scholarly journals Current and Future Perspectives of PD-1/PDL-1 Blockade in Cancer Immunotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Rangarirai Makuku ◽  
Neda Khalili ◽  
Sepideh Razi ◽  
Mahsa Keshavarz-Fathi ◽  
Nima Rezaei

Cancer immunotherapy, which reactivates weakened immune cells of cancer patients, has yielded great success in recent years. Among immunotherapeutic agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors have been of particular interest and have gained approval by the FDA for treatment of cancers. Immune checkpoint blockade through targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) has demonstrated promising antitumor effects in cancer immunotherapy of many different solid and hematologic malignancies. However, despite promising results, a favorable response is observed only in a fraction of patients, and there is still lack of a single therapy modality with curative ability. In this paper, we review the current and future perspectives of PD-1/L1 blockade in cancer immunotherapy, with a particular focus on predictive biomarkers of response to therapy. We also discuss the adverse events associated with PD-1/L1/2 inhibitors, ranging from severe life-threatening conditions such as autoimmune myocarditis to mild and moderate reactions such as skin rashes, and explore the potential strategies for improving the efficacy of immunotherapy with PD-1/L1 checkpoint inhibitors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shweta Joshi ◽  
Donald L. Durden

Cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade and adoptive CAR T-cell therapy, has clearly established itself as an important modality to treat melanoma and other malignancies. Despite the tremendous clinical success of immunotherapy over other cancer treatments, this approach has shown substantial benefit to only some of the patients while the rest of the patients have not responded due to immune evasion. In recent years, a combination of cancer immunotherapy together with existing anticancer treatments has gained significant attention and has been extensively investigated in preclinical or clinical studies. In this review, we discuss the therapeutic potential of novel regimens combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with therapeutic interventions that (1) increase tumor immunogenicity such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and epigenetic therapy; (2) reverse tumor immunosuppression such as TAMs, MDSCs, and Tregs targeted therapy; and (3) reduce tumor burden and increase the immune effector response with rationally designed dual or triple inhibitory chemotypes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianyu Tang ◽  
Xing Huang ◽  
Gang Zhang ◽  
Zhengtao Hong ◽  
Xueli Bai ◽  
...  

AbstractDespite great success in cancer immunotherapy, immune checkpoint-targeting drugs are not the most popular weapon in the armory of cancer therapy. Accumulating evidence suggests that the tumor immune microenvironment plays a critical role in anti-cancer immunity, which may result in immune checkpoint blockade therapy being ineffective, in addition to other novel immunotherapies in cancer patients. In the present review, we discuss the deficiencies of current cancer immunotherapies. More importantly, we highlight the critical role of tumor immune microenvironment regulators in tumor immune surveillance, immunological evasion, and the potential for their further translation into clinical practice. Based on their general targetability in clinical therapy, we believe that tumor immune microenvironment regulators are promising cancer immunotherapeutic targets. Targeting the tumor immune microenvironment, alone or in combination with immune checkpoint-targeting drugs, might benefit cancer patients in the future.


Author(s):  
Holger Bronger

AbstractIn the last decade immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) against the PD-1/PD-L1 system have revolutionised the treatment of numerous entities. To date, ovarian cancer has benefited very little from this success story. Possible causes include a rather low mutational burden compared to other tumour types, inadequate presentation of (neo-)antigens, and increased infiltration with immunosuppressive immune cells such as regulatory T cells and tumour-associated macrophages. In the clinical trials completed to date, the response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors have therefore been disappointingly low as well, although isolated long-term remissions have also been observed in ovarian cancer. The task now is to find suitable predictive biomarkers as well as to identify combination partners for ICB therapy that can increase the immunogenicity of ovarian cancer or overcome immunosuppressive resistance mechanisms. This paper provides an overview of the immune milieu in ovarian cancer, its impact on the effect of ICB, and summarises the clinical trial data available to date on ICB in ovarian cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zu Ye ◽  
Yin Shi ◽  
Susan P. Lees-Miller ◽  
John A. Tainer

The DNA damage response (DDR) is an organized network of multiple interwoven components evolved to repair damaged DNA and maintain genome fidelity. Conceptually the DDR includes damage sensors, transducer kinases, and effectors to maintain genomic stability and accurate transmission of genetic information. We have recently gained a substantially improved molecular and mechanistic understanding of how DDR components are interconnected to inflammatory and immune responses to stress. DDR shapes both innate and adaptive immune pathways: (i) in the context of innate immunity, DDR components mainly enhance cytosolic DNA sensing and its downstream STimulator of INterferon Genes (STING)-dependent signaling; (ii) in the context of adaptive immunity, the DDR is needed for the assembly and diversification of antigen receptor genes that is requisite for T and B lymphocyte development. Imbalances between DNA damage and repair impair tissue homeostasis and lead to replication and transcription stress, mutation accumulation, and even cell death. These impacts from DDR defects can then drive tumorigenesis, secretion of inflammatory cytokines, and aberrant immune responses. Yet, DDR deficiency or inhibition can also directly enhance innate immune responses. Furthermore, DDR defects plus the higher mutation load in tumor cells synergistically produce primarily tumor-specific neoantigens, which are powerfully targeted in cancer immunotherapy by employing immune checkpoint inhibitors to amplify immune responses. Thus, elucidating DDR-immune response interplay may provide critical connections for harnessing immunomodulatory effects plus targeted inhibition to improve efficacy of radiation and chemotherapies, of immune checkpoint blockade, and of combined therapeutic strategies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Lv ◽  
Xiaomei Chen ◽  
Shiying Fu ◽  
En Ren ◽  
Chao Liu ◽  
...  

Advances in the development of modern cancer immunotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors have dramatically changed the landscape of cancer treatment. However, most cancer patients are refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors...


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 176-176
Author(s):  
Annelies Laeremans ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Jeff Kim ◽  
Xiao-Jun Ma ◽  
Emily Park

176 Background: Interactions between tumor and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) play a key role in tumor progression and treatment response with accumulating evidence indicating a crucial role for tumor infiltrating immune cells. Although infiltrating cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) have been correlated with improved clinical outcome, they are ineffective in eradicating tumors due to their inhibition by immune checkpoint molecules. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated therapeutic efficacy and durable response for several tumor types including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the majority of patients are resistant or relapse after initial response. Characterizing the TME for checkpoint expression with single-cell and spatial resolution can provide critical insight into new immunotherapeutic strategies and identify new predictive biomarkers for stratifying and identifying patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapy including PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade. Methods: Using RNAscope in situ hybridization, we evaluated in situ co-expression profiles of therapeutic checkpoint targets at single-cell level in the TME of 56 archived NSCLC FFPE tissues. Results: Checkpoint molecules including PD1, PD-L1, PD-L2, TIM3, LAG3, CTLA-4 and GITR were visualized in a highly specific and sensitive manner in individual cells within tissue morphological context. Multiple checkpoint molecules were detected in the same immune environment, especially in highly inflamed tumors. In addition to PD-L1, tumor cell-intrinsic expression of PD1, TIM3, LAG3, and PD-L2 was observed in a subset of samples. Furthermore, co-expression of therapeutic checkpoint targets including PD1, LAG3, and TIM3 was observed in infiltrating immune cells and tumor cells. Conclusions: Single-cell co-expression profiles of checkpoint molecules could shed light on how cancer cells evade the host immune surveillance and develop resistance against checkpoint blockades. Also, they could reveal valuable insights into combinatorial therapies for checkpoint markers co-expressed by the patient’s immune cells in the TME.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1188
Author(s):  
I-Tsu Chyuan ◽  
Ching-Liang Chu ◽  
Ping-Ning Hsu

Immune checkpoints play critical roles in the regulation of T-cell effector function, and the effectiveness of their inhibitors in cancer therapy has been established. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) constitute a paradigm shift in cancer therapy in general and cancer immunotherapy in particular. Immunotherapy has been indicated to reinvigorate antitumor T-cell activity and dynamically modulate anticancer immune responses. However, despite the promising results in the use of immunotherapy in some cancers, numerous patients do not respond to ICIs without the existence of a clear predictive biomarker. Overall, immunotherapy involves a certain degree of uncertainty and complexity. Research on the exploration of cellular and molecular factors within the tumor microenvironment (TME) aims to identify possible mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance, as well as to develop novel combination strategies involving the specific targeting of the TME for cancer immunotherapy. The combination of this approach with other types of treatment, including immune checkpoint blockade therapy involving multiple agents, most of the responses and effects in cancer therapy could be significantly enhanced, but the appropriate combinations have yet to be established. Moreover, the in-depth exploration of complexity within the TME allows for the exploration of pathways of immune dysfunction. It may also aid in the identification of new therapeutic targets. This paper reviews recent advances in the improvement of therapeutic efficacy on the immune context of the TME and highlights its contribution to cancer immunotherapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14225-e14225
Author(s):  
Jessica Matta ◽  
Célia Matta ◽  
Emilie Thiebault Peter ◽  
David Moulaert ◽  
Robert Drillien ◽  
...  

e14225 Background: Activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors relies mainly on the presence of an immune response directed against neoantigens resulting from tumor specific mutations. The induction and/or amplification of such an immune response is expected to increase the activity of these therapies. We describe here a novel immunization platform developed for the purpose of personalized cancer immunotherapy. This platform integrates a DNA vector coding for neoantigens, a live modified vaccinia of strain Ankara (MVA) used as a physiologic adjuvant and anti-CTLA-4 as a locally acting early immune checkpoint blocker. Methods: Immune potency was assessed in C57BL6 mice injected subcutaneously three times five days apart with an ovalbumine (OVA) expressing DNA vector (100 µg), either alone or in combination with increasing doses of MVA (up to 2.5x107 plaque forming units, pfu) and increasing doses of anti-CTLA-4 (up to 100 µg). OVA specific immune responses were measured by ELISpot. Anti-tumor efficacy was then investigated with a similar administration scheme in a therapeutic B16F10 mice melanoma model with a DNA vector coding for the B16F10-M30 tumor neoantigen. Results: At an optimal dose of 2.5x106 pfu, MVA significantly improved OVA specific immune response up to 10 times higher as compared to vector alone. Addition of CTLA-4 blockade further increased the magnitude of response, up to 30 times higher than with vector alone. Both MVA and CTLA-4 demonstrated a bell-shaped dose dependent effect. In tumor-bearing animals, 80% experienced durable tumor-free survival when treated with the combination therapy as compared to less than 20% in untreated animals or animals treated with each component independently. Treatment appeared feasible and well-tolerated. Conclusions: Neoantigen coding DNA vector, MVA and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint blockade, when co-administered in immunocompetent C57BL6 mice, acted synergistically to induce a cellular immune response. The same approach translated into a strong anti-tumoral response in an aggressive melanoma model. This combined immunization platform appears as a potential novel way to enhance clinical benefit from current immune checkpoint inhibitors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document