scholarly journals Dysphagia Prevalence, Time Course, and Association with Probable Sarcopenia, Inactivity, Malnutrition, and Disease Status in Older Patients Admitted to an Emergency Department: A Secondary Analysis of Cohort Study Data

Geriatrics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Tina Hansen ◽  
Rikke Lundsgaard Nielsen ◽  
Morten Baltzer Houlind ◽  
Juliette Tavenier ◽  
Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Systemic Inflammation ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Handgrip Strength ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Disease Status

There is evolving evidence for an association between dysphagia and sarcopenia in older adults. For optimizing the acute health care initiative across health care settings, this study investigated prevalence and time-course of dysphagia in older patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) as well as its association with parameters for probable sarcopenia, inactivity, malnutrition, disease status, and systemic inflammation. A secondary analysis of data from the FAM-CPH cohort study on acutely admitted older medical patients (n = 125). Data were collected upon ED admission as well as four and 56 weeks after discharge. Using the Eating Assessment Tool cut-off score ≥ 2, signs of dysphagia were present in 34% of the patients at ED admission and persisted in 25% of the patients 56 weeks after discharge. Signs of dysphagia at 56-week follow-up were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with probable sarcopenia (low handgrip strength (OR = 3.79), low leg muscle strength (OR = 8.14), and low physical performance (OR = 5.68)) and with baseline swallowing inactivity (OR = 5.61), malnutrition (OR = 4.35), and systemic inflammation (OR = 1.33). Signs of dysphagia in older patients admitted to an ED was prevalent, persisted 56 weeks after discharge, and was associated with probable sarcopenia and related conditions; all modifiable targets for management of dysphagia in older patients.

scholarly journals Trends in treatment for patients with depression in general practice in Norway, 2009–2015: nationwide registry-based cohort study (The Norwegian GP-DEP Study)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Ruths ◽  
Inger Haukenes ◽  
Øystein Hetlevik ◽  
Tone Smith-Sivertsen ◽  
Stefan Hjørleifsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Time Trends ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Antidepressant Drug ◽  
Depression Care ◽  
Patient Gender

Abstract Background Depression is highly prevalent, but knowledge is scarce as to whether increased public awareness and strengthened government focus on mental health have changed how general practitioners (GPs) help their depressed patients. This study aimed to examine national time trends in GP depression care and whether trends varied regarding patient gender, age, and comorbidity. Methods Nationwide registry-based cohort study, Norway. The study population comprised all residents aged 20 years or older with new depression diagnoses recorded in general practice, 2009–2015. We linked reimbursement claims data from all consultations in general practice for depression with information on demographics and antidepressant medication. The outcome was type(s) of GP depression care during 12 months from the date of diagnosis: (long) consultation, talking therapy, antidepressant drug treatment, sickness absence certification, and referral to secondary mental health care. Covariates were patient gender, age, and comorbidity. The data are presented as frequencies and tested with generalized linear models. Results We included 365,947 new depression diagnoses. Mean patient age was 44 years (SD = 16), 61.9 % were women, 41.2 % had comorbidity. From 2009 to 2015, proportions of patients receiving talking therapy (42.3–63.4 %), long consultations (56.4–71.8 %), and referral to secondary care (16.6–21.6 %) increased, while those receiving drug treatment (31.3–25.9 %) and sick-listing (58.1–50 %) decreased. The trends were different for gender (women had a greater increase in talking therapy and a smaller decrease in sick-listing, compared to men), age (working-aged patients had a smaller increase in talking therapy, a greater increase in long consultations, and a smaller decrease in antidepressant drug use, compared to older patients) and comorbidity (patients with mental comorbidity had a smaller increase in talking therapy and a greater increase in long consultations, compared to those with no comorbidity and somatic comorbidity). Conclusions The observed time trends in GP depression care towards increased provision of psychological treatment and less drug treatment and sick-listing were in the desired direction according to Norwegian health care policy. However, the large and persistent differences in treatment rates between working-aged and older patients needs further investigation.

scholarly journals Development and validation of a delirium risk assessment tool in older patients admitted to the Emergency Department Observation Unit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Zucchelli ◽  
R. Apuzzo ◽  
C. Paolillo ◽  
V. Prestipino ◽  
S. De Bianchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Older Persons ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Training Sample ◽  
Risk Assessment Tool ◽  
Observation Unit ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Two Samples

Abstract Background Delirium is frequent though undetected in older patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED). Aims To develop and validate a delirium risk assessment tool for older persons admitted to the ED Observation Unit (OU). Methods We used data from two samples of 65 + year-old patients, one admitted to the ED of Brescia Hospital (n = 257) and one to the ED of Desio Hospital (n = 107), Italy. Data from Brescia were used as training sample, those collected in Desio as testing one. Delirium was assessed using the 4AT and patients’ characteristic were retrieved from medical charts. Variables found to be associated with delirium in the training sample were tested for the creation of a delirium risk assessment tool. The resulting tool’s performances were assessed in the testing subsample. Results Of all possible scores tested, the combination with the highest discriminative ability in the training sample included: age ≥ 75 years, dementia diagnosis, chronic use of neuroleptics, and hearing impairment. The delirium score exhibited an AUC of 0.874 and 0.893 in the training and testing samples, respectively. For a 1-point increase in the score, the odds of delirium increased more than twice in both samples. Discussion We propose a delirium risk assessing tool that includes variables that can be easily collected at ED admission and that can be calculated rapidly. Conclusion A risk assessment tool could help improving delirium detection in older persons referring to ED.

Outcomes in older patients requiring comprehensive allied health care prior to discharge from the emergency department

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glenn Arendts ◽  
Sarah Fitzhardinge ◽  
Karren Pronk ◽  
Marani Hutton
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Allied Health Care

scholarly journals Impact of emergency physician-staffed ambulances on preoperative time course and survival among injured patients requiring emergency surgery or transarterial embolization: A retrospective cohort study at a community emergency department in Japan

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0259733
Author(s):  
Yuko Ono ◽  
Yudai Iwasaki ◽  
Takaki Hirano ◽  
Katsuhiko Hashimoto ◽  
Takeyasu Kakamu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Emergency Physician ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Emergency Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Transarterial Embolization ◽  
Injured Patients

Injured patients requiring definitive intervention, such as surgery or transarterial embolization (TAE), are an extremely time-sensitive population. The effect of an emergency physician (EP) patient care delivery system in this important trauma subset remains unclear. We aimed to clarify whether the preoperative time course and mortality among injured patients differ between ambulances staffed by EPs and those staffed by emergency life-saving technicians (ELST). This was a retrospective cohort study at a community emergency department (ED) in Japan. We included all injured patients requiring emergency surgery or TAE who were transported directly from the ED to the operating room from January 2002 to December 2019. The primary exposure was dispatch of an EP-staffed ambulance to the prehospital scene. The primary outcome measures were preoperative time course including prehospital length of stay (LOS), ED LOS, and total time to definitive intervention. The other outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare these outcomes between the groups. Of the 1,020 eligible patients, 353 (34.6%) were transported to the ED by an EP-staffed ambulance. In the propensity score-matched analysis with 295 pairs, the EP group showed a significant increase in median prehospital LOS (71.0 min vs. 41.0 min, P < 0.001) and total time to definitive intervention (189.0 min vs. 177.0 min, P = 0.002) in comparison with the ELST group. Conversely, ED LOS was significantly shorter in the EP group than in the ELST group (120.0 min vs. 131.0 min, P = 0.043). There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (8.8% vs.9.8%, P = 0.671). At a community hospital in Japan, EP-staffed ambulances were found to be associated with prolonged prehospital time, delay in definitive treatment, and did not improve survival among injured patients needing definitive hemostatic procedures compared with ELST-staffed ambulances.

scholarly journals Intracranial hemorrhage after head injury among older patients on anticoagulation seen in the emergency department: a population-based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 193 (40) ◽  
pp. E1561-E1567
Author(s):  
Keerat Grewal ◽  
Clare L. Atzema ◽  
Peter C. Austin ◽  
Kerstin de Wit ◽  
Sunjay Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Head Injury ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Population Based

scholarly journals Changes in vulnerability among older patients with cardiovascular disease in the first 90 days after hospital discharge: A secondary analysis of a cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e024766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinjiao Wang ◽  
Mary S Dietrich ◽  
Susan P Bell ◽  
Cathy A Maxwell ◽  
Sandra F Simmons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Home Healthcare ◽  
Score Change ◽  
Hospitalised Patients

Objectives(1) To compare changes in vulnerability after hospital discharge among older patients with cardiovascular disease who were discharged home with self-care versus a home healthcare (HHC) referral and (2) to examine factors associated with changes in vulnerability in this period.DesignSecondary analysis of longitudinal data from a cohort study.Participants and setting834 older (≥65 years) patients hospitalised for acute coronary syndromes and/or acute decompensated heart failure who were discharged home with self-care (n=713) or an HHC referral (n=121).OutcomeVulnerability was measured using Vulnerable Elders Survey 13 (VES-13) at baseline (prior to hospital admission) and 30 days and/or 90 days after hospital discharge. Effects of HHC referral on postdischarge change in vulnerability were examined using three linear regression approaches, with potential confounding on HHC referral adjusted by propensity score matching.ResultsOverall, 44.4% of the participants were vulnerable at prehospitalisation baseline and 34.4% were vulnerable at 90 days after hospital discharge. Compared with self-care patients, HHC-referred patients were more vulnerable at baseline (66.9% vs 40.3%), had more increase (worsening) in VES-13 score change (B=−1.34(–2.07, –0.61), p<0.001) in the initial 30 days and more decrease (improvement) in VES-13 score change (B=0.83(0.20, 1.45), p=0.01) from 30 to 90 days after hospital discharge. Baseline vulnerability and the HHC referral attributed to 14%–16% of the variance in vulnerability change during the 90 postdischarge days, and 6% was attributed by patient age, race (African-American), depressive symptoms, and outpatient visits and hospitalisations in the past year.ConclusionAfter adjusting for preceding vulnerability and covariates, older hospitalised patients with cardiovascular disease referred to HHC had delayed recovery in vulnerability in first initial 30 days after hospital discharge and greater improvement in vulnerability from 30 to 90 days after hospital discharge. HHC seemed to facilitate improvement in vulnerability among older patients with cardiovascular disease from 30 to 90 days after hospital discharge.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document