scholarly journals Liposomal irinotecan in gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: efficacy, safety and place in therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Kipps ◽  
Kate Young ◽  
Naureen Starling
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Direct Result ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease. The majority of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease with a prognosis of short months. Therapeutic options are limited and until recently, there was no standard second-line chemotherapy option. Liposomal constructs have been engineered to encapsulate chemotherapy thereby preventing premature metabolism, improving distribution and minimizing toxicity. Favourable preclinical data on liposomal irinotecan and early phase trials, led to a recently published phase III trial of liposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with metastatic PDAC, who progressed after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. As a direct result, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have approved the use of liposomal irinotecan in this setting. However, first-line treatment options for this disease now include the combination regimen, FOLFIRINOX, in patients with good performance status, and the role of second-line combination treatment with liposomal irinotecan in this setting is unclear. Recent advances have changed the therapeutic landscape, as clinicians are now able to choose a sequential approach to treatment tailored to the individual patient characteristics. This article reviews current treatment options for metastatic PDAC and focuses on the efficacy, safety and place in therapy of liposomal irinotecan.

A pilot study of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV combined with paricalcitol in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS793-TPS793
Author(s):  
Patrick Grierson ◽  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Haeseong Park ◽  
Katrina Pedersen ◽  
Benjamin R. Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
High Serum ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

TPS793 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is predicted to be the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030, and is characterized by resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy and a highly fibrotic tumor microenvironment. Front-line therapies for advanced PDAC include FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with median overall survival ranging from 8.5 to 11 months. After progression on gemcitabine-containing therapy, 5-FU/LV/liposomal irinotecan is a standard second-line option, however outcomes are still poor. Retrospective studies demonstrate superior survival of advanced PDAC in patients with high serum levels of 25(OH) vitamin D. Notably, the PDAC tumor microenvironment is enriched in cancer-associated fibroblasts that favorably respond to vitamin D, prolonging survival in combination with chemotherapy in mouse models. Furthermore, vitamin D suppresses catabolism of irinotecan in gastrointestinal cancer cells, potentiating its efficacy. Therefore, we are conducing an investigator-initiated study of 5FU/LV/liposomal irinotecan with paricalcitol as second-line therapy in advanced PDAC. Methods: This is a pilot study of 5FU/LV/liposomal irinotecan combined with paricalcitol in patients with advanced PDAC progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy. All patients receive liposomal irinotecan, LV, 5-FU and paricalcitol. Liposomal irinotecan is given at 70 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes, LV at 400 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes, and 5-FU at 2400 mg/m2 continuous IV infusion over 46 hours, on Day 1 of each 14-day cycle. Paricalcitol IV infusion will precede the above, given according to assigned cohort (75 mcg weekly or 7 mcg/kg weekly). The primary objective of this study is to determine the tolerability between two different dose levels of paricalcitol added to the combination regimen of 5-FU/LV/liposomal irinotecan in patients with advanced PDAC. Secondary objectives are measures of efficacy (ORR, PFS, OS, CA19-9 biochemical response rate). Clinical trial information: NCT03883919.

Characteristics of long-term survivors in a randomized phase III trial (NAPOLI-1) of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) treated with liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI; MM-398) + 5-FU/LV.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 293-293
Author(s):  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Chung-Pin Li ◽  
Gyorgy Bodoky ◽  
Andrew Dean ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
The United States ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Long Term Survivors

293 Background: nal-IRI, a liposomal formulation of irinotecan, plus 5-FU/LV is approved in the United States and Taiwan for patients (pts) with mPDAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. Primary analysis of the NAPOLI-1 trial (NCT01494506) showed that nal-IRI+5-FU/LV significantly improved median overall survival vs 5-FU/LV (6.1 vs 4.2 months; HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.92; P = 0.012; Wang-Gillam et al, Lancet. 2016). Herein we report baseline characteristics of pts surviving ≥1 year (data cutoff, Nov 2015). Methods: This analysis includes 117 pts assigned to treatment with nal-IRI 70 mg/m2 (free base) + 5-FU/LV 2400/400 mg/m2 q2w, and 119 pts assigned to treatment with 5-FU/LV 2000/200 mg/m2weekly for weeks 1-4 q6w. Results: A total of 29 (25%) pts in the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV arm and 17 (14%) in the 5-FU/LV arm survived ≥1 year. These pts typically had better performance status, lower CA19-9 (U/mL) levels, and were less likely to have liver metastases at baseline, compared with the overall population (Table). For long-term survivors in the nal-IRI+5-FU/LV arm, a higher proportion of pts had neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >5, a marker of poor prognosis, suggesting that higher NLR may potentially be predictive of survival outcome with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV. Conclusions: More pts receiving nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV were alive beyond 1 year. The most prominent prognostic markers of survival ≥1 year included lower CA19-9, KPS ≥90 and absence of liver metastases. These analyses may be limited by small sample sizes. Clinical trial information: NCT01494506. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Sequential Treatment of Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Duct with Liver Metastasis Following the NAPOLI-1 Study Protocol with nal-Irinotecan plus 5-FU in the Second Line

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84
Author(s):  
Dilara Akhoundova Sanoyan ◽  
Cäcilia S. Reiner ◽  
Panagiota Papageorgiou ◽  
Alexander R. Siebenhüner
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Sequential Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
To Receive

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is typically diagnosed at an advanced or metastatic stage, when curative surgery is not recommended. Therefore, the prognosis is poor for this dismal disease, with only 1–2% of the patients reaching the 5-year survival follow-up. Current advances in systemic treatment with gemcitabine regimens, specifically polychemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel or other multidrug regimens such as FOLFIRINOX in the first line, have improved disease control over time. This higher efficacy of systemic treatment enables metastatic PDAC patients to receive second-line treatment more often nowadays. Currently, there is only one regimen for second-line treatment approved by the EMA, FDA, and Swissmedic, based on the phase III NAPOLI-1 study. In this case report, we present an outstanding response to sequential treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel followed by second-line treatment with nal-irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil.

scholarly journals CheckMate-032 Study: Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab and Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (28) ◽  
pp. 2836-2844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelena Y. Janjigian ◽  
Johanna Bendell ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Paolo A. Ascierto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Programmed Death Ligand 1 ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer

Purpose Metastatic esophagogastric cancer treatments after failure of second-line chemotherapy are limited. Nivolumab demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) versus placebo in Asian patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers. We assessed the safety and efficacy of nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in Western patients with chemotherapy-refractory esophagogastric cancers. Patients and Methods Patients with locally advanced or metastatic chemotherapy–refractory gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal junction cancer from centers in the United States and Europe received nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The primary end point was objective response rate. The association of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 status with response and survival was also evaluated. Results Of 160 treated patients (59 with nivolumab 3 mg/kg, 49 with nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, 52 with nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg), 79% had received two or more prior therapies. At the data cutoff, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 12% (95% CI, 5% to 23%), 24% (95% CI, 13% to 39%), and 8% (95% CI, 2% to 19%) in the three groups, respectively. Responses were observed regardless of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 status. With a median follow-up of 28, 24, and 22 months across the three groups, 12-month progression-free survival rates were 8%, 17%, and 10%, respectively; 12-month OS rates were 39%, 35%, and 24%, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 17%, 47%, and 27% of patients in the three groups, respectively. Conclusion Nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity, durable responses, encouraging long-term OS, and a manageable safety profile in patients with chemotherapy-refractory esophagogastric cancer. Phase III studies evaluating nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in earlier lines of therapy for esophagogastric cancers are underway.

scholarly journals Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients Treated with Liposomal Irinotecan Plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen ◽  
Macarulla ◽  
Blanc ◽  
Mirakhur ◽  
Jong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbohydrate Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Score ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Baseline Factors ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan ◽  
Aid Decision ◽  
Post Hoc

NAPOLI-1 (NCT01494506) was a phase III study of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy. This post hoc analysis of NAPOLI-1 aimed to develop a predictive nomogram for overall survival (OS) at 6 and 12 months. Analyses were derived from all patients in NAPOLI-1 randomized to receive nal-IRI+5-FU/LV, nal-IRI monotherapy, or 5-FU/LV combination therapy. OS was associated with baseline factors using univariate and multivariable Cox analyses. A predictive nomogram was derived and validated using a concordance index and calibration plots. The univariate analyses identified 21 independent factors that contributed to OS, with eight factors significantly associated with OS. The Karnofsky Performance Score contributed the largest number of points (100), followed by presence of liver metastasis (98) and randomization to nal-IRI+5-FU/LV (96). The other baseline factors showing effects were albumin (g/dL), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (U/mL), disease stage at diagnosis, and body mass index (kg/m2). The nomogram was used to predict the 6- and 12-month survival probability. The mean absolute errors between the observed and predicted probabilities for OS at 3, 6, and 9 months were 0.07, 0.08, and 0.07, respectively. This nomogram, based on NAPOLI-1, provides additional insight to aid decision-making for patients with mPDAC after previous gemcitabine-based therapy.

scholarly journals The Present Status of Immuno-Oncolytic Viruses in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Viruses ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1318
Author(s):  
Scott D. Haller ◽  
Michael L. Monaco ◽  
Karim Essani
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Clinical Investigation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
The United States ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Treatment Regimens

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related death in Western countries. The incidence of PDAC has increased over the last 40 years and is projected to be the second leading cause of cancer death by 2030. Despite aggressive treatment regimens, prognosis for patients diagnosed with PDAC is very poor; PDAC has the lowest 5-year survival rate for any form of cancer in the United States (US). PDAC is very rarely detected in early stages when surgical resection can be performed. Only 20% of cases are suitable for surgical resection; this remains the only curative treatment when combined with adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment regimens excluding surgical intervention such as chemotherapeutic treatments are associated with adverse effects and genetherapy strategies also struggle with lack of specificity and/or efficacy. The lack of effective treatments for this disease highlights the necessity for innovation in treatment options for patients diagnosed with early- to late-phase PDAC and immuno-oncolytic viruses (OVs) have been of particular interest since 2006 when the first oncolytic virus was approved as a therapy for nasopharyngeal cancers in China. Interest resurged in 2015 when T-Vec, an oncolytic herpes simplex virus, was approved in the United States for treatment of advanced melanoma. While many vectors have been explored, few show promise as treatment for pancreatic cancer, and fewer still have progressed to clinical trial evaluation. This review outlines recent strategies in the development of OVs targeting treatment of PDAC, current state of preclinical and clinical investigation and application.

Updated use of first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6607-6607
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Cartwright ◽  
Aimee Ginsburg Arlen ◽  
Lalan S. Wilfong ◽  
Robyn K. Harrell ◽  
J. Russell Hoverman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
First Line ◽  
Asco 2012

6607 Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. It is estimated that 45,220 patients will be diagnosed in 2013 and 38,460 will die (Siegel, CA Cancer J Clin 2013). Gemcitabine has long been the standard of care chemotherapy. Recent advances in treatment created a combination regimen (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, leucovorin, fluorouracil [FOLFIRINOX]) for patients with good Karnofsky performance status (PS) (Conroy, NEJM 2011). This retrospective analysis was conducted as an update to results reported at ASCO 2012 (Ginsburg Arlen, JCO 2012) to evaluate characteristics and overall survival (OS) of patients receiving FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based treatments in a large outpatient community setting. This is the largest study describing FOLFIRINOX patients to date. Methods: Patients with advanced PC treated within The US Oncology Network entered into the iKnowMed (iKM) database between June 2010 and November 2012 were included. Patterns of treatment were characterized by the median age at diagnosis, sex, PS, and first-line metastatic chemotherapy prescribed. The primary endpoints of the analysis were OS and uptake of FOLFIRINOX within the network. Results: Compared to ASCO 2012 results, 1,000 additional patients were identified in iKM. Of the 1,714 total patients, 24% received FOLFIRINOX (up from 13% in 2012) and 76% gemcitabine-based therapy (87% in 2012). Increased utilization of FOLFIRINOX for patients with good PS began in June 2010. For all patients (55% male), the median age at diagnosis was 67 years and the majority (85%) had a PS of 70% or greater. The OS was significantly longer for FOLFIRINOX (9.6 mos) versus gemcitabine (6.3 mos) (p<0.0001). This held true for PS of 70% or greater patient given FOLFIRINOX (9.6 mos) versus gemcitabine (7 mos) (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Utilization of FOLFIRINOX has continued to expand after the publication of phase III trials. Our data in a community setting supports a survival advantage for FOLFIRINOX. Although the magnitude of benefit may be smaller in the community, we agree that FOLFIRINOX should become a standard of care for good PS patients.

Activity and survival benefit of second-line chemotherapy (2L-Ctx) in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC): Pooled analysis of the literature.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15019-e15019 ◽  
Author(s):  
MinYuen Teo ◽  
Raymond S. McDermott
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

e15019 Background: Many clinicians adopt a nihilistic approach to the management of APC. Delivery of 2L-Ctx is relatively uncommon and no recognized standard exists. We sought to examine the published activity of chemotherapy in the 2nd line setting, and the rate of 2L-Ctx delivery and its influence on reported overall survival in 1st line trials. Methods: 1st and 2L-Ctx randomized trials published between 2000 and 2012 were identified from Pubmed, and manuscripts were obtained for data extraction. Pooled weighted objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were calculated. For 1st line studies, the percentage of patients who received 2L-Ctx were extracted and plotted against reported median overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS), defined as arithmetic difference between median OS and progression-free survival. Spearman correlation and linear regression were performed. Results: Sixty nine 2L Ctx studies (77 arms, n=2859) were identified. Majority received prior gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Pooled ORR was 6.6% (95% CI 5.6 – 7.6%) and DCR was 36.7% (34.5 – 38.0%). When only prospective studies were evaluated (42 studies, 48 arms, n=1546), ORR was 5.0% (3.8 – 6.2%) and DCR was 33.9% (31.0 – 36.9%). Exploratory analysis suggested that intensification of gemcitabine-based therapy (ORR: 10.0%; DCR: 54.7%) might be marginally more active than fluoropyrimidine (7.6%; 32.2%) or taxane based 2L-Ctx (5.2%; 33.6%). 28/52 identified 1st line studies (54%) reported the percentage of patients treated with second-line chemotherapy (11 phase II, 28 arms, n=1450; 17 phase III, 33 arms, n=5051). Percentage of 2L-Ctx delivery ranged from 14 – 68% and correlated with OS (r=.49 [.26 – .67], p<.01) and PPS (r=.57 [.36 – .72], p<.01). When phase II studies were excluded, correlation was improved for OS (r=.63 [.35 – .81], p<.01) and PPS (r=.79 [.59 – .89], p<.01). Percentage of locally advanced disease did not correlate with OS/PPS nor affect prior analysis. Conclusions: Whilst awaiting further advancement in the 1st line setting, increased delivery of 2L-Ctx to patients with APC and maintained performance status may offer a survival benefit.

An economic analysis of axitinib and sorafenib for second-line treatment of cytokine-refractory patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in the United States (US).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15601-e15601
Author(s):  
Ipek Özer-Stillman ◽  
Apoorva Ambavane ◽  
Paul Cislo
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Cost Difference ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Cost

e15601 Background: Cytokines are a first-line treatment option for a subset of advanced RCC patients in the US. After progression on cytokines, NCCN guidelines recommend targeted agents, such as axitinib and sorafenib. Subgroup analysis of post-cytokine patients in the phase III AXIS trial found that axitinib increased median progression free survival (PFS) compared with sorafenib (12.0 vs. 6.6 months, p<0.0001), while overall survival (OS) showed no difference (29.4 vs. 27.8 months, p=0.144). An economic analysis for this subgroup was conducted from a US healthcare payer perspective. Methods: A cohort partition model with monthly cycles was constructed to estimate direct medical costs and health outcomes, discounted at 3.0% per annum, over cohort lifetime. Patients were apportioned into 3 health states (progression-free, progressed and dead) based on OS and PFS Kaplan-Meier curves for the post-cytokine subgroup in the AXIS trial. Active treatment was applied until progression, followed by best supportive care (BSC) alone thereafter. The wholesale acquisition costs were based from RedBook. Adverse event (AE) management costs were obtained from published studies. AE rates and utility values were informed by the AXIS trial. Administrative claims data from MarketScan Database were analyzed to estimate costs for BSC and routine care of second-line advanced RCC patients. Results: The total per-patient lifetime costs were estimated to be $242,750 for axitinib and $168,880 for sorafenib and most of the cost difference (84%) was due to the higher total medication cost of axitinib. The cost difference was sensitive to dose intensity and length of treatment. The difference in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) for axitinib versus sorafenib was minor (1.3 versus 1.2) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for axitinib compared with sorafenib was $683,209/QALY. Conclusions: For cytokine-refractory advanced RCC patients, axitinib resulted in an ICER > $650,000/QALY versus sorafenib due to high drug costs and lack of OS benefit, indicating that axitinib may not present good value for money as 2nd line treatment when compared to sorafenib in the US.

LAPACT: An open-label, multicenter phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) plus gemcitabine (Gem) in patients (pts) with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS477-TPS477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Jill Lacy ◽  
Scot D. Dowden ◽  
Javier Sastre ◽  
Venu Gopal Bathini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Tumors

TPS477 Background: In pts with LAPC, more effective systemic therapies may be associated with improved local control, delay of metastasis, and overall survival (OS). The phase III MPACT trial in pts with metastatic PC demonstrated longer OS (median, 8.7 vs 6.6 mos; HR, 0.72; P < 0.001) and an ≈ 3-fold greater shrinkage of primary tumors with nab-P + Gem vs Gem alone (−22.15% vs −7.02%), raising the possibility of improved local PC control with nab-P + Gem. LAPACT will assess the efficacy and safety of nab-P + Gem in LAPC. Methods: LAPACT will enroll treatment-naive pts (planned n ≈ 110) in the United States, Canada, and Europe with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 1, confirmed unresectable LAPC, no distant metastases, and adequate organ function. Pts with mixed-origin tumors, any other malignancy within 5 years, peripheral neuropathy grade > 1, or clinically significant ascites are ineligible. Pts will receive nab-P 125 mg/m2 + Gem 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Pts without progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity after 6 cycles will receive investigator’s choice of surgery, chemoradiotherapy, or continued nab-P + Gem. If a major response is observed, surgery may occur prior to completing 6 cycles of nab-P + Gem. The primary endpoint is time to treatment failure (TTF; time from first therapy dose to discontinuation due to PD, start of a new non–protocol-defined anti-cancer therapy, or death). The study design allows for 80% power at a 1-sided α of 0.05 to detect a 30% increase over the 5.1-month median TTF observed for nab-P + Gem in the MPACT study. The secondary endpoints are disease control rate (DCR) after 6 cycles, overall response rate, progression-free survival, OS, safety, and quality of life. The exploratory endpoint is correlation of changes in circulating nucleic acids with PD and treatment response. An interim DCR analysis will occur after all pts have completed 6 cycles of nab-P + Gem, discontinued therapy due to PD, died, or started a new non–protocol-defined therapy before completing 6 cycles of therapy. Enrollment is ongoing (first pt enrolled in April 2015). Clinical trial information: NCT02301143.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document