scholarly journals Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder after Solid Organ Transplant in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Mobeen Zaka Haider ◽  
Zarlakhta Zamani ◽  
Muhammad Taqi ◽  
Hafsa Shahid ◽  
Zahoor Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Organ Transplantation ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Organ Transplants ◽  
Post Transplant

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), is one of the major complications after organ transplantation. The aim of this study is to study the incidence, risk factors especially EBV status, histopathological types, management, and outcomes of PTLD in the pediatric groups. Methods: Following the PRISMA guideline, we performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov from the past ten years on May 04, 2020. We used the MeSH terms of organ transplantation and lymphoproliferative disorders. The initial search revealed 1741 articles. We excluded all case reports, case series, pre-clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analysis. We found twenty-eight studies. We extracted the data for baseline characteristics, recipient & donor EBV status, immunosuppression used, type & stage of PTLD, organ system involved, duration between transplant and PTLD diagnosis, treatment, and mortality. Results: We included 32 studies with a total (n) of 15597 pediatric patients after a solid organ transplant. 1210 (7.75%) patients developed PTLD, out of which 609 (50.33%) were male participants, 453 (37.4%) female, and 148 (12.23%) the gender was unknown. (Table 1) Data from 19 studies showed that among PTLD patients, 115 recipients & 76 donors tested positive for Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), 187 recipients were seronegative and the rest were unknown at the time of transplant. Immunosuppressive drugs used after organ transplantation included; cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate, prednisone, mTOR inhibitors, induction therapy with OKT3, IL-2 inhibitors (basiliximab, daclizumab) and anti-thymocyte/anti-lymphocyte globulin. In two studies, antiviral prophylaxis with ganciclovir/valganciclovir was achieved. Data from nine studies showed the median age at PTLD diagnosis was 6.8 years. L'Huillier et al. stated that the median duration for EBV positive recipients to develop PTLD was 1.92 years (0.35-3.09 years), compared to EBV negative recipients, which was 0.95 years (2.48-2.92 years). Overall, the median duration from organ transplant to the diagnosis of PTLD among 15 studies was 29.1 months, ranging from 0.9 months to 186 months. The histopathology of PTLD was confirmed via biopsy specimen showing predominance in monomorphic type, i.e; 265/1210 (21.9%), followed by polymorphic type with 140/1210 (11.5%), an early lesion with 46/1210 (3.80%), Non-Hodgkin lymphoma 28/1210 (2.3%), Hodgkin lymphoma 33/1210 (2.72%) and mixed type (polymorphic & monomorphic) 4/1210 (0.33%). Histopathological data for 694 patients were not available. Treatment of PTLD was achieved with reduction or complete cessation of immunosuppressive therapy, anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab), antiviral treatment with ganciclovir/valganciclovir, lymphoma treatment with chemotherapeutic agents, radiotherapy, and surgical resection. Gajarski et al. concluded that patients who received induction therapy [OKT3, IL-2 antagonists (basiliximab, daclizumab) and anti-thymocyte globulin] had significantly less PTLD development as compared to those who did not receive induction therapy, i.e., (2.9% vs. 4.9%) among 2374 total patients. According to Hayes Jr. et al., recipient EBV seronegativity continued to be associated with lower mortality hazard (HR 0.715; 95 % CI 0.547, 0.935; p = 0.014). Data from 19 studies showed the mortality rate among 494 PTLD diagnosed patients was 22.7% (112) with an overall survival of 84.2% respectively from three studies. Data from five studies showed that direct PTLD related mortality accounted for 63% (17/27) of deaths in PTLD diagnosed patients. Conclusion: Our analysis shows that post-transplant EBV positive recipients who undergo multiorgan transplants are more likely to develop PTLD compared to EBV positive recipients with single organ transplantation. The median duration from organ transplants to the diagnosis of PTLD ranged from months to years, however, this duration was reported to be less in EBV negative recipients compared to EBV positive recipients with organ transplants. The most common histological type of PTLD among pediatric groups was monomorphic and the least common was Classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Rituximab use in the treatment of PTLD was associated with a decreased use of alkylating agents and as a result, the side effects associated with these agents were reduced. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder after Heart Transplant in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Mobeen Zaka Haider ◽  
Muhammad Taqi ◽  
Hasan Mahmood Mirza ◽  
Zarlakhta Zamani ◽  
Hafsa Shahid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Graft Rejection ◽  
Lymphoproliferative Disorder ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Transplant Patients

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a B-cell proliferation disorder that results from disruption in the physiological mechanisms for proliferation in an immunocompromised host after a solid organ transplant. Our study aims to review the demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes after transplantation. We also aim to study the role of immunosuppression induction therapy, the effect of PTLD on survival, and the effective chemotherapy used for B-cell disorders leading to improved survival. Methods: Following the PRISMA guideline, we performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov from the past decade on May 04, 2020. We used the MeSH terms of organ transplantation and lymphoproliferative disorders. 1741 articles were screened. We excluded all case reports, case series, pre-clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analysis and included three cohort studies and one prospective multicentric study. We extracted the data for baseline characteristics, the reason for transplantation, recipient & donor EBV status, immunosuppression used, type & stage of PTLD, organ system involved, duration between transplant and PTLD diagnosis, treatment, response to therapy, adverse effects of therapy and mortality. Results: We studied 9617 patients in the included four studies, out of which 499 patients developed PTLD. Data in these studies was collected over the last 20-26 years. Median follow-up of patients since transplant was 3-9 years (average 7.5y). Table 1 The age of the patients ranged from 3-18 years with a male: female gender ratio of 48:52% and around 50% of the patients were seronegative to EBV pretransplant. The following drugs were used for immunosuppression: cyclosporin, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate, interleukin 2 receptor antagonist (basiliximab), corticosteroids, anti-thymocyte globulins(ATG). Kindel et al. narrated that the development of eosinophilic oesophagitis may be a marker for the development of PTLD.Gajarski et al. concluded that Post-transplant Immunosuppressive induction therapy with cytolytic drugs (e.g OKT3 monoclonal antibody, ATG, thymoglobulin Basiliximab and daclizumab) , lowers the rate of PTLD, graft rejections, and early infections in post-transplant patients as compared patients who did not receive induction therapy . This depends upon the type of induction e.g OKT3 monoclonal antibody was associated with increased PTLDs and graft rejection, while Thymoglobulin/IL-2R antagonists demonstrated to decrease both the outcomes. Claire et al. described that overall mortality is decreasing due to the ongoing better understanding of pathophysiology and treatment options related to solid organ transplant. The mortality of the post-transplant congenital heart disease group was higher as compared to the cardiomyopathy group due to high comorbidities and surgical complications. The study by Christopher et al. showed that EBV seronegativity before transplant is associated with an increased risk of PTLD. PTLD is associated with lower survival rates as compared to non-PTLD groups. Conclusion: Our review illustrates that pretransplant seronegativity, OKT3 monoclonal antibody, and the development of eosinophilic esophagitis during the immunosuppressive regime increase the risk of PTLD. This study demonstrates that with a better understanding of PTLD and tumor behavior, the all-cause mortality rates are falling significantly. PTLD is one of the leading causes of mortality in post-transplant patients. However, the immunosuppressive induction therapy, absence of eosinophilic esophagitis, thymoglobulin/IL-2R antagonists improve survival and outcomes in the post-transplant patient in terms of graft rejection, graft failure, and development of PTLD. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Prevention of Fractures after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (11) ◽  
pp. 3457-3465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Stein ◽  
Dionisio Ortiz ◽  
Zhezhen Jin ◽  
Donald J. McMahon ◽  
Elizabeth Shane
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Organ Transplantation ◽  
Vertebral Fractures ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
First Year ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Mineral Density

Abstract Context: Bone loss and fracture are serious sequelae of organ transplantation, particularly in the first posttransplant year. Most interventional studies have been inadequately powered to detect effects on fracture. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine whether treatment with bisphosphonates (BP) or active vitamin D analogs (vitD) during the first year after transplantation reduces fracture risk and estimate the effect of these interventions on bone loss. Data Sources: Sources included PUBMED, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and abstracts from scientific meetings (presented 2003–2010). Study Selection: Randomized controlled clinical trials of BP or vitD in solid organ transplant recipients were included if treatment was initiated at the time of transplantation and fracture data were collected. Data Extraction: Two investigators independently extracted data and rated study quality. Fixed effect and random-effects models were used to obtain pooled estimates. Data Synthesis: Eleven studies of 780 transplant recipients (134 fractures) were included. Treatment with BP or vitD reduced the number of subjects with fracture [odds ratio (OR) 0.50 (0.29, 0.83)] and number of vertebral fractures, [OR 0.24 (0.07, 0.78)]. An increase in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine [2.98% (1.31, 4.64)] and femoral neck [3.05% (2.16, 3.93)] was found with treatment. When BP trials (nine studies, 625 subjects) were examined separately, there was a reduction in number of subjects with fractures [OR 0.53 (0.30, 0.91)] but no significant reduction in vertebral fractures [OR 0.34 (0.09, 1.24)]. Conclusions: Treatment with BP or vitD during the first year after solid organ transplant was associated with a reduction in the number of subjects with fractures and fewer vertebral fractures.

Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder after Liver Transplant: A Systematic Review

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Mobeen Zaka Haider ◽  
Zarlakhta Zamani ◽  
Hafsa Shahid ◽  
Muhammad Taqi ◽  
Zahoor Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Transplantation ◽  
Liver Transplant ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Organ Transplantation ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Post Transplant

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), a group of lymphoid disorders ranging from indolent polyclonal proliferation to aggressive lymphomas is a known complication following solid organ transplantation. The aim is to study the incidence, characteristics, predictive factors, management, and outcomes of PTLD after liver transplantation in particular. Methods: Following the PRISMA guideline, we performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov from the past ten years on May 04, 2020. We used the MeSH terms of organ transplantation and lymphoproliferative disorders. The initial search revealed 1741 articles. We excluded all case reports, case series, pre-clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analysis. We found fifteen studies including retrospective observational and cohort studies. We extracted the data for baseline characteristics, the reason for transplantation, recipient & donor EBV status, immunosuppression used, type & stage of PTLD, organ system involved, duration between transplant and PTLD diagnosis, treatment, response to therapy, adverse effects of therapy and mortality. Results: We included 15 studies with a total (n) of 10706 post-liver transplant patients. 294 (2.74%) patients developed PTLD as a complication, out of which 104 (35.3%) were males, 106 (36%) females, and 84 unknowns. Table 1. The incidence of PTLD in the pediatric group was 135/3116 (4.3%) whereas in the adult population it was 115/7545 (1.5%). Data from eleven studies show that out of 202 participants, 67 recipients were positive, 39 negative, and 18 donors positive for EBV infection at the time of transplant. Data on the EBV serostatus for the remaining 106 recipients was not known at the time of transplant. Data from two studies showed that 25/29 patients who later developed PTLD were seronegative for EBV prior to the transplant and 26/29 were reported to undergo seroconversion partly due to transplantation with EBV positive donors (7/13). Post-transplant immunosuppression was achieved with cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, prednisone, OKT3 for acute cellular rejection and induction with monoclonal antibodies. Data from four studies conclude the median age at the time of PTLD diagnosis is 47.6 months in the pediatric population while 54 years in adults, overall ranging from 1 year to 73 years. Ten studies show the overall median duration from organ transplant to the diagnosis of PTLD is 23.5 months. The median duration for the pediatric population was 11.6 months from the data collected from 55 patients whereas five studies with 166 adult liver transplant recipients showed a median duration of 35.5 months. Histopathological types were diagnosed via biopsy samples, with monomorphic in 76 (25.8%), early lesions in 22 (7.4%), polymorphic in 19 (6.4%), and classic Hodgkin lymphoma like PTLD in 8 (2.7%) of the samples. Among the monomorphic type, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most commonly reported i.e. 10/50 (20%) of patients with monomorphic type in two studies. Treatment of PTLD consisted of reduction or cessation of the post-transplant immunosuppressive drugs, anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab), antiviral treatment with ganciclovir, and lymphoma treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical resection. Data from eight studies show a mortality rate of 61/214 (28.5%) with Huang, et al. reporting ¾(75%) of total deaths due to PTLD progression. Two studies report an overall survival rate of 26/32 (81.3%) and five-year survival of 15/41 (36.6%). Conclusions: Our analysis shows the incidence of PTLD after liver transplant is low with no significant gender predominance but a difference in the incidence was observed with significantly higher rates in the pediatric group as compared to the adult population. The most common biopsy proved histopathological type was monomorphic, with the least common type being Hodgkin lymphoma like PTLD. Among the monomorphic, DLBCL was the most common subtype. After liver transplantation, the development of PTLD is observed earlier in pediatric patients in comparison to adult recipients. EBV naive patients prior to liver transplantation are at higher risk for seroconversion post-transplant if transplanted with EBV positive donors and hence at increased risk of PTLD development. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Clinical Updates, Challenges and Future Directions

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 3497-3506
Author(s):  
Raymund R. Razonable
Keyword(s):  
Organ Transplantation ◽  
Solid Organ Transplantation ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus is the classic opportunistic infection after solid organ transplantation. This review will discuss updates and future directions in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention, but they should not be mutually exclusive and each strategy should be considered depending on a specific situation. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is emphasized as a major factor that should pave the way for an individualized approach to prevention. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management, and strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are enumerated. There is increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, and their potential role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts is discussed.

#74: Development of a Solid-Organ Transplant-Specific Antibiogram in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital in Canada

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S1-S1
Author(s):  
T Kitano ◽  
M Science ◽  
N Nalli ◽  
K Timberlake ◽  
U Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Pediatric Hospital ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Organ Specific ◽  
Wide Population

Abstract Background Solid-organ transplant (SOT) patients are more vulnerable to infections by antimicrobial-resistant organisms (AROs) because of their hospital exposure, compromised immune systems, and antimicrobial exposure. Therefore, it may be useful for transplant facilities to create transplant-specific antibiograms to direct empirical antimicrobial regimens and monitor trends in antimicrobial resistance. Methods SOT (i.e., lung, liver, renal, and heart) antibiograms were created using antimicrobial susceptibility data on isolates from 2012 to 2018 at The Hospital for Sick Children, a tertiary pediatric hospital and transplant center in Toronto, Ontario. The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines were followed to generate the antibiograms. The first clinical isolate of a species from a patient in each year was included irrespective of body site; duplicates were eliminated and surveillance cultures were excluded. Results from 2 years of data were pooled on a rolling basis to achieve an adequate sample size in both SOT and hospital-wide antibiogram. The SOT antibiogram was then compared with the hospital-wide antibiogram of the compatible 2 pooled years from 2012 to 2018. For subgroup analyses in the SOT population, organ-specific antibiograms and transplant timing-specific antibiograms (pretransplant, post-transplant <1 year, and post-transplant ≥1 year) between transplant and sample collection dates were analyzed. All proportions were compared using the χ 2 test. Results The top 5 organisms in one (2 year) analysis period of the SOT antibiogram were Escherichia coli (n = 29), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 28), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 20), Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 18), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 17). For E.coli, susceptibility in the SOT antibiogram was significantly lower than those in the hospital-wide antibiogram in 2017/2018 for ampicillin (27% vs. 48%; P = 0.015), piperacillin/tazobactam (55% vs. 87%; P < 0.001), cefotaxime (59% vs. 88%; P < 0.001), ciprofloxacin (71% vs. 87%; P = 0.007) and cotrimoxazole (41% vs. 69%; P < 0.001), but not significantly different for gentamicin (94% vs. 91%; P = 0.490), tobramycin (88% vs. 90%; P = 0.701) and amikacin (100% vs. 99%; P = 0.558). These findings were consistent throughout the study period in E.coli. There was no statistically significant difference between the SOT and hospital-wide antibiograms for other organisms. There were no significant differences in susceptibility between organ-specific antibiograms or transplant timing-specific antibiograms in 2012–2018. Conclusions We found that E.coli from the SOT population had a significantly lower sensitivity to all antimicrobials, except aminoglycosides, compared with those from the hospital-wide population. Other organisms had similar susceptibility to the hospital-wide population. Developing a SOT antibiogram will assist in revising and improving empiric treatment guidelines for this population.

scholarly journals Exploring the Epidemiology of Cancer after Solid Organ Transplantation (EpCOT): an observational cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e043731
Author(s):  
Adnan Sharif ◽  
Javeria Peracha ◽  
David Winter ◽  
Raoul Reulen ◽  
Mike Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
Organ Transplantation ◽  
Record Linkage ◽  
Solid Organ Transplantation ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

IntroductionSolid organ transplant patients are counselled regarding increased risk of cancer (principally due to their need for lifelong immunosuppression) and it ranks as one of their biggest self-reported worries. Post-transplantation cancer is common, associated with increased healthcare costs and emerging as a leading cause of post-transplant mortality. However, epidemiology of cancer post-transplantation remains poorly understood, with limitations including translating data from different countries and national data being siloed across different registries and/or data warehouses.Methods and analysisStudy methodology for Epidemiology of Cancer after Solid Organ Transplantation involves record linkage between the UK Transplant Registry (from NHS Blood and Transplant), Hospital Episode Statistics (for secondary care episodes from NHS Digital), National Cancer Registry (from cancer registration data hosted by Public Health England) and the National Death Registry (from NHS Digital). Deterministic record linkage will be conducted by NHS Digital, with a fully anonymised linked dataset available for analysis by the research team. The study cohort will consist of up to 85 410 solid organ transplant recipients,who underwent a solid organ transplant in England between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 2015, with up-to-date outcome data.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Confidentiality Advisory Group (reference: 16/CAG/0121), Research Ethics Committee (reference: 15/YH/0320) and Institutional Review Board (reference: RRK5471). The results of this study will be presented at national and international conferences, and manuscripts with results will be submitted for publication in high-impact peer-reviewed journals. The information produced will also be used to develop national evidence-based clinical guidelines to inform risk stratification to enable risk-based clinical follow-up.Trial registration numberNCT02991105.

scholarly journals Does Post-Transplant Cytomegalovirus Increase the Risk of Invasive Aspergillosis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 327
Author(s):  
Nipat Chuleerarux ◽  
Achitpol Thongkam ◽  
Kasama Manothummetha ◽  
Saman Nematollahi ◽  
Veronica Dioverti-Prono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Invasive Aspergillosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Effect Estimate ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Cmv Disease ◽  
The Impact

Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and invasive aspergillosis (IA) cause high morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. There are conflicting data with respect to the impact of CMV on IA development in SOT recipients. Methods: A literature search was conducted from existence through to 2 April 2021 using MEDLINE, Embase, and ISI Web of Science databases. This review contained observational studies including cross-sectional, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, and case-control studies that reported SOT recipients with post-transplant CMV (exposure) and without post-transplant CMV (non-exposure) who developed or did not develop subsequent IA. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect estimate. Results: A total of 16 studies were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. There were 5437 SOT patients included in the study, with 449 SOT recipients developing post-transplant IA. Post-transplant CMV significantly increased the risk of subsequent IA with pORs of 3.31 (2.34, 4.69), I2 = 30%. Subgroup analyses showed that CMV increased the risk of IA development regardless of the study period (before and after 2003), types of organ transplantation (intra-thoracic and intra-abdominal transplantation), and timing after transplant (early vs. late IA development). Further analyses by CMV definitions showed CMV disease/syndrome increased the risk of IA development, but asymptomatic CMV viremia/infection did not increase the risk of IA. Conclusions: Post-transplant CMV, particularly CMV disease/syndrome, significantly increased the risks of IA, which highlights the importance of CMV prevention strategies in SOT recipients. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of programmatic fungal surveillance or antifungal prophylaxis to prevent this fungal-after-viral phenomenon.

Influenza B Virus Infection in Pediatric Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-229
Author(s):  
Teri Jo Mauch ◽  
Tim Myers ◽  
Clifford E. Kashtan ◽  
Susan Bratton ◽  
Elliot Krane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virus Infection ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Influenza B Virus ◽  
Influenza B ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Normal Children ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
B Virus

Objective. Influenza B virus causes epidemic infection in normal children, but only one case of infection in an immunocompromised solid organ transplant (SOT) recipient has been reported. Characterization of the clinical course of influenza B virus infection in pediatric SOT recipients may increase the utilization of preventive and therapeutic interventions by pediatricians caring for these immunocompromised children. Design. Retrospective chart review of patients whose respiratory viral cultures yielded influenza B from January 1989 through March 1992. Patients. Twelve pediatric SOT recipients with influenza B virus infection were identified. These included five renal, four hepatic, and three cardiac allograft recipients, ranging from 19 months to 17 years 9 months of age (median 6 years 2 months). The post-transplant interval ranged from 6 weeks to 4 years 6 months (average 26.7 months). No patient had been immunized against influenza. Exposure histories were documented for eight children; five of these occurred in the hospital. Results. Clinical symptoms included fever (12/12), respiratory (11/12), or gastrointestinal complaints (8/12). Five patients had neurologic involvement; one died of uncal herniation. Ten children were hospitalized (median duration, 3 days; range, 2 to 79 days). Two patients (post-transplant interval, 3 to 8 months) required mechanical ventilation, and one of these received aerosolized ribavirin. Three children had concurrent allograft rejection. Conclusions. Influenza B infection is potentially life-threatening in pediatric SOT recipients. We recommend annual immunization of pediatric SOT recipients, their household contacts, and health care workers. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of influenza vaccination in pediatric SOT recipients.

Neurocognitive Effects of Solid Organ Transplantation

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nataliya Zelikovsky ◽  
Debra S. Lefkowitz
Keyword(s):  
Organ Transplantation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Solid Organ Transplant ◽  
Chronic Illnesses ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Neurocognitive Outcomes ◽  
Medical Advances

The first successful organ transplant was a kidney transplant performed between identical twins in 1954. Since that time, major medical advances have been made to help improve survival rates for transplant recipients. In 2008, there were 1,964 solid organ transplants performed for children under age 18 (2007 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients [OPTN/SRTR] Annual Report 1997–2006). Currently, approximately 1,830 pediatric patients are awaiting some type of solid organ transplant (2007 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report 1997–2006). Organ transplantation in children is relatively recent compared to other treatments for children with chronic illnesses. The focus over the first few decades has been on medical advances and improving survival rates for transplant patients. In the recent years, increasing attention has been given to the developmental, neurocognitive, and psychosocial outcomes prior to transplant and in the short-term period post transplant. Most chronic illnesses and acute traumatic medical events have implications for neurocognitive outcomes. End-stage disease of the liver, kidney, heart, and lung are all believed to affect intellectual, academic, and neurocognitive functions. Gross neurodevelopmental deficits have become less common due to early medical intervention (e.g., improved nutrition, surgical intervention, reduced exposure to aluminum (Warady 2002). Organ transplantation is believed to ameliorate the deleterious long-term developmental and neurocognitive effects, but this topic has received little attention in the literature, and the available results with regard to intellectual, academic, and neurodevelopmental results have been mixed. In a combined sample of solid organ transplant patients, 40% had clinically significant cognitive delays (Brosig et al. 2006). Examining the impact of different underlying disease processes and transplantation of each solid organ separately is critical. Thus, we discuss the neurocognitive outcomes of each organ group separately in this chapter. Neurocognitive outcomes can be assessed in a variety of ways depending upon the age of the child. Among infants and toddlers, neurocognitive functioning is measured by an assessment of motor function, social and environmental interaction, and language development. Assessment of older children may involve the evaluation of intelligence, academic achievement, emotional and behavioral functioning, and adaptive skills.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document