Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of Severe Gastrointestinal Graft Versus Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4341-4341
Author(s):  
Cristina Castilla-LLorente ◽  
Richard A. Nash ◽  
George B McDonald ◽  
Barry E. Storer ◽  
Paul J. Martin

Abstract Introduction: Treatment of severe GI GVHD poses a challenge, as little progress has been made in developing better treatments and survival remains poor. One problem is that it is difficult to know the ultimate severity of GVHD and the outcome at the onset of symptoms. We analyzed patients with peak stage 3–4 GI GVHD to identify factors within 2 weeks of the onset of GVHD that predicted the eventual outcome. This information could be useful in initial patient management and to inform the design of clinical trials. Patients and methods: We reviewed the records of 117 consecutive patients transplanted between 2000–2005 who developed stages 3–4 GI GVHD. Data were collected for more than 20 parameters, including stool volume, abdominal pain, melena, upper GI symptoms, serum albumin, number of GVHD treatments, visual findings at endoscopy and histopathologic grade of GI biopsies. Clinical parameters were measured as the peak value during each 14 day period starting from 2 weeks before the diagnosis of GI GVHD to the resolution of symptoms, loss of follow-up or patient death. Patients had been treated with myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning regimens and received either marrow or growth factor-mobilized blood cells from related or unrelated HLA-matched donors. All patients received prophylactic pharmacologic immunosuppression for GVHD. Results: Median onset of symptoms was day 28 (range 4 – 113); 11 (9.6%) patients presented after day 80. Mean daily stool volume at diagnosis was 1494 ±1450 mL/day. At onset of GI symptoms, 75% of patients had ≥ stage 1 skin GVHD and 65% had ≥ stage 1 liver GVHD. At onset, 78% had upper GI symptoms (nausea and vomiting); less than 50% of patients presented with severe abdominal pain. Within the first 2 weeks after the diagnosis of GI GVHD, 52 (44.8%), 45 (38.7%), 7 (6.2%) and 12 (10.3%) patients had a peak GI stage of 4, 3, 2 and 1 respectively. All patients received high dose prednisone/prednisolone as initial treatment; 67 received 2nd line therapy; and 32 received three or more lines of treatment. Steroid refractoriness was defined as worsening GI symptoms after 3 days of high-dose steroid therapy, or non-response after 7 days, or only partial response after 14 days of therapy. Patients who developed stage 3 or 4 GI GVHD while receiving high dose prednisone for skin or liver GVHD were also considered steroid refractory. Non-relapse mortality was 71% and 41% at 1 year after transplant in patients with steroid-refractory and steroid-responsive GVHD, respectively. Overall survival was 30% at 1 year after HCT and 26% at 2 years. Thirteen patients relapsed, and all but 1 died subsequently. Adult patients who had steroid-refractory GVHD within 2 weeks of onset had a 1-year survival of 16% compared to 88% among steroid refractory pediatric patients. During the 14 day periods immediately before or after the onset of GI symptoms, these risk factors for overall mortality were identified by multivariable analysis: All patients, no endoscopy result considered (N=117) Factor Hazard Ratio p-value Adult age 3.2 .007 Jaundice (bilirubin >3.1 mg/dL) 1.97 .006 Albumin ≤1.6 g/dL 1.91 .01 Steroid refractory 1.76 .02 In a subgroup of patients who underwent endoscopy (N=73), a finding of ulcerated mucosa was predictive of mortality (HR 2.52, p=0.02). Conclusions: Within 2 weeks of GI symptom onset, mortality in patients with GVHD can be predicted by age, jaundice, hypoalbuminemia, response to prednisone, and presence of ulcerated mucosa at endoscopy. More effective early treatment in GI GVHD patients at risk for mortality is likely to be more useful than salvage therapy for steroid-refractory patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Wang

Enterogastric reflux (EGR) is the reflux of bile and digestive enzymes from the small bowel into the stomach. While it is a normal physiologic process in small amounts, excessive reflux and chronic EGR can cause upper GI symptoms often mimicking more common diseases such as gallbladder disease and GERD that often leads to its underdiagnosis. Identifying EGR is significant as it has been associated with the development of gastroesophogeal pathology including gastritis, esophagitis, ulcers, and mucosal metaplasia. This article presents a 22-year-old male with enterogastric reflux causing upper abdominal pain and will discuss the role of hepatobiliary scintigraphy in its diagnosis.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3154-3154
Author(s):  
Andrew C. Harris ◽  
Rachel Young ◽  
Steven M. Devine ◽  
William J Hogan ◽  
Francis Ayuk ◽  
...  

Abstract Clinical GVHD staging varies between centers and is not agreed upon by independent reviewers (Weisdorf, BBMT 2003). These inconsistencies help explain why promising GVHD treatments from single center studies have not reproduced in multicenter trials. To address this issue, our international GVHD research consortium has developed guidance that has been refined through consensus following case discussions, resulting in uniform and reproducible GVHD clinical symptom reporting. We record all raw target organ symptom data and apply staging based upon this data (Table 1). Only areas of erythema, bullae and desquamation are quantified because other skin changes are not typical of active GVHD rash. Upper GI symptoms must meet thresholds to diagnose GVHD: anorexia with associated weight loss, nausea and/or 2+ vomiting episodes/day lasting 3+ days. For lower GI GVHD we collect stool volumes excluding formed/mostly-formed stools. Unquantified episodes are counted at 200 ml per episode (3 ml/kg for children <50kg) based upon a chart review of 300 patients with post-BMT diarrhea from any cause. Non-GVHD rectal bleeding that results in flecks or streaks of blood in the stool are ignored for staging. We use the highest daily stool output in the 3 days prior to the diagnosis of lower GI GVHD to determine onset stage and, when available, a 3-day average stool volume for subsequent staging to smooth daily variability. We classify biopsy report interpretation into four standardized categories: Positive (unequivocal presence of GVHD), Equivocal (findings suggestive of GVHD, but the pathologist cannot confirm the diagnosis), Non-diagnostic (no abnormalities or subtle findings insufficient to determine etiology), and Non-GVHD etiology (definitive evidence of another diagnosis without concomitant features suggestive of GVHD). We then combine the biopsy interpretation with clinical decision making to assign an overall confidence level to the diagnosis of GVHD in each target organ (Table 2): Confirmed (positive biopsy, regardless of clinician treatment decision), Probable (GVHD diagnosis is sufficiently favored that treatment is given without a positive biopsy), Possible (symptoms present without a positive biopsy; not treated as GVHD), Negative (no symptoms or symptoms are present but a GVHD diagnosis is not entertained and a non-GVHD etiology is identified). Uniform clinical data collection is essential for future GVHD trials and requires application of clear guidance. While still subject to refinement, these guidelines, in use for 2 years by an international research consortium, are designed to be clear, easy to apply, and for clinical trial use. Table 1. GVHD Target Organ Staging Stage Skin (active erythema only) Liver (bilirubin) Upper GI Lower GI (stool output/day) 0 No active (erythematous) GVHD rash < 2 mg/dl No or intermittent nausea, vomiting or anorexia Adult: < 500 ml/day or <3 episodes/day Child: < 10 ml/kg/day or <4 episodes/day 1 Rash < 25% BSA 2-3 mg/dl Persistent nausea, vomiting or anorexia Adult: 500-999 ml/day or 3-4 episodes/day Child: 10 -19.9 ml/kg/day or 4-6 episodes/day 2 Rash 25 - 50% BSA 3.1-6 mg/dl - Adult: 1000-1500 ml/day or 5-7 episodes/day Child: 20 - 30 ml/kg/day or 7-10 episodes/day 3 Rash > 50% BSA 6.1-15 mg/dl - Adult: >1500 ml/day or >7 episodes/day Child: > 30 ml/kg/day or >10 episodes/day 4 Generalized rash (>50% BSA) and bullous formation or desquamation > 5% BSA >15 mg/dl - Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus, or grossly bloody stool (volume independent) Table 2. Confidence Levels Pathologic evidence Clinician assessment Treatment for acute GVHD Comments Confirmed Unequivocal evidence of GVHD GVHD is the etiology for symptoms Not required GVHD is clearly present even if other etiologies co-exist simultaneously Probable Not required (includes equivocal and non-diagnostic biopsies) GVHD most likely etiology for symptoms Yes GVHD is most likely present but other etiologies may also explain the symptoms and there insufficient evidence to make a confirmed diagnosis Possible GVHD in differential diagnosis (but no treatment is being provided) No GVHD may be present, but other etiologies are favored Negative Unequivocal evidence of a diagnosis other than GVHD (e.g., drug rash) GVHD is not considered as an explanation for the symptoms No and the symptoms resolve without GVHD treatment A "negative" biopsy (e.g., normal skin) is not unequivocal evidence of a diagnosis other than GVHD Disclosures Devine: Genzyme: Research Funding. Chen:Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Porter:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Levine:Novartis: Consultancy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Wang

Enterogastric reflux (EGR) is the reflux of bile and digestive enzymes from the small bowel into the stomach. While it is a normal physiologic process in small amounts, excessive reflux and chronic EGR can cause upper GI symptoms often mimicking more common diseases such as gallbladder disease and GERD that often leads to its underdiagnosis. Identifying EGR is significant as it has been associated with the development of gastroesophogeal pathology including gastritis, esophagitis, ulcers, and mucosal metaplasia. This article presents a 22-year-old male with enterogastric reflux causing upper abdominal pain and will discuss the role of hepatobiliary scintigraphy in its diagnosis.


Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2953
Author(s):  
Henry B. Ogden ◽  
Robert B. Child ◽  
Joanne L. Fallowfield ◽  
Simon K. Delves ◽  
Caroline S. Westwood ◽  
...  

l-Glutamine (GLN) is a conditionally essential amino acid which supports gastrointestinal (GI) and immune function prior to catabolic stress (e.g., strenuous exercise). Despite potential dose-dependent benefits, GI tolerance of acute high dose oral GLN supplementation is poorly characterised. Fourteen healthy males (25 ± 5 years; 1.79 ± 0.07 cm; 77.7 ± 9.8 kg; 14.8 ± 4.6% body fat) ingested 0.3 (LOW), 0.6 (MED) or 0.9 (HIGH) g·kg·FFM−1 GLN beverages, in a randomised, double-blind, counter-balanced, cross-over trial. Individual and accumulated GI symptoms were recorded using a visual analogue scale at regular intervals up to 24-h post ingestion. GLN beverages were characterised by tonicity measurement and microscopic observations. 24-h accumulated upper- and lower- and total-GI symptoms were all greater in the HIGH, compared to LOW and MED trials (p < 0.05). Specific GI symptoms (discomfort, nausea, belching, upper GI pain) were all more pronounced on the HIGH versus LOW GLN trial (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, most symptoms were still rated as mild. In comparison, the remaining GI symptoms were either comparable (flatulence, urge to regurgitate, bloating, lower GI pain) or absent (heart burn, vomiting, urge to defecate, abnormal stools, stitch, dizziness) between trials (p > 0.05). All beverages were isotonic and contained a dose-dependent number of GLN crystals. Acute oral GLN ingestion in dosages up to 0.9 g·kg·FFM−1 are generally well-tolerated. However, the severity of mild GI symptoms appeared dose-dependent during the first two hours post prandial and may be due to high-concentrations of GLN crystals.


2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1823-1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyang Huang ◽  
Laurence S. Magder ◽  
Michelle Petri

Objective.Findings from previous studies of predictors of depression among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been inconsistent. The aim of our study was to identify risk factors that preceded incident depression based on a large, closely followed longitudinal cohort.Methods.Data regarding 1609 patients with SLE in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort who had no history of depression prior to cohort entry were analyzed. Demographic variables, SLE manifestations, laboratory tests, physician’s global assessment, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI), cumulative organ damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index), and onset of depression were recorded at enrollment and each quarterly visit. Rates of incident depression were calculated overall, and in subgroups defined by demographic and clinical variables. Adjusted estimates of association were derived using pooled logistic regression.Results.The incidence of depression was 29.7 episodes per 1000 person-years. In the multivariable analysis, these variables remained as independent predictors of incident depression: recent SLE diagnosis, non-Asian ethnicity, disability, cutaneous activity, longitudinal myelitis, and current prednisone use of 20 mg/day or higher. Global disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI) was not a significant predictor after controlling for prednisone use.Conclusion.Depression in SLE is multifactorial. Higher-dose prednisone (≥ 20 mg daily) is 1 important independent risk factor. Global disease activity is not a risk factor, but cutaneous activity and certain types of neurologic activity (myelitis) are predictive of depression. The independent effect of prednisone provides clinicians with an additional incentive to avoid and reduce high-dose prednisone exposure in SLE.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Joydeep Chakrabartty ◽  
Manthan Kathrotiya ◽  
Kasturi Sengupta ◽  
Pronati Gupta

Introduction: One is left with very few options in patients with steroid refractory Gut Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD) which occurs post allogenic stem cell transplant (AlloSCT) with most of them increasing the financial burden, especially in resource poor countries like India and many others. Many studies looking in to the pathogenesis of Gut GVHD have confirmed the hypothesis that patients with less diverse faecal microbiome have a greater chance of developing intestinal GVHD and are more prone to succumb to transplant-related complications. Looking at the mechanism of cure in various diseases of the gut, led us to the thinking that reversal of intestinal dysbiosis could improve Gut GvHD. We used FMT as a second line treatment in few of our patients and got encouraging results. Our findings indicate the safety and effectiveness of FMT in acute Gut GVHD. Patient details: Please see image Materials and methods: Fecal material for FMT was taken from healthy donors who passed screening for transmissible disease. 100 gm of stool was prepared into a 200 ml solution and given once daily, serially for 4 days through naso-jejunal tube over 8 to 10 minutes. All patients received FMT as second line treatment after they were found non-responding or partially responding to steroids. All adverse events (AEs) that were first noted within 1 week of infusion of FMT were evaluated in terms of the safety. Response to FMT was evaluated at 14 days starting from the 1st FMT dose or at the time of maximum response whichever was first. Complete resolution of loose motions and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms was considered as complete response (CR). Decrease in severity of GVHD by at least one stage was considered as partial response (PR). Results: All four patients include were treated between 2018 to 2020. All of them were diagnosed with GI acute GVHD (Gut ± upper GI) on the basis of clinical, scopy (colonoscopy ± endoscopy) findings and histopathology. Case 2 and Case 4 had liver GVHD simultaneously with Gut GVHD. The median time for initiation of FMT was at 52.5(14-90) days from the day of AlloSCT. Three patients (Case 2,3,4) had GVHD immediately post AlloSCT, while Case 1 had GVHD at day 90. All patients had stool microscopy, culture and a stool BIOFIRE test sent to rule out viral, bacterial and parasitic infections. Clostridium difficile infection was not observed in any of the patients. Three patients (Case 1,2,3) received single course (4 days serially) while case 4 required 2 courses 14 days apart. Case one had sigmoid colon involvement and we also gave him per rectal FMT via a flatus tube which was placed in his sigmoid colon. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients. No side effects related to FMT were suspected or confirmed in any patients. Three patients (Case 1,2,3) achieved CR with complete resolution of loose stools and GI symptoms. The median time to response was 4 days (3-5 days). We were able to reduce the dose and taper off steroids in all four patients. Case 4 showed partial response but again had aggravation of GVHD after each course of FMT. At last follow up, two (case 2 and 3) out of four patients were alive. Case 1 expired 2 months after resolution of GVHD due to anginal attack. Case 3 had a secondary graft failure but is still transfusion independent. Case 4 expired due to sever uncontrolled acute GI GVHD (colonic + upper GI). Conclusion: In summary, FMT can be considered as a potential, relatively safe and well tolerated option for treatment of acute Gut GVHD in AlloSCT patients. Further clinical trials with large number of patients are required to explore FMT as one of the effective options for treatment of acute GVHD. Despite the small number of patients, previous findings and our data corroborate that interventions to maintain intestinal diversity can improve outcomes of AlloSCT. Table Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H Hunt ◽  
Surinder Dhaliwal ◽  
Gervais Tougas ◽  
Carmen Pedro ◽  
Jean-Francois Labbé ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of lower gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in the general Canadian population, and to explore patient satisfaction with traditional therapies and the level of patient interest in new treatments.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage 1: A telephone survey of a weighted sample of 1000 adults (18 years of age or older) was conducted to determine the prevalence of five GI symptoms – abdominal pain, abdominal discomfort, bloating, constipation or constipation with occasional diarrhea -- that were present for 12 weeks or more (not necessarily consecutive) over the past year. Respondents with only abdominal pain were excluded. Stage 2: A telephone survey of 689 women (18 to 64 years of age), experiencing the GI symptoms described in stage 1, was conducted to assess symptom impact and treatment satisfaction.RESULTS: Overall, 5.2% of the Canadian population (2.3% men and 7.9% women) experienced one or more lower GI symptoms (excluding those reporting abdominal pain alone). In stage 2, 26.2% of respondents had previously been diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome. Overall, 78.1% of participants experienced two or more symptoms. Bloating was the most common symptom (75.3%) and abdominal pain the most bothersome and most severe. Over the previous three months, 13.2% of respondents missed work or school and 28.8% were less productive. At least one physician (average of 2.2 physicians) was consulted for symptoms in 80.9% of respondents. Of the 63.8% women receiving treatment, most used nonprescription products. Patients receiving prescription treatments for constipation were most often dissatisfied (75%).CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal pain and discomfort, bloating and constipation are common, frequently occurring symptoms in the Canadian population and have a high burden on work performance and health care seeking. Most patients were dissatisfied with traditional therapies.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-234
Author(s):  
Edward B. Blau ◽  
Rebecca F. Morris ◽  
Eduardo J. Yunis

Polyarteritis in the older child is thought to be a rare disease. This study describes 11 children, 3 to 12 years of age, with polyarteritis seen over a five-year period. Fever, abdominal pain, hypertension, and leukocytosis were found in almost all. Renal disease occurred in eight. Examination of muscle, gut, or kidney tissue was an effective means of diagnosis. The pathological changes were the same as those seen in adults. There seemed to be an association between polyarteritis and group A streptococcal infection. Ten patients had a salutary response to high-dose prednisone administration.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S85-S85
Author(s):  
Armaghan-e-Rehman Mansoor ◽  
Yousaf B Hadi ◽  
Syeda Fatima Z Naqvi ◽  
Ali Y Khan ◽  
Raja S Khan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Antibiotics in patients with cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding are shown to improve outcomes. Little is known regarding optimum duration of prophylactic antibiotics, with 7 days of therapy generally recommended. Antibiotic duration has not been compared to outcomes in current scientific literature. The goal of our study was to study the effect of shorter antibiotic duration on outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis presenting with upper GI bleeding at our institute from 2010-2018. Patients were divided into three cohorts based on duration of antibiotic administration: 1-3 days, 4-6 days, and 7 days or more. Rates of infection within 30 days, time to infection, rebleeding and mortality were compared between the three groups. Multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate independent risk factors for infection. Results Medical charts of 943 patients with cirrhosis and upper GI bleed were reviewed. 303 patients did not have concomitant confirmed or suspected infection on presentation, of these 243 patients received antibiotics for prophylaxis and were included for analysis. Seventy-seven patients received antibiotic therapy for 3 days or less, 69 patients for 4-6 days, and 97 patients &gt;6 days. The groups were well matched in demographic & clinical variables. 27 patients developed infections within 30 days of bleed. High MELD score at presentation and presence of ascites were associated with infection within 30 days. Rates of infection were not statistically different between the antibiotic groups (p= 0.78). In the 30 days following GI bleed, pneumonia was the most diagnosed infection (11 patients) followed by UTI (8 patients). Four patients developed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and 3 were diagnosed with bacteremia. There was no difference in time to infection (p= 0.75), early re-bleeding (p=0.81), late re-bleeding (p= 0.37) and in-hospital mortality (p= 0.94) in the three groups. Six patients developed C. Difficile infection, none of whom were in the short antibiotic group. Conclusion Short course of antibiotics for prophylaxis (3 days) appears safe and adequate for prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis and upper gastrointestinal bleeding if bleeding has abated and there is no active infection. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Rasch ◽  
Tuyl Lilian van ◽  
Martijn Kremer ◽  
Irene Bultink ◽  
Maarten Boers ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document