scholarly journals Bridging global and local topology in whole-brain networks using the network statistic jackknife

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teague R. Henry ◽  
Kelly A. Duffy ◽  
Marc D. Rudolph ◽  
Mary Beth Nebel ◽  
Stewart H. Mostofsky ◽  
...  

Whole-brain network analysis is commonly used to investigate the topology of the brain using a variety of neuroimaging modalities. This approach is notable for its applicability to a large number of domains, such as understanding how brain network organization relates to cognition and behavior and examining disrupted brain network organization in disease. A benefit to this approach is the ability to summarize overall brain network organization with a single metric (e.g., global efficiency). However, important local differences in network structure might exist without any corresponding observable differences in global topology, making a whole-brain analysis strategy unlikely to detect relevant local findings. Conversely, using local network metrics can identify local differences, but are not directly informative of differences in global topology. Here, we propose the network statistic (NS) jackknife framework, a simulated lesioning method that combines the utility of global network analysis strategies with the ability to detect relevant local differences in network structure. We evaluate the NS jackknife framework with a simulation study and an empirical example comparing global efficiency in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and typically developing (TD) children. The NS jackknife framework has been implemented in a public, open-source R package, netjack, available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=netjack .

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teague R Henry ◽  
Kelly A. Duffy ◽  
Marc D. Rudolph ◽  
Mary Beth Nebel ◽  
Stewart H. Mostofsky ◽  
...  

Whole-brain network analysis is commonly used to investigate the topology of the brain in a variety of neuroimaging modalities. This approach is notable for its applicability to a large number of domains, such as understanding how brain network organization relates to cognition and behavior, examining disrupted brain network organization in disease, and assessing developmental trajectories across the lifespan. A benefit to this approach is the ability to summarize overall brain network organization with a single number (e.g., global efficiency). However, important local differences in network structure might exist without any corresponding observable differences in overall topology, making a whole-brain analysis strategy unlikely to detect relevant local findings. Here, we propose the network-based statistic (NBS) jackknife as a means of combining the utility of global network analysis strategies with the ability to detect relevant local differences in network structure. We describe the NBS jackknife framework, and demonstrate three specific testing scenarios in a series of examples. Finally, we provide an empirical example comparing global efficiency between children with ADHD and typically developing (TD) children. We demonstrate using functional connectivity data that there are no group differences in whole-brain global efficiency. Using the NBS jackknife, however, we identify group differences in global efficiency specific to the salience and subcortical subnetworks. The NBS jackknife framework has been implemented in a public, open source R package, netjack, available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=netjack.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suprateek Kundu ◽  
◽  
Joshua Lukemire ◽  
Yikai Wang ◽  
Ying Guo

AbstractThere is well-documented evidence of brain network differences between individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy controls (HC). To date, imaging studies investigating brain networks in these populations have typically been cross-sectional, and the reproducibility of such findings is somewhat unclear. In a novel study, we use the longitudinal ADNI data on the whole brain to jointly compute the brain network at baseline and one-year using a state of the art approach that pools information across both time points to yield distinct visit-specific networks for the AD and HC cohorts, resulting in more accurate inferences. We perform a multiscale comparison of the AD and HC networks in terms of global network metrics as well as at the more granular level of resting state networks defined under a whole brain parcellation. Our analysis illustrates a decrease in small-worldedness in the AD group at both the time points and also identifies more local network features and hub nodes that are disrupted due to the progression of AD. We also obtain high reproducibility of the HC network across visits. On the other hand, a separate estimation of the networks at each visit using standard graphical approaches reveals fewer meaningful differences and lower reproducibility.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolein Spronk ◽  
Kaustubh Kulkarni ◽  
Jie Lisa Ji ◽  
Brian P. Keane ◽  
Alan Anticevic ◽  
...  

AbstractA wide variety of mental disorders have been associated with resting-state functional network alterations, which are thought to contribute to the cognitive changes underlying mental illness. These observations have seemed to support various theories postulating large-scale disruptions of brain systems in mental illness. However, existing approaches isolate differences in network organization without putting those differences in broad, whole-brain perspective. Using a graph distance measure – connectome-wide correlation – we found that whole-brain resting-state functional network organization in humans is highly similar across a variety of mental diseases and healthy controls. This similarity was observed across autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and schizophrenia. Nonetheless, subtle differences in network graph distance were predictive of diagnosis, suggesting that while functional connectomes differ little across health and disease those differences are informative. Such small network alterations may reflect the fact that most psychiatric patients maintain overall cognitive abilities similar to those of healthy individuals (relative to, e.g., the most severe schizophrenia cases), such that whole-brain functional network organization is expected to differ only subtly even for mental diseases with devastating effects on everyday life. These results suggest a need to reevaluate neurocognitive theories of mental illness, with a role for subtle functional brain network changes in the production of an array of mental diseases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 562-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Kong ◽  
Christina J Herold ◽  
Eric F C Cheung ◽  
Raymond C K Chan ◽  
Johannes Schröder

Abstract Neurological soft signs (NSS) are often found in patients with schizophrenia. A wealth of neuroimaging studies have reported that NSS are related to disturbed cortical-subcortical-cerebellar circuitry in schizophrenia. However, the association between NSS and brain network abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia remains unclear. In this study, the graph theoretical approach was used to analyze brain network characteristics based on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. NSS were assessed using the Heidelberg scale. We found that there was no significant difference in global network properties between individuals with high and low levels of NSS. Regional network analysis showed that NSS were associated with betweenness centrality involving the inferior orbital frontal cortex, the middle temporal cortex, the hippocampus, the supramarginal cortex, the amygdala, and the cerebellum. Global network analysis also demonstrated that NSS were associated with the distribution of network hubs involving the superior medial frontal cortex, the superior and middle temporal cortices, the postcentral cortex, the amygdala, and the cerebellum. Our findings suggest that NSS are associated with alterations in topological attributes of brain networks corresponding to the cortical-subcortical-cerebellum circuit in patients with schizophrenia, which may provide a new perspective for elucidating the neural basis of NSS in schizophrenia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i464-i473
Author(s):  
Kapil Devkota ◽  
James M Murphy ◽  
Lenore J Cowen

Abstract Motivation One of the core problems in the analysis of biological networks is the link prediction problem. In particular, existing interactions networks are noisy and incomplete snapshots of the true network, with many true links missing because those interactions have not yet been experimentally observed. Methods to predict missing links have been more extensively studied for social than for biological networks; it was recently argued that there is some special structure in protein–protein interaction (PPI) network data that might mean that alternate methods may outperform the best methods for social networks. Based on a generalization of the diffusion state distance, we design a new embedding-based link prediction method called global and local integrated diffusion embedding (GLIDE). GLIDE is designed to effectively capture global network structure, combined with alternative network type-specific customized measures that capture local network structure. We test GLIDE on a collection of three recently curated human biological networks derived from the 2016 DREAM disease module identification challenge as well as a classical version of the yeast PPI network in rigorous cross validation experiments. Results We indeed find that different local network structure is dominant in different types of biological networks. We find that the simple local network measures are dominant in the highly connected network core between hub genes, but that GLIDE’s global embedding measure adds value in the rest of the network. For example, we make GLIDE-based link predictions from genes known to be involved in Crohn’s disease, to genes that are not known to have an association, and make some new predictions, finding support in other network data and the literature. Availability and implementation GLIDE can be downloaded at https://bitbucket.org/kap_devkota/glide. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billeci ◽  
Calderoni ◽  
Conti ◽  
Lagomarsini ◽  
Narzisi ◽  
...  

Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) is a group of neurodevelopmental disorders that is characterized by an altered brain connectivity organization. Autistic traits below the clinical threshold (i.e., the broad autism phenotype; BAP) are frequent among first-degree relatives of subjects with ASD; however, little is known regarding whether subthreshold behavioral manifestations of ASD mirror also at the neuroanatomical level in parents of ASD probands. To this aim, we applied advanced diffusion network analysis to MRI of 16 dyads consisting of a child with ASD and his father in order to investigate: (i) the correlation between structural network organization and autistic features in preschoolers with ASD (all males; age range 1.5–5.2 years); (ii) the correlation between structural network organization and BAP features in the fathers of individuals with ASD (fath-ASD). Local network measures significantly correlated with autism severity in ASD children and with BAP traits in fath-ASD, while no significant association emerged when considering the global measures of brain connectivity. Notably, an overlap of some brain regions that are crucial for social functioning (cingulum, superior temporal gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, frontal pole, and amygdala) in patients with ASD and fath-ASD was detected, suggesting an intergenerational transmission of these neural substrates. Overall, the results of this study may help in elucidating the neurostructural endophenotype of ASD, paving the way for bridging connections between underlying genetic and ASD symptomatology.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Cory Brunson ◽  
Thomas P. Agresta ◽  
Reinhard C. Laubenbacher

1Summary and KeywordsBackgroundComorbidity network analysis (CNA) is an increasingly popular approach in systems medicine, in which mathematical graphs encode epidemiological correlations (links) between diseases (nodes) inferred from their occurrence in an underlying patient population. A variety of methods have been used to infer properties of the constituent diseases or underlying populations from the network structure, but few have been validated or reproduced.ObjectivesTo test the robustness and sensitivity of several common CNA techniques to the source of population health data and the method of link determination.MethodsWe obtained six sources of aggregated disease co-occurrence data, coded using varied ontologies, most of which were provided by the authors of CNAs. We constructed families of comorbidity networks from these data sets, in which links were determined using a range of statistical thresholds and measures of association. We calculated degree distributions, single-value statistics, and centrality rankings for these networks and evaluated their sensitivity to the source of data and link determination parameters. From two open-access sources of patient-level data, we constructed comorbidity networks using several multivariate models in addition to comparable pairwise models and evaluated differences between correlation estimates and network structure.ResultsGlobal network statistics vary widely depending on the underlying population. Much of this variation is due to network density, which for our six data sets ranged over three orders of magnitude. The statistical threshold for link determination also had strong effects on global statistics, though at any fixed threshold the same patterns distinguished our six populations. The association measure used to quantify comorbid relations had smaller but discernible effects on global structure. Co-occurrence rates estimated using multivariate models were increasingly negative-shifted as models accounted for more effects. However, only associations between the most prevalent disorders were consistent from model to model. Centrality rankings were likewise similar when based on the same dataset using different constructions; but they were difficult to compare, and very different when comparable, between data sets, especially those using different ontologies. The most central disease codes were particular to the underlying populations and were often broad categories, injuries, or non-specific symptoms.ConclusionsCNAs can improve robustness and comparability by accounting for known limitations. In particular, we urge comorbidity network analysts (a) to include, where permissible, disaggregated disease occurrence data to allow more targeted reproduction and comparison of results; (b) to report differences in results obtained using different association measures, including both one of relative risk and one of correlation; (c) when identifying centrally located disorders, to carefully decide the most suitable ontology for this purpose; and, (d) when relevant to the interpretation of results, to compare them to those obtained using a multivariate model.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 547-561
Author(s):  
Marjolein Spronk ◽  
Brian P Keane ◽  
Takuya Ito ◽  
Kaustubh Kulkarni ◽  
Jie Lisa Ji ◽  
...  

Abstract A wide variety of mental disorders have been associated with resting-state functional network alterations, which are thought to contribute to the cognitive changes underlying mental illness. These observations appear to support theories postulating large-scale disruptions of brain systems in mental illness. However, existing approaches isolate differences in network organization without putting those differences in a broad, whole-brain perspective. Using a graph distance approach—connectome-wide similarity—we found that whole-brain resting-state functional network organization is highly similar across groups of individuals with and without a variety of mental diseases. This similarity was observed across autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and schizophrenia. Nonetheless, subtle differences in network graph distance were predictive of diagnosis, suggesting that while functional connectomes differ little across health and disease, those differences are informative. These results suggest a need to reevaluate neurocognitive theories of mental illness, with a role for subtle functional brain network changes in the production of an array of mental diseases. Such small network alterations suggest the possibility that small, well-targeted alterations to brain network organization may provide meaningful improvements for a variety of mental disorders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document