scholarly journals Compared the Effect of Mitroxantrone ( MA) with Idarubicine (IA) for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Induction Therapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5229-5229
Author(s):  
Peilong Lai ◽  
Mingyan Wu ◽  
Minming Li ◽  
Chengxin Deng ◽  
Zesheng Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Event Rates ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: Treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has remained relatively unchanged over the past few decades. Standard-dose cytarabine and idarubicin (7+3 IA) or daunorubicin (7+3 DA) induction regimen have been recommended for AML induction therapy by global guidelines. Mitroxantrone, a type II topoisomerase inhibitor, disrupts DNA synthesis and DNA repair, has been recommended as a salvage treatment for refractory/relapsed AML or induction therapy for elderly patients. Objective: To compare the the clinical response and adverse events of Idarubicin regimen ( IA) with mitoxantrone and cytarabine (MA) in the treatment of newly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) . Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 164 patients with newly diagnosed AML who received either IA (idarubicin 10mg/M2, d1-3; cytarabine 200mg/d, d1-7) or MA regimen (mitoxantrone 10mg/M2, d1-d3; cytarabine 200mg/d, d1-7) as induction therapy from September 2010 to November 2017 at Guangdong General Hospital. The primary end point of this study was complete response and complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CR/CRi), with secondary end points were adverse event rates and days of granulocyte and platelet recovery. Results: A total of 164 patients , 90 patients were males and 74 females, the median age was 41 (range:14~64) years old. There were 88 patients received IA regimen and 76 patients received MA regimen. There was no significant difference in clinical features and molecular biological characteristics in two groups (P>0.05). The CR/CRi rate was 72.3% and 64.0% (P=0.263) in IA and MA group after the first induction regimen, respectively. And the accumulated CR/CRi rate was 85.9% and 75.7% in two group, respectively (P=0.109). The common adverse reactions in the two groups were myelosuppression and infection , but with no statistical difference (P>0.05) in the incidence and grade of serious. The grade 4 and grade 5 neutropenia were 95.3% vs.98.7% and 4.7% vs. 1.3%, P>0.05 in IA and MA group respectively. And thrombocytpenia were 72.9% vs.63.2% and 4.7% vs. 1.3%, P>0.05. There was no significant difference in the incidence and severity of gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, respiratory, skin, liver and kidney injury between the two groups (P>0.05). The median days of intravenous antibiotics (including antifungal drugs), neutrophil recovery, platelet recovery and the units of platelet and red blood cell suspension transfusion had no statistical difference in two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: This retrospective study implied mitoxantrone with standard-dose cytarabine (3+7 MA) regimen has similar efficacy and outcome to the idarubicin with standard-dose cytarabine (3+7 IA) regimen for newly diagnosed AML, without increasing the incidence of adverse event rates. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Randomized Clinical Trial of Induction Therapy Comparing Intensified Daunorubicin with Idarubicin in Patients with Previously Untreated De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (JALSG AML201 Study).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2000-2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeki Ohtake ◽  
Shuichi Miyawaki ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujita ◽  
Hitoshi Kiyoi ◽  
Katsuji Shinagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract We conducted a multicenter prospective randomized study to determine whether the intensified daunorubicin (DNR) induction chemotherapy would be as effective as idarubicin (IDR) in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Newly diagnosed adult patients with AML excluding FAB-M3 were consecutively registered and randomized to receive either increased dose of DNR or standard dose of IDR induction chemotherapy. All patients received cytarabine 100mg/m2 daily for 7 days by continuous intravenous infusion, and either DNR 50mg/m2 daily for 5 days or IDR 12mg/m2 daily for 3 days according to randomization. If the patients did not achieve complete remission (CR) after the first induction therapy, the same induction therapy was given once more. Patients achieving CR were again randomized to receive either 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine or 4 courses of conventional multiagent consolidation therapy. The results of later randomization will be reported another abstract. From December 2001 to December 2005, 1064 newly diagnosed patients with de novo AML were registered and 1057 were eligible. Median age was 47 years old (range 15 to 64). Five hundred twenty five patients were randomized to DNR group, and 532 to IDR group. The two groups were well matched for pretreatment characteristics. CR was achieved in 407 patients (77.5%; 95% CI, 73.9% – 81.1%) with 321 (61.1%) after 1 induction course in DNR group and 418 patients (78.6%; 75.1% – 82.1%) with 341 (64.1%) after 1 course in IDR group (p = 0.68). Patients receiving IDR took slightly but significantly longer to recover from neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. There was a higher rate of sepsis in IDR (8.7%) than DNR (4.9%) (p = 0.02). The early death within 60 days occurred in 25 patients (4.7%) in IDR and 11 (2.1%) in DNR (p = 0.03). Logistic regression analysis revealed that induction regimen was not the independent prognostic factor, but CBF leukemia and the percentage of peroxidase positive leukemic blast were the significant independent factors for achieving remission. There was also no significant difference between the groups in the longer-time measures of efficacy: estimated overall survival at 4 years was 49.1% (42.4% – 55.8%) for DNR and 53.1% (47.6% – 58.6%)for IDR (p = 0.37); estimated relapse free survival at 4 years from CR was 42.2% (36.1% – 48.3%) for DNR and 41.8% (35.9% – 47.7%) for IDR (p = 0.62). The Cox proportional hazards analyses showed that the induction regimen did not affect these outcomes. In conclusion, increased dose of DNR and standard dose of IDR both achieve high remission rate and good long-term efficacy, and are equally effective for the treatment of AML patients up to 64 years, although the final assessment will have to be performed after longer follow up.

Etoposide and mitoxantrone in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients with persistent leukemia after a course of induction therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7073-7073
Author(s):  
W. M. McHayleh ◽  
R. Redner ◽  
R. Sehgal ◽  
A. Raptis ◽  
M. Agha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Acute Myeloid

7073 Background: The goal of induction chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is complete remission with restoration of normal bone marrow. If residual leukemia is present after the first course of induction therapy, patients receive a second course identical to the first or receive a non-cross resistant antileukemic regimen. Methods: In a retrospective study of adult patients with newly-diagnosed AML treated at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute between December 2002 and May 2008, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2/d) and etoposide (100 mg/m2/d), both administered intravenously within 5 days as second course therapy of patients not responding to first-course induction therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin. Univariate and multivariate associations between patient characteristics and complete response (CR) were assessed by logistic regression, with overall- and relapse-free survival estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: 74 AML patients (mean age 56 years, range: 18–73 years) completed treatment with etoposide and mitoxantrone; 29 (39%) achieved CR. Lower CR rate was associated with unfavorable cytogenetic risk status at diagnosis and higher percent blasts prior to treatment with mitoxantrone and etoposide. Ten (14%) patients died due to infectious complications. No grade 3 or 4 hepatic toxicities were observed. One patient developed grade 3 cardiac toxicity. Median duration of neutrophil recovery following therapy in patients achieving CR was 29 days. Median overall survival was 9.0 months (95% CI 5.8–14.9 months). The 29 patients who achieved CR received postremission therapy: 16 of these eventually relapsed, while 4 others died without evidence of relapse. Median duration of relapse-free survival in these 29 patients was 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.0–19.3 months). Conclusions: Our study suggests that the combination of etoposide and mitoxantorne is an active and well-tolerated regimen as second-course therapy in newly diagnosed AML patients who have persistent leukemia after a first course of induction therapy with cytarabine and idarubicin. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized study of induction therapy comparing standard-dose idarubicin with high-dose daunorubicin in adult patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: the JALSG AML201 Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (8) ◽  
pp. 2358-2365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeki Ohtake ◽  
Shuichi Miyawaki ◽  
Hiroyuki Fujita ◽  
Hitoshi Kiyoi ◽  
Katsuji Shinagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract We conducted a multi-institutional randomized study to determine whether high-dose daunorubicin would be as effective as standard-dose idarubicin in remission-induction therapy for newly diagnosed adult patients younger than 65 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia. Of 1064 patients registered, 1057 were evaluable. They were randomly assigned to receive either daunorubicin (50 mg/m2 daily for 5 days) or idarubicin (12 mg/m2 daily for 3 days) in combination with 100 mg/m2 of cytarabine by continuous infusion daily for 7 days as induction therapy. Complete remission was achieved in 407 (77.5%) of 525 patients in the daunorubicin group and 416 (78.2%) of 532 in the idarubicin group (P = .79). Patients achieving complete remission received intensive postremission therapy that consisted of either 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine or 4 courses of standard-dose therapy. Overall survival rates at 5 years were 48% for the daunorubicin group and 48% for the idarubicin group (P = .54), and relapse-free survival rates at 5 years were 41% and 41% (P = .97), respectively. Thus, high-dose daunorubicin and standard-dose idarubicin were equally effective for the treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemia, achieving a high rate of complete remission and good long-term efficacy. This study is registered at http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctrj/ as C000000157.

Difference Expressions CD34 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cell Culture in the Administration of Cytarabine-Daunorubicine Dose Standards

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 143
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saiful Rahman ◽  
Paulus Budiono Notopuro ◽  
Suprapto Ma'at ◽  
Made Putra Sedana ◽  
Arifoel Hajat
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Leukemia Cell ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cd34 Expression ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The cure rate for patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is 20-75%. Standard-dose cytarabine + (SDAC)-daunorubicine gives a remission rate of ± 60%, and the case of relapse is frequently found. In-vivo CD34 expression is a reliable and straightforward test that must evaluate AML patients' response to predict the response of chemotherapy + induction phase accurately. Differences in in-vitro CD34 expression are expected to be able to predict chemosensitivity in AML patients. An experimental post-test-only control group study was conducted from May to December 2019, and 8 AML subjects were found. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) were isolated from peripheral blood samples of patients with AML collected in EDTA tubes. The PBMC isolated from peripheral blood were divided into two groups, and each group contained 106 PBMC cells in culture media. The control group (without treatment) and the SDAC-daunorubicine group were 0 + incubated for 4 hours at 37 C with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. The expression of CD34 was measured using FACSCalibur™, while + CD34+ percentage was calculated with CellQuest™ software. The percentage of CD34 in the control, SDAC + DNR, showed a significant difference with p < 0.001. This study showed a significant difference between the control group and the group + administered with the standard dose of cytarabine-daunorubicine with p < 0.001. The average CD34 expression in the + SDAC-DNR treatment group was higher than in the control group. CD34 markers cannot be used as predictors of chemosensitivity in the administration of chemotherapy.

Microtransplantation: HLA-Mismatched Allogeneic Cellular Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (HMMACT)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5944-5944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Mohrbacher ◽  
Ibrahim Syed ◽  
Noah Merin ◽  
Giridharan Ramsingh ◽  
Susan Groshen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cellular Therapy ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: This clinical trial addressed feasibility and safety of microtransplantation by HLA-mismatched allogeneic cellular therapy (HMMACT) in poor risk acute myeloid leukemia patients. A secondary objective was to estimate complete response rate, infections, GVHD incidence, and induction mortality. Methods: Patients with high risk AML were enrolled: 4 were > 75 yo, 3 with MLL+ ((t(6;11), 11+ and t(10;11)), 3 complex/del7, one FLT3+. Patients received induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 IV for 3 days) and cytarabine (150 mg/m2 IV for 7 days) and received HLA-mismatched GCSF mobilized PBSCs on day 9 or 10. Family donors were concurrently HLA typed and best available donor underwent GCSF mobilization (5 mg/kg SQ BID x 4 days) and leukapheresis after medical evaluation and safety testing. HLA partial mismatch patients (4- 5/10 antigen) were chosen. Apheresis cells were counted and analyzed by flow cytometry for CD34+ cells; CD3+, CD4+CD25+ and CD8 + cells; and CD3-CD56+ NK cells. Target CD3 cell dose was 1 x 108/kg per cycle; cells cryopreserved as for standard stem cell donors. Family donor HLA-mismatched GCSF mobilized peripheral blood cells were infused fresh on day 9 or 10 (up to day 16), 36-50 hours after end of cytarabine. Bone marrow biopsy was evaluated on day 14 and 28 for AML remission status, and T/NK cell number. Patients achieving a complete response proceeded to consolidation with cytarabine 0.5 -1.0 gram/m2 x 6 doses with fresh or cryopreserved HMMACT cells from their donor for 2 courses a month apart. Patients: 10 patients age 31 – 80 yo consented: 8 received allo cells; 1 screen failure (no haplo family member identified); 1 patient too ill after initiating chemo to collect donor. Eight patients received at least one course of HMMACT; 1 withdrew early due to AML progression, a second for poor performance status. Three patients had de novo AML; 5 patients had secondary AML. Six Patients had2 or more cycles of HMMACT: four achieved CR: Pt 1 and 4 received 3 cycles, Pt 2 and 6 received 2 cycles of cell infusions and all achieved CR. Pt 9 received 2 inductions with cells, and sustained a partial clinical remission for 6 months. Two Patients had 1 cycle of HMMACT:Pt 3: received 1 cycle cells, but response not assessed; Pt 8: received 1 cycle cells, and achieved CR 3+mos but declined further therapy. Safety: Acute reactions to cell infusions were minimal. Delayed reactions attributed to cell infusions included fever grade 1-2, rash grade 1-2, diarrhea grade 1-2 resolving in 7-10 days. Patients with prior MDS or refractory leukemia requiring 2 inductions had a longer time to ANC and platelet recovery. Feasibility: Two patients had no donor; 2 donors only collected enough for 2 cell infusions. Response: 5/8 pts receiving cells had CR/CRi (62.5%) lasting 3 to 10+ months. Conclusions: Although there were the usual significant complications of treating leukemia and infections, the cellular therapy itself was well-tolerated. Patients often had fevers in first week after cell infusions, or experienced transient rash and diarrhea in the same time period, which were self resolving in all cases and may reflect elimination of allogeneic cells by the patient’s immune system. No patient developed GVHD. Feasibility of obtaining family donors was as expected for this diverse US population. Infectious complications were low by AML treatment standards. Complete remission rates are encouraging, but not as durable as hoped, likely reflecting the fact that all of our patients had high risk cytogenetics in contrast to the prior published studies by Chinese investigators. The majority were elderly who would not otherwise be offered intensive therapy. Family donors achieved expected cell targets and tolerated mobilization/collection procedures well. All but one patient receiving 2 to 3 cycles achieved complete remission. Two elderly patients who received one or two cell infusions during induction sustained prolonged survival of 6 months in spite of no further therapy, one achieving a CR and the other a sustained PR. Neutrophil and platelet recoveries tended to follow the pattern of the patient's prior secondary leukemia or myelodysplastic disorder. Once patients achieved complete remission however, recovery of blood counts was relatively rapid on further cycles of consolidation. We are now assessing Treg, T and NK cell phenotype of patient and donor cells by flow cyAtometry as biological correlates. Disclosures Chaudhary: University of Southern California: Inventor on a patent application relevant to this work filed to US patent office (No. 62/031,053). Patents & Royalties.

Cladribine, But Not Fludarabine, Added to Daunorubicin and Cytarabine During Induction Prolongs Survival of Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (20) ◽  
pp. 2441-2448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerzy Holowiecki ◽  
Sebastian Grosicki ◽  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Slawomira Kyrcz-Krzemien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of a purine analog, cladribine or fludarabine, to the standard induction regimen affects the outcome of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods A cohort of 652 untreated AML patients with median age 47 years (range, 17 to 60 years) were randomly assigned to receive one of three induction regimens: DA (daunorubicin plus cytarabine), DAC (DA plus cladribine), or DAF (DA plus fludarabine). Postremission treatment was the same for all arms. Results Complete remission rate in the DAC arm was higher compared with the DA arm (67.5% v 56%; P = .01) as a consequence of reduced incidence of resistant disease (21% v 34%; P = .004). There was no significant difference in early outcome between the DAF and DA arms. The probability of overall survival was improved for the DAC arm (45% ± 4% at 3 years) compared with the DA arm (33% ± 4%; P = .02), and leukemia-free survival was comparable. Long-term outcome did not differ significantly for the comparison of the DAF and DA arms. A survival advantage of the DAC arm over the DA arm was observed among patients age 50 years or older (P = .005), those with initial leukocyte count above 50 × 109/L (P = .03), and those with unfavorable karyotype (P = .03). DAF revealed a significant advantage over DA in patients with adverse karyotype (P = .02). Conclusion The addition of cladribine to the standard induction regimen is associated with increased rate of complete remission and improved survival of adult patients with AML.

scholarly journals The Hypomethylating Agent Decitabine Prior to Chemotherapy Improves the Therapy Efficacy in Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4932-4932
Author(s):  
Xuejie Jiang ◽  
Zhixiang Wang ◽  
Changxin Yin ◽  
Guopan Yu ◽  
Jieyu Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Western Blotting ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytotoxic Effect ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Hypomethylating Agent ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction. Most acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with adverse prognosis either fail to achieve complete remission (CR) or relapse after short-term remission, new strategies are needed to improve therapeutic effect in these patients. Gene silencing via DNA methylation are frequent and reversible in high-risk AML, it provides the possibility to treat AML patients with DNA-hypomethylating agent. Decitabine alone has limited anti-leukemia effect and minimal toxicity. Studies demonstrated that decitabine prior to chemotherapy was likely to increase efficacy in AML. In this study, we investigated the effect of decitabine on susceptibility to cytotoxic drugs in chemoresistant AML cells. Efficacy and safety of decitabine prior to HAA regimen was evaluated in refractory, relapsed and high-risk AML patients. Methods. HL60, HL60/ADR, Kasumi-1, and primary AML cells were pre-treated with 1.0 μM decitabine for 72 hours, Sensitivities to harringtonine, adriamycin, cytarabine and the combination was determined by MTT, apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry. Protein expression was detected by western blotting. In clinic, Twenty-three patients were enrolled in decitabine prior to HAA regimen, and twenty-four patients in HAA alone. CR ratio was used to evaluate efficacy. Durations of neutrocytopenia or thrombcytopemia and infection incidence were observed to assess the safety. All of patients were followed up to 36 monthes, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated. Result. Decitabine increased sensitivity and apoptosis induced by harringtonine in HL60/ADR, as well as adriamycin and cytarabine in HL60/ADR and Kasumi-1 cells. But no change in sensitivity to each drug was observed in HL60, and sensitivity to harringtonine in Kasumi-1. The similar changes in sensitivity to adriamycin and cytarabine were also observed in primary AML cells from refractory patients (n=6). Cytotoxic effect of HAA was alsoincreaed by decitabine in HL60/ADR and Kasumi-1 cells (p=0.004, 0.018). Western blotting showed that decitabine decreased expression of DNMT1, activation of p53 and inhibition of c-Myc, Survivin and Bcl-2. In clinic, 16 (69.6%) patients in decitabine plus HAA regimen responded to the first course of induction therapy: 14 CR (60.9%) and 2 PR (8.7%). 1 in 2 patients with PR achieved CR after second course induction. It brought the overall CR was 65.2%. Otherwise, 10 (45.8%) patients in HAA regimen alone responded to the first induction: 7 CR (29.2%) and 4 PR (16.7%), 3 in 4 patients with PR achieved CR after the second induction, and overall CR reached 41.7%. The first-cycle CR ratio in decitabine plus HAA was higher than that in HAA alone (p=0.041). Patients continued to receive chemotherapy alternatively combined with decitabine. The median OS was 14 months in chemotherapy plus decitabine, 6 months in chemotherapy alone, and median DFS were 18 and 5 months in the former and latter. No significant difference was observed in the time of neutrophil (p=0.832, 0.631) or platelet recovery (p=0.798, 0.544) after induction and intensification therapy. The incidences of infection were also similar (p=0.724, 0.697). The clinic data indicated that decitabine plus HAA regimenit was efficacy and well-tolerated to treat refractory AML patients. Conclusion. Our results demonstrated that decitabine increased cytotoxic effect against chemoresistant AML cells. Combination of decitabine and HAA was safe and efficacy to treat refractory/relapsed AML. These findings support clinic protocols based on decitabine prior to chemotherapy to overcome resistance and improve therapeutic efficacy in AML patients. Disclosures Carter: PrismBiolab: Research Funding.

High-Dose Cytarabine Consolidation With or Without Additional Amsacrine and Mitoxantrone in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of the Prospective Randomized AML2003 Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (17) ◽  
pp. 2094-2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Schaich ◽  
Stefani Parmentier ◽  
Michael Kramer ◽  
Thomas Illmer ◽  
Friedrich Stölzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose To assess the treatment outcome benefit of multiagent consolidation in young adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Patients and Methods Between December 2003 and November 2009, 1,179 patients (median age, 48 years; range, 16 to 60 years) with untreated AML were randomly assigned at diagnosis to receive either standard high-dose cytarabine consolidation with three cycles of 18 g/m2 (3× HD-AraC) or multiagent consolidation with two cycles of mitoxantrone (30 mg/m2) plus cytarabine (12 g/m2) and one cycle of amsacrine (500 mg/m2) plus cytarabine (10 g/m2; MAC/MAMAC/MAC). Allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantations were performed in a risk-adapted and priority-based manner. Results After double induction therapy using a 3 + 7 regimen including standard-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin, complete remission was achieved in 65% of patients. In the primary efficacy population of patients evaluable for consolidation outcomes, consolidation with either 3× HD-AraC or MAC/MAMC/MAC did not result in any significant difference in 3-year overall (69% v 64%; P = .18) or disease-free survival (46% v 48%; P = .99) according to the intention-to-treat analysis. Furthermore, MAC/MAMAC/MAC led to additional GI and hepatic toxicity and a higher rate of infection and bleeding, resulting in significantly shorter 3-year overall survival in the per-protocol analysis compared with 3× HD-AraC (63% v 72%; P = .04). Conclusion In younger adults with AML, multiagent consolidation using mitoxantrone and amsacrine in combination with high-dose cytarabine does not improve treatment outcome and confers additional toxicity.

CXCR4 as a Predictor of Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2941-2941
Author(s):  
Domenico Pastore ◽  
Anna Mestice ◽  
Margherita Giannoccaro ◽  
Arcangelo Liso ◽  
Maria Paola Martelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Common Mutation ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Induced Apoptosis ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The expression of CXCR4 (CD184) has been associated with poor prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and it has also been suggested that the CXCL12(SDF-1a)/CXCR4 interaction contributes to the resistance of leukemia cells to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Inhibition of CXCR4 was found to enhance chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in a subset of leukemic myeloblasts that carry Flt3 mutations and to overcome chemoresistance associated with stromal activity. NPM variants with a cytoplasmic localization represent the most common mutation detected in myeloid malignancies and are associated with a favourable clinical outcome. A recent study provides biological evidence for a novel role for NPM as a negative regulator of CXCR4 signalling induced by CXCL12: suppression of NPM expression enhanced chemotactic responses to CXCL12, and conversely, over-expression of a cytosolic NPM mutant reduced chemotaxis induced by CXCL12. We investigated whether CD184 expression is a negative predictor factor for response to chemotherapy and if there is clinical evidence that NPM mutations could overcome chemoresistance to induction therapy in this subset of patients. The expression of CD184 was analyzed by flow cytometric methods in a group of 70 cases of adult AML at onset of disease, diagnosed at our Institution since January 2006. The diagnosis was performed according to FAB/WHO criteria; all patients received intensive chemotherapy according to institutional protocols. There were 34 males and 36 females and median age was 46 years (range 18–65). AML cells were gated based upon their CD45 expression and samples were considered positive if CD184 was expressed by more than 20% of blasts. CD184 was positive in 45 and negative in 25 cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of sex, age, Hb level, WBC and Plt counts, percentage of blasts, and occurrence of the NPM mutation. The CR rate was 45% in CD184+ and 82% in CD184- (p=0.03); among CD184+ cases, the CR rate was significantly higher in NPMc+ cases, (p=0.03). Our results show that CD184 expression is associated with a lower rate of CR after induction therapy and this association is stronger in NPM unmutated cases, suggesting that CD184 expression is a negative predictive factor for response to chemotherapy. Further data are needed to verify if the biological role of the cytosolic NPM mutant as a negative regulator of CXCR4 signalling induced by CXCL12 could have a clinical role contributing to overcome the resistance of leukemic cells to induction chemotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document