Impact of Psychological Covariates on Experimental Pain Sensitivity in Children and Adolescents with SCD

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 985-985
Author(s):  
Nitya Bakshi ◽  
Ines Lukombo ◽  
Inna Belfer ◽  
Lakshmanan Krishnamurti

Abstract Background: Children with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) have increased sensitivity to heat and cold pain (Brandow et al) during steady state. However, the role of psychological factors such as anxiety, depressive symptoms and catastrophizing on pain sensitivity is not known in SCD. Characterization of these factors may provide an insight into the study of their possible roles in the transition to chronic pain. Aim: To determine if psychological factors impact pain sensitivity in patients with SCD. Methods: Patients with SCD were offered quantitative sensory testing (QST) when at steady state (at least 2 weeks following a VOE). QST procedures included estimation of pressure, mechanical and thermal pain thresholds (minimum intensity of stimulus which is first perceived as painful) and tolerances (maximum intensity of a pain-producing stimulus that a participant is willing to accept in a given situation) as well as windup values (increased pain perception to repetitive painful stimuli). At each time point, participants completed the PROMIS measures of pain intensity, pain interference, anxiety, depressive symptoms, sleep, fatigue and peer relationships. Participants also completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale ((PCS)-Sullivan et al), Child Somatization Inventory (Walker et al), Pain Coping Inventory (Varni et al)* as well as Peds QL Generic and SCD specific measures of Quality of life*. Results: We determined the experimental pain phenotype (sensitivity to pressure, mechanical and thermal pain) of 29 patients with SCD during steady state (> 2 weeks from a vaso-occlusive episode). These participants were not receiving long-term opioids or adjunctive medications for pain. The median age of participants was 15 (IQR 10-19) and majority (69%) were female. Approximately half of the study sample had HbSS. Three quarters of the study sample were prescribed hydroxyurea. The median Hb level was 11.1 (IQR 10.2-11.6). The median number of VOC's in the year prior to testing was 1(IQR 0-2) and in 3 years prior to testing was 3 (IQR 2-5). The median PROMIS pain intensity T-score was 37.8, PROMIS pain interference T-score was 48.75, PROMIS Depressive symptom T-score was 44.35 and PROMIS anxiety was 43.9; these scores were not higher than the average T-score of 50 described in the pediatric population. High catastrophizing scores were reported on the PCS, with median score being 29. The median cold pain threshold was 23.6 degrees C (IQR 15.8-26.7) and median heat pain threshold was 39.1 degrees C (IQR 37.5-40.9). We noted that increase in scores on PROMIS depressive symptoms was associated with lower heat (Spearman's rho= -0.55), cold (Spearman's rho= 0.57) and mechanical (Spearman's rho= -0.4) pain thresholds. Scores on PROMIS depressive symptoms predicted heat and cold pain thresholds independent of age and VOC's in the past 3 years. Increased PROMIS anxiety scores were associated with lower mechanical pain thresholds (Spearman's rho= -0.43) and lower cold detection thresholds (Spearman's rho= 0.46). Increased scores on PCS were associated with lower heat detection thresholds (Spearman's' rho= -0.39). (All p-values were<0.05) Table 1.OutcomeDepressive symptomsVOCs in 3 years prior to studyAge (years)Model signCoeffp-valueCoeffp-valueCoeffp-valueCold Pain Threshold0.40.003-0.190.6-0.410.16<0.0127Heat Pain Threshold-0.120.0130.380.0120.20.068<0.00128 Conclusions: Depressive symptoms and anxiety are associated with lower experimental pain thresholds in patients with SCD. Higher scores on PROMIS depressive symptoms predict increased sensitivity to heat and cold pain independent of age and number of VOCs experienced in the past 3 years. Further studies are needed to determine the contribution of psychological factors in the transition to chronic pain in SCD. Acknowledgments: 1-Sickle Cell Disease Association of America 2- *PedsQL™ contact information and permission to use: Mapi Research Trust, Lyon, France. E-mail: [email protected] - Internet: www.Mapi-trust.org and http://www.pedsql.org/index.html Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 2132-2132
Author(s):  
E. Vermetten

Although posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is associated with chronic pain, preliminary evidence suggests reduced experimental pain sensitivity in this disorder. The questions addressed in the present study were whether pain perception would also be reduced in PTSD patients who are not suffering from chronic pain symptoms, and whether a reduction in pain sensitivity would also be present in combat veterans who did not develop PTSD. For this, we determined thermal detection and pain thresholds in 10 male combat-related PTSD patients, 10 combat control subjects (no PTSD) and 10 healthy controls without combat experience. All subjects were pain free. First, we measured thermal sensory thresholds with ramped heat and cold stimuli using the method of limits. Ramped thermal sensory stimulation revealed no deficits for the detection of (non-noxious) f2.1thermal stimuli between groups. In contrast, heat and cold pain thresholds in both combat groups (PTSD and combat controls) were significantly increased compared to healthy controls. However, these stimuli could not distinguish between the two groups due to ceiling effects. When using longer-lasting heat stimulation at different temperatures (30 s duration; method of fixed stimuli), we found significantly lower frequency of pain reports in PTSD patients compared with both combat and healthy controls, as well as significantly lower pain ratings. Our results suggest an association of PTSD with reduced pain sensitivity, which could be related to PTSD-related (neuro-)psychological alterations or to a pre-existing risk factor for the disorder.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-691
Author(s):  
Robert Waller ◽  
Anne Smith ◽  
Helen Slater ◽  
Peter O’Sullivan ◽  
Darren Beales ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims There is high level evidence for physical activity (PA) improving outcomes in persistent pain disorders and one of the mechanisms proposed is the effect of exercise on central nociceptive modulation. Although laboratory studies and small field intervention studies suggest associations between physical activity and pain sensitivity, the association of objectively measured, habitual PA and sedentary behaviour (SB) with pain sensitivity requires further investigation. Current evidence suggests PA typically lowers pain sensitivity in people without pain or with single-site pain, whereas PA is frequently associated with an increase in pain sensitivity for those with multisite pain. The aim of this study was to explore the relationships of PA and SB with pain sensitivity measured by pressure pain thresholds and cold pain thresholds, considering the presence of single-site and multisite pain and controlling for potential confounders. Methods Participants from the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study (n = 714) provided data at age 22-years. PA and SB were measured via accelerometry over a 7-day period. Pain sensitivity was measured using pressure pain threshold (4 sites) and cold pain threshold (wrist). Participants were grouped by number of pain areas into “No pain areas” (n = 438), “Single-site pain” (n = 113) and “Multisite pain” (n = 163) groups. The association of PA and SB variables with pain sensitivity was tested separately within each pain group by multivariable regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Results For those with “Single-site pain”, higher levels (>13 min/day) of moderate-vigorous PA in ≥10 min bouts was associated with more pressure pain sensitivity (p = 0.035). Those with “Multisite pain” displayed increased cold pain sensitivity with greater amounts of vigorous PA (p = 0.011). Those with “No pain areas” displayed increased cold pain sensitivity with decreasing breaks from sedentary time (p = 0.046). Conclusions This study was a comprehensive investigation of a community-based sample of young adults with “No pain areas”, “Single-site pain” and “Multisite pain” and suggests some associations of measures of PA and SB with pain sensitivity. Implications The findings suggest that the pattern of accumulation of PA and SB may be important to inform improved clinical management of musculoskeletal pain disorders. This study provides a baseline for follow-up studies using the Raine Study cohort. Future research should consider temporal influences of PA and SB on pain sensitivity, pain experience and consider using a broader range of pain sensitivity measures.


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. e13-e18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob M Vigil ◽  
Lauren N Rowell ◽  
Joe Alcock ◽  
Randy Maestes

BACKGROUND: There is no standardized method for cold pressor pain tasks across experiments. Temperature, apparatus and aspects of experimenters vary widely among studies. It is well known that experimental pain tolerance is influenced by setting as well as the sex of the experimenter. It is not known whether other contextual factors influence experimental pain reporting.OBJECTIVES: The present two-part experiment examines whether minimizing and standardizing interactions with laboratory personnel (eg, limiting interaction with participants to consenting and questions and not during the actual pain task) eliminates the influence of examiner characteristics on subjective pain reports and whether using different cold pain apparatus (cooler versus machine) influences reports.METHODS:The present experiment manipulated the gender of the experimenter (male, female and transgender) and the type of cold pressor task (CPT) apparatus (ice cooler versus refrigerated bath circulator). Participants conducted the CPT at one of two pain levels (5°C or 16°C) without an experimenter present.RESULTS:Men and women showed lower pain sensitivity when they were processed by biological male personnel than by biological female personnel before the CPT. Women who interacted with a transgendered researcher likewise reported higher pain sensitivity than women processed by biological male or female researchers. The type of CPT apparatus, despite operating at equivalent temperatures, also influenced subjective pain reports.DISCUSSION: The findings show that even minimal interactions with laboratory personnel who differ in gender, and differences in laboratory materials impact the reliable measurement of pain.CONCLUSION: More standardized protocols for measuring pain across varying research and clinical settings should be developed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Pratik Akhani ◽  
Samir Mendpara ◽  
Bhupendra Palan

Background: Pain is one of the most common reasons for patients to seek medical attention and it causes considerable human suffering. Pain is a complex perception that differs enormously among individual patients. Gender plays an important role in how pain is experienced, coped with and treated. Even young healthy individuals often differ in how they perceive and cope with pain. This study was done to investigate gender differences in response to experimental pain among medical students from a western state in India. Methods: A total of 150 medical students (86 males and 64 females) participated in this interventional study. The Cold Pressor Test was used to exert experimental pain. To study the response, cardiovascular measures (radial pulse, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure) and pain sensitivity parameters (pain threshold, pain tolerance and pain rating) were assessed. Results: No significant difference was found in cardiovascular response to experimental pain between both the genders (p>0.05). Pain threshold and pain tolerance were found to be significantly higher in males whereas pain rating was found to be significantly higher in females (p<0.01). Pulse reactivity showed a negative relationship with pain threshold and pain tolerance whereas a positive relationship with pain rating, however no statistically significant relation was found between these measures. Conclusion: Females display greater pain sensitivity than males. Different pain perception might account for gender difference in pulse reactivity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isa Amalie Olofsson ◽  
Jeppe Hvedstrup ◽  
Katrine Falkenberg ◽  
Mona Ameri Chalmer ◽  
Henrik Winther Schytz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Headache affects 90–99% of the population. Based on the question “Do you think that you never ever in your whole life have had a headache?” 4% of the population say that they have never experienced a headache. The rarity of never having had a headache suggests that distinct biological and environmental factors may be at play. We hypothesized that people who have never experienced a headache had a lower general pain sensitivity than controls. Methods We included 99 male participants, 47 headache free participants and 52 controls, in an observer blinded nested case-control study. We investigated cold pain threshold and heat pain threshold using a standardized quantitative sensory testing protocol, pericranial tenderness with total tenderness score and pain tolerance with the cold pressor test. Differences between the two groups were assessed with the unpaired Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate. Results There was no difference in age, weight or mean arterial pressure between headache free participants and controls. We found no difference in pain detection threshold, pericranial tenderness or pain tolerance between headache free participants and controls. Conclusion Our study clearly shows that freedom from headache is not caused by a lower general pain sensitivity. The results support the hypothesis that headache is caused by specific mechanisms, which are present in the primary headache disorders, rather than by a decreased general sensitivity to painful stimuli. Trial registration Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04217616), 3rd January 2020, retrospectively registered.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadas Nahman-Averbuch ◽  
Ian A. Boggero ◽  
Benjamin M. Hunter ◽  
Hannah Pickerill ◽  
James L. Peugh ◽  
...  

Psychological factors, such as anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing, may affect how healthy individuals experience experimental pain. However, current literature puts forth contradictory results, possibly due to differing study methodologies, such as the type of psychophysical measure or survey. To better understand such results, this paper analyzed the relationships between psychological factors and experimental pain outcomes across eight different studies (total n= 595) conducted in different populations of healthy adult and adolescent participants. Analyses were conducted with and without controlling for sex, age, and race. Each study was analyzed separately and as part of an aggregate analysis. Even without correction for multiple comparisons, only a few significant relationships were found for the individual studies. Controlling for demographic factors had minimal effect on the results. Importantly, even the few statistically significant models showed relatively small effect sizes; psychological factors explained no more than 20% of the variability in experimental pain sensitivity of healthy individuals. The aggregate analyses revealed relationships between anxiety and PPT / cold pain ratings and between pain catastrophizing and PPT. Sample size calculations based on the aggregate analyses indicated that several hundred participants would be required to correctly detect relationships between these psychological factors and pain measures. These overall negative findings suggest that anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing in healthy individuals may not be meaningfully related to experimental pain outcomes. Furthermore, positive findings in the literature may be subject to small group effects and publication bias towards positive findings.


Psihologija ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koraljka Modic-Stanke ◽  
Dragutin Ivanec

The aim was to examine the effect of the experimenter?s social status and its interaction with participant?s gender on pressure pain threshold. Both male and female students participated in the study (N = 96) and were evenly assigned into two groups which differed only in the professional status of the experimenter who was a professor (higher status) in one group and a student (lower status) in the other. The factorial ANOVA revealed statistically significant and large main effects of the experimenter?s status and the participants? gender, indicating higher pain thresholds in male participants and in the higher status experimenter group. Although both males and females had higher pain thresholds when measured by a higher status experimenter, a statistically significant interaction revealed that status affected male participants more so than females. The obtained results are probably due to social behaviour, emphasizing relevance of the experimenter?s and participants? characteristics in pain measurement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyochol Ahn ◽  
Setor K. Sorkpor ◽  
Miyong Kim ◽  
Hongyu Miao ◽  
Chengxue Zhong ◽  
...  

Multiple studies in healthy populations and clinical samples have shown that ethnic minorities have greater pain sensitivity than their majority counterparts. Acculturation is speculated to be one of the sociocultural factors contributing to pain sensitivity since cultural beliefs and practices can influence the way patients perceive and respond to pain. However, the relationship of acculturation to pain sensitivity in minority populations remains poorly understood. Therefore, in this cross-sectional study, we examined the relationship between acculturation and experimental pain sensitivity in 50 Asian Americans residing in North Central Florida with knee osteoarthritis pain. The Suinn-Lew Asian Self Identity Acculturation Scale was used to assess acculturation, and multimodal quantitative sensory testing was performed to measure experimental sensitivity, including heat pain tolerance, pressure pain threshold, and punctate mechanical pain. Descriptive and regression analyses were performed. Participants’ mean age was 55.7 years, and about half of this sample were Korean American (56%). The participants had lived in the United States for 21 years on average. Regression analyses indicated that lower acculturation to American culture may contribute to greater experimental pain sensitivity. Asian Americans who were more acculturated to the American culture had higher heat pain tolerance (beta = 0.61, P=0.01), higher pressure pain threshold (beta = 0.59, P=0.02), and lower ratings of punctate mechanical pain (beta = −0.70, P<0.01). These findings add to the literature regarding sociocultural factors associated with pain in Asian Americans; additional research with a larger and more diverse sample of Asian Americans is warranted for cross-validation.


Cephalalgia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 904-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trond Sand ◽  
Kristian Bernhard Nilsen ◽  
Knut Hagen ◽  
Lars Jacob Stovner

Normal heat pain threshold (HPT) and cold pain threshold (CPT) repeatability should be estimated in order to identify thermal allodynia in longitudinal studies, but such data are scarce in the literature. The aim of our study was to estimate normal HPT and CPT repeatability in the face, forehead, neck and hand. In addition, we reviewed briefly normative studies of thermal pain thresholds relevant for headache research. Thermal pain thresholds were measured on three different days in 31 healthy headache-free subjects. Coefficients of repeatability and normal limits were calculated. HPT and CPT were lowest in the face. Pooled across regions, the lower repeatability limit for the test/retest ratio was 63% for HPT and 55% for CPT. The upper normal CPT limit varied between 24.5°C and 29.7°C. Lower HPT limits ranged between 35.5°C and 40.8°C. Quantitative sensory methods provide useful information about headache and pain pathophysiology, and it is important to estimate the normal test/retest repeatability range in follow-up studies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Waller ◽  
Anne Julia Smith ◽  
Peter Bruce O’Sullivan ◽  
Helen Slater ◽  
Michele Sterling ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground and aimsCurrently there is a lack of large population studies that have investigated pain sensitivity distributions in healthy pain free people. The aims of this study were: (1) to provide sex-specific reference values of pressure and cold pain thresholds in young pain-free adults; (2) to examine the association of potential correlates of pain sensitivity with pain threshold values.MethodsThis study investigated sex specific pressure and cold pain threshold estimates for young pain free adults aged 21–24 years. A cross-sectional design was utilised using participants (n =617) from the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study at the 22-year follow-up. The association of site, sex, height, weight, smoking, health related quality oflife, psychological measures and activity with pain threshold values was examined. Pressure pain threshold (lumbar spine, tibialis anterior, neck and dorsal wrist) and cold pain threshold (dorsal wrist) were assessed using standardised quantitative sensory testing protocols.ResultsReference values for pressure pain threshold (four body sites) stratified by sex and site, and cold pain threshold (dorsal wrist) stratified by sex are provided. Statistically significant, independent correlates of increased pressure pain sensitivity measures were site (neck, dorsal wrist), sex (female), higher waist-hip ratio and poorer mental health. Statistically significant, independent correlates of increased cold pain sensitivity measures were, sex (female), poorer mental health and smoking.ConclusionsThese data provide the most comprehensive and robust sex specific reference values for pressure pain threshold specific to four body sites and cold pain threshold at the dorsal wrist for young adults aged 21–24 years. Establishing normative values in this young age group is important given that the transition from adolescence to adulthood is a critical temporal period during which trajectories for persistent pain can be established.ImplicationsThese data will provide an important research resource to enable more accurate profiling and interpretation of pain sensitivity in clinical pain disorders in young adults. The robust and comprehensive data can assist interpretation of future clinical pain studies and provide further insight into the complex associations of pain sensitivity that can be used in future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document