Jerzy Wróblewski’s Concept of Legal Interpretation in its Axiological and Epistemological Context

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 217-228
Author(s):  
Tomasz Bekrycht

The work of Jerzy Wróblewski has had a huge impact not only on the theory and philosophy of law, both in Poland and internationally, but also on the whole of ​​jurisprudence, especially the fields of doctrinal legal research and the practical application of the law (in particular on adjudication). The aim of this study is to present one of Wróblewski’s most influential concepts, namely the theoretical model of judicial interpretation, from the point of view of axiology and epistemology in the field of jurisprudence.

Author(s):  
Tyler Lohse

This essay comments on the nature of the language of the law and legal interpretation by exam- ining their effects on their recipients. Two forms of philosophy of law are examined, legal positiv- ism and teleological interpretive theory, which are then applied to their specific manifestations in literature and case law, both relating to antebellum slave law. In these cases, the slave sustains civil death under the law, permissible by means of these legal interpretive strategies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-200
Author(s):  
Sheila Fakhria

The school of law are determined by law and the period of time so that by jurists make legal interpretation based on the time and place. So at this time jurists are always reviewing the law that is based on the presence or emergence of various schools in the philosophy of law shows the struggle of ideas will not cease in the field of law. Similarly, the existence of Islamic law in a society that seeks to be grouped according typology of existing law schools in the philosophy of law.


Author(s):  
I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari

Research in connection with jurnal writing thesis takes the theme the protection of the law against companies factor in billing accounts receivable factoring transactions. Problems studied involves two things; the first what factors the company’s legal position as a buyer on receivables in factoring and financing institution both what form of legal protection that can be given to companies factor of a possible failure of the trade receivables collection. This includes research conducted legal research categories, namely normative legal research literature or legal research based on secondary data. The approach used is the approach ot the laws and facts approach. Next to for further analysis techniques use the description legal interpretation techniques based argumentative theory, principles, and concepts relevan laws. The results showed that the company,s legal position as a purchaser of  factoring receivables is very weak and vulnerable than risk the possibility of failure of collection of accounts receivable due to non fulfillment of the achievements by the customer. In this context there is no guarantee of  legal protection for the company for the payment or refund factor its receivables in full. The next from legal protection that can be given to the factor as a buyer of receivables is; a) apply the type of recourse factoring in the factoring agreement with the burden of responsibility is on the client in case of failure of collection of accounts receivable, b) implement a system of personal/corporate guarantees, and c) apply the prudential banking principles


Legal Theory ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-152
Author(s):  
Alex Silk

ABSTRACTIt is common to think that what theory of linguistic vagueness is correct has implications for debates in philosophy of law. I disagree. I argue that the implications of particular theories of vagueness on substantive issues of legal theory and practice are less far-reaching than often thought. I focus on four putative implications discussed in the literature concerning (i) the value of vagueness in the law, (ii) the possibility and value of legal indeterminacy, (iii) the possibility of the rule of law, and (iv) strong discretion. I conclude with some methodological remarks. Delineating questions about conventional meaning, legal content determination, and norms of legal interpretation and judicial practice can motivate clearer answers and a more refined understanding of the space of overall theories of vagueness, interpretation, and law.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-395
Author(s):  
Sebastián A. Reyes Molina

The topic of ‘judicial discretion’ has been at the center of the debate on legal interpretation in the philosophy of law.1 In a general sense, ‘discretion’ here refers to the exercise of a judgment by a decision-maker due to the lack of legal constraints affecting one’s ability to decide a case. The most fundamental question on this topic is ‘do judges have discretion when interpreting the law?’ There are three kinds of answers to this query. One kind of answer states that judges never have discretion.2 Another kind of answer states that judges always have discretion in interpretation.3 The third kind of answer states that judges sometimes have discretion when interpreting the law, and sometimes they do not.4


Author(s):  
Paweł Jabłoński ◽  
Przemysław Kaczmarek

The aim of this paper is to show the derivative concept of legal interpretation from the point of view of the structure of limits of the juridical power. This structure includes the politico-legal culture, the legal text, the juridical culture, and personal factors, such as ethical and aesthetic judgements. These days, the derivative concept is the most influential Polish theory of legal interpretation. According to this concept the process of interpreting the law is a kind of a game between the legal text and extratextual factors, which are treated as extratextual limits of juridical power. On the one hand, the legal text does not determine the full meaning of the law, although it has great importance for it. On the other hand, the derivative concept precisely identifies certain others factors that are relevant for the content of law.


LEGALITAS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Alex Subagyo Dan Irman Syahriar

Basically the damage to other people's belongings is very detrimental to the owner of the damaged goods only partially or completely so that the owner of the goods can no longer use his belongings, other than that the goods that have been damaged are valuable to the owner by damaging the goods very disturbing the peace of the owner of the goods . How is the application of the law to the crime of destruction of goods in a demonstration and how is the criminological point of view of the crime of destruction of goods in a demonstrationThis type of research used in this study is a type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results showed that the threat of punishment in article 170 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, regarding legal sanctions for perpetrators of violence against people or goods in public is threatened with imprisonment for five years and six months, whereas in Article 406 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code with the same result, namely violence against goods, the perpetrators were threatened with imprisonment for up to two years and eight months or a maximum fine of four Rp. 4,500 (four thousand and five hundred). Every human being has an interest, where interests are divided into three namely individual interests, group interests and general interests. Crime, violence and "mass vandalism" in Indonesia are products of social systems with various values that are not mutually harmonious, and are not always compatible, harmonious and balanced.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2525
Author(s):  
Vikran Fasyadhiyaksa Putra Y

AbstractPhishing is an act to commit fraud by tricking the target with the intention of stealing the target's account, by spreading broadcasts which are often carried out through fake emails with fake information that directs the target to a fake page to trap the target so that the perpetrator gets access to the victim's account. Phishing still has some obscurity, especially in the modus operandi of the perpetrator. Therefore, this research aims to analyze and explain the modus operandi of the criminal act of phishing according to the ITE Law. This research is a normative legal research. Because the writing of this research in seeking the truth in order to answer legal issues raised by the author uses secondary data to find legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines, and tends to image law as a perspective discipline, which means that only see the law from the point of view of the norms only, which of course is prescriptive. This approach uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach.Keywords: Phishing Crime; Cyber; Operandi Mode.AbstrakPhising adalah suatu perbuatan untuk melakukan penipuan dengan mengelabui target dengan maksud untuk mencuri akun target, dengan cara menyebarkan broadcast yang seringkali dilakukan melalui email palsu dengan muatan informasi palsu yang mengarahkan target ke halaman palsu untuk menjebak target sehingga pelaku mendapatkan akses terhadap akun korban, Secara ringkas Perbuatan phising masih memiliki beberapa kekaburan terutama pada modus operandi pelaku. Oleh karena itulah penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menjelaskan terkait modus operandi Tindak pidana Phising menurut UU ITE. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Karena penelitian ini dalam mencari kebenaran guna menjawab isu hukum yang diangkat penulis menggunakan data sekunder untuk menemukan suatu aturan-aturan hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, maupun doktrin-doktrin hukum, dan cenderung mencitrakan hukum sebagai disiplin prespektif, yang berarti hanya melihat hukum dari sudut pandang norma-normanya saja, yang tentunya bersifat preskriptif. Pendekatan ini menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Kata Kunci: Tindak Pidana Phising; Siber; Modus Operandi.


2021 ◽  
pp. 99-109
Author(s):  
A. E. Shevchenko ◽  
V. K. Antoshkina

The proposed paper outlines the main approaches to understanding of the scientific and legal doctrine and its constitutive features, as well as the influence on the law interpretation processes. The authors note that the scientific and legal doctrine not only defines the toolkit and approaches to the interpretation of legal texts, but forms the definitions, categories, conceptions, constructions which are used by legislators in creating regulations and by subjects of law which have to understand the true meaning of norms contained in such legal acts and implement in practice. The main provisions concerning the peculiarities of the doctrinal sources usage while judicial interpretation in different legal families are highlighted. The characteristic features of doctrinal interpretation, forms of its objectification and interconnection with judicial interpretation are determined. Particular attention is paid to the usage of doctrinal provisions in the legal interpretation by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and the Supreme Court. The main forms in which the results of doctrinal interpretation are used in judicial activity are outlined: the functioning of scientific advisory councils, whose members provide their opinions on complex legal issues; involvement of an expert in the field of law to the court proceedings in certain cases provided by the current legislation. It is noted that during the court hearing of the case while the formation of a legal position the possibility to refer to the opinion of authoritative Ukrainian legal scholars is not typical and acceptable for the domestic legal system. It is noted that many authoritative lawyers, scientists with academic degrees and titles, who are also engaged in scientific activity, have worked and still work as judges, especially of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. This practice is especially valuable because a judge is able to apply the results of his/her scientific work in interpreting the law in the process of judicial activity and at the same time to use his/her practical experience in scientific research. The authors of the paper cover issues related to the use of «judicial doctrines» and the solution of «exceptional legal issues», which are relatively new to domestic jurisprudence. The interconnection of these concepts with legal doctrine is determined. It is established that although the current legislation provides for certain ways of using doctrinal provisions and the results of doctrinal interpretation in law enforcement practice, but this process is not developed enough and needs further clarification. Keywords: scientific-legal doctrine, legal interpretation, doctrinal interpretation, judicial doctrines, exceptional legal problem.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
JAMES RIDWAN EFFERIN

ABSTRACTOn the 6th day of January 2020, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia has issued a Decree Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (“the Constitutional Court Decree”), which decides that regarding the phrase “has an equal enforceable power as the court decisions that have permanent legal force” on Article 15 Paragraph (2) of the Law number 42 year 1999 on Fiduciary (“the Law No. 42/1999”), is in contradiction with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and shall have no legal binding power if it is not considered to be “towards any fiduciary that have no consent on default and the debtor has raised an objection to surrender the fiduciary object voluntarily. Furthermore the phrase “default” on Article 15 Paragraph (3) of the Law No. 42/1999 is in contradiction with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and shall have no legal binding power if it is not considered to be “a default shall not be determined solely by the creditor, but should be based on a consent between the creditor and debtor or based on any legal actions which determine the said default.”The Constitutional Court gives a legal interpretation that the executorial power of the Fiduciary Certificate is not considered automatically being applicable, but it shall depend on certain condition(s), i.e.: a consent on default by the creditor and debtor, and /or the willingness of the debtor to voluntarily surrender its fiduciary objects. This Decree will give an impact to the creditor because Fiduciary is supposed to have a character of ease on the execution if the debtor is in default (Elucidation of Article 15 Paragraph (3) Law No. 42/1999), but now if the debtor refused to cooperate, then the creditor should have a decree from the Court first before executing any fiduciary object.The type of this legal research is juridical normative with a legal and conceptual approaches. Keywords: Constitutional Court Decree No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019; Execution; Fiduciary ABSTRAK  Pada tanggal 6 Januari 2020 Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia telah mengeluarkan Putusan Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 (“Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”)  yang menentukan bahwa frasa “kekuatan eksekutorial” dan “sama dengan putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap” pada Pasal 15 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia (“UU No. 42/1999”), bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat sepanjang tidak dimaknai “terhadap jaminan fidusia yang tidak ada kesepakatan tentang cidera janji dan debitur keberatan menyerahkan secara sukarela objek yang menjadi jaminan fidusia. Selain itu frasa “cidera janji” pada Pasal 15 Ayat (3) UU No. 42/1999 juga dinyatakan bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 dan tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat sepanjang tidak dimaknai bahwa “adanya cidera janji tidak ditentukan secara sepihak oleh kreditur melainkan atas dasar kesepakatan antara kreditur dengan debitur atau atas dasar upaya hukum yang menentukan telah terjadinya cidera janji.”Mahkamah Konstitusi telah memberikan penafsiran hukum bahwa kekuatan eksekutorial Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia tidak serta merta dapat diberlakukan, namun digantungkan pada suatu keadaan tertentu, misalnya: kesepakatan cidera janji oleh kreditur dan debitur, dan/atau kesediaan debitur untuk menyerahkan objek jaminan fidusia dengan sukarela.Keputusan ini memberikan dampak kepada kreditur karena seharusnya Jaminan Fidusia mempunyai sifat mudah dalam eksekusi apabila debitur wanprestasi (Penjelasan Pasal 15 Ayat (3) UU No. 42/1999), tetapi saat ini apabila debitur menolak bekerjasama, maka kreditur harus memperoleh putusan pengadilan lebih dahulu sebelum melakukan eksekusi.Tipe penelitian hukum ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Kata Kunci: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 18/PUU-XVII/2019; Eksekutorial; Fidusia


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document