Socioeconomic position and one-year mortality risk among patients with heart failure: A nationwide register-based cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Andersen ◽  
Thomas Alexander Gerds ◽  
Gunnar Gislason ◽  
Morten Schou ◽  
Christian Torp-Pedersen ◽  
...  

Aims We sought to determine whether socioeconomic position affects the survival of patients with heart failure treated in a national healthcare system. Methods We linked national Danish registers, identified 145,690 patients with new-onset heart failure between 2000 and 2015, and obtained information on education and income levels. We analysed differences in survival by income quartile and educational level using multiple Cox regression, stratified by sex. We standardised one-year mortality risks according to income level by age, year of diagnosis, cohabitation status, educational level, comorbidities and medical treatment of all patients. We standardised one-year mortality risk according to educational level by age and year of diagnosis. Results One-year mortality was inversely related to income. In women the standardised average one-year mortality risk was 28.0% in the lowest income quartile and 24.3% in the highest income quartile, a risk difference of −3.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) −4.9% to −2.6%). In men the standardised one-year mortality risk was 26.1% in the lowest income quartile and 20.2% in the highest income quartile, a risk difference of −5.8% (95% CI −6.8% to −4.9%). Similar gradients in standardised mortality were present between the highest and lowest educational levels: −6.6% (95% CI −9.6% to −3.5%) among women and −5.0% (95% CI −6.3% to −3.7%) among men. Conclusions Income and educational level affect the survival of patients with heart failure, even in a national health system. Research is needed to investigate how socioeconomic differences affect survival.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
O.M Aldaas ◽  
F Lupercio ◽  
C.L Malladi ◽  
P.S Mylavarapu ◽  
D Darden ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Catheter ablation improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the role of catheter ablation in HF patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Purpose To determine the efficacy of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF relative to those with HFrEF. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared AF recurrence at one year after catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF versus those with HFrEF. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method for dichotomous variables, where a RR<1.0 favors the HFpEF group. Results Four studies with a total of 563 patients were included, of which 312 had HFpEF and 251 had HFrEF. All patients included were undergoing first time catheter ablation of AF. Patients with HFpEF experienced similar recurrence of AF one year after ablation on or off antiarrhythmic drugs compared to those with HFrEF (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.69–1.10, p=0.24), as shown in Figure 1. Recurrence of AF was assessed with electrocardiography, Holter monitoring, and/or event monitoring at scheduled follow-up visits and final follow-up. Conclusion Based on the results of this meta-analysis, catheter ablation of AF in patients with HFpEF appears as efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm as in those with HFrEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daichi Maeda ◽  
Nobuyuki Kagiyama ◽  
Kentaro Jujo ◽  
Kazuya Saito ◽  
Kentaro Kamiya ◽  
...  

AbstractFrailty is a common comorbidity associated with adverse events in patients with heart failure, and early recognition is key to improving its management. We hypothesized that the AST to ALT ratio (AAR) could be a marker of frailty in patients with heart failure. Data from the FRAGILE-HF study were analyzed. A total of 1327 patients aged ≥ 65 years hospitalized with heart failure were categorized into three groups based on their AAR at discharge: low AAR (AAR < 1.16, n = 434); middle AAR (1.16 ≤ AAR < 1.70, n = 487); high AAR (AAR ≥ 1.70, n = 406). The primary endpoint was one-year mortality. The association between AAR and physical function was also assessed. High AAR was associated with lower short physical performance battery and shorter 6-min walk distance, and these associations were independent of age and sex. Logistic regression analysis revealed that high AAR was an independent marker of physical frailty after adjustment for age, sex and body mass index. During follow-up, all-cause death occurred in 161 patients. After adjusting for confounding factors, high AAR was associated with all-cause death (low AAR vs. high AAR, hazard ratio: 1.57, 95% confidence interval, 1.02–2.42; P = 0.040). In conclusion, AAR is a marker of frailty and prognostic for all-cause mortality in older patients with heart failure.


Author(s):  
Satoru Kodama ◽  
Kazuya Fujihara ◽  
Chika Horikawa ◽  
Mayuko Yamada ◽  
Takaaki Sato ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inder S Anand ◽  
Scott D Solomon ◽  
Brian Claggett ◽  
Sanjiv J Shah ◽  
Eileen O’Meara ◽  
...  

Background: Plasma natriuretic peptides (NP) are helpful in the diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and predict adverse outcomes. Levels of NP beyond a certain cut-off level are often used as inclusion criteria in clinical trials to ensure that the patients have HF, and to select patients at higher risk. Whether treatments have a differential effect on outcomes across the spectrum of NP levels is unclear. In the I-Preserve trial a benefit of irbesartan on all outcomes was only seen in HFpEF patients with low but not high NP levels. We hypothesized that in the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial, spironolactone might have a greater benefit in patients with lower NP levels. Methods and Results: BNP (n=468) or NT-proBNP (n=400) levels were available at baseline in 868 patients with HFpEF enrolled in the natriuretic peptide stratum (BNP ≥100 pg/mL or an NT- proBNP ≥360 pg/mL) of the TOPCAT trial. In a multi-variable Cox regression model, that included age, gender, region (Americas vs. Russia/Georgia), atrial fibrillation, diabetes, eGFR, BMI and heart rate, higher BNP or NT-proBNP as a continuous, standardized log-transformed variable or grouped by terciles (see Figure for BNP & NT-proBNP tercile values) was independently associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for heart failure (Figure-1). There was a significant interaction between the effect of spironolactone and baseline BNP or NT-proBNP terciles for the primary outcome (P=0.02, Figure-2), with greater benefit of the drug in the lower compared to higher NP terciles. Conclusions: The benefit of spironolactone in lower risk HFpEF patients may indicate effects of the drug on early, but not late higher-risk stage of the disease. These findings question the strategy of using elevated NP as a patient selection criterion in HFpEF trials.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon M Dunlay ◽  
Yariv Gerber ◽  
Susan A Weston ◽  
Jill M Killian ◽  
Margaret M Redfield

Introduction: Mortality among patients with heart failure (HF) is high. Though individual biomarkers have been studied to determine their value in risk prediction, the role of a multimarker strategy in predicting mortality above established risk indicators requires evaluation in a relevant cohort using robust analytical methods. Objective: To determine whether adding C-reactive protein (CRP), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and troponin T (TnT) to established risk indicators improved HF mortality risk prediction. Methods: Olmsted County residents presenting with HF from July 2004 to September 2007 were prospectively recruited to undergo biomarker measurement. We investigated whether addition of CRP, BNP, and TnT to a model including established risk indicators improved 6-month mortality risk prediction using multiple methods ( c statistic, net reclassification index, integrated discrimination improvement). Results: Of 566 participants (mean age 77±13 years, 48% male), 87(15%) patients died after 6 months follow-up. Patients with CRP (<12.1mg/L), BNP (<341pg/mL), and TnT (≥0.01ng/mL) below the median (n=112) had the lowest mortality (3%), those with one or two biomarkers above the median had intermediate mortality, and those with all biomarkers above the median (n=105) had markedly increased 6-month mortality (33%). After adjustment for other predictors, higher CRP, BNP, and TnT were each associated with increased mortality, with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.66(1.24 –2.24), 2.06(1.42–3.07), and 1.45(1.12–1.87), respectively. While adding CRP, BNP, and TnT individually to the model improved mortality risk prediction, the combination of two or more biomarkers offered greater incremental benefit. Using all biomarkers resulted in an increase in the c statistic from 0.747 to 0.832 (p<0.001), a net reclassification index of 0.33 (p<0.001), and a 100% relative improvement in risk discrimination (integrated discrimination improvement 0.097, p<0.001). Conclusions: The combined use of CRP, BNP, and TnT markedly improved the prediction of 6-month mortality in HF beyond established risk indicators. Implementation of a multimarker strategy including CRP, BNP, and TnT for risk prediction in HF should be considered. This research has received full or partial funding support from the American Heart Association, AHA Midwest Affiliate (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota & Wisconsin).


Circulation ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 133 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Narelle M Berry ◽  
Shahid Ullah ◽  
Vincent L Versace ◽  
Alexandra L McCarthy ◽  
John J Atherton ◽  
...  

Introduction: The causal link between chemotherapy treatments and subsequent cardiotoxicity is well established, particularly for children with hematological malignancies. Little information exists on the characteristics and outcomes for patients with heart failure (HF) after chemotherapy. This study aimed to describe the characteristics, survival and mortality of patients who received chemotherapy for hematological cancer (leukemias, lymphomas and related disorders) before 18 years old and subsequently developed HF compared to those who did not. Methods: Linked health data (1996-2009) from the Queensland Cancer Registry, Death Registry and Hospital Administration records for HF and chemotherapy admissions were reviewed. From all breast and hematological cancers patients (n=73,158), 15,987 received chemotherapy, including 819 patients aged ≤18 years at time of cancer diagnosis. Patients were categorized as those with an index HF admission (occurred after cancer diagnosis) and those without an index HF admission (non HF). Results: Of the 819 patients, 3.7% (n=30) had an index HF admission. Median age of HF patients at time of cancer diagnosis was 5 years (IQR 3-12) compared to 7 years (IQR 3-14) in the non HF group (p=0.503). Median follow up from cancer diagnosis was 2.5 years in the HF group compared to 5.42 years in the non HF group (p<0.01). Of those who developed HF, 70% (n=21) had the index admission within 12 months of their cancer diagnosis. Of those with HF, 53.3% (n=16) died (all cause) compared to 14.6% (n=115) with no HF. On adjustment for age, sex and chemotherapy admissions, HF patients had an almost 5 fold increased mortality risk compared to non HF patients (HR 4.91 [95% CI, 2.88-8.36]) (Figure 1). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that in children with hematological cancers the onset of HF occurred soon after chemotherapy and mortality risk is almost 5 times that of children who do not develop HF. Innovative strategies are still needed for the prevention and management of cardiotoxicity in this population.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Tamaki ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
Tetsuya Watanabe ◽  
Takashi Morita ◽  
Yoshio Furukawa ◽  
...  

Background: A four-parameter risk model including cardiac iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging and readily available clinical parameters has been recently developed for the prediction of 2-year cardiac mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) using a Japanese CHF database consisting of 1322 patients. However, there is no information available on the usefulness of 2-year MIBG-based cardiac mortality risk score for the prediction of post-discharge prognosis in patients with heart failure with preserved LVEF (HFpEF) who are admitted with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Methods and Results: Patients' data were extracted from The Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT-HFpEF) study, which is a prospective multicenter observational registry for ADHF patients with LVEF ≥50% in Osaka. We studied 239 patients who survived to discharge. Cardiac MIBG imaging was performed just before discharge. The 2-year cardiac mortality risk score was calculated using four parameters, including age, LVEF, NYHA functional class, and the cardiac MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio on delayed image. The patients were stratified into three groups based on the 2-year cardiac mortality risk score: low- (<4%), intermediate- (4-12%), and high-risk (>12%) groups. The endpoint was all-cause death. During a follow-up period of 1.6±0.8 years, 33 patients had all-cause death. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that 2-year MIBG-based cardiac mortality risk score was an independent predictor of all-cause death (p=0.0009). There was significant difference in the rate of all-cause death among the three groups stratified by 2-year cardiac mortality risk score (Figure). Conclusions: In this multicenter study, the 2-year MIBG-based cardiac mortality risk score was shown to be useful for the prediction of post-discharge clinical outcome in HFpEF patients admitted for ADHF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document