Non-operative treatment options for knee osteoarthritis: current concepts

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 274-281
Author(s):  
David A Parker ◽  
Corey Scholes ◽  
Thomas Neri
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Coordinated Care ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Functional Benefit

Knee osteoarthritis in younger patients can be a challenging condition to manage. The patient and clinician have a range of non-operative management options available, although the guidance to effectively apply these options is lacking. The following review summarises a range of non-operative treatment options as an accessible reference for primary care providers to establish a coordinated care plan in consultation with the patient as part of a shared decision making process. Options are summarised in non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments. These options are based on the latest guidelines based on authoritative recommendations, as well as recent articles with a good level of evidence that have not yet been incorporated into these official contents. The coordination of treatment using a range of modalities remains poorly explained in the literature and the current review proposes a conceptual model for coordinated care to be provided. In this model, the patient is central to the interaction between the coordinator and specialist providers, and the treatment plan is tailored to provide the optimal pain relief and functional benefit specific to the patient.

scholarly journals Teaching Family Nurse Practitioner Students to Provide Mental Health Care to Older Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 10-11
Author(s):  
Victoria Grando ◽  
Roy Grando
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Neurocognitive Disorders ◽  
Mental Condition ◽  
Care Providers

Abstract In recent years, FNPs have been challenged to deliver mental health services in the primary care setting. Over half of mental health services are provided in primary care, and one-quarter of all primary care patients have a mental disorder. Moreover, 20% of older adults have a mental or neurological disorder often not diagnosed. Nationally, it is estimated that 17% of older adults commit suicide, 15% have a mental condition, 11% have dementia, and 5% have a serious mental condition. There is a paucity of adequately prepared primary care providers trained in geropsychiatric treatment. A didactic course was developed to instruct FNP students in the skills needed to provide mental health treatment in primary care. We discuss mental illness in the context of culture to ensure that treatment is congruent with a patient’s unique cultural background and experiences. This shapes the patients’ beliefs and behaviors that influence the way they view their condition and what they perceive as acceptable solutions. We then go into detail about the common mental conditions that older adults exhibit. Through the case study method, students learn to identify the presenting problem, protocols for analyzing the case, which includes making differential diagnoses and a treatment plan including initial medications, non-medical treatments, and referral. Students are introduced to the DMS-5 to learn the criteria for mental health diagnosis with an emphasis on suicide, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorders, substance use disorders, and neurocognitive disorders. We have found that students most often misdiagnose neurocognitive disorders.

scholarly journals The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on the Intra-Articular Microenvironment in Knee Osteoarthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 5492
Author(s):  
Dawid Szwedowski ◽  
Joanna Szczepanek ◽  
Łukasz Paczesny ◽  
Jan Zabrzyński ◽  
Maciej Gagat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Metabolic Functions ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Positive Effect

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) represents a clinical challenge due to poor potential for spontaneous healing of cartilage lesions. Several treatment options are available for KOA, including oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, braces, activity modification, and finally operative treatment. Intra-articular (IA) injections are usually used when the non-operative treatment is not effective, and when the surgery is not yet indicated. More and more studies suggesting that IA injections are as or even more efficient and safe than NSAIDs. Recently, research to improve intra-articular homeostasis has focused on biologic adjuncts, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The catabolic and inflammatory intra-articular processes that exists in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) may be influenced by the administration of PRP and its derivatives. PRP can induce a regenerative response and lead to the improvement of metabolic functions of damaged structures. However, the positive effect on chondrogenesis and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) is still highly controversial. Recommendations from in vitro and animal research often lead to different clinical outcomes because it is difficult to translate non-clinical study outcomes and methodology recommendations to human clinical treatment protocols. In recent years, significant progress has been made in understanding the mechanism of PRP action. In this review, we will discuss mechanisms related to inflammation and chondrogenesis in cartilage repair and regenerative processes after PRP administration in in vitro and animal studies. Furthermore, we review clinical trials of PRP efficiency in changing the OA biomarkers in knee joint.

Cancer survivorship algorithms as clinical tools for primary care providers.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 100-100
Author(s):  
Guadalupe R. Palos ◽  
Katherine Ramsey Gilmore ◽  
Paula A. Lewis-Patterson ◽  
Maria Alma Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Coordinated Care ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
The Impact

100 Background: Clinical decision tools (CDTs) such as survivorship algorithms may be valuable resources for primary care providers who provide post-treatment care for cancer survivors. Our objective was to assess providers’ perceptions, adoption, and satisfaction with clinical practice algorithms tailored to site-specific cancer survivorship clinics. Methods: Eligible providers were those assigned to one of 9 site-specific survivorship clinics, (breast, colorectal, genitourinary, gynecology, head and neck, lymphoma, melanoma, stem cell transplant, and thyroid). Potential respondents were invited to participate by emails. Voluntary return of the survey indicated a provider’s informed consent. Providers had the choice to participate by clicking on a link embedded in an email. Once the link was activated, the user was taken to a 10-item survey with questions asking about the usability, awareness, and satisfaction with the algorithms specific to their clinic. Descriptive statistics (i.e. frequencies and percentages) were used to summarize the responses. Results: Of 35 providers assigned in the survivorship clinics, 18 responded resulting in a 51% response rate. The majority of respondents (94.4%) were aware of the survivorship algorithms specific to their clinic. Over 75% reported using the algorithms occasionally (16.7%), frequently (33%) and always (33.3%). The major barrier to using the algorithms was a lack of awareness on to access the algorithms. Over half of the providers (55.6%) preferred using the digital versions of the algorithms. 68% strongly agreed the algorithms were practical to use and implement in their clinical setting. The majority of providers’ reported being satisfied (62.5%) or very satisfied (25.0%) with the algorithms tailored to their site specific clinic. Conclusions: Survivorship practice algorithms were perceived as useful clinical resources to deliver coordinated care to cancer survivors with diverse cancer diagnoses. Future work is needed to determine the impact of the algorithms on providers’ practice with cancer survivors.

Creation of an APN-led cancer survivorship clinic in a community cancer center.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 61-61
Author(s):  
Pamela Jane Vetter
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Survivorship Care Plan ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Plans

61 Background: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) report From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition, noted cancer patients often lacked the ability to successfully navigate the transition from patient to survivor (2006). To assist patients with understanding their disease and follow up, managing side effects and connecting with resources, the IOM recommends a survivorship care plan (SCP). The Commission on Cancer (CoC) is requiring accredited cancer programs provide SCPs to curative patients while giving them full discretion on structuring these programs. Methods: After researching survivorship components, a consultative model serving the adult cancer patients curatively treated at my facility was chosen. My goals included increasing patient satisfaction and connection to resources, fulfilling accreditation requirements, as well as financial benefits. I secured champions and procured budgetary approval. An assessment tool was created, a SCP program chosen, and a schedule created with IT. I gathered resources, reviewed side effect management, chose evaluation metrics and created educational materials and a tracking system. Results: 235 patients were seen in the first year of the clinic. Through nine months of 2017, 67.9% of eligible patients were provided with a SCP. Downstream revenue included patients changing to an Aspirus Primary Care Provider and referrals to various providers. Patients were connected to community and facility resources. Side effect assistance given; multiple medical issues addressed; additional Advanced Care Plans completed. Patients and Primary Care Providers are complimentary of the service. Conclusions: Successful start to survivorship clinic; will meet CoC accreditation. Many eligible patients who did not receive a SCP were seen at an unaffiliated Urology clinic. Moving forward, plan to work with their clinic to provide SCPs. Other challenges included time spent tracking patients, which should ease with a newly implemented electronic medical record.

Staging the development and implementation of a Coordinated Cancer Care Model using risk-based survivorship care: A deliberative discussion among multiple stakeholders.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18027-e18027
Author(s):  
Dominique Tremblay ◽  
Karine Bilodeau ◽  
Catherine Prady ◽  
Nassera Touati
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Cancer Risk Assessment ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Institute Of Medicine ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Deliberative Discussion

e18027 Background: Risk-based survivorship care has become one of the best practices care recommended by the Institute of Medicine. It involves coordinated follow-up services based on the risk of long-term and late effects, cancer recurrence and an individualised care plan. Risk-based care requires specific knowledge about cancer histology, treatments, and potential consequences of cancer and its treatment to guide surveillance, screening and counseling. Diagnostic and treatment details and their associated health risks may not be known by survivors or their multiple care providers. Implementing risk-based survivorship care is often challenging for providers. This presentation report on a deliberative workshop on the development and planning of a risk-based survivorship care model. Methods: The deliberative workshop is part of a larger study in two regional cancer networks in Quebec, selected for there differences (geographic location, population size, academic mandate). A total of 25 key informants (researchers, managers, family physicians, oncologists, cancer survivors, nurses, social workers) participated into the workshop on October 2nd, 2018. Deliberative discussion between local stakeholders followed by videoconference, getting together stakeholders from both networks was drawn from Gupta et al 3 steps: 1) identify the problem; 2) develop the innovation; 3) design the pilot test. Results: Although the context of the network was different, main issues were similar: 1) there is no common understanding of the concept “risk-based survivorship care”, either for survivors, primary care providers and cancer specialist; 2) “silo functioning” within and between teams is a main barriers to ensure care coordination based on risk assessment; 3) organizational assets should be formalized to insure safe coordination of survivorship care based on cancer risk assessment. Conclusions: Given the recognized importance of risk-based survivorship care and implementation challenges, deliberative discussions may provide a useful lens to inform translation of this model into real practices and guide empirical studies.

A MODEL TO FACILITATE OUTCOME ASSESSMENT OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 253-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seema S. Sonnad ◽  
Cheryl A. Moyer ◽  
Shushma Patel ◽  
Joseph I. Helman ◽  
Susan L. Garetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Initial Cost ◽  
Limited Effectiveness ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea is a common disorder with significant morbidity and effects on quality of life. Management can include a range of mechanical, behavioral, and surgical approaches. This paper aims to devise a model of management options to assist in initial cost-effectiveness investigations.Methods: In the absence of practice pattern data and widely accepted guidelines, we reviewed published literature and devised a model of treatment options to facilitate initial studies of outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness.Results: Obstructive sleep apnea is rarely addressed by conservative behavioral-based strategies because these options, while inexpensive, have only limited effectiveness. Effective treatment most often relies on nasal continuous positive airway pressure, but poor tolerance or compliance sometimes leads to treatment with oral appliances or surgery. Patients treated by one modality may try another if the initial strategy is ineffective. Laboratory evidence that sleep apnea is effectively treated, and long-term follow-up, are necessary regardless of the treatment modality chosen.Conclusions: Each patient's treatment plan must be individually tailored, but the management model proposed here reflects available evidence-based literature and the authors' impression of current practice patterns. This model should be useful for initial cost-effectiveness investigations.

scholarly journals Multidisciplinary Management of Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre M. Gholam ◽  
Renuka Iyer ◽  
Matthew S. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Optimal Sequence ◽  
Medical Oncologists ◽  
The Many

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of new cancer diagnoses in the United States, with an incidence that is expected to rise. The etiology of HCC is varied and can lead to differences between patients in terms of presentation and natural history. Subsequently, physicians treating these patients need to consider a variety of disease and patient characteristics when they select from the many different treatment options that are available for these patients. At the same time, the treatment landscape for patients with HCC, particularly those with unresectable HCC, has been rapidly evolving as new, evidence-based options become available. The treatment plan for patients with HCC can include surgery, transplant, ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, radiation therapy, and/or systemic therapies. Implementing these different modalities, where the optimal sequence and/or combination has not been defined, requires coordination between physicians with different specialties, including interventional radiologists, hepatologists, and surgical and medical oncologists. As such, the implementation of a multidisciplinary team is necessary to develop a comprehensive care plan for patients, especially those with unresectable HCC.

Determinants of survivorship care plan implementation in U.S. cancer programs.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 78-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Birken ◽  
Deborah Mayer ◽  
Bryan Weiner ◽  
Allison Mary Deal
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Survivorship Care Plan ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Program Type ◽  
Adoption And Implementation

78 Background: The Institute of Medicine recommended and many professional societies require survivorship care plan (SCP) use to facilitate cancer survivors’ transition from treatment to follow-up care. Rates of SCP adoption (plans to use SCPs) and implementation (current use) in US cancer programs remain unclear. Our objectives were to (1) assess rates of SCP adoption and implementation and (2) determine what distinguishes cancer programs that have implemented SCPs from those that have not moved beyond adoption. Methods: We surveyed employees knowledgeable about SCP adoption and implementation in a nationally representative sample of 100 US cancer programs. Data were analyzed using descriptive and bivariate statistics. Results: The response rate was 80%. Ninety-six percent of programs adopted SCPs, but only 45% implemented SCPs. Among programs that implemented, SCP use remains inconsistent: Use is restricted primarily to breast (81.58%) and colorectal (55.26%) cancer survivors; in 58.33% of these programs, less than a quarter of providers has ever used SCPs; and SCPs are seldom delivered to survivors or their primary care providers. Employees in many programs indicated that SCPs were adopted because of the belief that SCPs would improve care quality and the release of professional society guidelines; however, neither of these factors influenced SCP implementation. Few quality markers (e.g., NCI-designated program type; Commission on Cancer membership) influenced SCP implementation. Determinants of SCP implementation included teaching hospital program type (p = .04) and NCCCP membership (p = .009). Freestanding facility type had a negative relationship with SCP implementation (p = .02). Conclusions: Given inconclusive evidence of SCPs’ effectiveness in improving care coordination and patient outcomes, many scholars have recently advocated for research to promote SCPs’ effectiveness. These efforts may be in vain if SCPs are not more routinely implemented. Efforts should be targeted at enabling programs to implement quality improvement tools. Future research should determine what promotes SCP implementation among teaching hospitals and NCCCP members, and what inhibits freestanding facilities from implementing SCPs.

Oncology team perception and patient experience discordances in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) care.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19176-e19176
Author(s):  
Sara A. Hurvitz ◽  
Rebecca R Crawford ◽  
Tamar Sapir ◽  
Jeffrey D. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered Care ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Actual Patient ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Centered Care

e19176 Background: In TNBC, ensuring patients understand their treatment options and engaging them in shared decision-making (SDM) is vital to patient centered care; however, system-, team-, and individual-level barriers may challenge optimal SDM. As part of a quality improvement, accredited initiative, we identified areas of discordance between oncology healthcare professionals (HCP) perception and actual patient reported experiences. Methods: From 02/2019 – 10/2019, we administered surveys to assess challenges, barriers, attitudes, and experiences of HCP who care for patients with TNBC (N = 77) and their patients with TNBC (N = 65) at 6 community oncology practices. Results: Despite indications of high levels of SDM – 86% of patients indicated that they are always or mostly involved with treatment decisions – survey responses highlight discordances. For example, when asked to identify the most influential factors to patient treatment choice, HCP most commonly indicated side effects (94%), while patients most commonly indicated quality of life (48%). Additionally, when asked to identify the side effect of greatest concern to patients, 61% of patients indicated alopecia, while 45% of HCP indicated gastrointestinal (GI) distress. While both HCP and their patients indicate that the oncology team is the most useful source of patient education, HCP underestimated the extent to which patients rely on their primary care providers (PCPs). Patients and HCP each identified limited time as a barrier to SDM, but patients indicated not knowing what to ask, while HCP indicated that low health literacy was the top barrier to SDM. 31% of patients and their care team identified that improvements in discussions about realistic prognosis were vital to improved care. Conclusions: These survey findings reveal discordances between oncology HCP’s perceptions and patient reported experiences when receiving treatment for TNBC. These findings may highlight areas for improvement in co-productive patient-centered care. [Table: see text]

Stress Urinary Incontinence Assessment and Conservative Treatments

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidhartha Kalra ◽  
Benjamin M Brucker
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Assessment And Treatment

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a prevailing condition affecting women’s physical, psychological, and social well-being. SUI is the most common type of urinary incontinence, with an estimated prevalence of 8 to 33%. Despite increased awareness, it is still commonly underreported. Identifying the problem and developing an individualized assessment and treatment plan are essential for achieving the best outcome and quality of life for these women. Numerous tools exist that may aid clinicians in making an appropriate diagnosis and then selecting the optimal treatment, including behavioral, medical, and surgical approaches. Although a plethora of treatment options exist for SUI, conservative management is considered an effective first-line option for most patients. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current understanding of SUI in women and to outline the evaluations and conservative management options with the best available scientific evidence. This review contains 3 highly rendered figures, 2 tables, and 57 references Key words: Stress Urinary Incontinence, Conservative management, Pelvic Floor Exercises, Pessary, Vaginal inserts, medical treatment

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document