Infection-relapse and a potentially surgical stratification model for the treatment of mycotic aortic aneurysms: A propensity-matched pilot study

Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 500-510
Author(s):  
Mingyuan Liu ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Haijie Che ◽  
Junjun Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Severe Infection ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective This study evaluates the overall survival and the infection-relapse after endovascular repair (Endo) vs. open surgery (Open) for mycotic aortic aneurysms and the potential influence of perioperative severity of infection to the decision-making on the long-term survival. Design A multicenter, retrospective analysis of 5247 consecutive aortic aneurysm repair performed from January 2003 to December 2017 at five tertiary medical centers was conducted. Among the study population, 257 patients with mycotic aortic aneurysms s were identified. Methods: Finally, 73 patients were enrolled in the cohort after exclusion and a 1:1 propensity-matched analysis. The study cohort drawn from matched data included 37 patients in the Endo group and 36 patients in the Open group. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included infection-relapse during the follow-up. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess predictors for late mortality. Results The mean follow-up time for the entire cohort was 41 months (range, 1 to 135 months). Among propensity-matched patients, there was no significant difference in baseline characteristics. There was no difference in overall survival ( P = 0.083) between the groups at five years, but Open group was associated with a lower infection-relapse incidence during the follow-up ( P = 0.011). Subgroup analysis revealed a better survival rate for Open in patients with severe infection ( P = 0.003) or small periaortic abscess ( P = 0.049). Conclusion There were no significant differences between Endo and Open in overall survival. However, Open was a more definite option with less infection-relapse and had potential advantages for patients with severe infection or with a small periaortic abscess.

scholarly journals 15-year Follow-up of Comparing Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Multicentres, Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyu Luo ◽  
Guang Cao ◽  
wenbin Guo ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Qiuru Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Backgroud: Longer follow-up was necessary to testify the exact value of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND).Methods：From January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2005,1027 patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to two groups: MALND and CALND. 996 eligible patients were enrolled. The end points are disease free survival and overall survival.Results：The final cohort of 996 patients was followed for an average of 184 months. The distribution of all events was fairly similar between two groups of patients. The incidence of local in-breast events did not differ in a significant manner between two cohorts. Similarly, the rate of distant metastases was not significantly different with 30.0% in MLND and 32.6% in CALND. And no significant difference was observed in other primary tumor between two groups (p=0.46). Patients who remain alive with no event comprise a total of 37.2% in MALND and 35.4% in CALND. Other primary cancers and deaths from other causes were distributed equally between two groups. The 15-year disease-free survival rates were41.1 percent for the MALND group and 39.6 percent for the CALND group (p=0.79). MALND was found to be not inferior for overall survival (P =0.54). The 15-year overall survival rates were 49.5 percentafter MALND and 51.2 percentafter CALND (p=0.86). Probability of overall survival was not significantly different between two groups.Conclusions：MALND does not increase unfavorable events, and also does not affect the long-term survival of patients. Therefore, MALND should be one of the preferred approaches for breast cancer surgery.

Ten Year Follow up Analysis of the OSHO Phase III Trial (AML 96) Comparing Different Application Modes of AraC in Patients below 60 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): No Impact of AraCApplication Mode on Remission Rate, Toxicity, Disease-Free Survival or Overall Survival

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2966-2966
Author(s):  
Cornelia Becker ◽  
Rainer Krahl ◽  
Antje Schulze ◽  
Georg Maschmeyer ◽  
Christian Junghanß ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Clinical trials on different cytarabine doses for treatment of AML provide evidence of a dose response effect, but also for increase toxicity after high dose AraC (HDAC). Pharmacokinetic measurements of cytarabine-triphosphate (AraC-CTP), which is the most relevant cytotoxic metabolite of AraC, have revealed its formation in leukemic cells to be saturated with infusion rates above 250 mg/m2/h, this being significantly lower than used in HDAC schedules. Methods: Based on a pharmacological model and encouraging results of a phase II study we conducted a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial comparing the effects of two different application modes of AraC in patients up to 60 years with untreated newly diagnosed AML. Patients were randomized to receive AraC at two different infusion rates (IR) during induction and consolidation treatment: arm A/experimental: 1 × 2 g/m2/d AraC over 8 hours (IR 250 mg/m2/h) arm B/standard: 2 × 1 g/m2/d AraC over 3 hours (IR 333 mg/m2/h). Induction and first consolidation consisted of AraC (days 1, 3, 5, 7) in combination with an anthracycline (Idarubicine 12 mg/m2 or Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, days 1–3). The final dosage points (AraC day 7 and anthracycline day 3) were excluded from the second consolidation. The third consolidation consisted of either allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation or of chemotherapy identical to second consolidation. Results: From 02/97 to 04/02 419 patients were enrolled in the study. The present analysis is based on 361 eligible and evaluable patients with a median follow up of 7 years. CR was reached in 249/361 (69%; 95%CI: 65%–74%) patients. No statistically significant differences were detected between arms A and B with regard to CR-rate (69% vs 69%) or early death rate (11% vs 8%). Hematological recovery of median white blood cell count (WBC) > 109/l and median platelets (plt) > 50 × 109/l revealed no difference between arms A and B after induction (WBC day 22 vs 22, p=0,68; plt day 25 vs 26, p=0,41) and consolidation (WBC day 28 vs 27, p=0,07; plt day 42 vs 40, p= 0,58). The event free survival (EFS) after 5 years is 0,25 ± 0,03 % for all patients with an overall survival of 0,31 ± 0,03 % after 5 years. For the purposes of analysis, the 83 transplant patients (23 allogeneic MRD, 14 allogeneic MUD and 46 autologous) were censored at time of transplant. No statistically significant difference between arms A and B in regard to EFS (0,25 ± 0,04 vs 0,25 ± 0,04, p=0,99), relapse incidence (0,63 ± 0,06 vs 0,60 ± 0,06, p=0,89), overall survival (0,32 ± 0,04 vs 0,30 ± 0,04, p=0,44) and therapy associated mortality (0,18 ± 0,04 vs 0,17 ± 0,03, p=0,95) were detectable after adjustment of prognostic factors. An analysis of risk factors by multivariate cox regression model confirmed cytogenetics at diagnosis to be the most important risk factor for CR rate (p<10−6) and for EFS (p<10−6). Other significant prognostic factors for EFS evaluated in the multivariate analysis were de novo vs secondary AML (p=0,0001), WBC (continuous) (p=0,001), LDH (>1–4 × vs other ULN) (p=0,008) and FAB classification (FAB M0,6,7 vs FAB M1,2,4,5) (p=0,0005). EFS after 5 years shows a significant correlation to cytogenetics (p<10−6) with 0,71±0,1, 0,27±0,05, 0,20±0,06 and 0,03±0,03 for favorable, normal, other and unfavorable cytogenetic karyotype, respectively. Conclusion: We conclude that the application of AraC at the presumptive saturating infusion rate of 250 mg/m2/h results in comparable remission rates, toxicity, event free survival and overall survival as compared to the standard IR with 333 mg/m2/h.

scholarly journals Addition of rituximab to hyper-CVAD improves overall survival in newly diagnosed Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma from the Middle East and North Africa region

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 4199
Author(s):  
Najla S. Bin Sabbar ◽  
Fatimah S. Alowirdi ◽  
Fatimah A. Basakran ◽  
Lujain A. Al-Badr ◽  
Rawan A. Assiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Middle East ◽  
North Africa ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Mena Region ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Therapy Regimen ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Background: Burkitt leukemia/lymphoma (BL) is a highly aggressive malignancy treated with intensive combinational chemotherapy. However, there is paucity in the literature with regards to outcome in patients with BL from the Middle East and North Africa Region (MENA).Methods: We examined the impact of incorporation of the monoclonal antibody rituximab within a chemotherapy backbone of hyper-fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine and methotrexate (hyper-CVAD). Between 2007 to 2016, a total of 21 patients were identified and data retrospectively collected with median follow up was 32 months (1.1-120). The cohort was stratified based on exposure to rituximab and there was no significant difference regarding gender, age, stage, presence of constitutional symptoms, baseline presenting blood counts and proportion of patients completing prescribed therapy regimen between the strata.Results: Estimated overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort at 2 years was 71.1%; however, patients who received rituximab in conjunction with hyper-CVAD had a statistically significant improvement in 2-year OS at 81.2% vs 40% (p=0.048).Conclusions: In conclusion, we observed that incorporation of rituximab within a hyper-CVAD backbone improved OS in BL patients from the MENA region. These results warrant further evaluation.

Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive versus open lumbar fusion: a minimum 10-year follow-up

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Tae Seok Jeong ◽  
Seong Son ◽  
Sang Gu Lee ◽  
Yong Ahn ◽  
Jong Myung Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Adjacent Segment Disease ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVE The object of this study was to compare, after a long-term follow-up, the incidence and features of adjacent segment disease (ASDis) following lumbar fusion surgery performed via an open technique using conventional interbody fusion plus transpedicular screw fixation or a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) using a tubular retractor together with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with a follow-up period > 10 years who had undergone instrumented lumbar fusion at the L4–5 level between January 2004 and December 2010. The patients were divided into an open surgery group and MIS group based on the surgical method performed. Baseline characteristics and radiological findings, including factors related to ASDis, were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the incidence of ASDis and related details, including diagnosis, time to diagnosis, and treatment, were analyzed. RESULTS Among 119 patients who had undergone lumbar fusion at the L4–5 level in the study period, 32 were excluded according to the exclusion criteria. The remaining 87 patients were included as the final study cohort and were divided into an open group (n = 44) and MIS group (n = 43). The mean follow-up period was 10.50 (range 10.0–14.0) years in the open group and 10.16 (range 10.0–13.0) years in the MIS group. The overall facet joint violation rate was significantly higher in the open group than in the MIS group (54.5% vs 30.2%, p = 0.022). However, in terms of adjacent segment degeneration, there were no significant differences in corrected disc height, segmental angle, range of motion, or degree of listhesis of the adjacent segments between the two groups during follow-up. The overall incidence of ASDis was 33.3%, with incidences of 31.8% in the open group and 34.9% in the MIS group, showing no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.822). Additionally, detailed diagnosis and treatment factors were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS After a minimum 10-year follow-up, the incidence of ASDis did not differ significantly between patients who had undergone open fusion and those who had undergone MIS fusion at the L4–5 level.

Impact of Hybrid Operating Rooms on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282199672
Author(s):  
Giovanni Tinelli ◽  
Marie Bonnet ◽  
Adrien Hertault ◽  
Simona Sica ◽  
Gian Luca Di Tanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Operating Room ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: Evaluate the impact of hybrid operating room (HOR) guidance on the long-term clinical outcomes following fenestrated and branched endovascular repair (F-BEVAR) for complex aortic aneurysms. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected registry data were retrospectively analyzed to compare the procedural, short- and long-term outcomes of consecutive F-BEVAR performed from January 2010 to December 2014 under standard mobile C-arm versus hybrid room guidance in a high-volume aortic center. Results: A total of 262 consecutive patients, including 133 patients treated with a mobile C-arm equipped operating room and 129 with a HOR guidance, were enrolled in this study. Patient radiation exposure and contrast media volume were significantly reduced in the HOR group. Short-term clinical outcomes were improved despite higher case complexity in the HOR group, with no statistical significance. At a median follow-up of 63.3 months (Q1 33.4, Q3 75.9) in the C-arm group, and 44.9 months (Q1 25.1, Q3 53.5, p=0.53) in the HOR group, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of target vessel occlusion and limb occlusion. When the endograft involved 3 or more fenestrations and/or branches (complex F-BEVAR), graft instability (36% vs 25%, p=0.035), reintervention on target vessels (20% vs 11%, p=0.019) and total reintervention rates (24% vs 15%, p=0.032) were significantly reduced in the HOR group. The multivariable Cox regression analysis did not show statistically significant differences for long-term death and aortic-related death between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Our study suggests that better long-term clinical outcomes could be observed when performing complex F-BEVAR in the latest generation HOR.

Aggressive Treatment in Glioblastoma: What Determines the Survival of Patients?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Yu ◽  
Guozhong Zhang ◽  
Songtao Qi
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Malignant Gliomas ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Control Cohort ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Long Term Survivors

Abstract Background and Study Aims The exact reason of long-term survival in glioblastoma (GBM) patients has remained uncertain. Molecular parameters in addition to histology to define malignant gliomas are hoped to facilitate clinical, experimental, and epidemiological studies. Material and Methods A population of GBM patients with similar clinical characteristics (especially similar resectability) was reviewed to compare the molecular variables between poor (overall survival [OS] < 18 months, control cohort) and long-term survivors (overall survival > 36 months, OS-36 cohort). Results Long-term GBM survivors were younger. In the OS-36 cohort, the positive rate of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation was very low (7.69%, 3/39) and there was no statistical difference in OS between IDH mutant and wild-type patients. The results of 1p/19q codeletions are similar. Besides, there were no significant difference in MGMT promoter methylation, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation, and TP53 mutations between OS-36 cohort and control cohort. Conclusions No distinct markers consistently have been identified in long-term survivors of GBM patients, and great importance should be attached to further understand the biological characteristics of the invasive glioma cells because of the nature of diffuse tumor permeation.

Treatment outcomes of recurrent and metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma: A retrospective analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18056-e18056
Author(s):  
Julie Elaine McGrath ◽  
Punita Grover ◽  
Joanne Xiu ◽  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Jennifer Hsing Choe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Adenoid Cystic ◽  
Significant Difference

e18056 Background: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy of glandular tissue with a high rate of local recurrence and metastatic disease. Despite being regarded as an indolent disease, the clinical course of recurrent and metastatic ACC (R/M ACC) is highly variable. Responses to chemotherapy (chemo) are uniformly poor. Several multi-targeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (mTKIs), EGFR inhibitors (EGFRi) and other targeted agents have been studied in single-arm early phase trials with response rates ranging from 0-16% and progression free survival ranging from 2.5-17 months. However, there have been no comparative clinical trials and it is not known if one treatment strategy is superior. We undertook this retrospective study to assess the real-world clinical outcomes in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma using the Caris Life Sciences database. Methods: Real world overall survival (rwOS) for cases of ACC was obtained from insurance claims data and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated from the date of collection to the date of last contact. Cases were divided into subgroups based on treatment received – chemo (including platinum agents, taxanes, 5FU, topoisomerase inhibitors, anthracyclines), EGFRi (cetuximab, erlotinib, lapatinib), mTKIs (pazopanib, axitinib, sunitinib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, sorafenib) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (atezolizumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab). Results: 368 patients (pts) were identified with ACC, 16 were locally recurrent and 216 tumors were taken from metastatic sites. 50 pts received chemo, 6 were treated with EGFRi and 15 with mTKIs. Pts who received combination EGFRi and chemo or mTKI and chemo were excluded. The median overall survival (mOS) all patients with metastatic ACC was 2.8 years (yrs). The mOS of pts with R/M ACC was 3 yrs for chemo, 2.9 yrs for EGFRi and 1.5 yrs for mTKIs. There was no significance in mOS between chemo vs mTKIs (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.3 - 2, p = 0.72) and chemo vs EGFRi (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.3 - 2.5, p = 0.78). We further compared the outcomes of those treated with EGFRi (n = 8) with mTKIs (n = 19) in the entire cohort. For most pts, these agents were given as front line therapy. 25% (2/8) of patients had received treatment prior to EGFRi and 20% (4/9) prior to mTKIs (p = 1). There was no significant difference in mOS with HR 0.6 (95% CI 0.16 - 2.6), p = 0.6. We also compared the mOS of patients who received ICIs (n = 22) with those who did not (n = 346) but there was no significant difference (mOS 3.19 vs 3.17 yrs respectively, HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.47- 1.61, p = 0.65). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the mOS between pts with R/M ACC who were treated with chemo, EGFRi or TKIs and in those who received ICIs compared to those who did not in our limited patient population. This highlights the need for predictive biomarkers for better patient selection with the goal of personalizing treatment strategies for this disease.

SP6.1.11 The Effect of the Enhanced Recovery Programme for Liver Surgery on Long Term Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalaiyarasi Arujunan ◽  
Abdulwarith Shugaba ◽  
Harmony Uwadiae ◽  
Joel Lambert ◽  
Georgios Sgourakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Aims The Enhanced Recovery Programme for Liver Surgery (ERPLS) has been shown to promote functional recovery and reduce hospital stay. However, its effect on long term survival has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the ERPLS on 5-year patient survival. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) between January 2011 and December 2016 at a regional hepatobiliary centre. The cohort comprised of 60 pre-ERPLS and 60 post-ERPLS patients. The primary outcome was 5-year patient survival. The secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications and 90-day readmission rates. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of overall survival. Results There was no significant difference in the age (p = 0.960), gender (p = 0.332) and type of resection (p = 0.198) between both groups. ERPLS was not an independent predictor for overall survival (Gehan Wilcoxon Test, p = 0.828). There was no significant difference in the LOS (p = 0.874) and 90-day readmission rates (p = 0.349). Major postoperative complications (&gt;3a Clavien-Dindo classification) were significantly less in the ERPLS group (p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, positive resection margins and major postoperative complications were independent predictors for overall survival. Conclusions ERPLS does not seem to have an effect on long term patient survival. However, it appears to reduce the rate of major postoperative complications. LOS and 90-day readmission rates were not influenced by ERPLS.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: Real World Experience of a Single Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kopińska ◽  
A. Koclęga ◽  
A. Wieczorkiewicz-Kabut ◽  
K. Woźniczka ◽  
D. Kata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Entire Cohort

Introduction: Refractory and relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL) is associated with poor prognosis, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remains the only potentially curative approach.Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of allotransplantation in R/R HL setting.Material: Overall, 24 patients (17 men and 7 women) at a median age of 27 years (range 18–44) underwent allo-SCT between 2002 and 2020.Results: Nineteen patients received prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT1) whereas eight patients received second ASCT (ASCT2) after failure of ASCT1. Six patients received only brentuximab vedotin (BV; n = 4) or BV followed by checkpoint inhibitors (CPI; n = 2) before entering allo-SCT. Median time from ASCT1 to allo-SCT was 17.1 months. Fifteen patients received grafts from unrelated donors. Peripheral blood was a source of stem cells for 16 patients. Reduced-intensity conditioning was used for all patients. Disease status at transplant entry was as follows: complete remission (CR; n = 4), partial response (PR; n = 10), and stable disease (SD; n = 10). Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) developed in 13 (54%) and 4 (16%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 13.3 months. At the last follow-up, 17 (71%) patients died. The main causes of death were disease progression (n = 10), infectious complications (n = 6), and steroid-resistant GVHD (n = 1). Non-relapse mortality at 12 months was 25%. At the last follow-up, seven patients were alive; six patients were in CR, and one had PR. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 40%.Conclusion: Chemosensitive disease at transplant was associated with better outcome. Allo-SCT allows for long-term survival in refractory and relapsed HL.

scholarly journals Deciding the operation type according to mismatch repair status among hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients: should a tailored approach be applied, or does one size fit all?

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Kai Liao ◽  
Yueh-Chen Lin ◽  
Yu-Jen Hsu ◽  
Yih-Jong Chern ◽  
Jeng-Fu You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tailored Approach ◽  
Mismatch Repair Status ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background Although extended colectomy (EC) was recommended for HNPCC patients, previous studies did not show significantly improved overall survival. Immunohistochemical (IHC) stain of mismatch repair (MMR) gene protein expression is now a feasible and reliable test clinically. Therefore, we tried to investigate whether we could use MMR IHC stain to select operation types in HNPCC patients. Patients and methods Between 1995 and 2013, 186 HNPCC patients were collected. Status of MMR protein expression, perioperative clinic-pathological variables and post-operative follow up status were analyzed by multivariate analyses. Results Sixty-five percent (121 of 186) patients of these HNPCC patients demonstrated loss of at least one MMR protein. There were several significant differences existing between deficient MMR (dMMR) and proficient MMR (pMMR) subgroups in terms of clinic-pathological characteristics. With the average follow-up duration of 93.9 months, we observed significantly high risk of developing metachronous CRC between SC and EC subgroups (crude rate 8.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.035). However, no significant difference was observed among the presence of extra-colonic tumors (12.4% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.284). The positive and negative prediction rate of metachronous CRC in dMMR subgroup was 12.8 and 87.2% while 1.9 and 98.1% in the pMMR subgroup. Survival outcomes were significantly affected by MMR status and resection types by multivariate analysis. Significantly better OS in dMMR subgroup (HR = 0.479, 95% CI: 0.257–0.894, p = 0.021) comparing with pMMR subgroup was observed. However, significant improved DFS (HR = 0.367, 95% CI: 0.172–.0787, p = 0.010) but not significant for OS (HR = 0.510, 95% CI: 0.219–1.150, p = 0.103) for EC subgroup compared with SC subgroup. Differences existing among different subgroups by combing extent of resection and MMR status. In dMMR subgroup, SC, compared with EC, demonstrated significantly worse DFS by multivariate analyses (HR = 3.526, 95% CI: 1.346–9.236, p = 0.010) but not for OS (HR = 2.387, 95% CI: 0.788–7.229, p = 0.124), however, no significantly differences of OS and DFS in pMMR subgroup between SC and EC were found. Conclusions Significantly better overall survival and higher rate of metachronous CRC exist in dMMR subgroup of HNPCC patients comparing with pMMR subgroup. Extended colectomy significantly improved DFS and was thus recommended for dMMR subgroup but not pMMR subgroup of HNPCC patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document