Pre-Existing Antihypertensive Treatment Predicts Early Increase in Blood Pressure during Bevacizumab Therapy: The Prospective AVALUE Cohort Study

Background: Incident severe HTN during hospitalization is far more common than admission for HTN, however treatment guidelines are lacking. Severe inpatient HTN is poorly studied, therefore our goal is to characterize inpatients who develop severe HTN and assess BP response to antihypertensive treatment. Methods: This is a cohort study of adults admitted for reasons other than HTN and developed severe HTN within a single healthcare system. We defined severe inpatient HTN as the first documentation of BP elevation (>180 systolic or >110 diastolic) at least 1 hour after hospital admission. Treatment was defined as receiving antihypertensive medications within 6 hours of BP elevation. We studied the association between treatment and BP drop ≥30%. Results: Among 224,265 hospitalized adults, 23,147 developed severe HTN of which 40% were treated. Compared to inpatients who did not develop severe HTN, those who did were older, more commonly women and Black, and had more comorbidities. Of the treated and untreated patients, 45.5 and 46.4% had a MAP drop ≥30% (p-value= 0.2). Risk factors for severe MAP drop include older age, Black race, HTN, and diabetes. Additionally, treatment vs. no treatment and treatment with intravenous vs. oral medications were associated with greater odds of MAP drop ≥30% ( Table 1 ). Conclusion: While there was no difference in the proportion of treated and untreated patients with severe MAP reduction, after adjustment for factors independently associated with HTN we found that treatment was associated with severe BP drop. Further research is needed to phenotype inpatients with severe HTN to help establish treatment guidelines.

Download Full-text

Intensification of older adults’ outpatient blood pressure treatment at hospital discharge: national retrospective cohort study

BMJ ◽

10.1136/bmj.k3503 ◽

2018 ◽

pp. k3503 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Timothy S Anderson ◽

Charlie M Wray ◽

Bocheng Jing ◽

Kathy Fung ◽

Sarah Ngo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Blood Pressure ◽

Older Adults ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Antihypertensive Treatment ◽

Pressure Control ◽

Blood Pressure Treatment ◽

History Of ◽

Hospital To Home

AbstractObjectivesTo assess how often older adults admitted to hospital for common non-cardiac conditions were discharged with intensified antihypertensive treatment, and to identify markers of appropriateness for these intensifications.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingUS Veterans Administration Health System.ParticipantsPatients aged 65 years or over with hypertension admitted to hospital with non-cardiac conditions between 2011 and 2013.Main outcome measuresIntensification of antihypertensive treatment, defined as receiving a new or higher dose antihypertensive agent at discharge compared with drugs used before admission. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to control for characteristics of patients and hospitals.ResultsAmong 14 915 older adults (median age 76, interquartile range 69-84), 9636 (65%) had well controlled outpatient blood pressure before hospital admission. Overall, 2074 (14%) patients were discharged with intensified antihypertensive treatment, more than half of whom (1082) had well controlled blood pressure before admission. After adjustment for potential confounders, elevated inpatient blood pressure was strongly associated with being discharged on intensified antihypertensive regimens. Among patients with previously well controlled outpatient blood pressure, 8% (95% confidence interval 7% to 9%) of patients without elevated inpatient blood pressure, 24% (21% to 26%) of patients with moderately elevated inpatient blood pressure, and 40% (34% to 46%) of patients with severely elevated inpatient blood pressure were discharged with intensified antihypertensive regimens. No differences were seen in rates of intensification among patients least likely to benefit from tight blood pressure control (limited life expectancy, dementia, or metastatic malignancy), nor in those most likely to benefit (history of myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, or renal disease).ConclusionsOne in seven older adults admitted to hospital for common non-cardiac conditions were discharged with intensified antihypertensive treatment. More than half of intensifications occurred in patients with previously well controlled outpatient blood pressure. More attention is needed to reduce potentially harmful overtreatment of blood pressure as older adults transition from hospital to home.

Download Full-text

Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is common in primary care patients: Retrospective cohort study of 221,803 adults

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0248362 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (4) ◽

pp. e0248362

Author(s):

Finlay A. McAlister ◽

Brendan Cord Lethebe ◽

Alexander A. Leung ◽

Rajdeep S. Padwal ◽

Tyler Williamson

Keyword(s):

Blood Pressure ◽

Primary Care ◽

Cohort Study ◽

Standard Deviation ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Blood Pressure Variability ◽

Antihypertensive Treatment ◽

Treatment Regimens ◽

Primary Care Patients

Objective Although high visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (BPV) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events, the frequency of high BPV is unknown. We conducted this study to define the frequency of high BPV in primary care patients, clinical correlates, and association with antihypertensive therapies. Methods Retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record data (with previously validated case definitions based on billing codes, free text analysis of progress notes, and prescribing data) from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network of 221,803 adults with multiple clinic visits over a 2-year period. We a priori defined a standard deviation>13.0 mm Hg in visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) as “high BPV” based on prior literature. Results Overall, 85,455 (38.5%) patients had hypertension (mean 6.56 visits with SBP measurement, mean SBP 134.4 with Standard Deviation [SD] 11.3, 33.2% exhibited high BPV) and 136,348 did not (mean 3.96 visits with SBP measurement, mean SBP 120.9 with SD 8.2, 16.5% had high BPV). BPV increased with age regardless of whether individuals had hypertension or not; at all ages BPV varied across antihypertensive treatment regimens and was greater in those receiving renin angiotensin blockers or beta-blockers (p<0.001). High BPV was more frequent in patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dementia, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or Parkinson’s disease. Conclusions High visit-to-visit BPV is present in one sixth of non-hypertensive adults and one third of hypertensive individuals and is more common in those with comorbidities. The frequency of high BPV varies across antihypertensive treatment regimens.

Download Full-text