Abstract 16539: Heart Failure With Mid-Range or Improved Ejection Fraction Improves Cardiovascular Outcomes

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Cefalu ◽  
Jasneet Devgun ◽  
Samuel Kennedy ◽  
Jeremy Slivnick ◽  
Zachary Garrett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcomes ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Ohio State University

Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFiEF) is a unique and developing clinical entity among the heart failure (HF) spectrum. Prior studies suggest the characteristics, therapy, and prognosis of HFiEF are distinctive from HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF). We hypothesized that patients diagnosed with acute HF who later progressed to HFiEF would have improved cardiovascular outcomes compared to HFrEF. Our retrospective study included 295 adult patients with no prior history of HF at The Ohio State University diagnosed with acute HF. We defined HFrEF as a persistent ejection fraction < 40%, HFmrEF as persistent ejection fraction 40-49%, and HFiEF as improvement from baseline ejection fraction by > 5%. Nearly 74% of patients were found to have HFiEF while 12% and 14% were classified as HFrEF and HFmrEF respectively. Using a log-rank test, the time to first cardiovascular rehospitalization was significantly longer in HFiEF compared to HFrEF or HFmrEF (p=0.0192, Figure 1). Multivariable analysis, controlled for age and gender, indicated HFiEF had a trend towards significance as an independent predictor for time to cardiovascular hospitalization (p=0.053). Notably amyloid HF, valvular HF, and ischemic HF were all significant independent predictors. Survival analysis demonstrated that HFmrEF had significantly longer survival on log-rank test compared to HFrEF (p=0.0367). Multivariable analysis shows significantly lower hazard of mortality for those with HFmrEF (HR 0.57, 95% CI [0.36-0.92], p=0.017). Our exciting data indicates the progression to HFiEF after the diagnosis of acute HF is associated with reduced cardiovascular rehospitalization, and HFmrEF is associated with increased survival. These data have implications in patient surveillance and risk stratification as well as defining the natural history of HFiEF and HFmrEF as unique entities.

scholarly journals Prognostic role of myocardial work in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction treated by sacubitril/valsartan

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Galli ◽  
Y Bouali ◽  
A Gallard ◽  
A Hubert ◽  
C Leclercq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Echocardiographic Examination ◽  
Constructive Work

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background the non-invasive assessment of myocardial work (MW) by pressure-strain loops analysis (PSL) is a relative new tool for the evaluation of myocardial performance. Sacubitril/Valsartan is a treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) which has a spectacular effect on the reduction of cardiovascular events (MACEs). Purposes of this study were to evaluate 1) the short and medium term effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment on MW parameters; 2) the prognostic value of MW in this specific group of patients. Methods 79 patients with HFrEF (mean age: 66 ± 12 years; LV ejection fraction: 28 ± 9%) were prospectively included in the study and treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan. Echocardiographic examination was performed at baseline, and after 6- and 12-month of therapy with Sacubitril/Valsartan. Results Sacubitril/Valsartan significantly increased myocardial constructive work (CW) (1023 ± 449 vs 1424 ± 484 mmHg%, p &lt; 0.0001) and myocardial work efficiency (WE) [87 (78-90) vs 90 (86-95), p &lt; 0.0001]. During FU (2.6 ± 0.9 years), MACEs occurred in 13 (16%) patients. After correction for LV size, LVEF and WE, global myocardial constructive work (CW) was the only predictor of MACEs [HR 0.99 (0.99-1.00), p = 0.05]. (Table 1). A CW &lt; 910 mmHg (AUC = 0.81, p &lt; 0.0001, Figure 1, left panel) identified patients at particularly increase risk of MACEs [HR 11.09 (1.45-98.94), p = 0.002, log-rank test p &lt; 0.0001] (Figure 2, Right panel). Conclusions in patients with HFrEF who receive a comprehensive background beta-blocker and mineral-corticoid receptor antagonist therapy, Sacubitril/Valsartan induces a significant improvement of myocardial CW and WE. In this population, the estimation of CW before the initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan therapy allows the prediction of MACEs. Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value Age, per year 0.99 (0.95-1.04) 0.81 Ischemic cardiomyopathy 1.07 (0.36-3.21) 0.89 LVEDVi*, per ml/m2 1.01 (1.00-1.03) 0.03 LVESVi, per ml/m2 1.01 (1.00-1.03) 0.009 1.01 (0.99-1.02) 0.35 LVEF, per % 0.91 (0.85-0.98) 0.01 1.02 (0.93-1.12) 0.71 CW, per mmHg% 0.99 (0.99-1.00) 0.002 0.99 (0.99-1.00) 0.04 WE, per mmHg% 0.91 (0.86-0.96) 0.001 0.95 (0.88-1.02) 0.16 Predictors of MACEs at univariable and multivariable analysis Abstract Figure 1 A and B

Prognostic role of myocardial work in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction treated by sacubitril/valsartan

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Galli ◽  
Y Bouali ◽  
C Laurin ◽  
A Gallard ◽  
A Hubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Echocardiographic Examination ◽  
Constructive Work

Abstract Background The non-invasive assessment of myocardial work (MW) by pressure-strain loops analysis (PSL) is a relative new tool for the evaluation of myocardial performance. Sacubitril/Valsartan is a treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) which has a spectacular effect on the reduction of cardiovascular events (MACEs). Purposes of this study were to evaluate 1) the short and medium term effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan treatment on MW parameters; 2) the prognostic value of MW in this specific group of patients. Methods 79 patients with HFrEF (mean age: 66±12 years; LV ejection fraction: 28±9%) were prospectively included in the study and treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan. Echocardiographic examination was performed at baseline, and after 6- and 12-month of therapy with Sacubitril/Valsartan. Results Sacubitril/Valsartan significantly increased global myocardial constructive work (CW) (1023±449 vs 1424±484 mmHg%, p&lt;0.0001) and myocardial work efficiency (WE) [87 (78–90) vs 90 (86–95), p&lt;0.0001]. During FU (2.6±0.9 years), MACEs occurred in 13 (16%) patients. After correction for LV size, LVEF and WE, CW was the only predictor of MACEs (Table 1). A CW&lt;910 mmHg (AUC=0.81, p&lt;0.0001, Figure 1A) identified patients at particularly increase risk of MACEs [HR 11.09 (1.45–98.94), p=0.002, log-rank test p&lt;0.0001] (Figure 1 B). Conclusions In patients with HFrEF who receive a comprehensive background beta-blocker and mineral-corticoid receptor antagonist therapy, Sacubitril/Valsartan induces a significant improvement of myocardial CW and WE. In this population, the estimation of CW before the initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan therapy allows the prediction of MACEs. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia and heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita B Khaira ◽  
Ellen Brinza ◽  
Gagan D Singh ◽  
Ezra A Amsterdam ◽  
Stephen W Waldo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
History Of

The impact of heart failure (HF) on long-term survival in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) has not been well described. Outcomes stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) are also unknown. A single center retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent treatment for CLI from 2006 to 2013. Baseline demographics, procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. HF diagnosis was based on appropriate signs and symptoms as well as results of non-invasive testing. Among 381 CLI patients, 120 (31%) had a history of HF and 261 (69%) had no history of heart failure (no-HF). Within the HF group, 74 (62%) had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 46 (38%) had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The average EF for those with no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF were 59±13% vs 56±9% vs 30±9%, respectively. The likelihood of having concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) was lowest in the no-HF group (43%), higher in the HFpEF group (70%) and highest in the HFrEF group (83%) ( p=0.001). Five-year survival was on average twofold higher in the no-HF group (43%) compared to both the HFpEF (19%, p=0.001) and HFrEF groups (24%, p=0.001). Long-term survival rates did not differ between the two HF groups ( p=0.50). There was no difference in 5-year freedom from major amputation or freedom from major adverse limb events between the no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF groups, respectively. Overall, the combination of CLI and HF is associated with poor 5-year survival, independent of the degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Abstract 16083: Risk of Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction in Women With and Without History of Breast Cancer: The Pathways Heart Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamal S Rana ◽  
Heather Greenlee ◽  
Richard Cheng ◽  
Cecile A Laurent ◽  
Hanjie Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
White Women ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Introduction: Incidence of heart failure (HF), specifically with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), is rising in the general population, yet is understudied. To provide a population-based estimate of HF in breast cancer (BC) survivors, we compared risk of HF in women with and without BC history in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) integrated health system. Methods: Data were extracted from KPNC electronic health records. All invasive BC cases diagnosed from 2005-2013 were identified and matched 1:5 with non-BC controls on birth year, race/ethnicity, and KPNC membership at BC diagnosis. Cox regression models assessed the hazard of HF by EF status: HFpEF (EF ≥ 45%), HF with reduced EF (HFrEF; EF < 45%), and unknown EF. Women with prior history of HF were excluded. Models were adjusted for factors known to affect BC risk or CVD and for prevalent CVD at BC diagnosis. We also examined case subgroups who received cardiotoxic chemotherapy, left-sided radiation therapy, and/or endocrine therapy, versus their controls. Results: A total of 14,804 women diagnosed with invasive BC and with no history of HF were identified and matched to 74,034 women without BC history. Women were on average 61 years at BC diagnosis and 65% white. Women with HFpEF were older and more likely to have hypertension (p<0.05). Among all cases vs. controls, there was increased risk of HFrEF (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.18, 1.98) but not HFpEF or unknown EF (figure). Compared to their controls, women treated with chemotherapy were more than 3-times likely to develop HFrEF (HR: 3.26, 95% CI: 2.2, 4.8) and more than 1.5-times likely to develop HFpEF (HR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.24). Women who received left-sided radiation therapy had nearly double the risk of developing HFrEF (HR=1.85, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.84). No associations were found among women who received endocrine therapy. Conclusions: Increased surveillance is warranted for women with BC receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy for development of both HFrEF and HFpEF.

Impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on mortality in patients admitted for neutropenic fever in 2016.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6586-6586
Author(s):  
Suheil Albert Atallah-Yunes ◽  
Faris Haddadin ◽  
Anis Kadado ◽  
Syed S. Ali
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Neutropenic Fever ◽  
Multivariate Linear Regression ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Impact

6586 Background: Neutropenic fever (NF) remains one of the most common causes for hospitalization and mortality in oncology patients. Concomitant cardiovascular disease in patients with cancer is not uncommon. There is limited data on the impact of cardiovascular (CVS) comorbidities on mortality in cancer patients with NF. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using the 2016 National Inpatient Sample database (NIS) of adults ( > 18 years) admitted for NF based on the ICD-10 code. Mortality was the primary outcome. Multivariate linear regression adjusted for potential confounder of age, sex, race, Charlson comorbidity index and all the CVS comorbidities of the study including atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), hypertension (HTN), history of smoking, history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or TIA and dyslipidemia. STATA 15 was used for analysis. Results: We identified 31,310 patients (mean age 44.6) (49.6% females) admitted with NF, among which 250 died during same admission. On multivariate linear regression there was a significant increase in adjusted all-cause mortality in patients with AF (OR: 2.39; 95%-CI 1.06- 5.40, P = 0.035) and HFpEF (OR: 4.30; 95%-CI 1.08- 17.17, P = 0.039). There was no significant increase in mortality in patients with HFrEF, dyslipidemia, HTN, PVD, CAD, history of CVA/TIA and smoking. Conclusions: Patients with NF and concomitant history of AF or HFpEF have an increased risk of mortality during hospitalization. Inflammation is emerging as a key player in AF pathogenesis. This may explain why AF appears to correlate with mortality, as those with more severe presentations are more likely to have a heightened state of inflammation. Patients with NF are more likely to receive fluids in the setting of infectious complications which could explain the increased mortality in CHF patients with NF. Identifying risk factors for increased mortality in patients with NF is important for risk stratification and in guiding clinicians in the management of this delicate population. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Cushing Syndrome in the Setting of Chronic Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Can Treatment Improve Chronic Dilated Cardiomyopathy?

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A125-A126
Author(s):  
Leilani Pathak ◽  
Shikha Singh ◽  
Lina Soni ◽  
Ying Yin Zhou ◽  
Samara Skwiersky
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Dilated Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Cushing Syndrome ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Morning Cortisol ◽  
History Of ◽  
Suppression Test ◽  
Dexamethasone Suppression

Abstract Background: Cushing syndrome (CS) is well known to be associated with metabolic syndrome, venous thromboembolism, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and rarely dilated cardiomyopathy. The pathophysiological effects of hypercortisolism on the myocardium results in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, myofibrillolysis, myocardial fibrosis, global longitudinal and circumferential strain. Our patient presents an example of CS in the setting of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, multiple thromboembolic events, and diabetes mellitus in a young adult. Clinical Case: A 34-year male with a past medical history of dilated cardiomyopathy with biventricular failure and left ventricle ejection fraction of 10%, pulmonary embolism, diabetes mellitus, and gout presented with shortness of breath. On physical exam he presented with symptoms of CS: moon facies, supraclavicular fat pads, dorsal fat pads, purple striae of abdominal skin, truncal obesity, ecchymosis, and skin atrophy. Labs showed elevated morning cortisol after overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (cortisol 8.6 mcg/dl, n&lt; 5 mcg/dl), repeat morning cortisol after overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (cortisol 5.7 mcg/dl, n&lt; 5 mcg/dl), and ACTH-concentrations &lt;5 pg/ml. CT-scan was insignificant for adrenal hyperplasia. He was admitted and treated for acute congestive heart failure exacerbation with plans for definitive treatment of CS outpatient with further imaging studies. Conclusion: The occurrence of CS induced heart failure results in increased mortality. There have been numerous accounts of resolution of cardiomyopathy after surgical treatment for CS secondary to adrenal adenoma. Our patient had a 10-year history of chronic dilated cardiomyopathy prior to cushingoid symptoms and confirmatory endocrinological data. The definitive treatment for CS syndrome in our patient would eventually be surgery targeting the source of hypercortisolism, however his cardiovascular risk factors would make him a poor surgical candidate. Severely reduced ejection fraction is a contraindication for generalized anesthesia needed for surgery. When surgery is contraindicated in CS medical management is recommended according to guidelines that target pituitary-directed medical treatments for Cushing’s disease and targeted therapies to treat ectopic ACTH syndrome. To our knowledge there have been few studies that demonstrate the effects of CS treatment on chronic conditions such as dilated cardiomyopathy. Studies have shown that surgical treatment for CS have reversed cardiomyopathy caused by CS but it still remains to be answered whether this same effect is achieved to some degree in chronic dilated cardiomyopathy.

scholarly journals Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stage 3/4 CKD: A meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0261986
Author(s):  
Ning Li ◽  
Guowei Zhou ◽  
Yawei Zheng ◽  
Dan Lv ◽  
Xiangjun Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcomes ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitors ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Stage 4

Introduction After stage 3 CKD, the risk of adverse cardiovascular events increased significantly. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the cardiovascular protective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with stage 3/4 CKD with different baseline kidney function or underlying diseases. Method To identify eligible trials, we systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to April 15, 2021. The primary cardiovascular outcome was defined as a combination of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure. Baseline kidney functions (stage 3a CKD: eGFR45-59mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 3b CKD: eGFR30-44mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 4 CKD: eGFR<30mL/min per 1.73m2) and underlying diseases (Type 2 diabetes, heart failure (Preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) were used to stratify efficacy and safety outcomes. The results were subjected to a sensitivity analysis to ensure that they were reliable. Results In the present study, a total of eleven trials were included that involved a total of 27,823 patients with stage 3/4 CKD. The treatment and control groups contained 14,451 and 13,372 patients, respectively. In individuals with stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes by 26% (HR 0.74, [95% CI 0.69–0.80], I2 = 0.00%), by 30% in patients with stage 3a CKD (HR 0.70, [95% CI 0.59–0.84], I2 = 18.70%), by 23% in patients with stage 3b CKD (HR 0.77, [95% CI 0.66–0.90], I2 = 2.12%), and by 29% in patients with stage 4 CKD (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.53–0.96], I2 = 0.00%). The risk of primary outcomes was reduced by 29% (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.63–0.80], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with type 2 diabetes, by 28% (HR 0.72, [95% CI 0.56–0.93], I2 = 37.23%) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, by 21% (HR 0.79, [95% CI 0.70–0.89], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and by 25% (HR 0.75, [95% CI 0.64–0.88], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Conclusions For stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly decreased the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes, and these benefits were consistent throughout the spectrum of different kidney functions, even in stage 4 CKD. There was no evidence of increased adverse outcomes across different baseline clinical complications, such as type 2 diabetes, heart failure, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

scholarly journals Prognostic Nutritional Index as the Predictor of Long-Term Mortality among HFrEF Patients with ICD

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Cinier ◽  
MI Hayiroglu ◽  
L Pay ◽  
AC Yumurtas ◽  
O Tezen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Nutritional Index ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Nutritional Index ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The benefit of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) could be limited in a particular group of patients. Low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) indicates malnutrition and pro-inflammatory condition. We sought to investigate the value of PNI in predicting long-term mortality among HFrEF patients with ICD. Methods Electronic database was searched for identifying patients with HFrEF who were implanted ICD in our institution between 2009 and 2019. Demographic and clinical characteristics of included patients were recorded. PNI was calculated according to the formula: 10 x serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 x total lymphocyte count (per mm3). Patients were divided into the quartiles according to PNI values. Differences between the groups were analysed by the log-rank test. A forward Cox proportional regression model was used for multivariable analysis. Results One thousand and hundred patients were included to the study. The underlying heart failure etiology was ischemic and non-ischemic in 77.3% and 22.7% of patients respectively. Mortality rate in Q1 (5.1%) was considered as the reference. In the unadjusted model the mortality rate was 9.5% [hazard ratio (HR) 1.76, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) (0.92 – 3.38)] in Q2, 10.2% (HR 1.88, 95% CI 0.99 – 3.58) in Q3 and 39.6% (HR 8.12, 95% CI 4.65 – 14.17) in Q4. The same trend was consistent in the age- and sex-adjusted, comorbidities-adjusted and covariates-adjusted models. Conclusion Among patients who were implanted ICD secondary to HFrEF, lower PNI value predicted all-cause mortality during long-term follow up. This is the first study demonstrating the value of PNI in this population. Table 1Admission Prognostic Nutritional Index (n = 1100)Q1 (n = 275)Q2 (n = 275)Q3 (n = 275)Q4 (n = 275)Long-term mortalityNumber of deaths142628109Mortality, %5.19.510.239.6Mortality, HR (%95 CI)Model 1: unadjusted1[Reference]1.76 (0.92 - 3.38)1.88 (0.99 - 3.58)8.12 (4.65 - 14.17)Model 2: adjusted for age, sex1[Reference]1.70 (0.90 - 3.48)1.79 (0.94 - 3.42)7.76 (4.42 - 13.61)Model 3: adjusted for comorbiditesa1[Reference]1.85 (0.96 - 3.55)1.89 (0.99 - 3.60)9.02 (4.34 - 14.12)Model 4: adjusted for covariatesb1[Reference]1.66 (0.88 - 3.21)1.60 (0.80 - 3.05)6.45 (3.61 - 12.5)Cox proportional analysis and logistic regression models for the long-term mortality by the prognostic nutritional indexAbstract Figure 1

scholarly journals P974 Sacubitril/valsartan is well tolerated in patients with heart failure and a history of cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M K Frey ◽  
E Han ◽  
H Arfsten ◽  
N Pavo ◽  
M Huelsmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Functional Class ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Cancer

Abstract Introduction Sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to significantly reduce cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisations due to heart failure in patients with reduced ejection fraction when compared to enalapril. Until now, sacubitril/valsartan has not been evaluated in patients with a history of cancer, as these patients were excluded from the pivotal trial, PARADIGM-HF. The aim of the current study was to assess tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a history of cancer. Methods We retrospectively enrolled all patients at our heart failure out-patient unit who fulfilled the indication criteria to receive sacubitril/valsartan and had a history of cancer. Fifteen patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan had a diagnosis of histologically confirmed cancer: 26.7% breast cancer (n = 4), 13.3% osteosarcoma (n = 2), 13.3% colorectal cancer (n = 2), 13.3% renal cell carcinoma (n = 2), 6.7% non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 1), 6.7% lung cancer (n = 1), 6.7% prostate cancer (n = 1), 6.7% bladder carcinoma and 6.7% myeoloproliferative syndrome (n = 1). Surgery due to cancer was performed in 80% of patients (n = 12), 26.7% previously received chemotherapy (n = 6) and 40% radiation therapy (n = 4). Results Sacubitril/valsartan was withdrawn in 2 patients (13.3%) because of dizziness and pruritus respectively. After a mean follow-up of 13 ±8 months, NYHA functional class improved significantly (mean -0.5, p = 0.001), ejection fraction as assassed by echocardiography increased (mean +6.8%, p = 0.018) and NT-proBNP was significantly decreased (mean -1552pg/ml, p = 0.026). There was no significant change in creatinine levels (+0.046 mg/dl, p = 0.564 ). Conclusions In this pilot study we were able to show that sacubitril/valsartan is generally well tolerated in patients with a history of cancer. Patients with cardiotoxicity induced heart failure can be treated and uptitrated with sacubitril/valsartan to usual dosages similarly as in other causes of heart failure. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings in cancer patients with cardiotoxicity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document