scholarly journals Feasibility and effectiveness of daily temperature screening to detect COVID-19 in a prospective cohort at a large public university

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley N. Facente ◽  
Lauren A. Hunter ◽  
Laura J. Packel ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Anna Harte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Temperature Monitoring ◽  
Daily Temperature ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Measured Temperature ◽  
Mean Body Temperature ◽  
Transmission Potential ◽  
Specimen Collection ◽  
Primary Means

Abstract Background Many persons with active SARS-CoV-2 infection experience mild or no symptoms, presenting barriers to COVID-19 prevention. Regular temperature screening is nonetheless used in some settings, including university campuses, to reduce transmission potential. We evaluated the potential impact of this strategy using a prospective university-affiliated cohort. Methods Between June and August 2020, 2912 participants were enrolled and tested for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at least once (median: 3, range: 1–9). Participants reported temperature and symptoms daily via electronic survey using a previously owned or study-provided thermometer. We assessed feasibility and acceptability of daily temperature monitoring, calculated sensitivity and specificity of various fever-based strategies for restricting campus access to reduce transmission, and estimated the association between measured temperature and SARS-CoV-2 test positivity using a longitudinal binomial mixed model. Results Most participants (70.2%) did not initially have a thermometer for taking their temperature daily. Across 5481 total person months, the average daily completion rate of temperature values was 61.6% (median: 67.6%, IQR: 41.8–86.2%). Sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 ranged from 0% (95% CI 0–9.7%) to 40.5% (95% CI 25.6–56.7%) across all strategies for self-report of possible COVID-19 symptoms on day of specimen collection, with corresponding specificity of 99.9% (95% CI 99.8–100%) to 95.3% (95% CI 94.7–95.9%). An increase of 0.1 °F in individual mean body temperature on the same day as specimen collection was associated with 1.11 increased odds of SARS-CoV-2 positivity (95% CI 1.06–1.17). Conclusions Our study is the first, to our knowledge, that examines the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of daily temperature screening in a prospective cohort during an infectious disease outbreak, and the only study to assess these strategies in a university population. Daily temperature monitoring was feasible and acceptable; however, the majority of potentially infectious individuals were not detected by temperature monitoring, suggesting that temperature screening is insufficient as a primary means of detection to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

scholarly journals Feasibility and effectiveness of daily temperature screening to detect COVID-19 in a large public university setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley N Facente ◽  
Lauren A. Hunter ◽  
Laura J. Packel ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Anna Harte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Model ◽  
Temperature Monitoring ◽  
Daily Temperature ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Measured Temperature ◽  
Mean Body Temperature ◽  
Transmission Potential ◽  
University Campuses ◽  
Specimen Collection ◽  
Primary Means

Background. Many persons with active SARS-CoV-2 infection experience mild or no symptoms, presenting barriers to COVID-19 prevention. Regular temperature screening is nonetheless used in some settings, including University campuses, to reduce transmission potential. We evaluated the potential impact of this strategy using a prospective University-affiliated cohort. Methods. Between June and August 2020, 2,912 participants were enrolled and tested for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at least once (median: 3, range: 1-9). Participants reported temperature and symptoms daily via electronic survey using a previously owned or study-provided thermometer. We assessed feasibility and acceptability of daily temperature monitoring, calculated sensitivity and specificity of various fever-based strategies for restricting campus access to reduce transmission, and estimated the association between measured temperature and SARS-CoV-2 test positivity using a longitudinal binomial mixed model. Results. Most participants (70.2%) did not initially have a thermometer for taking their temperature daily. Across 5481 total person months, the average daily completion rate of temperature values was 61.6% (IQR: 41.8%-86.2%). Sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 ranged from 0% (95% CI 0-9.7%) to 40.5% (95% CI 25.6-56.7%) across all strategies for self-report of possible COVID-19 symptoms on day of specimen collection, with corresponding specificity of 99.9% (95% CI 99.8-100%) to 95.3% (95% CI 94.7-95.9%). An increase of 0.1 degree Fahrenheit in individual mean body temperature on the same day as specimen collection was associated with 1.11 increased odds of SARS-CoV-2 positivity (95% CI 1.06-1.17). Conclusions. Daily temperature monitoring was feasible and acceptable; however, the majority of potentially infectious individuals were not detected by temperature monitoring, suggesting that temperature screening is insufficient as a primary means of detection to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

A comparison of the Remote Food Photography Method and the Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool for measuring full day dietary intake among school-aged children

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Traci A. Bekelman ◽  
Corby K. Martin ◽  
Susan L. Johnson ◽  
Deborah H. Glueck ◽  
Katherine A. Sauder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Intake ◽  
Energy Intake ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Dietary Assessment ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Food Photography ◽  
Photography Method

Abstract The limitations of self-report measures of dietary intake are well known. Novel, technology-based measures of dietary intake may provide a more accurate, less burdensome alternative to existing tools. The first objective of this study was to compare participant burden for two technology-based measures of dietary intake among school-age children: the Automated-Self Administered 24-hour Dietary Assessment Tool-2018 (ASA24-2018) and the Remote Food Photography Method (RFPM). The second objective was to compare reported energy intake for each method to the Estimated Energy Requirement for each child, as a benchmark for actual intake. Forty parent-child dyads participated in 2, 3-day dietary assessments: a parent proxy-reported version of the ASA24 and the RFPM. A parent survey was subsequently administered to compare satisfaction, ease of use and burden with each method. A linear mixed model examined differences in total daily energy intake (TDEI) between assessments, and between each assessment method and the EER. Reported energy intake was 379 kcal higher with the ASA24 than the RFPM (p=0.0002). Reported energy intake with the ASA24 was 231 kcal higher than the EER (p = 0.008). Reported energy intake with the RFPM did not differ significantly from the EER (difference in predicted means = −148 kcal, p = 0.09). Median satisfaction and ease of use scores were 5 out of 6 for both methods. A higher proportion of parents reported that the ASA24 was more time consuming than the RFPM (74.4% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.002). Utilization of both methods is warranted given their high satisfaction among parents.

Are We Worrying About the Right Men and Are the Right Men Feeling Worried? Conscious But Not Unconscious Prostate Anxiety Predicts Screening Among Men From Three Ethnic Groups

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan S. Consedine
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ethnic Groups ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Self Report ◽  
European American ◽  
Emotional Stroop Task ◽  
Screening Behavior ◽  
Minority Men ◽  
The Right ◽  
Mixed Model Anovas

Anxieties regarding cancer and screening have been consistently linked in prostate screening behavior with cancer-related anxieties generally thought to be higher among minority men. To date, however, the literature linking cancer anxieties to screening among diverse men remains predicated on self-reported anxiety. Research has yet to consider how “accurate” the reporting of anxiety may be among distinct groups of men or the possibility that anxiety may influence prostate cancer (PC) screening behavior through conscious and nonconscious channels; the current study tested for discrepancies between self-report and Stroop-ascertained general- and prostate-specific anxiety and their links to screening among 180 U.S.-born African American, U.S.-born European American, and immigrant Jamaican men. Men provided self-report information regarding trait and prostate-related anxiety and completed an emotional Stroop task. Mixed model ANOVAs showed that while U.S.-born African Americans had few discrepancies between self-report and Stroop-ascertained anxiety, Jamaicans reported greater PC anxiety than indicated by Stroop performance, while the opposite was true among U.S.-born Europeans. As expected, self-reported (but not Stroop-ascertained) PC anxiety predicted screening in multivariate analysis. Although men from different age and ethnic groups varied in the discrepancy between self-reported and Stroop-ascertained PC anxiety, the influence of avoidance-producing emotions appears to operate predominantly through conscious channels.

scholarly journals Mood and Global Symptom Changes among Psychotherapy Clients with Depressive Personality

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Rachel E. Maddux ◽  
Lars-Gunnar Lundh
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Repeated Measures Analysis ◽  
Depressive Personality ◽  
Symptom Changes ◽  
Psychotherapy Clients ◽  
Over Time

The present study assessed the rate of depressive personality (DP), as measured by the self-report instrument depressive personality disorder inventory (DPDI), among 159 clients entering psychotherapy at an outpatient university clinic. The presenting clinical profile was evaluated for those with and without DP, including levels of depressed mood, other psychological symptoms, and global severity of psychopathology. Clients were followed naturalistically over the course of therapy, up to 40 weeks, and reassessed on these variables again after treatment. Results indicated that 44 percent of the sample qualified for DP prior to treatment, and these individuals had a comparatively more severe and complex presenting disposition than those without DP. Mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine between-groups changes on mood and global severity over time, with those with DP demonstrating larger reductions on both outcome variables, although still showing more symptoms after treatment, than those without DP. Only eleven percent of the sample continued to endorse DP following treatment. These findings suggest that in routine clinical situations, psychotherapy may benefit individuals with DP.

scholarly journals O003 The impact of wind farm noise in a laboratory setting on objective and subjective sleep efficiency

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A1-A2
Author(s):  
T Liebich ◽  
L Lack ◽  
G Micic ◽  
K Hansen ◽  
B Zajamsek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Disturbance ◽  
Wind Farm ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Sleep Efficiency ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Sleep Diary ◽  
Noise Condition ◽  
Subjective Sleep ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Well-controlled studies of wind farm noise (WFN) on sleep are lacking despite complaints and known effects of other noise types on sleep. This laboratory-based study investigated the impact of continuous full-night WFN exposure replicated from field recordings on polysomnography-measured (objective) and sleep diary-determined (subjective) sleep efficiency compared to a quiet control night. Methods Based on residential location and self-report data, 50 participants were categorised into three groups (14 living <10km from a wind farm and self-reporting sleep disturbance; 19 living <10km from a wind farm and self-reporting no sleep disturbance and 18 controls living in a quiet rural area). Participants underwent full in-laboratory polysomnography during exposure to continuous WFN (25 dB(A)) throughout the night and a quiet control night (background noise 19 dB(A)) in random order. Group and noise condition effects were examined via linear mixed model analysis. Results Participants (30 females) were aged (mean±SD) 54.9±17.6 range: 18–80 years. Sleep efficiency in the control condition was (median [interquartile range]) objective: 85.5 [77.4 to 91.2]%; subjective: 85.7 [69.2 to 92.7]%) versus the WFN condition (objective: 86.1 [78.6 to 91.7]% subjective: 85.8 [66.2 to 93.8]%) with no significant main or interaction effects of group or noise condition (all p’s >0.05). Conclusion These results do not support that WFN at 25 dB(A) significantly impacts objective or subjective sleep efficiency in participants with or without prior WFN exposure or self-reported WFN-related sleep disturbance. Further analyses to investigate potential sleep micro-structural changes remain warranted.

scholarly journals Reducing shoulder complaints in employees with high occupational shoulder exposures: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study (The Shoulder-Café Study)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Trøstrup ◽  
Lone Ramer Mikkelsen ◽  
Poul Frost ◽  
Annett Dalbøge ◽  
Mette Terp Høybye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Exercise Intervention ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Cluster Randomised Trial ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Background: In Denmark, exercise therapy in combination with work modifications is the first choice treatment for persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures. To obtain this treatment they must visit several healthcare providers, which makes usual care fragmented and uncoordinated. Therefore, we developed a new intervention which unifies the expertise that is needed. The main hypotheses are that a group-based Shoulder-Café intervention will reduce (I) shoulder complaints and (II) occupational shoulder exposures more effectively than an individual-based Shoulder-Guidance intervention (active control – enhanced usual care). Methods: A cluster-randomised trial is conducted including 120 employees with high occupational shoulder exposures. Companies (clusters) are randomised to either Shoulder-Café or Shoulder-Guidance with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants are 18–65 years old and have an Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) ≤ 40. Both interventions include a home-based shoulder exercise programme, assessment of shoulder exposures by technical measurements and self-report, and general information on how to reduce shoulder exposures. The Shoulder-Café course also includes three café meetings with physiotherapist-supervised exercises, clinical shoulder evaluation, education on shoulder anatomy, workplace-oriented counselling, and an opportunity for a workplace visit by a health and safety consultant. The primary outcomes are the OSS at 6 month follow-up (hypothesis I), and the mean number of minutes/day with the arm elevated > 60° shortly after end of intervention (hypothesis II). We will use mixed model analysis that allows for company clustering, and data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: Persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures are an obvious target group for secondary prevention efforts. We developed the Shoulder-Café to reduce shoulder complaints and shoulder exposures while unifying the expertise that is needed to evaluate and treat shoulder complaints. If the intervention is effective, it would warrant widespread implementation. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov on 18 May 2017 (ID: NCT03159910). Keywords: Exercise, Intervention, Mechanical exposure, Occupation, Randomised controlled trial, Shoulder, Training programme.

scholarly journals Regular consumption of soft drinks is associated with type 2 diabetes incidence in Mexican adults: findings from a prospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leticia Torres-Ibarra ◽  
Berenice Rivera-Paredez ◽  
Rubí Hernández-López ◽  
Francisco Canto-Osorio ◽  
Luz María Sánchez-Romero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Soft Drinks ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Diabetes Incidence ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Mexican Adults ◽  
Incident Cases

Abstract Background Although high consumption of soft drinks has been associated with excess of type 2 diabetes risk, the strength of this association in the Mexican population, where a type 2 diabetes genetic susceptibility has been well established, has been scarcely studied. This study aimed to estimate the risk of type 2 diabetes due to soft drinks consumption in a cohort of Mexicans. Methods We used data on 1445 participants from the Health Workers Cohort Study, a prospective cohort conducted in Cuernavaca, Mexico. Soft drinks consumption was assessed with a semi-quantitative 116-item food frequency questionnaire. Incident type 2 diabetes was defined as self-report of physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose > 126 mg/dl, or hypoglycemic medication at any examination. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. Results With a total of 9526.2 person-years of follow-up, 109 incident cases of type 2 diabetes were observed. Type 2 diabetes incidence rate was 7.6, 11.0, and 17.1 per 1000 person-years across levels of soft drinks consumption of < 1, 1–4, and ≥ 5 servings/week, respectively (p < 0.001 for trend). The intake of ≥5 soft drinks/week was significantly associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (HR 1.9 95% CI:1.0–3.5) compared with consumption of < 1/week (p-trend = 0.040). The HR was attenuated by further adjustment for body mass index (HR 1.5 95%CI:0.8–2.8) and abdominal obesity (HR 1.6 95%CI:0.8–3.0). Conclusions The consumption of soft drinks was associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes in a cohort of Mexican adults. Our results further support recommendations to limit soft drinks intake to address the growing diabetes epidemic in Mexico.

scholarly journals Reducing shoulder complaints in employees with high occupational shoulder exposures: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study (The Shoulder-Café Study)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Trøstrup ◽  
Lone Ramer Mikkelsen ◽  
Poul Frost ◽  
Annett Dalbøge ◽  
Mette Terp Høybye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Usual Care ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
General Information ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Cluster Randomised Trial ◽  
Mixed Model Analysis ◽  
Cluster Randomised ◽  
First Choice

Abstract Background: In Denmark, exercise therapy in combination with work modifications is the first choice treatment for persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures. To obtain this treatment they must visit several healthcare providers, which makes usual care fragmented and uncoordinated. Therefore, we developed a new intervention which unifies the expertise that is needed. The main hypotheses are that a group-based Shoulder-Café intervention will more effectively reduce (I) shoulder complaints and (II) occupational shoulder exposures than an individual-based Shoulder-Guidance intervention (active control – enhanced usual care). Methods: A cluster-randomised trial is conducted including 120 employees with high occupational shoulder exposures. Companies (clusters) are randomised to either Shoulder-Café or Shoulder-Guidance with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants are 18–65 years old and have an Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) ≤ 40. Both interventions include a home-based shoulder exercise programme, assessment of shoulder exposures by technical measurements and self-report, and general information on how to reduce shoulder exposures. The Shoulder-Café course also includes three café meetings with physiotherapist-supervised exercises, clinical shoulder evaluation, education on shoulder anatomy, workplace-oriented counselling, and an opportunity for a workplace visit by a health and safety consultant. The primary outcomes are the OSS at 6 month follow-up (hypothesis I), and the mean number of minutes/day with the arm elevated > 60° shortly after end of intervention (hypothesis II). We will use mixed model analysis that allows for company clustering, and data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: Persons with shoulder complaints and high occupational shoulder exposures are an obvious target group for secondary prevention efforts. We developed the Shoulder-Café to reduce shoulder complaints and shoulder exposures while unifying the expertise that is needed to evaluate and treat shoulder complaints. If the intervention is effective, it would warrant widespread implementation. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov on 18 May 2017 (ID: NCT03159910).

scholarly journals Fecundability among Danish women with a history of miscarriage: a prospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e023996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathrine Wildenschild ◽  
Anders H Riis ◽  
Vera Ehrenstein ◽  
Elizabeth E Hatch ◽  
Lauren A Wise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Reproductive History ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Fertility Treatment ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
History Of ◽  
Cumulative Probabilities

ObjectiveTo examine the association between history of miscarriage and fecundability (the cycle-specific probability of conception).DesignNationwide prospective cohort study using web-based questionnaires.SettingDenmark, 2007–2012.Participants977 women attempting to conceive, not using fertility treatment, and with a reproductive history of only miscarriage or only live birth.Exposure and outcome measuresInformation on previous pregnancy outcomes, including miscarriage, came from self-report or from relevant registries. Participants were followed for up to 12 months or until they reported a pregnancy, stopped trying to conceive or started fertility treatment, whichever came first. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to estimate cumulative probabilities of conception for women whose reproductive history included only miscarriage or only live birth. Using proportional probabilities regression modelling, we computed fecundability ratios (FR) with 95% CI comparing women with a history of only miscarriage with women with a history of only live birth.ResultsAfter adjustment for potential confounders, the cumulative probabilities of conception within 12 cycles of follow-up were 85% (95% CI 81% to 89%) for women with a history of 1 miscarriage, 85% (95% CI 73% to 92%) for women with a history of ≥2 miscarriages and 88% (95% CI 87% to 89%) for women whose reproductive history included only live birth. Adjusted FRs were 0.87 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.07) and 0.65 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.17) for women with a history of 1 and ≥2 miscarriages, respectively.ConclusionsOur results indicate that women with a history of miscarriage may have slightly reduced fecundability compared with women with a history of only live birth. The reduction in fecundability was greater for women with repeated miscarriages, although the estimates were imprecise. Despite a potential delay in conception, women with previous miscarriage may have similar probability of pregnancy by 12 cycles of attempts to women with proven fertility.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document