">’</ins>s Spring Workshop, 2015, Northumbria University.  This article highlights the journey through this literature. Firstly, it explains what a systematic review is and how it can be used within mixed methods research. It then goes on to outline the methodology used and the number of articles sourced, excluded and synthesised. The analysis shows the amount of papers published before 2015 and their basic content. Finally, I discuss my reflection on the systematic review, what I thought went well and what didn’t, explaining how it was received at the Workshop.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of the Contribution of Dance Movement Psychotherapy Towards the Well-Being of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supritha Aithal ◽  
Zoe Moula ◽  
Vicky Karkou ◽  
Themis Karaminis ◽  
Joanne Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Dance Movement ◽  
Protocol Registration

Background: The present review provides an original examination of published literature on the use of Dance Movement Psychotherapy (DMP) as an intervention for children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD).Method: The review was systematically conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A protocol consisting of four phases: identification; screening and selection; data extraction and synthesis; quality assurance was developed and registered with the PROSPERO. A search strategy was developed using population and intervention as the key concepts and ten databases were searched between 6.1.2018 to 4.4.2018 and 10.07.2021 to 20.07.2021. The intervention characteristics were extracted based on the TIDieR template for intervention description and replication checklist. Quality assessment and level of evidence of all the included studies were evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) for treatment criteria.Results: Nine research studies with a total of 133 participants were identified through a systematic search process. There was only one mixed-methods study with the component of randomisation found during the literature search. Collected information was synthesised in relation to (a) ways in which dance movement psychotherapists work with children; (b) data collection methods and findings. Results from the reviewed literature suggest that DMP can potentially promote various aspects of well-being in children with ASD. Eight out of nine studies mentioned the effects of DMP on improving different social and communication skills. However, results from quality assessments and synthesised outcomes indicate that research in DMP is still in its infancy.Conclusions: We conclude that further large-scale, high-quality studies are required to generate further evidence that explains the processes involved in DMP, the effectiveness of DMP, the relationship between therapeutic factors of DMP, and research findings for children on the autism spectrum.Systematic Review Protocol Registration: PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42018087912.

Cycling is associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular diseases and death: Part 1 – systematic review of cohort studies with meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (14) ◽  
pp. 870-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solveig Nordengen ◽  
Lars Bo Andersen ◽  
Ane K Solbraa ◽  
Amund Riiser
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dose Response ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effect Estimate ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Quantitative Studies

ObjectivesPhysical inactivity is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cycling as a physical activity holds great potential to prevent CVD. We aimed to determine whether cycling reduces the risk of CVD and CVD risk factors and to investigate potential dose-response relationships.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesWe searched four databases (Web of Science, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus and Scopus). All quantitative studies, published until August 2017, were included when a general population was investigated, cycling was assessed either in total or as a transportation mode, and CVD incidence, mortality or risk factors were reported. Studies were excluded when they reported continuous outcomes or when cycling and walking were combined in them. We pooled adjusted relative risks (RR) and OR. Heterogeneity was investigated using I.ResultsThe search yielded 5174 studies; 21 studies which included 1,069,034 individuals. We found a significantly lower association in combined CVD incidence, mortality and physiological risk factors with total effect estimate 0.78 (95% CI (CI): 0.74–0.82; P<0.001; I2=58%). Separate analyses for CVD incidence, mortality and risk factors showed estimates of RR 0.84 (CI, 0.80 to 0.88; P<0.001; I2=29%), RR 0.83 (CI, 0.76 to 0.90; P<0.001; I2=0%), and OR 0.75 (CI, 0.69 to 0.82; P<0.001; I2=66%), respectively. We found no dose-response relationship or sex-specific difference.ConclusionsAny form of cycling seems to be associated with lower CVD risk, and thus, we recommend cycling as a health-enhancing physical activity.Systematic review registrationProspero CRD42016052421.

Arts and Mixed Methods Research: An Innovative Methodological Merger

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 956-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandy M. Archibald ◽  
Nancy Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mixed Methods Research ◽  
Concept Formation ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Conceptual Integration ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
The Arts ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Methodological Approaches ◽  
High Level

Integrating the arts with mixed methods research (MMR) presents untapped potential for innovative methodological approaches. Arts and MMR integration exists on a continuum, ranging from low-level (e.g., communicating about MMR using art) to high-level integration (e.g., interweaving arts-based and MMR approaches), and myriad art forms are available to facilitate concept formation, data collection, analysis, and representation. Given that a primary objective of the arts and MMR respectively is to explore and understand the complex social world, arts–MMR integration has potential to enable insights not possible through the use of either approach in isolation, and to present new opportunities for transformative social change. In this article, we explore such potentials and intersections philosophically and methodologically by way of four case examples framed by the newly conceptualized Art-MMR Integration Continuum, which ranges from communicative, data source, analytic, and conceptual integration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document