scholarly journals An Audit of Management of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Major Tertiary Healthcare Service

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Krystle Y. Chong ◽  
Yee K. Mak ◽  
Beverley Vollenhoven ◽  
Ben W. Mol
Keyword(s):  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Local Hospital ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Tertiary Healthcare ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancies

Background: Ectopic pregnancy remains the most common cause of early pregnancy mortality, with management options differing according to clinical presentation and investigations. This audit aims to investigate the indications for medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy at a tertiary hospital network, in order to assess variances in practice and adherence to local hospital protocols. Methods: A retrospective audit of the management of women with a diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was performed over 12 months from July 2018 to June 2019, at three hospitals in the largest healthcare network in Victoria, Australia. Information collected included patient demographics, risk factors for ectopic pregnancy, pathology and radiology results, documented indication for surgery, and any complications of treatment. A subgroup analysis of data was done to investigate changes and deficiency in management of ectopic pregnancy compared to local hospital protocol. Results: Over a 12-month period, 138 women were diagnosed with an ectopic pregnancy, of which 99 (72%) received surgical management and 39 (28%) received medical management. Four women within the medical group were excluded from analysis, one due to loss of follow-up and three patients who were diagnosed with nontubal ectopic pregnancies. About 94% (33/35) of women who received methotrexate were within hospital guidelines for medical management and 91% (32/35) were successfully managed without surgery. All women who received surgical management underwent a salpingectomy and 97% (96/99) had clear indications documented for surgery within local protocol. Conclusion: Overall, the majority of women with ectopic pregnancy were treated according to local guidelines. Expectant management and the option of salpingostomy as a surgical alternative could be considered in the local guidelines. The dissemination of this clinical audit data is aimed at continuing clinical governance and improvements in outcomes.

scholarly journals Non-surgical management of unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 3041
Author(s):  
Anjali Choudhary ◽  
Priyanka Chaudhari ◽  
Neeta Bansal
Keyword(s):  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Beta Hcg ◽  
Surgical Options ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancies

Background: Ectopic pregnancy is still the leading cause of pregnancy related morbidity in the first trimester. Since majority of the women who present with ectopic pregnancies are sub fertile and young, there is a role for non-surgical options of managing these pregnancies. Expectant and medical management not only serves to conserve the fallopian tubes but also saves women from surgical trauma and morbidity. The objective of this retrospective study was to share our experience of treating un-ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancies conservatively.Methods: Women diagnosed with un-ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy, fit for conservative /medical management were included. Women with serum beta HCG levels less than 1000 mIU/L were treated expectantly and women with Bet HCG levels >1000 but <10,000 mIU /L were given Injectable methotrixate. Response to treatment was monitored by serial beta HCG levels.Results: Total 37 women included in the study.12% women showed complete resolution with expectant treatment alone and 88% resolved after a single dose methotrixate.Conclusions: Many women with un-ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancies would benefit from expectant management, or methotrixate therapy. Methotrixate used in carefully selected women is safe and effective in resolving these cases with good post treatment reproductive outcome.

scholarly journals Impact of SARS-Cov-2 on ectopic pregnancies management in the United Kingdom: a multicentre paired observational study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Platts ◽  
Jeewantha Ranawakagedon ◽  
Reeba Oliver ◽  
Sayantana Das ◽  
Phalguni Kotabagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Length Of Treatment ◽  
Hospital Visits ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Pregnancy Registry

Objective: to describe the impact of COVID-19 on the management of patients with ectopic pregnancy. Design: a multicentre study comparing outcomes from a prospective cohort during the pandemic [Covid-ectopic pregnancy registry (CEPR)] compared to an historical pre-pandemic cohort [non-Covid ectopic pregnancy registry (NCEPR)]. Setting: five London university hospitals. Population and Methods: consecutive patients diagnosed clinically and/or radiologically with ectopic pregnancy (March/2020-Aug/2020) were entered into the CEPR and an exploratory matched analysis was performed comparing results to NCEPR patients (January/2019-June/2019). Main outcome measures: patient demographics, management (expectant, medical and surgical), length of treatment, number of hospital visits (non-surgical management), length of stay (surgical management) and 30-day complications. Results: 341 patients met inclusion: 162 CEPR and 179 NCEPR. A significantly higher percentage of women underwent non-surgical management versus surgical management in the CEPR versus NCEPR (58.6% [95/162] vs 72.6% [130/179]; p= 0.0084]. Amongst patients managed with expectant management the CEPR had a significantly lower mean number of hospital visits compared to NCEPR [3.6 [SD 1.4] vs 13.7 [SD 13.4], p= 0.0053]. Amongst patients managed with medical management, the CEPR had a significantly lower mean number of hospital visits [NCEPR 6.4 [SD 2.3] vs 8.8 [SD 3.9], p= 0.0014]. There was no observed difference in complication rates between cohorts. Conclusion: women were found to undergo significantly higher rates of non-surgical management during COVID-19 first wave vs NCEPR cohort. Women managed non-surgically in CPER cohort were also managed with fewer hospital attendances. This did not lead to an increase in observed complications rates.

scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy safety morbidity and complications of conservative and surgical management of ectopic pregnancies in government TD medical college, Alappuzha, Kerala, India

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1473
Author(s):  
Laila C. Markose ◽  
Sathiamma P. K.
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Vaginal Bleeding ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Uterine Cavity ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Medical College

Background: Ectopic pregnancy is pregnancy with implantation of fertilized ovum outside the uterine cavity most commonly in the fallopian tube. Objective of the study was to compare the efficacy, safety, morbidity and complications of conservative and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy.Methods: This is a descriptive study at Government Medical College Alappuzha, Kerala, India to analyze safety morbidity efficacy and complications of conservative medical and surgical management of cases of ectopic pregnancy admitted over a period of one year from May 2011 to April 2012. The study group comprised of 81patients with early pregnancy complaining of abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, amenorrhoea and no intra uterine gestationsonologically. After confirming diagnosis management options included conservative, surgical or medical management with methotrexate as per selection criteria. Maternal morbidity in terms of hospital stay, blood transfusion, side effects of drugs were compared in both groups.Results: Accurate diagnoses of cases were done. Presenting complaints of the study subjects where vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain and amenorrhoea, which was in variably present in all subjects. Laparotomy done in 71.6% case, methotrexate given for 27.2% cases, laparoscopy for 1.2% all without significant morbidity. Two cases of failed medical management had laparotomy in view of tubal rupture.Blood transfusion given for18.4% case.Conclusions: Hospital stay was more in medically managed group. Sticking on to proper selection criteria both methods are safe and effective without any complications or failure.

scholarly journals Non-surgical management of ectopic pregnancy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2686
Author(s):  
Vineeta Gupta ◽  
Shweta Nimonkar ◽  
Priyanka Chaudhari ◽  
Namrata Saxena ◽  
Parul Singh
Keyword(s):  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Uterine Cavity ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Clinical Profile ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Future Fertility ◽  
Β Hcg

Background: Ectopic pregnancy is a condition when a fertilized ovum is implanted outside the uterine cavity. It is one of the important causes of maternal mortality and morbidity in India. Treatment includes expectant management, medical management and surgical management. Expectant and medical management are the treatment of choice for hemodynamically stable patients who do not want surgical treatment and are desirous of future fertility. The aim of study was to analyse the clinical profile, regimen of medical method used and outcome of non-surgical management in patients with ectopic pregnancy.Methods: It was a retrospective observational distributive study conducted at Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences from January 2015 to December 2019. There were total 182 diagnosed cases of ectopic pregnancy during this duration. Out of them, 87 patients were given non-surgical management. Data was obtained from their medical records to analyse the clinical profile, outcome of expectant and medical management and efficacy of regimen used.Results: Total 87 patient out of 182 diagnosed cases of ectopic pregnancy were studied. Out of these, 57 (65.5%) patients were in the age group of 20 to 30 years, 44 (50.6%) patients were third gravidas and 32 (36.8%) patients did not have any live issue. Thirty three (37.93%) patients had haemoglobin less than 10 gm%, 41 (47.13%) patients had one or more previous caesarean sections and 73 (83.91%) patients had tubal ectopic pregnancy. Overall success rate with non-surgical management was 94.25%.Conclusions: Our study emphasised the role of expectant and medical management in stable patients of ectopic pregnancy and recommends to use methotrexate as therapy even when initial serum β HCG levels are more than 5000 IU and haemoglobin level less than 10 gm% under close monitoring.

scholarly journals Surgical intervention in ectopic pregnancies

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fouzia Rasool Memon ◽  
Mini Poothavelil ◽  
Samreen Memon
Keyword(s):  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Presenting Symptoms ◽  
Beta Hcg ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancies ◽  
Study Setting

Objectives: To find out the negative laparoscopy rate for suspected ectopic pregnancy. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Electronic medical record databases in North Cumbria University Hospital, Carlisle, United Kingdom. Period: August 2014 to August 2018. Material and Methods: The data of total 150 laparoscopies performed for ectopic pregnancy management was collected for gestational age at presentation, symptoms, serial beta human chorionic gonadotrophic hormone (HCG) levels, ultrasound findings, time interval for diagnosis, time to surgery and histology. Results: One hundred and fifty patients (52 under 5 weeks and 98 over 5 weeks’ gestation) were incorporated into this study. The primary presenting symptoms were pain and vaginal bleeding. Suboptimal rise in serial beta HCG (performed 48 hours apart) was seen in 69 patients (46%) while other 81 patients (54%) had confirmed ectopic on USS and were offered surgical management after the scan. One hundred forty for women (96%) went for surgical management and one patient had conservative management as she was asymptomatic with low HCG(less than 1000IU) at the first visit and rapid drop in serial BHG results. Fifty three women (35%) had surgery on the same day when they had ectopic pregnancies seen on USS, 63 (42%) went to theatre for surgery between 0-6 days, while 34 patients (23%) had surgery between 7-14 days of USS. All women were operated through laparoscopic route and tubal ectopic pregnancies were confirmed at laparoscopy. There was no negative laparoscopy in our study period. Conclusion: Judicious and timely surgical intervention made it possible to treat every case through laparoscopic route with zero negative laparoscopy rate.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Clues and Management of ectopic Pregnancy in Sir Salimullah Medical College and Mitford Hospital, Dhaka

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
Nazia Islam
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Abdominal Pregnancy ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancies ◽  
Condition Diagnosis

Background: Ectopic pregnancy is a common clinical condition. Diagnosis and managementof this condition is necessary in due to day practice. Methods: A cross sectional study on ectopic pregnancy was conducted in Sir SalimullahMedical College and Mitford Hospital (SSMC & MH) , Dhaka, with the objective to analyzethe risk factors and assess the results of management with respect to maternal morbidityand mortality of ectopic pregnancy during the last two years. Result: Fifty patients were admitted with ectopic pregnancy from 1st January 2008 to 31stDecember 2010.Frequency of ectopic pregnancy were 1.5% of total 3252 pregnancies. Riskfactors were found in 45% of cases. Surgical treatment were performed in total 43 patients.There was one heterotrophic pregnancy and one case of abdominal pregnancy. Four patientswere given intramuscular Methotrexate and two un-ruptured ectopics resolved spontaneouslyafter by expectant management. Conclusion: Conservative management was an option but surgical treatment was donemore often because of late referrals. Screening of high risk cases, early diagnosis and earlyintervention would reduce the morbidity in ectopic pregnancies. Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2018; Vol. 33(1) : 49-53

scholarly journals Ectopic pregnancy at the Gambian Tertiary hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 295-303
Author(s):  
Matthew Anyanwu ◽  
Grace Titilope
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Clinical Feature ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Significant Burden ◽  
Incidence Risk ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancies ◽  
The Tropics

Background/Aims: Ectopic pregnancy is a gynaecological emergency with significant burden of maternal mortality and morbidity in the tropics. The incidence reported in the literature range from 1:60 to 1:250 pregnancies. The aim was to determine incidence and risk factors of ectopic pregnancy in the Gambia. Methodology: A longitudinal study of ectopic pregnancy at Gambian tertiary hospital from January 2016 to April 2018. Data was collected from patients’ folders, entered into SPSS version 20 and analysed with de- scriptive statistics. The test of variation and significance was by ANOVA and Chi-square respectively with error margin set at 0.05 and confidence interval of 95%. Results: A total number of 2562 pregnancies were recorded, 43 were ectopic pregnancies. The estimated incidence was 0.2%. Majority of the patients were between 26 – 35 years (56%), primiparous (32%), heterogeneous marriage (82%) and housewives (86%). Occupation was not associated with ruptured or unruptured ectopic pregnancy (p-0.421). Low parity was associated with more ectopic pregnancy than high parity (p-0.001). The commonest clinical feature was abdominal pain (65.1%), whilst the most prominent risk factors were pelvic inflamma- tory disease (27.9%) and previous abortion (23.3%). Ectopic pregnancy was seasonal. Conclusion: The incidence rate of 0.2% was in the range reported in the literature. Low parity, previous abortion and pelvic inflammatory disease were the risk factors. Keywords: Ectopic; pregnancy; incidence; risk factors.

scholarly journals Management of tubal ectopic pregnancy with methotrexate in the setting of symptomatic Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-281
Author(s):  
N.M. Millan ◽  
J Morano ◽  
L Florez ◽  
J Carugno ◽  
C.A. Medina
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Patient Management ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancies

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents a complex therapeutic challenge. As the pandemic progresses, patients are presenting with ectopic pregnancies (EPs) and symptomatic COVID-19. Objective: We present the management of a patient with multiple medical comorbidities and tubal EP in the setting of severe symptomatic COVID-19 infection where all management options were precluded. Methods: Case report with literature review of management of tubal EP in the setting of severe symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Result: After careful consideration of options, the patient underwent successful medical management with methotrexate while receiving supportive care for COVID-19. Conclusions: Methotrexate proved to be the safest therapeutic option in this patient. Management of patients with severe COVID-19 and gynaecologic emergencies should be individualised and carefully reviewed with evolving knowledge of COVID-19.

scholarly journals Clinical presentation of tubal ectopic pregnancy

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1148
Author(s):  
Kavitha Garikapati ◽  
M. Parvathi Devi ◽  
N. Alekya Goud
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Uterine Cavity ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Child Bearing ◽  
Incidence Risk ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancies

Background: When the fertilized ovum gets implanted at site other than normal position of uterine cavity, it is known as ectopic pregnancy. Incidence of ectopic pregnancy is 1-2% of all reported pregnancies. It is an unmitigated disaster of human production and the most important cause of morbidity and mortality in first trimester with major cause of reduced child bearing potential. It is notorious in its clinical presentation, challenging the attending physician.Methods: women with risk factors, signs and symptoms and with confirmed diagnosis. Women discharged against medical advice. Study population is 50. Retrospective analysis for 3 years (2016-2019). Objectives of this study were to study the incidence, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis and changing trends of modern management. Results analysed after entering the information in the excel sheets using descriptive analysisResults: Out of 4940 deliveries, 50 were tubal ectopic pregnancies 1.012%. Women aged 20-25 years were 52%. In our study, multiparous were 68%. Common symptoms were abdominal pain 80.2%, amenorrhea 72%, urine gravindex test positive 92.8%. Etiology was PID 20%, previous ectopic pregnancy 4%, IUCD 4%, LSCS with tubectomy 16%, most common site is ampulla 82%. About 78% were ruptured. Tubal abortions 4%, salpingectomy done in 82%. Laparotomy in 2.43% in hemodynamically unstable. Medical management 8%. Salpingostomy in 4% and expectant management 2%. Morbidity in the form of blood transfusion 23.48%, DIC with ICU admission 2%. No mortality.Conclusions: A high index of clinical suspicion with underlying risk factors may get us early diagnosis for timely intervention.

scholarly journals Unexpected rupture of an expectantly managed tubal ectopic pregnancy: a reminder for enhanced diligence

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. e230876
Author(s):  
Amenda Ann Davis ◽  
Kusum Lata ◽  
Akshita Panwar ◽  
Alka Kriplani
Keyword(s):  
Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Chorionic Gonadotropin ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Original Diagnosis ◽  
Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy ◽  
Β Hcg ◽  
Ectopic Pregnancies ◽  
Asymptomatic Women ◽  
Low Serum

Expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancies is a feasible and possibly preferable method of management in asymptomatic women with low serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). This involves serial monitoring of β-hCG until negative, after which it is deemed as spontaneously resolved ectopic pregnancy. We describe a case of tubal ectopic pregnancy which was expectantly managed with an initial β-hCG of 585 mIU/mL until undetectable. This patient presented with ruptured ectopic pregnancy 8 weeks after the original diagnosis, at the level of 5 mIU/mL. This highlights the importance of close monitoring in the expectant management of tubal ectopic pregnancies, with the incorporation of imaging, even when serial β-hCG shows a persistently reducing trend.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document