scholarly journals Changes in vulnerability among older patients with cardiovascular disease in the first 90 days after hospital discharge: A secondary analysis of a cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e024766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinjiao Wang ◽  
Mary S Dietrich ◽  
Susan P Bell ◽  
Cathy A Maxwell ◽  
Sandra F Simmons ◽  
...  

Objectives(1) To compare changes in vulnerability after hospital discharge among older patients with cardiovascular disease who were discharged home with self-care versus a home healthcare (HHC) referral and (2) to examine factors associated with changes in vulnerability in this period.DesignSecondary analysis of longitudinal data from a cohort study.Participants and setting834 older (≥65 years) patients hospitalised for acute coronary syndromes and/or acute decompensated heart failure who were discharged home with self-care (n=713) or an HHC referral (n=121).OutcomeVulnerability was measured using Vulnerable Elders Survey 13 (VES-13) at baseline (prior to hospital admission) and 30 days and/or 90 days after hospital discharge. Effects of HHC referral on postdischarge change in vulnerability were examined using three linear regression approaches, with potential confounding on HHC referral adjusted by propensity score matching.ResultsOverall, 44.4% of the participants were vulnerable at prehospitalisation baseline and 34.4% were vulnerable at 90 days after hospital discharge. Compared with self-care patients, HHC-referred patients were more vulnerable at baseline (66.9% vs 40.3%), had more increase (worsening) in VES-13 score change (B=−1.34(–2.07, –0.61), p<0.001) in the initial 30 days and more decrease (improvement) in VES-13 score change (B=0.83(0.20, 1.45), p=0.01) from 30 to 90 days after hospital discharge. Baseline vulnerability and the HHC referral attributed to 14%–16% of the variance in vulnerability change during the 90 postdischarge days, and 6% was attributed by patient age, race (African-American), depressive symptoms, and outpatient visits and hospitalisations in the past year.ConclusionAfter adjusting for preceding vulnerability and covariates, older hospitalised patients with cardiovascular disease referred to HHC had delayed recovery in vulnerability in first initial 30 days after hospital discharge and greater improvement in vulnerability from 30 to 90 days after hospital discharge. HHC seemed to facilitate improvement in vulnerability among older patients with cardiovascular disease from 30 to 90 days after hospital discharge.

Geriatrics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Tina Hansen ◽  
Rikke Lundsgaard Nielsen ◽  
Morten Baltzer Houlind ◽  
Juliette Tavenier ◽  
Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen ◽  
...  

There is evolving evidence for an association between dysphagia and sarcopenia in older adults. For optimizing the acute health care initiative across health care settings, this study investigated prevalence and time-course of dysphagia in older patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) as well as its association with parameters for probable sarcopenia, inactivity, malnutrition, disease status, and systemic inflammation. A secondary analysis of data from the FAM-CPH cohort study on acutely admitted older medical patients (n = 125). Data were collected upon ED admission as well as four and 56 weeks after discharge. Using the Eating Assessment Tool cut-off score ≥ 2, signs of dysphagia were present in 34% of the patients at ED admission and persisted in 25% of the patients 56 weeks after discharge. Signs of dysphagia at 56-week follow-up were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with probable sarcopenia (low handgrip strength (OR = 3.79), low leg muscle strength (OR = 8.14), and low physical performance (OR = 5.68)) and with baseline swallowing inactivity (OR = 5.61), malnutrition (OR = 4.35), and systemic inflammation (OR = 1.33). Signs of dysphagia in older patients admitted to an ED was prevalent, persisted 56 weeks after discharge, and was associated with probable sarcopenia and related conditions; all modifiable targets for management of dysphagia in older patients.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e044416
Author(s):  
Tan Van Nguyen ◽  
Huyen Thanh Dang ◽  
Mason Jenner Burns ◽  
Hiep HH Dao ◽  
Tu Ngoc Nguyen

ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the prevalence of impairment of activities of daily living (ADLs) in older patients with heart failure (HF), and to examine the impact of ADL impairment on readmission after discharge.Design and settingsA prospective cohort study was conducted in patients aged ≥65 years with HF admitted to a tertiary hospital in Vietnam from August 2016 to June 2017. Difficulties with six ADLs were assessed by a questionnaire. Participants were classified into two categories (with and without ADL impairment). The associations of ADL impairment with 3-month readmission were examined using logistic regression models.ResultsThere were 180 participants (mean age 80.6±8.2, 50% female) and 26.1% were classified as having ADL impairment. The most common impaired activity was bathing (21.1%), followed by transferring (20.0%), toileting (12.2%), dressing (8.9%), eating (3.3%), and continence (2.8%). During 3-month follow-up, 32.8% of the participants were readmitted to hospitals (55.3% in participants with ADL impairment, 24.8% in those without ADL impairment, p<0.001). ADL impairment significantly increased the risk of 3-month readmission (adjusted OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.25 to 6.05, p=0.01).ConclusionsIn summary, ADL impairment was common in older hospitalised patients with HF and was associated with increased readmission. These findings suggest further studies on ADL assessment and intervention during transition care for older patients with HF after discharge to prevent readmission.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Aline Hurtaud ◽  
François Lallier ◽  
Matthieu Heidet ◽  
Charline Arnoult ◽  
Moustapha Dramé ◽  
...  

Abstract Background hospital discharge is a critical event for older patients. The French guidelines recommended the swift transmission of a discharge summary to the general practitioner (GP) and a primary care consultation within 7 days. The relevance and feasibility of these guidelines have not previously been assessed. Objective to perform a real-life assessment of compliance with French guidelines on the transmission of discharge summaries and post-discharge medical reviews and to examine these factors’ association with 30-day readmissions. Design a prospective multicentre cohort study. Setting primary care (general practice) in France. Subjects a sample of GPs and the same number of patients aged 75 or over having consulted within 30 days of hospital discharge. Methods the main endpoints were the proportion of discharge summaries available and the proportion of patients consulting their GP within 7 days. The 30-day readmission rate was also measured. Factors associated with these endpoints were assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results seventy-one GPs (mean ± standard deviation age: 49 ± 11; males: 62%) and 71 patients (mean age: 84 ± 5; males: 52%; living at home: 94%; cognitive disorders: 22%) were included. Forty-six patients (65%, [95% confidence interval [CI]]: 53–76) consulted their GP within 7 days of hospital discharge. At the time of the consultation, 27 GPs (38% [95% CI]: 27–50) had not received the corresponding hospital discharge summary. Discharge summary availability was associated with a lower risk of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] = 0.25 [0.07–0.91]). Conclusions compliance with the French guidelines on hospital-to-home transitions is insufficient.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastiaan Van Grootven ◽  
Anthony Jeuris ◽  
Maren Jonckers ◽  
Els Devriendt ◽  
Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e024747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Redmond ◽  
Ronald McDowell ◽  
Tamasine C Grimes ◽  
Fiona Boland ◽  
Ronan McDonnell ◽  
...  

ObjectivesWhether unintended discontinuation of common, evidence-based, long-term medication occurs after hospitalisation; what factors are associated with unintended discontinuation; and whether the presence of documentation of medication at hospital discharge is associated with continuity of medication in general practice.DesignRetrospective cohort study between 2012 and 2015.SettingElectronic records and hospital supplied discharge notifications in 44 Irish general practices.Participants20 488 patients aged 65 years or more prescribed long-term medication for chronic conditions.Primary and secondary outcomesDiscontinuity of four evidence-based medication drug classes: antithrombotic, lipid-lowering, thyroid replacement drugs and respiratory inhalers in hospitalised versus non-hospitalised patients; patient and health system factors associated with discontinuity; impact of the presence of medication in the hospital discharge summary on continuity of medication in a patient’s general practitioner (GP) prescribing record at 6 months follow-up.ResultsIn patients admitted to hospital, medication discontinuity ranged from 6%–11% in the 6 months posthospitalisation. Discontinuity of medication is significantly lower for hospitalised patients taking respiratory inhalers (adjusted OR (AOR) 0.63, 95% CI (0.49 to 0.80), p<0.001) and thyroid medications (AOR 0.62, 95% CI (0.40 to 0.96), p=0.03). There is no association between discontinuity of medication and hospitalisation for antithrombotics (AOR 0.95, 95% CI (0.81 to 1.11), p=0.49) or lipid lowering medications (AOR 0.92, 95% CI (0.78 to 1.08), p=0.29). Older patients and those who paid to see their GP were more likely to experience increased odds of discontinuity in all four medicine groups. Less than half (39% to 47.4%) of patients had medication listed on their hospital discharge summary. Presence of medication on hospital discharge summary is significantly associated with continuity of medication in the GP prescribing record for lipid lowering medications (AOR 1.64, 95% CI (1.15 to 2.36), p=0.01) and respiratory inhalers (AOR 2.97, 95% CI (1.68 to 5.25), p<0.01).ConclusionDiscontinuity of evidence-based long-term medication is common. Increasing age and private medical care are independently associated with a higher risk of medication discontinuity. Hospitalisation is not associated with discontinuity but less than half of hospitalised patients have medication recorded on their hospital discharge summary.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-André Natella ◽  
Philippe Le Corvoisier ◽  
Elena Paillaud ◽  
Bertrand Renaud ◽  
Isabelle Mahé ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e022782 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mouaz Alsawas ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
M Hassan Murad ◽  
Mohammed Yousufuddin

ObjectiveTo assess gender disparity in outcomes among hospitalised patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) or pneumonia.DesignA retrospective cohort study.SettingA tertiary referral centre in Midwest, USA.ParticipantsWe evaluated 12 265 adult patients hospitalised with ADHF, 15 777 with AMI and 12 929 with pneumonia, from 1 January 1995 through 31 August 2015. Patients were selected using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrevalence of comorbidities, 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission. Comorbidities were chosen from the 20 chronic conditions, specified by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. Logistic regression analysis was conducted adjusting for multiple confounders.ResultsPrevalence of comorbidities was significantly different between men and women in all three conditions. After adjusting for age, length of stay, multicomorbidities and residence, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between men and women in AMI or ADHF, but men with pneumonia had slightly higher 30-day mortality with an OR of 1.19 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.34). There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between men and women with AMI or pneumonia, but women with ADHF were slightly more likely to be readmitted within 30 days with OR 0.90 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.99).ConclusionGender differences in the distribution of comorbidities exist in patients hospitalised with AMI, ADHF and pneumonia. However, there is minimal clinically meaningful impact of these differences on outcomes. Efforts to address gender difference may need to be diverted towards targeting overall population health, reducing race/ethnicity disparity and improving access to care.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e046698
Author(s):  
Katja Thomsen ◽  
Anders Fournaise ◽  
Lars Erik Matzen ◽  
Karen Andersen-Ranberg ◽  
Jesper Ryg

IntroductionHospital readmission is a burden to patients, relatives and society. Older patients with frailty are at highest risk of readmission and its negative outcomes.ObjectiveWe aimed at examining whether follow-up visits by an outgoing multidisciplinary geriatric team (OGT) reduces unplanned hospital readmission in patients discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF).DesignA retrospective single-centre before-and-after cohort study.Setting and participantsStudy population included all hospitalised patients discharged from a Danish geriatric department to an SNF during 1 January 2016–25 February 2020. To address potential changes in discharge and readmission patterns during the study period, patients discharged from the same geriatric department to own home were also assessed.InterventionOGT visits at SNF within 7 days following discharge. Patients discharged to SNF before 12 March 2018 did not receive OGT (−OGT). Patients discharged to SNF on or after 12 March 2018 received the intervention (+OGT).Main outcome measuresUnplanned hospital readmission between 4 hours and 30 days following initial discharge.ResultsTotally 847 patients were included (440 −OGT; 407 +OGT). No differences were seen between the two groups regarding age, sex, activities of daily living (ADLs), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) or 30-day mortality. The cumulative incidence of readmission was 39.8% (95% CI 35.2% to 44.8%, n=162) in −OGT and 30.2% (95% CI 25.8% to 35.2%, n=113) in +OGT. The unadjusted risk (HR (95% CI)) of readmission was 0.68 (0.54 to 0.87, p=0.002) in +OGT compared with –OGT, and remained significantly lower (0.72 (0.57 to 0.93, p=0.011)) adjusting for age, length of stay, sex, ADL and CCI. For patients discharged to own home the risk of readmission remained unchanged during the study period.ConclusionFollow-up visits by OGT to patients discharged to temporary care at an SNF significantly reduced 30-day readmission in older patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Luo ◽  
J M Du-Fay-De-Lavallaz ◽  
J M D Gomez ◽  
S Fugar ◽  
L Golemi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Introduction Patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk for mortality during hospitalization. Better definition of the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of cardiac arrest during hospitalization for COVID-19 may support early identification and intervention. Purpose To estimate the incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with COVID-19, describe the temporal trends in incidence of and survival after cardiac arrest, summarise characteristics of those who experienced a cardiac arrest, and compare the characteristics of survivors versus non-survivors of cardiac arrest. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted for COVID-19 to a tertiary medical center comprising three hospitals between March and November 2020. Data entry is ongoing for more than 2000 patients admitted through 2021. Clinical variables extracted via review of electronic medical records included age, sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, history of cardiovascular disease (ie., coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or cerebrovascular event), other comorbidities included in the Charlson comorbidity index, date of admission, duration of hospitalization, all cardiac arrest events during hospitalization, presenting rhythm during first cardiac arrest, and death. Data were described using summary statistics. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations. Results Among 1666 patients, 107 (6.4%) experienced at least one in-hospital cardiac arrest event during hospitalization for COVID-19, of which 25 (23%) survived to hospital discharge. From March to October 2020, there was a decrease in estimated cardiac arrest incidence in-hospital from 8.2% to 3%, whereas estimated survival to hospital discharge after an arrest remained similar at approximately 20% (Figure). Compared to those who did not, patients who experienced in-hospital cardiac arrest were older and more likely to have existing cardiovascular disease, as well as other comorbidities. Similar factors were associated with lower chance of survival after cardiac arrest (Table). Patients with pulseless ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) as presenting rhythm in cardiac arrest had better survival to hospital discharge compared to those with other rhythms (OR 3.3, p=0.02). Younger age (per 10 years, OR=0.7, p=0.03) and fewer comorbidities (per one fewer comorbidity, OR=1.5, p=0.05) were associated with better survival after cardiac arrest in multivariable logistic regression. Conclusion There was a decline in estimated incidence of cardiac arrest during hospitalization for COVID-19 since beginning of pandemic, with survival to hospital discharge after cardiac arrest estimated to be stable at around 20%. Younger age and fewer comorbidities especially cardiovascular disease were associated with better survival after an in-hospital cardiac arrest. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Rush University Medical Center Figure 1 Table 1


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document