scholarly journals THE CHRONO-GEOMETRICAL STRUCTURE OF SPECIAL AND GENERAL RELATIVITY: A RE-VISITATION OF CANONICAL GEOMETRODYNAMICS

2007 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 79-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
LUCA LUSANNA
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Special Relativity ◽  
Geometrical Structure ◽  
Clock Synchronization ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Relativistic Limit ◽  
Inertial Frames

A modern re-visitation of the consequences of the lack of an intrinsic notion of instantaneous 3-space in relativistic theories leads to a reformulation of their kinematical basis emphasizing the role of non-inertial frames centered on an arbitrary accelerated observer. In special relativity the exigence of predictability implies the adoption of the 3 + 1 point of view, which leads to a well posed initial value problem for field equations in a framework where the change of the convention of synchronization of distant clocks is realized by means of a gauge transformation. This point of view is also at the heart of the canonical approach to metric and tetrad gravity in globally hyperbolic asymptotically flat space-times, where the use of Shanmugadhasan canonical transformations allows the separation of the physical degrees of freedom of the gravitational field (the tidal effects) from the arbitrary gauge variables. Since a global vision of the equivalence principle implies that only global non-inertial frames can exist in general relativity, the gauge variables are naturally interpreted as generalized relativistic inertial effects, which have to be fixed to get a deterministic evolution in a given non-inertial frame. As a consequence, in each Einstein's space-time in this class the whole chrono-geometrical structure, including also the clock synchronization convention, is dynamically determined and a new approach to the Hole Argument leads to the conclusion that "gravitational field" and "space-time" are two faces of the same entity. This view allows to get a classical scenario for the unification of the four interactions in a scheme suited to the description of the solar system or our galaxy with a deparametrization to special relativity and the subsequent possibility to take the non-relativistic limit.

scholarly journals An Alternative to the Alcubierre Theory: Warp Fields by the Gravitation via Accelerated Particles Assertion

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Edward A. Walker
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Equilibrium Point ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Particle Accelerators ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Published Paper ◽  
Accelerated Particles ◽  
Gravitational Equilibrium

<p class="1Body">A summarization of the Alcubierre metric is given in comparison to a new metric that has been formulated based on the theoretical assertion of a recently published paper entitled “gravitational space-time curve generation via accelerated particles”. The new metric mathematically describes a warp field where particle accelerators can theoretically generate gravitational space-time curves that compress or contract a volume of space-time toward a hypothetical vehicle traveling at a sub-light velocity contingent upon the amount of voltage generated. Einstein’s field equations are derived based on the new metric to show its compatibility to general relativity. The “time slowing” effects of relativistic gravitational time dilation inherent to the gravitational field generated by the particle accelerators is mathematically shown to be counteracted by a gravitational equilibrium point between an arrangement of two equal magnitude particle accelerators. The gravitational equilibrium point produces a volume of flat or linear space-time to which the hypothetical vehicle can traverse the region of contracted space-time without experiencing time slippage. The theoretical warp field possessing these attributes is referred to as the two gravity source warp field which is mathematically described by the new metric.</p>

DESITTER GAUGE THEORY OF GRAVITATION

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. ZET ◽  
V. MANTA ◽  
S. BABETI
Keyword(s):  
Gauge Theory ◽  
Riemann Tensor ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Minkowski Space Time ◽  
Strength Tensor ◽  
Group A ◽  
Theory Of Gravitation ◽  
Tensor Formula

A deSitter gauge theory of gravitation over a spherical symmetric Minkowski space–time is developed. The "passive" point of view is adapted, i.e., the space–time coordinates are not affected by group transformations; only the fields change under the action of the symmetry group. A particular ansatz for the gauge fields is chosen and the components of the strength tensor are computed. An analytical solution of Schwarzschild–deSitter type is obtained in the case of null torsion. It is concluded that the deSitter group can be considered as a "passive" gauge symmetry for gravitation. Because of their complexity, all the calculations, inclusive of the integration of the field equations, are performed using an analytical program conceived in GRTensorII for MapleV. The program allows one to compute (without using a metric) the strength tensor [Formula: see text], Riemann tensor [Formula: see text], Ricci tensor [Formula: see text], curvature scalar [Formula: see text], field equations, and the integration of these equations.

scholarly journals A MAXWELL-LIKE FORMULATION OF GRAVITATIONAL THEORY IN MINKOWSKI SPACE–TIME

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 1027-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDUARDO A. NOTTE-CUELLO ◽  
WALDYR A. RODRIGUES
Keyword(s):  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Minkowski Space ◽  
Gravitational Theory ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Lorentzian Geometry ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Yang Mills ◽  
Minkowski Space Time ◽  
Clifford Bundle ◽  
Gauge Fixing

Using the Clifford bundle formalism, a Lagrangian theory of the Yang–Mills type (with a gauge fixing term and an auto interacting term) for the gravitational field in Minkowski space–time is presented. It is shown how two simple hypotheses permit the interpretation of the formalism in terms of effective Lorentzian or teleparallel geometries. In the case of a Lorentzian geometry interpretation of the theory, the field equations are shown to be equivalent to Einstein's equations.

SPACE–TIME ENERGY–MOMENTUM, THE OBSERVER AND UNCERTAINTY IN GENERAL RELATIVITY

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 2353-2359 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. I. COOPERSTOCK ◽  
M. J. DUPRE
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Uncertainty Principle ◽  
Ricci Tensor ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Energy Integral ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Extended Space ◽  
Energy And Momentum

In this essay, we introduce a new approach to energy–momentum in general relativity. Space–time, as opposed to space, is recognized as the necessary arena for its examination, leading us to define new extended space–time energy and momentum constructs. From local and global considerations, we conclude that the Ricci tensor is the required element for a localized expression of energy–momentum to include the gravitational field. We present and rationalize a fully invariant extended expression for space–time energy, guided by Tolman's well-known energy integral for an arbitrary bounded stationary system. This raises fundamental issues which we discuss. The role of the observer emerges naturally and we are led to an extension of the uncertainty principle to general relativity, of particular relevance to ultra-strong gravity.

Psychological Space-time Reinforcement Sensitivity Hypothesis & Mental Disorders: From Special to General Relativity Interpretation

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 01-14
Author(s):  
Meriama Hansali Mebarki
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Special Relativity ◽  
Conscious Experience ◽  
Space Time ◽  
The Self ◽  
Psychological Space ◽  
The Past ◽  
Reinforcement Sensitivity ◽  
Spatio Temporal

The reinforcement sensitivity theory lacks basic sources of any human experience :time, place, and learning contexts that have shaped the reinforcement; therefore I have assumed a missing link in Gray's framework based on special relativity relying on the «what, where, and when of happenning»? as major resources of human conscious experience, which under punishment or reward exceed the sensitivity to pleasant or unpleasant stimuli transcending therefore the Weber law, that's why I called it: Psychological Space-Time Reinforcement Sensitivity “PSTRS” axis. The lasts explains BAS and BIS systems sensitivity to reinforcement across the cognitive space-time continuum of episodic memory, and not only across the two great dimensions of fear/anxiety and defensive distance of the McNaughton & Corr model of 2004. So, based on the disruption of the high-sensitivity information processing system in the brain, the four-dimensional conscious experience is distorted by its underlying sources and context. Thus, one of the timedominating records prevents the individual from overcoming the present., such in depression, obsessive compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (psychological sensitivity to the past). These temporal records clearly lose their sequence and associative nature in dissociative symptoms due to the disruption of the most important milestone on which Einstein's physics was based. Consequently, psychological space-time reinforcement sensitivity supposes that psychological disorders can be interpreted according to the laws of special relativity (acceleration / deceleration), but this seems more complicated when it comes to mental disorders where the self is disturbed on its spatio-temporal axis as observed in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia looks like a three-componements disorder characterized by a disruption of the experience of time, place and self, which could be asummed up as a “self space-time disturbance". Notably schizophrenic patients appear losing the ability to gather in a dynamic way these componements, as if the world seemed missig the gestalt characteristic or fragmented. The past felt like an inevitable destiny inhibits the direction towards the future; sometimes disorient the self to the point of feeling lost, as if the psychological time slows down to the point of feeling separated from the « now » the physical time. So are we dealing with an Euclidian space? The article attempts to provide a non-traditional interpretation of mental disorders by including general relativity in psychological studies, based on the neurobiological bases involved in the spatio-temporal processing of the conscious experience in the quantum brain.

Related to Relativity

2019 ◽  
pp. 265-284
Author(s):  
Steven J. Osterlind
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
General Relativity ◽  
Special Relativity ◽  
Golden Age ◽  
Albert Einstein ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Scientific Exploration ◽  
Richard Burton ◽  
Time Continuum

This chapter provides the context for the early twentieth-century events contributing to quantification. It was the golden age of scientific exploration, with explorers like David Livingstone, Sir Richard Burton, and Sir Ernest Shackleton, and intellectual pursuits, such as Hilbert’s set of unsolved problems in mathematics. However, most of the chapter is devoted to discussing the last major influencer of quantification: Albert Einstein. His life and accomplishments, including his theory of relativity, make up the final milestone on our road to quantification. The chapter describes his time in Bern, especially in 1905, when he published several famous papers, most particularly his law of special relativity, and later, in 1915, when he expanded it to his theory of general relativity. The chapter also provides a layperson’s description of the space–time continuum. Women of major scientific accomplishments are mentioned, including Madame Currie and the mathematician Maryam Mirzakhani.

scholarly journals Gravitational Redshifts and the Mass-Radius Relation

1989 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 401-407
Author(s):  
Gary Wegner
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Solar System ◽  
White Dwarf ◽  
Sufficient Accuracy ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
Principle Of Equivalence ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Tests Of General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field Equations

The gravitational redshift is one of Einstein’s three original tests of General Relativity and derives from time’s slowing near a massive body. For velocities well below c, this is represented with sufficient accuracy by:As detailed by Will (1981), Schiff’s conjecture argues that the gravitational redshift actually tests the principle of equivalence rather than the gravitational field equations. For low redshifts, solar system tests give highest accuracy. LoPresto & Pierce (1986) have shown that the redshift at the Sun’s limb is good to about ±3%. Rocket experiments produce an accuracy of ±0.02% (Vessot et al. 1980), while for 40 Eri B the best white dwarf, the observed and predicted VRS agree to only about ±_5% (Wegner 1980).

scholarly journals On the methods of extending Dirac's equation of the electron to general relativity

1942 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-50
Author(s):  
D Martin
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Covariant Derivative ◽  
Riemannian Geometry ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Dirac Equations ◽  
Usual Form ◽  
Galilean System ◽  
Second Category ◽  
Working Out

1. Introduction. The problem of extending Dirac's equation of the electron to general relativity has been attacked by many authors, by methods which fall roughly into either of two classes according as the formulation does or does not require the introduction of a local Galilean system of coordinates at each point of space-time. As examples of the former class we mention the methods of Fock (1929) and of Cartan (1938), and as representing the latter class the method described by Ruse (1937). Also, Whittaker (1937) discovered a vector whose vanishing is completely equivalent to the Dirac equations, but this method, unlike the others in the second category, does not apply the Riemannian technique to spinors but only to vectors and tensors derived from these. Now Cartan has denied the possibility of fitting a spinor into Riemannian Geometry if his point of view of spinors is adhered to, and this he argues accounts for the “choquant” properties with which they have been endowed by the geometricians in order to enable them to write down an expression of the usual form for the covariant derivative of a spinor. Consequently, doubt has been cast on the compatibility of the various methods, so in this paper an attempt is made to clarify the matter by working out explicitly the case of the general metric by some of the more important of these methods.

INFLUENCE OF EARTH’S GRAVITY ON (g−2) MEASUREMENTS

1988 ◽  
Vol 03 (13) ◽  
pp. 1227-1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. WIDOM ◽  
C.C. CHEN
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Magnetic Moment ◽  
Anomalous Magnetic Moment ◽  
Space Time ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Background Space

Experimental probes of the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, which are sufficiently sensitive to probe electro-weak unification contributions to (g−2), are also sufficiently sensitive to test an interesting feature of general relativity. The gravitational field of the earth produces a background space-time metric which will influence (g−2) measurements.

A generalized field theory - I. Field equations

1977 ◽  
Vol 356 (1687) ◽  
pp. 471-481 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Field Theory ◽  
General Relativity ◽  
Geometrical Structure ◽  
Natural Generalization ◽  
Theory Of Relativity ◽  
Field Equations ◽  
Physical Elements

A field theory representing a natural generalization of the theory of relativity is being constructed by using a tetrad-space. A unique set of field equations exactly equal in number (16) to the unknowns used, and having the same strength as those of general relativity, is obtained. All physical elements of interest are related directly to the members of the geometrical structure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document