A Comparison of Two Butyrophenones with Trifluoperazine

1966 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Marjerrison ◽  
W. Hrychuk ◽  
E.I. Varsanyi
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Drug Action ◽  
Small Study ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Morbidity Score ◽  
Closed Ward

A small study was carried out to compare the clinical effects of the two butyrophenone compounds, triperidol and haloanisone to those of trifluoperazine, in a population of chronically hospitalized long-term schizophrenics in a closed ward setting. Twenty-seven patients were randomly assigned to one of the three compounds, and treated for a twelve-week period under double-blind conditions. Observations with a modified PRP rating scale, based on ward nurses' monthly ratings, revealed an over-all improvement after one month of treatment, but differences between the three drugs were not apparent and the over-all decrease of this PRP morbidity score was not sustained in subsequent ratings. Psychiatrist's ratings on the IMPS revealed several symptom-factor differences with treatment. Between-drug differences on these factors were apparent. They are discussed in terms of the possible differences in type of drug action which they may reflect. The incidence of parkinsonistic side effects with each drug is presented. In no case did the side effects prevent continued treatment with the compound.

EEG Synchronized TMS for Individualized Therapy in Major Depressive Disorder

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1144-1144
Author(s):  
Y. Jin ◽  
J. Phillips ◽  
Yueqin Huang ◽  
Steven Heurta
Keyword(s):  
Major Depressive Disorder ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Depressive Disorder ◽  
Active Treatment ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
List Type ◽  
Major Depressive ◽  
Double Blind

IntroductionEfficacy of conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in major depressive disorder (MDD) is limited. The authors report here on an alternative treatment using low energy synchronized TMS (sTMS) at the intrinsic frequency of subjects’ alpha electroencephalogram (EEG).ObjectivesEstablish efficacy and safety profile of sTMS in MDD.Aim(1)Examine the clinical effectiveness of sTMS.(2)Identify adverse effects associated with sTMS.MethodsFifty-two MDD subjects with 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD17) scores >17 were enrolled into a randomized, sham controlled, double-blind trial. Current medication remained unchanged during the trial. Depressive symptoms were evaluated by HAMD17 administered weekly.EEGs were recorded at baseline to determine the stimulus frequency and at week 4 to evaluate the physiological effect. sTMS was delivered through three 6000-G cylindrical neodymium magnets synchronously rotating at a rate equal to the subject's intrinsic alpha frequency.ResultsForty-five subjects completed at least 1 week of treatment and were evaluable. Those who received active treatment had superior clinical response to sham (t = 2.54, P = 0.01), where 55.2% in the active treatment group were clinical responders versus 12.5% in sham (X2 = 7.82, P = 0.005). No significant side effects were reported. The clinical improvement was correlated with the degree of EEG improvement (r = .46, P = 0.009).ConclusionsA therapeutic effect in MDD subjects can be achieved through administration of sTMS at the subject's alpha EEG frequency. Because of minimal side effects, this appears to be a safe and effective treatment option.

Sulpiride and Haloperidol in Schizophrenia: A Double-blind Cross-over Study of Therapeutic Effect, Side Effects and Plasma Concentrations

1985 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jes Gerlach ◽  
Kirsten Behnke ◽  
Jon Heltberg ◽  
Ebbe Munk-Andersen ◽  
Henrik Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Median Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Day Range ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Therapeutic Profile

SummaryIn a double-blind cross-over trial, 20 chronic schizophrenic patients were treated with sulpiride and haloperidol in two 12-week periods. The final median dose of sulpiride was 2000 mg/day (range 800–3200) and of haloperidol 12 mg/day (range 6–24). Sulpiride had an antipsychotic effect and therapeutic profile not significantly different from that of haloperidol. In spite of the high doses of sulpiride, extrapyramidal side-effects were seen less frequently during the first four weeks of the sulpiride period than during the corresponding haloperidol period (P < 0.05), whereas autonomic side-effects were equally rare for both drugs. A positive correlation was found between daily dose and plasma concentration of both sulpiride (P < 0.001) and haloperidol (P < 0.05), but no correlation could be established between clinical effects and plasma levels of either neuroleptic.

A Double-Blind Comparison of Prazepam with Diazepam, Chlorazepate Dipotassium and Placebo in Anxious Out-Patients

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis F Fabre ◽  
David M McLendon ◽  
Arthur Mallette
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Drug Study ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Check List ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
Lost To Follow Up ◽  
Age Range

This study compared prazepam with diazepam, chlorazepate dipotassium, and placebo in the treatment of anxious out-patients. Patients were screened for participation in the study to be sure they met the criteria for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they had complicating physical or mental problems. All patients signed an informed consent. Seventy-three patients entered the study, thirteen did not complete at least two weeks of treatment and were not used in the data analysis. Of these thirteen, ten did not return and were lost to follow-up, two entered the hospital for reasons unrelated to the drug study, and one patient on diazepam was terminated because of increased anxiety. Sixty patients were used in the data analysis, thirty-six males and twenty-four females with an age range of 21–61 years. Side-effects were minimal. Drowsiness was reported by two people in the placebo group, one taking chlorazepate dipotassium, three on prazepam and one on diazepam. One diazepam patient reported nausea and vomiting. Scores on the Zung Self-Rating Scale for Anxiety showed all three drug groups to be superior to placebo. The Hopkins Symptom Check-list found prazepam and diazepam to be superior to placebo and chlorazepate. No differences among the groups were found in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Prazepam may offer advantages over the other available benzodiazepines since it may be more readily absorbed than chlorazepate and has less side-effects than diazepam.

A Comparative Trial of Opipramol and Chlordiazepoxide in the Treatment of Anxiety

1973 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Jepson ◽  
G Beaumont
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Comparative Trial ◽  
Anxiety Score ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Somatic Anxiety ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
The Difference

A daily dose of 200 mg of opipramol (Insidon, Geigy) and 30 mg of chlordiazepoxide (Librium, Roche) were compared in a clinical trial in general practice. The trial was double blind and a stratified randomisation technique was employed. Twenty four patients received opipramol and twenty six chlordiazepoxide for four weeks. A total anxiety score and separate ‘psychic’ anxiety and ‘somatic’ anxiety scores were recorded, using a rating scale initially and after two and four weeks treatment. No overall difference in efficacy was found between the two drugs—opipramol producing a 76% improvement and chlordiazepoxide 64% by the end of the study. There was no difference in the relief of psychic anxiety. Although opipramol appeared to give more relief of somatic anxiety, the difference was not statistically significant. Again although opipramol relieved more individual symptoms than chlordiazepoxide, none of the differences were significant. 70% of patients on opipramol and 74% of those on chlordiazepoxide were classified ‘better’ globally by both doctor and patient by the end of the trial. The total number of side effects recorded was similar on both drugs although drowsiness occurred twice as frequently on chlordiazepoxide as it did on opipramol.

A 6-months, randomised, placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal patch in osteoarthritis patients naïve to potent opioids

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 122-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Breivik ◽  
Tone Marte Ljosaa ◽  
Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen ◽  
Jan Persson ◽  
Hannu Aro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Local Skin

AbstractObjectivePatients with osteoarthritis (OA) pain often have insufficient pain relief from non-opioid analgesics. The aim of this trial was to study efficacy and tolerability of a low dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal delivery system, added to a NSAID or coxib regimen, in opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe OA pain.MethodsA 6 months randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study at 19 centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, in which OA patients (>40 years) with at least moderate radiographic OA changes and at least moderate pain in a hip and/or knee while on a NSAID or a coxib were randomised to a 7-day buprenorphine patch (n = 100) or an identical placebo patch (n = 99). The initial patch delivered buprenorphine 5 μg/h. This was titrated to 10 or 20 μg/h, as needed. Rescue analgesic was paracetamol 0.5–4 g daily. Statistical analysis of outcome data was mainly with a general linear model, with treatment as factor, the primary joint of osteoarthritis, baseline scores, and season as covariates.ResultsMost patients had OA-radiographic grade II (moderate) or grade III (severe), only 8 in each group had very severe OA (grade IV). The median buprenorphine dose was 10 μg/h. 31 buprenorphine-treated patients and 2 placebo-treated patients withdrew because of side effects. Lack of effect caused 12 placebo-treated and 7 buprenorphine-treated patients to withdraw. The differences in effects between treatments: Daytime pain on movement, recorded every evening on a 0–10 numeric rating scale decreased significantly more (P = 0.029) in the buprenorphine group. Patients’ Global Impression of Change at the end of the double blind period was significantly improved in the buprenorphine group (P = 0.017). The chosen primary effect outcome measure, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index for Pain (P = 0.061), and secondary outcome measures, the WOMAC OA score for functional abilities (P = 0.055), and the WOMAC total score (P = 0.059) indicated more effects from buprenorphine than placebo, but these differences were not statistically significant. In a post-hoc, subgroup analysis with the 16 patients with radiographic grad IV (very severe) excluded, WOMAC OA Index for Pain was significantly (P = 0.039) reduced by buprenorphine, compared with placebo. WOMAC OA score for stiffness and the amount of rescue medication taken did not differ. Sleep disturbance, quality of sleep, and quality of life improved in both groups. Side effects: Typical opioid side effects caused withdrawal at a median of 11 days before completing the 168 days double blind trial in 1/3 of the buprenorphine group. Mostly mild local skin reactions occurred equally often (1/3) in both groups.ConclusionsAlthough the 24 hours WOMAC OsteoArthritis Index of pain was not statistically significantly superior to placebo, day-time movement-related pain and patients’ global impression of improvement at the end of the 6-months double blind treatment period were significantly better in patients treated with buprenorphine compared with placebo. Opioid side effects caused 1/3 of the buprenorphine-patients to withdraw before the end of the 6-months double blind study period.ImplicationsA low dose 7-days buprenorphine patch at 5–20 μg/h is a possible means of pain relief in about 2/3 of elderly osteoarthritis patients, in whom pain is opioid-sensitive, surgery is not possible, NSAIDs and coxibs are not recommended, and paracetamol in tolerable doses is not effective enough. Vigilant focus on and management of opioid side effects are essential.

scholarly journals Shen-Zhi-Ling Oral Liquid Improves Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Alzheimer’s Disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weidong Pan ◽  
Qiudong Wang ◽  
Shin Kwak ◽  
Yu Song ◽  
Baofeng Qin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Fluctuation Analysis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Oral Liquid ◽  
Detrended Fluctuation ◽  
Behavioral And Psychological Symptoms

We evaluated the effects of the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) Shen-Zhi-Ling oral liquid (SZL) on the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Among 98 patients with AD and BPSD enrolled (mean age, 57.2 ± 8.9 years old), 91 (M = 55,F = 36; mean age, 57.2 ± 9.7 years old) completed the study. Patients took either SZL (n=45) or placebo granules (n=46) in a double-blind manner for 20 weeks while maintaining other anticognitive medications unchanged. Changes in BPSD between week 0, week 10, week 20, and week 25 were assessed using the behavioral pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (BEHAVE-AD) rating scale and the neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI), detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) represented by diurnal activity (DA), evening activity (EA), and nocturnal activity (NA) according to actigraphic recordings. SZL but not placebo oral liquid delayed the development of BPSD significantly according to the changes in some of the clinical scores and the EA and NA parameters of DFA at week 20 compared with week 0. No side effects were observed in laboratory tests. The results indicate that SZL might delay the development of BPSD in AD patients and thus is a potentially suitable drug for long-term use.

Executive Functioning Outcomes Over 6 Months of Atomoxetine for Adults With ADHD: Relationship to Maintenance of Response and Relapse Over the Subsequent 6 Months After Treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lenard A. Adler ◽  
Mary Solanto ◽  
Rodrigo Escobar ◽  
Sarah Lipsius ◽  
Himanshu Upadhyaya
Keyword(s):  
Executive Functioning ◽  
Adult Adhd ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Behavior Rating Inventory ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Controlled Clinical Study

Objective: This study examines the relationship between maintenance of improved executive functioning (EF) in adults with ADHD with long-term symptom improvement with atomoxetine. Method: Data were collected from a yearlong, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study on adult patients with ADHD receiving atomoxetine (80-100 mg/day) for 24 weeks. Patients were then randomized to continue atomoxetine or placebo for 6 months. Executive functioning was rated with Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function–Adult Version: Self-Report™ (BRIEF-A: Self-Report™), and the T-scores were determined. Results: Postrandomization T-scores for atomoxetine patients were significantly better than those of placebo patients (3 and 6 months postrandomization). Patients with greater improvements in EF were more likely to show worsening of EF and to relapse after atomoxetine discontinuation. The maintenance of improved EF was significantly associated with improved ADHD symptoms (Conners’ Adult ADHD Rating Scale–Investigator Rated: Screening Version [CAARS-Inv:SV] with adult prompts). Conclusion: Treatment with atomoxetine improved EF during the treatment phases. Improved EF was maintained up to 6 months after discontinuation of atomoxetine.

A Double-Blind Study of Trazodone and Mianserin in the Treatment of Depression in General Practice

1982 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
H H Richards ◽  
R N Midha ◽  
S Miller
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Therapeutic Effect ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Global Improvement ◽  
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ◽  
Self Rating ◽  
Visual Analogue Scales ◽  
Analogue Scales

The antidepressant and anxiolytic efficacy of trazodone (100–200 mg daily), mianserin (60–120 mg daily) and diazepam (15–30 mg daily) was evaluated in ninety-three patients suffering from mild to moderate depression, with or without anxiety, over 6 weeks in a double-blind non-crossover general practice study. Efficacy was evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Patient Self-Rating Visual Analogue scales, physician global assessments and the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale. All three treatments significantly reduced symptoms of depression, as measured on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the physician's assessment of Global Improvement. Trazodone was significantly superior to both mianserin and diazepam. As assessed using Visual Analogue Scales, trazodone was also shown to be significantly superior to diazepam in improving the patient's ability to concentrate and in reducing daytime tiredness. Although evidence of efficacy was found, there were no differences in activity between the treatment groups using the physician's assessment of Current Severity or on assessment of Therapeutic Effect. The treatments all caused a reduction in anxiety as assessed by the Zung Self-Rating Scale. The overall incidence of side-effects was similar between groups. For those side-effects considered to be significantly interfering with the patient's function, but not outweighing the therapeutic effect, a reduction of dosage was effective. Several patients complaining of drowsiness or lethargy as an unacceptable daytime side-effect were switched successfully from twice daily to night-time dosing. Significantly more patients with side-effects (outweighing therapeutic effect or in the presence of no improvement) were withdrawn from the mianserin group than from the trazodone or diazepam groups. Overall, the therapeutic efficacy in relation to the incidence of clinically significant side-effects, favoured trazodone for the treatment of general practice patients suffering from depression, with or without anxiety.

scholarly journals Existing and Emerging Approaches to Treating Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

US Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Brannagan III Thomas H ◽  
Khosro Farhad ◽  
Inna Kleyman ◽  
Megan Leitch ◽  
Rebecca Traub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Demyelinating Polyneuropathy ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare disabling disease with an incompletely understood autoimmune etiology. Differentiating the condition from other neurological diseases can be challenging and appropriate treatment is often delayed. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), plasmapheresis, corticosteroids and subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) have all been demonstrated to be beneficial in placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials. Corticosteroids, including methylprednisolone and dexamethasone are effective and frequently used in CIDP but their long-term use is limited by side effects. One of the most commonly prescribed treatments for CIDP is IVIg which diminishes inflammatory processes and prevents disease progression. Treatment with IVIg has proven effective in randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trials and the results support its use in CIDP. For some patients, the benefit of IVIg, is limited by the frequency of infusions and systemic side effects such as flu-like symptoms, headache, and nausea. Other effective treatments for CIDP include corticosteroids that are associated with serious side effects in long-term use and plasmapheresis which requires specialized facilities. More recently, SCIg has been demonstrated in double blind, placebo-controlled studies to be effective for maintenance use in CIDP in patients whose disease has been controlled by IVIg. In a large clinical trial, 0.2 g/kg and 0.4 g/kg body weight doses of 20% SCIg equivalent to 1 mL/kg or 2 mL/kg, respectively, administered weekly, demonstrated efficacy in CIDP and were well tolerated. Immunomodulating treatments such as cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab have also shown efficacy in select populations with CIDP.

Double-Blind Evaluation of Domperidone in Acute Vomiting and Dyspeptic Disorders

1981 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Agorastos ◽  
N P Zissis ◽  
I Kaprinis ◽  
G Goulis
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial ◽  
Therapeutic Results ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Symptom Rating

The anti-emetic effects of domperidone were evaluated under double-blind conditions in twenty-four patients with acute vomiting randomly assigned to treatment either with 10 mg i.m. domperidone (six females, five males) or with placebo (seven females, six males). The therapeutic results were better with domperidone and the differences from placebo were statistically significant (p < 0.02). In a second randomized, crossover, double-blind trial, domperidone (10 mg t.i.d.) evaluated according to a nine-symptom rating scale, in eighteen dyspeptic patients, proved significantly more effective than placebo. The duration of treatment was 6 weeks and the drugs were crossed-over after 3 weeks. The difference between the two groups was most marked during the second phase of the trial. No side-effects were reported.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document