scholarly journals RACE INDEPENDENTLY PREDICTS UNSUCCESSFUL HEALING OF OSTEOCHONDRITIS DISSECANS IN THE PEDIATRIC KNEE

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0003
Author(s):  
Jigar S. Gandhi ◽  
Theodore J. Ganley

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported disparities in medical and surgical care along the lines of race and socioeconomic status. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of these factors on successful or unsuccessful healing of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions in the knee. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients younger than 18 years that were treated for a knee OCD lesion at our urban, tertiary children’s hospital between 2006 and 2017. Demographic data included patient-reported race, median household income for the patient’s zip code, and insurance status. We also collected information regarding clinical history, imaging, treatment course, and post-treatment outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was healing of the OCD lesion based on radiographic and clinical examination. Univariate analysis was followed by purposeful entry multivariate regression to control for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 205 children with mean follow-up of 15.8 ± 6.5 months were included in the analysis. The mean age was 12.4 ± 2.8 years and 145 (71%) were male. At their most recent follow-up, 28 subjects (13.7%) did not show radiographic or clinical evidence of healing. In univariate analysis, non-healing lesions were found in 25% of black children compared to 9.4% of white children (p=0.02). There was no difference in insurance status or median household income between patients who successfully and unsuccessfully healed their OCD lesion. After controlling for age, sex, sports participation, lesion size and stability, skeletal maturity, and operative vs. non-operative treatment in a multivariate model, black children had 6.7 times higher odds of unsuccessful healing compared to their white counterparts (95% CI 1.1, 41.7; p=0.04). CONCLUSION: In this study, black children with OCD of the knee were less likely to heal than white patients even when accounting for socioeconomic and other factors in a multivariate model.

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando D Testai ◽  
Carl D Langefeld ◽  
Faisal Mukarram ◽  
Norma K Castillo ◽  
Maureen Hillmann ◽  
...  

Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with early neurological deterioration and death. Prior studies showed that delays in seeking medical attention may occur among minorities. In this study we investigated the factors affecting time from symptom onset to ER arrival (TOA) in a race/ethnic enriched population. Methods: Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ERICH) is a prospective study of spontaneous ICH. Baseline characteristics, presenting symptoms, first contact (911 vs. ER vs. primary physician), ICH volume, location and intraventricular extension, insurance status, GCS at presentation, and TOA were collected. Data was analyzed using generalized linear models and Spearman’s rank correlations. TOA was natural log transformed and a multivariate model was developed using backward elimination (P-value=0.05). Results: A total of 1158 subjects were enrolled; 28 were excluded due to lack of TOA. Of the 1,030 included 59% were men with 24% whites, 41% blacks, and 35% Hispanics. Mean age was 61±15 years, mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at presentation was 12.4±3.7 (median=15), and median TOA was 431 min (interquartile range 106-820). Location of ICH was 56% deep, 28% lobar, 8% cerebellum, and 5% brainstem. Approximately 29% of subjects had no medical insurance, 36% had medicare, 18% medicaid, 36% private insurance, and 1% VA insurance. In univariate analysis women, use of 911, EMS run, different presenting symptoms, lobar and deep location, and low GCS were associated with shorter TOA. In multivariate model only women (p=0.05), GCS (p=0.04), use of 911 (p<0.001), EMS run (p<0.001), and weakness and dysarthria as presenting symptoms remained significant. Ethnicity was not a significant predictor (p=0.79). These variables explain 23.3% of the variation in TOA. Conclusion: Ethnicity and insurance status did not affect time to presentation. Women, use of 911, EMS run, weakness and lower GCS were associated with shorter TOA in ICH. Increased education in target populations with higher incidence of ICH such as minorities on stroke signs/symptoms and use of 911 may expedite access to medical care. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of TOA on outcome.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 900.1-900
Author(s):  
L. Diebold ◽  
T. Wirth ◽  
V. Pradel ◽  
N. Balandraud ◽  
E. Fockens ◽  
...  

Background:Among therapeutics used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Tocilizumab (TCZ) and Abatacept (ABA) are both biologic agents that can be delivered subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV). During the first COVID-19 lockdown in France, all patients treated with IV TCZ or IV ABA were offered the option to switch to SC administration.Objectives:The primary aim was to assess the impact of changing the route of administration on the disease activity. The second aim was to assess whether the return to IV route at the patient’s request was associated with disease activity variation, flares, anxiety, depression and low physical activity during the lockdown.Methods:We conducted a prospective monocentric observational study. Eligibility criteria: Adult ≥ 18 years old, RA treated with IV TCZ or IV ABA with a stable dose ≥3 months, change in administration route (from IV to SC) between March 16, 2020, and April 17, 2020. The following data were collected at baseline and 6 months later (M6): demographics, RA characteristics, treatment, history of previous SC treatment, disease activity (DAS28), self-administered questionnaires on flares, RA life repercussions, physical activity, anxiety and depression (FLARE, RAID, Ricci &Gagnon, HAD).The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a DAS28 variation>1.2 at M6. Analyses: Chi2-test for quantitative variables and Mann-Whitney test for qualitative variables. Factors associated with return to IV route identification was performed with univariate and multivariate analysis.Results:Among the 84 patients who were offered to switch their treatment route of administration, 13 refused to change their treatment. Among the 71 who switched (48 TCZ, 23 ABA), 58 had a M6 follow-up visit (13 lost of follow-up) and DAS28 was available for 49 patients at M6. Main baseline characteristics: female 81%, mean age 62.7, mean disease duration: 16.0, ACPA positive: 72.4%, mean DAS28: 2.01, previously treated with SC TCZ or ABA: 17%.At M6, the mean DAS28 variation was 0.18 ± 0.15. Ten (12.2%) patients had a DAS28 worsening>1.2 (ABA: 5/17 [29.4%] and TCZ: 5/32 [15.6%], p= 0.152) and 19 patients (32.8%) had a DAS28 worsening>0.6 (ABA: 11/17 [64.7%] and TCZ: 8/32 [25.0%], p= 0.007).At M6, 41 patients (77.4%) were back to IV route (26 TCZ, 15 ABA) at their request. The proportion of patients with a DAS28 worsening>1.2 and>0.6 in the groups return to IV versus SC maintenance were 22.5%, 42.5% versus 11.1% and 22.2% (p=0.4), respectively. The univariate analysis identified the following factors associated with the return to IV route: HAD depression score (12 vs 41, p=0.009), HAS anxiety score (12 vs 41, p=0.047) and corticosteroid use (70% vs 100%, p=0.021), in the SC maintenance vs return to IV, respectively.Conclusion:The change of administration route of TCZ and ABA during the first COVID-19 lockdown was infrequently associated with a worsening of RA disease. However, the great majority of the patients (77.4%) request to return to IV route, even without disease activity worsening. This nocebo effect was associated with higher anxiety and depression scores.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 876-877
Author(s):  
W. Zhu ◽  
T. De Silva ◽  
L. Eades ◽  
S. Morton ◽  
S. Ayoub ◽  
...  

Background:Telemedicine was widely utilised to complement face-to-face (F2F) care in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the impact of this on patient care is poorly understood.Objectives:To investigate the impact of telemedicine during COVID-19 on outpatient rheumatology services.Methods:We retrospectively audited patient electronic medical records from rheumatology outpatient clinics in an urban tertiary rheumatology centre between April-May 2020 (telemedicine cohort) and April-May 2019 (comparator cohort). Differences in age, sex, primary diagnosis, medications, and proportion of new/review appointments were assessed using Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests. Univariate analysis was used to estimate associations between telemedicine usage and the ability to assign a diagnosis in patients without a prior rheumatological diagnosis, the frequency of changes to immunosuppression, subsequent F2F review, planned admissions or procedures, follow-up phone calls, and time to next appointment.Results:3,040 outpatient appointments were audited: 1,443 from 2019 and 1,597 from 2020. There was no statistically significant difference in the age, sex, proportion of new/review appointments, or frequency of immunosuppression use between the cohorts. Inflammatory arthritis (IA) was a more common diagnosis in the 2020 cohort (35.1% vs 31%, p=0.024). 96.7% (n=1,444) of patients seen in the 2020 cohort were reviewed via telemedicine. In patients without an existing rheumatological diagnosis, the odds of making a diagnosis at the appointment were significantly lower in 2020 (28.6% vs 57.4%; OR 0.30 [95% CI 0.16-0.53]; p<0.001). Clinicians were also less likely to change immunosuppressive therapy in 2020 (22.6% vs 27.4%; OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.65-0.92]; p=0.004). This was mostly driven by less de-escalation in therapy (10% vs 12.6%; OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.59-0.95]; p=0.019) as there was no statistically significant difference in the escalation or switching of immunosuppressive therapies. There was no significant difference in frequency of follow-up phone calls, however, patients seen in 2020 required earlier follow-up appointments (p<0.001). There was also no difference in unplanned rheumatological presentations but significantly fewer planned admissions and procedures in 2020 (1% vs 2.6%, p=0.002). Appointment non-attendance reduced in 2020 to 6.5% from 10.9% in 2019 (OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.44-0.74]; p<0.001), however the odds of discharging a patient from care were significantly lower in 2020 (3.9% vs 6%; OR 0.64 [95% CI 0.46-0.89]; p=0.008), although there was no significance when patients who failed to attend were excluded. Amongst patients seen via telemedicine in 2020, a subsequent F2F appointment was required in 9.4%. The predictors of needing a F2F review were being a new patient (OR 6.28 [95% CI 4.10-9.64]; p<0.001), not having a prior rheumatological diagnosis (OR 18.43 [95% CI: 2.35-144.63]; p=0.006), or having a diagnosis of IA (OR 2.85 [95% CI: 1.40-5.80]; p=0.004) or connective tissue disease (OR 3.22 [95% CI: 1.11-9.32]; p=0.031).Conclusion:Most patients in the 2020 cohort were seen via telemedicine. Telemedicine use during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with reduced clinic non-attendance, but with diagnostic delay, reduced likelihood of changing existing immunosuppressive therapy, earlier requirement for review, and lower likelihood of discharge. While the effects of telemedicine cannot be differentiated from changes in practice related to other aspects of the pandemic, they suggest that telemedicine may have a negative impact on the timeliness of management of rheumatology patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (9) ◽  
pp. 996-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randi L. Lassiter ◽  
Robyn M. Hatley

This study was conducted to assess whether race and socioeconomic status influence the management method used to treat pediatric perforated appendicitis. Nonelective pediatric admissions with a primary diagnosis of appendicitis were analyzed using data from the 2001–2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the association between race, insurance status, median household income, rural/metropolitan location, and the risk adjusted odds of undergoing surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy, percutaneous drainage, or neither surgery nor percutaneous drainage. A total of 46,211 admissions of perforated appendicitis were identified. Surgery was performed in 90.5 per cent of them. Black children were less likely to have surgery [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.53] and more likely to be managed non-surgically with percutaneous drainage (AOR = 1.79). Self-pay patients were less likely to have laparoscopic surgery (AOR = 0.80). Children from rural counties were more likely to undergo surgery than those from larger metropolitan areas (AOR = 1.30). Higher estimated household income did not predict the method of treatment. Although previous studies have attributed racial disparities in outcomes for appendicitis to different rates of perforation and access to care, these findings demonstrate significantly dissimilar management strategies for patients presenting with a similar disease process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0020
Author(s):  
Alessandra L. Falk ◽  
Regina Hanstein ◽  
Chaiyaporn Kulsakdinun

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Socioeconomic status has been recognized throughout the medical literature, both within orthopedics and beyond, as a factor that influences outcomes after surgery, and can result in substandard care. Within the foot and ankle subspecialty, there is limited data regarding socioeconomic status and post-operative outcomes, with the current literature focusing on outcomes for diabetic feet. However, ankle fractures are among the most common fractures encountered by orthopedic surgeons. While a few studies have explored the impact of ankle fractures on employment and disability status, the effect of socioeconomic status on return to work post operatively has not yet been investigated. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of low socioeconomic status on return to work. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 592 medical charts of patients with CPT code 27766, 27792, 27814, 27822, 27823, 27827, 27829, 27826, 27828 from 2015-2018. Included were patients >18 yrs of age who sustained an acute ankle fracture, were employed prior to the injury, and with information on return to work after ankle surgery, zip code, race, ethnicity and insurance status. Excluded were patients who were not employed prior to their injury. Socioeconomic status was either defined by insurance status - Medicaid/Medicare, commercial, or workman’s compensation -, or by assessing socioeconomic status (SES) using medial household per capita income by zip code as generated and reported by the US National Census Bureau’s 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. The national dataset was divided into quartiles with the lowest quartile defined as low SES. Patients who had income that fell within this income category were classified as low SES. Results: 174 patients were included with an average follow-up of 10.2months. 22/174 (12.6%) patients didn’t return to work post-operatively. Univariate analysis identified non-sedentary work to decrease the likelihood of return to work (HR:0.637; p=0.03). Patients with a low SES were more prevalent in the no return group compared to the return to work group (86% vs 60%; p=0.028). 95% of patients with low SES were a minority compared to 56% with average/high SES (p<0.005). Patients with low SES had a higher BMI (p=0.026), a longer hospitalization (p=0.04) and more wound complications (p=0.032). Insurance type didn’t affect return to work (p=0.158). Patients with workman’s compensation had a longer follow-up time and a longer time to return to work compared to other insurances (p<0.005 for each comparison). Conclusion: Low socioeconomic status based on income, not insurance type, affected return to work after an ankle fracture ORIF. Patients with workman’s compensation took a longer time to return to work compared to other insurance types. These findings warrants the need to consider socioeconomic status when allocating resources to treat these patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 1049-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal Bhutiani ◽  
Keith R. Miller ◽  
Matthew V. Benns ◽  
Nicholas A. Nash ◽  
Glen A. Franklin ◽  
...  

To date, no studies have examined the relationship between geographic and socioeconomic factors and the frequency of pedestrians sustaining traumatic injuries from a motor vehicle. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of location on the frequency of pedestrian injury by motor vehicle. The University of Louisville Trauma Registry was queried for patients who had been struck by a motor vehicle from 2010 to 2015. Demographic and injury information as well as outcome measures were evaluated to identify those impacting risk of pedestrian versus motor vehicle accidents. Number of incidents was correlated with lower median household income. There was also a moderate correlation between the number of incidents and population density. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a significant association between increased median household income and distance from downtown Louisville and decreased risk of death following pedestrian versus motor vehicle accident. Incidence of pedestrian injury by motor vehicles is influenced by regional socioeconomic status. Efforts to decrease the frequency of these events should include further investigation into the mechanisms underpinning this relationship.


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1900096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Roussel ◽  
Edouard Sage ◽  
Gilbert Massard ◽  
Pascal-Alexandre Thomas ◽  
Yves Castier ◽  
...  

IntroductionSince July 2007, the French high emergency lung transplantation (HELT) allocation procedure prioritises available lung grafts to waiting patients with imminent risk of death. The relative impacts of donor, recipient and matching on the outcome following HELT remain unknown. We aimed at deciphering the relative impacts of donor, recipient and matching on the outcome following HELT in an exhaustive administrative database.MethodsAll lung transplantations performed in France were prospectively registered in an administrative database. We retrospectively reviewed the procedures performed between July 2007 and December 2015, and analysed the impact of donor, recipient and matching on overall survival after the HELT procedure by fitting marginal Cox models.ResultsDuring the study period, 2335 patients underwent lung transplantation in 11 French centres. After exclusion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema, 1544 patients were included: 503 HELT and 1041 standard lung transplantation allocations. HELT was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 1.41 (95% CI 1.22–1.64; p<0.0001) in univariate analysis, decreasing to 1.32 (95% CI 1.10–1.60) after inclusion of recipient characteristics in a multivariate model. A donor score computed to predict long-term survival was significantly different between the HELT and standard lung transplantation groups (p=0.014). However, the addition of donor characteristics to recipient characteristics in the multivariate model did not change the hazard ratio associated with HELT.ConclusionsThis exhaustive French national study suggests that HELT is associated with an adverse outcome compared with regular allocation. This adverse outcome is mainly related to the severity status of the recipients rather than donor or matching characteristics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22
Author(s):  
Thomas Q. Xu ◽  
Aaron L. Wiegmann ◽  
Taylor J. Jarazcewski ◽  
Ethan M. Ritz ◽  
Carlos A. Q. Santos ◽  
...  

Introduction: Health-care disparities have been reported throughout medical literature for decades. While blatant explicit bias is not prevalent, a substantial body of research has been published suggesting that systemic biases related to sex, race, income, and insurance status likely exist. To our knowledge, no study has assessed the impact of patient race and insurance status on clinical decision-making in facial fracture repair in the United States. Thus, the objective of this project was to assess if race and insurance status impacted whether patients obtained open or closed treatment of simple mandibular fractures. Methods: Patients who had either open or closed treatment of mandibular fractures were extracted from the 2012 and 2013 National Inpatient Sample and analyzed. Patients who had a length of stay longer than 3 days or died during their inpatient stay were excluded. These exclusion criteria were used to control for patients with polytrauma as well as complicated fractures. Univariate analysis was undertaken to elucidate different variable associations with the type of reduction performed. All covariates were then entered into a multivariable logistic regression model to test the variables simultaneously. Results: Patients with simple condylar, alveolar border, and closed mandibular fractures were more likely to undergo closed reduction (CR) on univariate analysis, as were patients with female gender and a fall mechanism ( P value < .05). African Americans, Hispanics, and patients without insurance were more likely to undergo open reduction on univariate analysis ( P value < .05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with simple condylar, subcondylar, alveolar border, or closed mandibular fractures were more likely to undergo a CR, as were patients with female gender and a firearm or fall mechanism ( P < .05). However, neither race nor insurance status demonstrated a statistically significant association with closed or open reduction. Conclusion: Anatomic location and mechanism of injury were the variables found to be significantly associated with patients undergoing open reduction versus CR of simple mandibular fractures—not race or insurance status.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
M. Y. Ho ◽  
J. S. Albarrak ◽  
W. Y. Cheung

16 Background: Surgical resection plays an integral role in the multimodality treatment of patients with EC or GC. The distribution of thoracic and general surgeons at the county level varies widely across the US. The impact of the allocation of these surgeons on cancer outcomes is unclear. Our aims were to 1) examine the effect of surgeon density on EC or GC mortality, 2) compare the relative roles of thoracic and general surgeons on EC and GC outcomes and 3) determine other county characteristics associated with cancer mortality. Methods: Using county-level data from the Area Resources File, U.S. Census and National Cancer Institute, we constructed regression models to explore the effect of thoracic and general surgeon density on EC and GC mortality, respectively. Multivariate analyses controlled for incidence rate, county demographics (population aged 65+, proportion eligible for Medicare, education attainment, metropolitan vs. rural), socioeconomic factors (median household income) and healthcare resources (number of general practitioners, number of hospital beds). Results: In total, 332 and 402 counties were identified for EC and GC, respectively: mean EC/GC incidence = 5.29/6.83; mean EC/GC mortality=4.70/3.92; 91% were metropolitan and 9% were rural; mean thoracic and general surgeon densities were 10 and 63 per 100,000 people, respectively. When compared to counties with no thoracic surgeons, those with at least 1 thoracic surgeon had reduced EC mortality (beta coefficient -0.031). For GC, counties with 1 or more general surgeons also had decreased number of deaths (beta coefficient -0.095) when compared with those without any surgeons. While increasing the density of surgeons beyond 10 only yielded minimal improvements in EC mortality, it resulted in significant further reductions in GC mortality. Other county characteristics, such as increased number of hospital beds and higher median household income, were correlated with improved outcomes. Conclusions: Mortality from GC appears to be more susceptible to the benefits of increased surgeon density. For EC, a strategic policy of allocating health resources and distributing the workforce across counties will be best able to optimize outcomes at the population-level. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10042-10042
Author(s):  
Juliette Thariat ◽  
Laurence Moureau-Zabotto ◽  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
Antoine Italiano ◽  
Jacques-Olivier Bay ◽  
...  

10042 Background: 40-50% of sarcomas become metastatic. Median survival of metastatic patients has improved over time. The probably multifactorial reasons for such improvement are not fully clear. Noteworthy, for patients with a controlled primary and a limited number of lung metastases, complete resection of their metastases yields survival rates of up to 40% at three years. Advances in surgery, radiotherapy and radiofrequency have fostered the use of local treatments for various metastatic sites (lung, liver, spine...). Methods: A multicentric retrospective study of the Groupe Sarcome Francais (GSF-GETO); approved by the nationally-review board and ethical committee, was conducted to assess the impact of local ablative treatment on overall survival. Patients who had had oligometastases (any site, 1-5 synchronous metastases) at diagnostic or during the course of disease between 2000 and 2010 were included. Results: Median age of the 243 oligometastatic sarcoma patients was 53 years-old (11-86). Patients had grade I, II and III in 7.5%, 29.6% and 63.3% of cases, respectively with various histologies. 69% of patients underwent local ablative treatment of metastases. Median follow-up was 59 months (4-212) for living patients. Median overall survival was 51 months (1-348). On univariate analysis, grade, histology, absence of chemotherapy, local ablative treatment (surgery, irradiation, radiofrequency or chemoembolisation) correlated with survival but not age or site of oligometastasis. On multivariate analyses, grade (hazard ratio HR 0.12 [CI95 0.3-0.6]) and local ablative treatment (HR 3.8 [CI95 2.1-7.1]) remained significant. Conclusions: Local ablative treatment of metastases is associated with better survival in sarcoma patients with oligometastatic disease. The role of the locoregional treatment of metastases and its impact on quality of life should be assessed prospectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document