scholarly journals Retrospective Multivariate Analysis of Data from Children with Suspected Appendicitis: A New Tool for Diagnosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Zafer Dokumcu ◽  
Bade Toker Kurtmen ◽  
Emre Divarci ◽  
Petek Bayindir Tamay ◽  
Timur Kose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Radiological Data ◽  
Negative Appendectomy Rate ◽  
New Scoring

Background.Decision-making for management may sometimes be difficult in acute appendicitis (AA). Various diagnostic scoring systems exist, but their sensitivity and specificity rates are far from ideal. In this study, the determination of the predictors and the effect of radiological data and developing a new scoring system were aimed.Methods.Medical records of patients who were hospitalized for AA between February 2012 and October 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All data were compared between patients with and without appendicitis. The multivariate analysis was performed to define significant variables and to examine the sensitivity and specificity of each group of predictors including radiological data. A new scoring system (NSS) was formed and was compared with two existing scoring systems: pediatric appendicitis score (PAS) and Alvarado scoring system (ASS) by using reclassification method.Results.Negative appendectomy rate was 11.3%. Statistical analysis identified 21 independently significant variables. The heel drop test had the highest odds ratio. Sensitivity and specificity rates of clinical predictors were 84.6% and 94.8%, respectively. Radiological predictors increased the sensitivity rate to 86.9%. Sensitivity and specificity rates for PAS, ASS, and NSS were 86.8% and 83.9%, 84.7% and 81.6%, and 96.8% and 95.6%, respectively. The “re-assessed negative appendectomy rate” was 6.2% and false positive results were remarkably more common in patients with duration of symptoms less than 24 hours.Conclusion.Radiological data improves the accuracy of diagnosis. Containing detailed clinical and radiological data, NSS performs superiorly to PAS and ASS, regarding sensitivity and specificity without any age limitation. The efficiency of NSS may be enhanced by determining different predictors for different phases of the inflammatory process.

scholarly journals Retrospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Modified Alvarado Scoring System (MASS) in a Croatian Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Branko Bakula ◽  
Vanja Radišić Biljak ◽  
Mirko Bakula ◽  
Fran Rašić ◽  
Ana-Maria Šimundić
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
False Negative ◽  
False Negative Rate ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Average Mass ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Calculated Mass

<p><strong>Objective. </strong>Diagnosing acute appendicitis (AA) is challenging and this has stimulated surgeons to develop scoring systems that could potentially decrease the rate of misdiagnosis in patients with suspected appendicitis. One of the most widely used today is the Modified Alvarado scoring system (MASS), however its sensitivity and specificity varies a great deal between studies. As a result, we wanted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MASS retrospectively at our institution to achieve the highest possible value of sensitivity and decrease the number of false negative patients.</p><p><strong>Material and Methods. </strong>We retrospectively calculated MASS for all subsequent patients who had undergone an appendectomy at our institution between July 2015 and March 2017.</p><p><strong>Results. </strong>In 118 out of 146 operated patients, AA was confirmed intraoperatively. There was a statistically significant difference between the average MASS score in the positive and negative appendectomy groups (6 v. 4, respectively, P&lt;0.001), with a significantly higher number of females among the negative appendectomies (P&lt;0.001). When lowering the cut-off to a value as low as ≥3, the sensitivity of the MASS score increased to 97.45% (95% CI: 92.7 – 99.5), thus obtaining a very low false negative rate of merely 2.55%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion. </strong>This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study confirmed the higher average MASS score in the group of patients with confirmed AA diagnosis. A MASS score above the proposed low cut-off value (≥3) can be a useful tool to help surgeons ruling in patients with AA in order to reduce the risk of missing diagnosis.</p>

scholarly journals Comparison of the reliability of scoring systems in the light of histopathological results in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 323-327
Author(s):  
Zehra Unal Ozdemir ◽  
Hakan Ozdemir ◽  
Oguzhan Sunamak ◽  
Cebrail Akyuz ◽  
Mehmet Torun
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Histopathological Examination ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Receiver Operating Curve ◽  
General Surgeon ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
The Mean

Background:Acute appendicitis is a very common surgical emergency. Early and correct diagnosis and early intervention are necessary to prevent complications. It is often diagnosed on clinical signs and a certain ratio of negative appendectomy is acceptable. For early and accurate diagnosis, various scoring systems such as Alvarado, Ohmann, Eskelinen and more recently Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) have been developed.Objective:In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and accuracy of scoring systems.Materials and methods:The patients who attended emergency department and operated with acute appendicitis pre-diagnosis were evaluated retrospectively. Alvarado, Ohmann, Eskelinen, and RIPASA scores were calculated and compared with histopathologic results by reviewing the patient files.Results:A total of 76 patients (44 males and 32 females) were included in the study. The mean age was 33.8 ± 13.2 years. Of which, 59 patients (77.6%) were diagnosed to have acute appendicitis on histopathological examination. The mean leukocyte count was 13.9 ± 3.7 × 103μL. Sensitivity and specificity of Alvarado, Ohmann, Eskelinen, and RIPASA were 36%–82%; 58%–71%; 36%–8%, and 68%–71%, respectively. Cut-off values were 8, 14, 55.63, and 10, respectively. RIPASA had the highest accuracy. The cut-off value of leukocyte counts was 13,900 × 103/μL. Sensitivity and specificity were 64% and 88%, respectively; positive predictive value was 95%. In the receiver operating curve analysis, the area under the curve was found to be 74%.Conclusion:The RIPASA scoring system is a more reliable scoring system than Ohmann, Eskelinen, and Alvarado scoring systems. In cases of suspected acute appendicitis, it may be useful to evaluate patients with RIPASA score in emergency departments by general practitioners, where there is no general surgeon. Thus, patients can be guided in a timely manner to reduce the complications that may arise from delays. The cut-off value of 13,900 × 103/μL is an important marker for the presence of acute appendicitis.

scholarly journals The Bedel Score: Suggesting a New Scoring System to Avoid Negative Appendectomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 966-972
Author(s):  
Cihan Bedel ◽  
Mustafa Korkut ◽  
Fatih Selvi ◽  
Ökkes Zortuk
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Threshold Value ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Study Population ◽  
The Mean ◽  
New Scoring

Introduction: Scoring systems are still valuable and valid for differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). Bedel Score is a new diagnostic tool with 7 parameters that can be easily applied. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic performance of the Bedel score in AA and compare it with the Alvarado score. Methods: Our study consisted of 95 patients as a prospective cohort who were admitted to our emergency department due to abdominal pain and were hospitalized with a preliminary diagnosis of AA. Bedel and Alvarado scores were calculated. The patients were categorized into two groups (positive and negative appendectomy) according to their histopathological diagnosis. Results: The study population consisted of 65 (68.4%) male and 30 (31.6%) female patients. The mean age of the patients was 34 (18-87) years. 81 (85.3%) of the patients had histopathologically confirmed AA. Median Alvarado score was significantly higher in patients with positive AA than those with negative AA (7 (range: 3-10) vs. 5 (range 3-7), p<0.001, respectively). Median Bedel score of positive AA patients were also significantly higher than those with negative AA (9 (range: 6-10) vs. 5 (range 2-8) p<0.001, respectively) In separating acute appendicitis from negative exploration, the threshold of the Alvarado score is 63% sensitivity for ?7, 85.7% specificity; The Bedel score had 80.2% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity for the threshold value ?7. Conclusion: Bedel score is fast, simple, easy to learn and apply, as well as an effective and practical scoring system with only 7 parameters. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, Alvarado score, New score, Negative appendectomy

Surgical Case

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (SPL1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Hameed Al-Badri
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Delay ◽  
Small Population ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Time Cost ◽  
Voluntary Cough ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Sharp Pain ◽  
Clinical Syndromes ◽  
Negative Appendectomy Rate ◽  
Classical Symptom

Appendicitis is a common and urgentsurgical illness with protean manifestations,generous overlap with other clinical syndromes,and significant morbidity,whichincreases with diagnostic delay. No single sign,symptom,or diagnostic test accurately confirms the diagnosis ofappendiceal inflammation in all cases. The surgeon's goals are to evaluate a relatively small population of patients referred for suspected appendicitis and to minimize the negative appendectomy rate without increasing the incidence of perforation. The emergency department clinician must evaluate the larger group of patients who present to the ED with abdominal pain of all etiologies with the goal of approaching 100% sensitivity for the diagnosis in a time-,cost-,and consultation-efficient manner.IN 1886Reginald fitz, pathologist 1st described the clinical condition of A.A.Fewyears laterCharles mcBurney describe the clinical finding ofA.A.55% of patients presented with classical symptom of A.A so complication occurbecauseof atypical presentation which due to variation in app. Position, age of patient & degree of inflammation.Migrating pain 80% sensitive and specific Vomiting 50% Nausea60 -90 %Anorexia 75 % Diarrhea18 % 32 % has similar attach 90 % RLQ tenderness Marklesign 74 %Dunphy's sign (sharp pain in the RLQ elicited by a voluntary cough) may be helpful in making the clinical diagnosis of localized peritonitis. Similarly,RLQ pain in response to percussion of a remote quadrant of the abdomen,or to firm percussion of the patient's heel,suggests peritoneal Inflammation

scholarly journals Conditional CT Strategy—An Effective Tool to Reduce Negative Appendectomy Rate and the Overuse of the CT

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2456
Author(s):  
Raminta Luksaite-Lukste ◽  
Ruta Kliokyte ◽  
Arturas Samuilis ◽  
Eugenijus Jasiunas ◽  
Martynas Luksta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Transabdominal Ultrasound ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Negative Appendectomy Rate

(1) Background: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) remains challenging; either computed tomography (CT) is universally used or negative appendectomy rates of up to 30% are reported. Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) as the first-choice imaging modality might be useful in adult patients to reduce the need for CT scans while maintaining low negative appendectomy (NA) rates. The aim of this study was to report the results of the conditional CT strategy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. (2) Methods: All patients suspected of acute appendicitis were prospectively registered from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. Data on their clinical, radiological and surgical outcomes are presented. (3) Results: A total of 1855 patients were enrolled in our study: 1206 (65.0%) were women, 649 (35.0%) were men, and the median age was 34 years (IQR, 24.5–51). TUS was performed in 1851 (99.8%) patients, and CT in 463 (25.0%) patients. Appendices were not visualized on TUS in 1320 patients (71.3%). Furthermore, 172 (37.1%) of 463 CTs were diagnosed with AA, 42 (9.1%) CTs revealed alternative emergency diagnosis and 249 (53.8%) CTs were normal. Overall, 519 (28.0%) patients were diagnosed with AA: 464 appendectomies and 27 diagnostic laparoscopies were performed. The NA rate was 4.2%. The sensitivity and specificity for TUS and CT are as follows: 71.4% and 96.2%; 93.8% and 93.6%. (4) Conclusion: A conditional CT strategy is effective in reducing NA rates and avoids unnecessary CT in a large proportion of patients. Observation and repeated TUS might be useful in unclear cases.

scholarly journals New scoring system in assessment of Hoffa’s fat pad synovitis: A comparative study with established scoring systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 162-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeo Hagiwara ◽  
Albert Yang ◽  
Shoichiro Takao ◽  
Yasuhito Kaneko ◽  
Taiki Nozaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Fat Pad ◽  
Hoffa’S Fat Pad ◽  
New Scoring

Can Computed Tomography Scan be Performed Effectively in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis without the Added Morbidity of Rectal Contrast?

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 917-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel D. Dearing ◽  
Jamesa Recabaren ◽  
Magdi Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Ct Examination ◽  
Preoperative Ct ◽  
Negative Appendectomy Rate ◽  
Pathology Reports

The highest degrees of accuracy have been demonstrated for CT scans using rectal contrast in diagnosing appendicitis. However, the administration of rectal contrast is associated with patient discomfort and rarely, rectosigmoid perforation (0.04%). Additionally, the commonly accepted negative appendectomy rate is around 16 per cent. We performed a retrospective review of radiology, operative, and pathology reports of consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy or CT examination for appendicitis during 2006. CT scans were performed without rectal contrast. The accuracy of each type of inpatient CT examination and negative appendectomy rates were determined. Two hundred and thirty-eight patients underwent appendectomy. One hundred and thirty-four appendectomy patients (56%) received a preoperative CT scan. The negative appendectomy rates were 6.3 per cent overall, 8.7 per cent without CT examination and 4.5 per cent with CT (P = 0.3). Two hundred and forty-five inpatient CT scans were performed for suspected appendicitis with a sensitivity of 90 per cent, specificity of 98 per cent, accuracy of 94 per cent, positive predictive value of 98 per cent, and negative predictive value of 91 per cent. CT scanning without rectal contrast is effective for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis making rectal contrast, with its attendant morbidity, unnecessary. The previously acceptable published negative appendectomy rate is higher than that found in current surgical practice likely due to preoperative CT scanning.

scholarly journals Soluble CD163 Is a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Zhang ◽  
Chenkai Huang ◽  
Yuan Nie ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
Nanxi Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Scavenger Receptor ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Decompensated Cirrhosis ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Soluble Cd163 ◽  
End Stage ◽  
New Scoring

Background: Soluble CD163 (sCD163) is a scavenger receptor membrane protein expressed almost exclusively on Kupffer cells and other macrophages. It was found to be associated with the severity of liver cirrhosis. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the novel biomarker sCD163 predicts outcomes in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.Materials and Methods: A single-center, observational, prospective study with 345 decompensated cirrhosis patients was conducted in the Gastroenterology Department between January 2017 and December 2020. Their plasma samples were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for sCD163 within 24 hours of admission. These patients were followed up at 28 days, 3 months and 6 months. The independent risk factors were identified with uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses. We evaluated the predictive performance of the new scoring system (including sCD163) and the original scoring system.Results: The sCD163 level was significantly higher in non-surviving patients than in surviving patients. Positive associations were found between sCD163 levels and the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores. Logistic regression confirmed that sCD163 was an independent risk factor for 28-day, 3-month, and 6-month mortality. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of the use of sCD163 for the prediction of 28-day, 3-month, and 6-month mortality were relatively higher (AUROCs: 0.856; 0.823 and 0.811, respectively). The AUROCs of the new scores obtained by adding sCD163 to the original scoring systems (CTP + sCD163, MELD + sCD163 and ALBI + sCD163) showed that the new scoring systems had better predictive performance than the original scoring systems at all time points (P &lt; 0.001).Conclusion: sCD163 is a prognostic predictor of short-term and long-term outcomes in decompensated cirrhosis patients. Accordingly, the addition of sCD163 to the original clinical scoring systems improved their prognostic performance.

scholarly journals A study to find out correlation between clinical diagnosis and histopathological diagnosis in patients with acute appendicitis undergoing surgical treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 2046
Author(s):  
Mohit Jain ◽  
Yogesh Kumar Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Emergency Operation ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Diagnostic Modality ◽  
Negative Appendectomy Rate ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent abdominal emergencies and appendectomy subsequently the most common emergency operation performed all over the world. The aim of the study is to evaluate the reliability of Clinical Diagnosis for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and correlate it with the gold standard and absolute diagnostic modality, histopathology.Methods: This is a prospective study carried out in 150 patients who were admitted under department of surgery, AFMC Pune, Maharashtra from 1st July 2014 to 31st June 2016 for a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis.Results: In our study overall negative appendectomy rate was 18.7% (12.37% in male and 30.19% in female). Hence in the overall females had more negative appendectomy rate compared to males. In our series a score of >7 using Alvarado system had a total sensitivity of 72.95%. While sensitivity increases to 99.18% when score of >5 used as cut-off.Conclusions:Alvarado scoring system is beneficial in decreasing negative appendectomy rate and thus reduces complication rates. It is effective in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in both men and females but some other diagnostic modality may be necessary to ascertain the diagnosis in females along with the clinical scoring system to rule out other pelvic pathology and to reduce negative appendectomy rate in females. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document