Antibacterial Activity and Irritation Potential of Selected Essential Oil Components – Structure-Activity Relationship
A selection of structurally diverse components of essential oils was subjected to an antibacterial screening against the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae as well as the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae using a broth microdilution method. In addition, the irritation potential of these substances to mucous membranes was evaluated by a modified HET-CAM (Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane) assay. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and irritation threshold concentrations (ITC) were compared in order to identify substances with a low mucous membrane irritation potential at the antibacterially effective concentration. Regarding the antibacterial activity, the most active substances were cinnamaldehyde, phenols, monoterpene alcohols and aldehydes. Oxygenated monoterpenes and phenylpropanoids without either alcohol or aldehyde function (ethers, ketones) showed moderate activity. Mono- and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons, as well as sesquiterpene alcohols, were more or less inactive against most of the bacteria tested, with the exception of Streptococcus pneumoniae whose growth was inhibited by sesquiterpenes at exceptionally low concentrations. In most cases, the irritation potential of the test compounds could also be traced back to their structural features. 2-Phenylethanol, monoterpene alcohols, phenols and aromatic aldehydes had the lowest ITC-values, followed by monoterpene aldehydes, ketones and ethers. In contrast, monoterpene hydrocarbons caused irritation only at higher doses. Of special interest was the fact that all the sesquiterpenes tested were not irritant even when applied undiluted to the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM).