Effectiveness of polymyxin B hemoperfusion for sepsis depends on the baseline SOFA score: a nationwide observational study

Abstract Background Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX) aims to treat septic shock by removing endotoxin from the patient’s blood. However, the relationship between the severity of the patient's organ damage and the survival benefit of PMX treatment is not clear. Methods We analyzed the efficacy of PMX on adult sepsis patients using the propensity score matching method and the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) national inpatient database from April 2018 to March 2020. We stratified the patients into five categories based on their baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and compared the mortality between PMX-treated and non-treated groups in each category. We also compared continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF)-, ventilator- and noradrenaline-free days between the groups. Results Of 44,177 patients included in the study, 2191 received PMX. After 1:1 propensity score matching, we created matched cohorts of 2033 pairs. PMX significantly improved the survival of the patients in the SOFA score categories of 7–9 and 10–12. On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the survival rate in SOFA score categories of 0–6, 13–15, and 16–24. In analyzing organ support-free days, PMX was also beneficial in the 7–9 and 10–12 SOFA categories compared to other categories. Conclusion Analysis of a large-scale Japanese inpatient database found a significant association between PMX efficacy and baseline SOFA score. This result indicates higher efficacy in patients with medium SOFA scores in the range of 7–12. The result provides a promising hypothesis for selecting appropriate patients for PMX and should be validated in future RCTs.

Download Full-text

Effects of Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion on Septic Shock Patients Requiring Noradrenaline: Analysis of a Nationwide Administrative Database in Japan

Blood Purification ◽

10.1159/000513213 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-6

Author(s):

Kenji Fujimori ◽

Kunio Tarasawa ◽

Kiyohide Fushimi

Keyword(s):

Septic Shock ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Polymyxin B ◽

Administrative Database ◽

Control Group ◽

Continuous Hemodiafiltration ◽

Significant Survival ◽

Maximum Daily Dose ◽

Polymyxin B Hemoperfusion

Introduction: Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX) reduces endotoxin in septic shock patients’ blood and can improve hemodynamics and organ functions. However, its effects on the reduction of septic shock mortality are controversial. Methods: Using the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination database from April 2016 to March 2019, we identified adult septic shock patients treated with noradrenaline. This study used propensity score matching to compare the outcome between PMX-treated and non-treated patients. The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality, counting from the day of noradrenaline initiation. The secondary endpoints were noradrenaline-, ventilator-, and continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF)-free days at day 28. Results: Of 30,731 eligible patients, 4,766 received PMX. Propensity score matching produced a matched cohort of 4,141 pairs with well-balanced patient backgrounds. The 28-day survival rate was 77.9% in the PMX group and 71.1% in the control group (p < 0.0001). Median days of noradrenalin-, CHDF-, and ventilator-free days were 2 days (p < 0.0001), 2 days (p < 0.0001), and 6 days (p < 0.0001) longer in the PMX group than in the control group, respectively. When stratified with the maximum daily dose of noradrenaline, the PMX group showed a statistically significant survival benefit in the groups with noradrenaline dose <20 mg/day but not in the noradrenaline group dose ≥20 mg/day. Conclusion: Analysis of large Japanese databases showed that septic shock patients who received noradrenaline might benefit from PMX treatment.

Download Full-text

Empiric use of anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a propensity score-matched study of risks and benefits

Biomarker Research ◽

10.1186/s40364-021-00283-y ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Bo Yu ◽

Victor Perez Gutierrez ◽

Alex Carlos ◽

Gregory Hoge ◽

Anjana Pillai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Risk Estimation ◽

Large Population ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Hospitalized Patients ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 demonstrate a higher risk of developing thromboembolism. Anticoagulation (AC) has been proposed for high-risk patients, even without confirmed thromboembolism. However, benefits and risks of AC are not well assessed due to insufficient clinical data. We performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes from AC in a large population of COVID-19 patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 1189 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March 5 and May 15, 2020, with primary outcomes of mortality, invasive mechanical ventilation, and major bleeding. Patients who received therapeutic AC for known indications were excluded. Propensity score matching of baseline characteristics and admission parameters was performed to minimize bias between cohorts. Results The analysis cohort included 973 patients. Forty-four patients who received therapeutic AC for confirmed thromboembolic events and atrial fibrillation were excluded. After propensity score matching, 133 patients received empiric therapeutic AC while 215 received low dose prophylactic AC. Overall, there was no difference in the rate of invasive mechanical ventilation (73.7% versus 65.6%, p = 0.133) or mortality (60.2% versus 60.9%, p = 0.885). However, among patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, empiric therapeutic AC was an independent predictor of lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.476, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.345–0.657, p < 0.001) with longer median survival (14 days vs 8 days, p < 0.001), but these associations were not observed in the overall cohort (p = 0.063). Additionally, no significant difference in mortality was found between patients receiving empiric therapeutic AC versus prophylactic AC in various subgroups with different D-dimer level cutoffs. Patients who received therapeutic AC showed a higher incidence of major bleeding (13.8% vs 3.9%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with a HAS-BLED score of ≥2 had a higher risk of mortality (HR 1.482, 95% CI 1.110–1.980, p = 0.008), while those with a score of ≥3 had a higher risk of major bleeding (Odds ratio: 1.883, CI: 1.114–3.729, p = 0.016). Conclusion Empiric use of therapeutic AC conferred survival benefit to patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, but did not show benefit in non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Careful bleeding risk estimation should be pursued before considering escalation of AC intensity.

Download Full-text

Chemoembolization Plus Radiotherapy versus Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Invading the Portal Vein: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers12051116 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (5) ◽

pp. 1116 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hee Ho Chu ◽

Jin Hyoung Kim ◽

Ju Hyun Shim ◽

Sang Min Yoon ◽

Pyeong Hwa Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Portal Vein ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Combined Treatment ◽

Correct Selection ◽

Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Entire Study ◽

Treatment Type ◽

Significant Difference

A combination of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib or radiotherapy (RT) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, the two combined treatment approaches were compared in patients with HCC and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Data from 307 patients treated with TACE plus RT (n = 203) or TACE plus sorafenib (n = 104) as first-line treatment for HCC with PVTT were retrospectively evaluated. Using the propensity model to correct selection bias, 87 patients were included from each treatment group. During follow up (median, 12 months) in the entire study population, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the TACE plus RT group than in the TACE plus sorafenib group (6.5 vs. 4.3 months, respectively; p = 0.017 and 16.4 vs. 12 months, respectively; p = 0.007). Following propensity score matching, the median PFS and OS in the two groups showed no statistically significant difference. Multivariable analysis found no significant association between PFS or OS and the treatment type. In conclusion, this retrospective study of data from patients with advanced HCC with PVTT shows that PFS and OS did not differ significantly in patients treated with TACE plus RT and TACE plus sorafenib.

Download Full-text

Abstract 17088: In-Hospital Complications and Outcomes of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis From Nationwide Database

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.17088 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Moghniuddin Mohammed ◽

Amit Noheria ◽

Seth Sheldon ◽

Madhu Reddy

Keyword(s):

Propensity Score ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Real World ◽

Electronic Device ◽

Artery Bypass ◽

Pacemaker Implantation ◽

Leadless Pacemaker ◽

Ventricular Lead ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Before And After

Introduction: There are no randomized controlled trials that compared the outcomes of leadless pacemaker (L-PPM) implantation with transvenous pacemaker (TV-PPM) and there is scarcity of data on real world outcomes. Methods: We queried National Inpatient Sample to identify all adult patients who had primary discharge diagnosis of conduction disorders or tachy-arrhythmias and excluded patients who had a concomitant procedure for valve replacement, coronary artery bypass grafting, ablation and/or cardiac implantable electronic device removal so that complications can be attributed to the pacemaker implantation. We included only procedures from November 2016 to December 2017 as Micra was the only available L-PPM during that period. For the comparison cohort we selected patients, during the same time period, who had a procedure code for single chamber pacemaker implantation in conjunction with right ventricular lead placement. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching and the variables used for matching are marked with asterisk in Table 1. All the codes used to identify complications has been previously validated from the Micra Post-approval registry and Coverage with Evidence Study. Results: Total of 1,305 patients for L-PPM and 13,905 patients in the TV-PPM group were included. Baseline characteristics with standardized mean difference before and after matching are shown in Table 1. Briefly, patients in L-PPM group were younger but had higher co-morbidities compared to TV-PPM group. The complications before and after matching are shown in Table 2. Conclusions: In conclusion, we found no significant difference between in-hospital complications after propensity score matching, with the exception of deep venous thrombosis. There was no difference between length of stay but cost for L-PPM was significantly higher. In this real-world analysis, we found that the leadless PPM implantation is safe in comparison to transvenous PPM.

Download Full-text

Cold snare polypectomy reduced delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with conventional hot polypectomy: a propensity score-matching analysis

Endoscopy International Open ◽

10.1055/s-0043-105578 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 05 (07) ◽

pp. E587-E594 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Takeshi Yamashina ◽

Manabu Fukuhara ◽

Takanori Maruo ◽

Gensho Tanke ◽

Saiko Marui ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Propensity Score ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Secondary Analysis ◽

Colorectal Polyps ◽

Propensity Score Model ◽

Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Cold Snare Polypectomy ◽

Few Data ◽

Snare Polypectomy

Abstract Background and study aims Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for small colorectal polyps has lower incidence of adverse events, especially delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB). However, few data are available on comparisons of the incidence of DPPB of CSP and hot polypectomy (HP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of DPPB after CSP and compare it with that of HP. A propensity score model was used as a secondary analysis. Patients and methods This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single municipal hospital. We identified 539 patients with colorectal polyps from 2 mm to 11 mm in size who underwent CSP (804 polyps in 330 patients) or HP (530 polyps in 209 patients) between July 2013 and June 2015. Results There were no cases of DPPB in the CSP group. Conversely, DPPB occurred in 4 patients (1.9 %) after HP, resulting in a significant difference between the CSP and HP groups (0.008 % vs 0 %, P = 0.02). Propensity score-matching analysis created 402 matched pairs, yielding a significantly higher DPPB rate in the HP group than CSP group (0.02 % vs 0 %, P = 0.04). However, significantly more patients in the CSP group had unclear horizontal margins that precluded assessment (83 vs 38 cases, P < 0.001). The retrieval failure rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than in the HP group (3 % vs 0.7 %, P = 0.01). Conclusions DPPB was less frequent with CSP than HP, as selected by the propensity score-matching model. Our findings indicate that CSP is recommended polypectomy in daily clinical setting. However, special care should be taken during polyp retrieval and horizontal margin assessment, and these issues could be taken into account in follow-up after CSP.

Download Full-text

Outcomes between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke after thrombectomy: Propensity-score matching analysis

Interventional Neuroradiology ◽

10.1177/15910199211030769 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 159101992110307

Author(s):

Kai Qiu ◽

Qing-Quan Zu ◽

Lin-Bo Zhao ◽

Sheng Liu ◽

Hai-Bin Shi

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Symptom Onset ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Stroke Group ◽

Community Onset

Background The benefit of endovascular thrombectomy for patients with in-hospital stroke remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the endovascular thrombectomy outcomes between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods From January 2015 to July 2019, 362 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation received endovascular thrombectomy in our centre. After propensity score matching with a ratio of 1:2 (in-hospital stroke:community-onset stroke), clinical characteristics and functional outcomes were compared between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke groups. Results Thirty-six patients with in-hospital stroke and 72 patients with community-onset stroke were enrolled. The number of patients with New York Heart Association classification III/IV (41.7% vs. 6.9%, p < 0.001) and with underlying cancer (25.0% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001) was higher in the in-hospital stroke than in the community-onset stroke group. The intravenous thrombolysis rate was lower in the in-hospital stroke group (13.9% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.002). No significant difference in symptom onset to puncture ( p = 0.618), symptom onset to recanalisation ( p = 0.618) or good reperfusion (modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2 b) rates ( p = 0.852) was found between the groups. The favourable clinical outcome trend (modified Rankin scale ≤2 at 90 days) was inferior, but acceptable, in the in-hospital stroke, group compared to the community-onset stroke group (30.6% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.262). Conclusion Patients with in-hospital stroke had more disadvantageous comorbidities than those with community-onset stroke. Cardiac dysfunction seems to be associated with poor outcomes after thrombectomy. Nevertheless, endovascular thrombectomy still appears to be safe and effective for patients with in-hospital stroke.

Download Full-text

Abstract 14598: Multiple Arterial Coronary Bypass Grafting is Associated With Improved Survival in Females

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.14598 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Derrick Tam ◽

Rodolfo Rocha ◽

Jiming Fang ◽

Maral Ouzounian ◽

Joanna Chikwe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Coronary Artery ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Administrative Databases ◽

Rank Test ◽

Bypass Grafting ◽

Female Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Arterial Grafting

Introduction: Multiple arterial grafting (MAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with improved survival and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in observational studies of mostly males. It is not known whether the MAG is beneficial in females. Herein, we compared the late clinical outcomes of MAG versus single arterial grafting (SAG) in females undergoing CABG for multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) Methods: Clinical and administrative databases for Ontario, Canada, were linked to obtain all female patients with angiographic evidence of left main, triple, or double vessel disease undergoing isolated non-emergent primary CABG from 2008-2019. Baseline characteristics were compared and 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to account for differences. 30-day mortality was compared in the matched groups. Late mortality and MACCE ( composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and death) was compared between the matched groups with a stratified log rank test and Cox-proportional hazard model. Results: In total 2,961 and 7,954 females underwent CABG with MAG and SAG respectively for multivessel CAD. Prior to propensity-score matching, compared to SAG, those that underwent MAG were younger (66.0 vs. 68.9 years) and had less comorbidities. After propensity-score matching, 2,446 well-matched pairs were formed. In matched patients, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (1.6% vs 1.8%, P=0.43) between MAG and SAG. The median and maximum follow-up was 5.0 and 11.0 years respectively. Over the entire follow-up, MAG was associated with improved survival (Figure, hazard ratio (HR): 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.98) and freedom from MACCE (HR: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.76-0.95). Conclusions: MAG was associated with improved survival and freedom from MACCE and should be considered for female patients with good life expectancy requiring CABG.

Download Full-text

Clinical Effect of the Acrylonitrile-Co-Methallyl Sulfonate Surface-Treated Membrane as a Cytokine Adsorption Therapy for Sepsis due to Acute Panperitonitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Blood Purification ◽

10.1159/000504560 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 49 (3) ◽

pp. 364-371

Author(s):

Kentarou Hayashi ◽

Yusuke Sasabuchi ◽

Hiroki Matsui ◽

Mikio Nakajima ◽

Hiroyuki Ohbe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Propensity Score ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Clinical Effect ◽

Primary Outcome Measure ◽

Gastrointestinal Perforation ◽

Disease Mechanism ◽

Diagnosis Procedure Combination ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction: Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response syndrome caused by infectious diseases, with cytokines possibly having an important role in the disease mechanism. Acrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate surface-treated (AN69ST) membrane is expected to improve the outcomes of patients with sepsis through cytokine adsorption. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of the AN69ST membrane in comparison to standard continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) membranes for panperitonitis due to lower gastrointestinal perforation. Methods: Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified adult patients with sepsis due to panperitonitis receiving any CRRT. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients who received CRRT with the AN69ST membrane (AN69ST group) and those who received CRRT with other membranes (non-AN69ST group). The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Results: A total of 528 and 1,445 patients were included in the AN69ST group and in the non-AN69ST group, respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 521 pairs. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (32.1 vs. 35.5%; p = 0.265) and 30-day mortality (41.3 vs. 42.8%, p = 0.074) between the AN69ST group and the non-AN69ST group. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in-hospital mortality between CRRT with the AN69ST membrane and CRRT with standard CRRT membranes for panperitonitis due to lower gastrointestinal perforation. These results indicate that the AN69ST membrane is not superior to the standard CRRT membrane.

Download Full-text

Twelve-year single critical care center experience of nicardipine prolonged-release implants in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a propensity score matching analysis

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015664 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (8) ◽

pp. 774-776 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Yasuhiro Kuroi ◽

Hidenori Ohbuchi ◽

Naoyuki Arai ◽

Yuichi Takahashi ◽

Shinji Hagiwara ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Critical Care ◽

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽

Side Effects ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Cerebral Infarction ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Cerebral Vasospasm ◽

Care Center ◽

Prolonged Release ◽

Significant Difference

ObjectiveTo develop a nicardipine prolonged-release implant (NPRI) to prevent cerebral vasospasm in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in 1999, which may be used during craniotomy, and report the results of our recent 12-year single critical care center experience.MethodsOf 432 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated between 2007 and 2019, 291 were enrolled. 97 Patients were aged >70 years (33%), 194 were female (67%), 138 were World Federation of Neurological Societies grades 1, 2, and 3 (47%), 218 were Fisher group 3 (75%), and 243 had an anterior circulation aneurysm (84%). Using a propensity score matching method for these five factors, the severity of cerebral vasospasm, occurrence of delayed cerebral infarction, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge were analyzed.ResultsOne hundred patients each with or without NPRI were selected, and the ratios of coil/clip were 0/100 and 88/12, respectively. Cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral infarction were both significantly less common in the NPRI group (p=0.004, OR=0.412 (95% CI 0.223 to 0.760) and p=0.005, OR=0.272 (95% CI 0.103 to 0.714, respectively); a significant difference was seen in the mRS score at discharge by Fisher’s exact test (p=0.0025). A mRS score of 6 (dead) was less common in the group with NPRI, and mRS scores of 0 and 1 were also less common. No side effects were seen.ConclusionsNPRIs significantly reduced the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral infraction without any side effects. The NPRI and non-NPRI groups showed different patterns of short-term outcomes in the single critical care center, which might have been due to selection bias and patient characteristics. Differences in outcomes may become clear in comparisons with patients treated by craniotomy.

Download Full-text

Relationship between formulaic breast volume and risk of breast cancer based on linear measurements

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-020-07499-5 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Xiaoxia Li ◽

Chunlan Zhou ◽

Yanni Wu ◽

Xiaohong Chen

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Logistic Regression ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Propensity Score Matching ◽

Conditional Logistic Regression ◽

Control Group ◽

Case Group ◽

Breast Volume ◽

Linear Measurements ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background Whether breast volume is a risk factor for breast cancer is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate whether a significant association between breast volume and risk of breast cancer, based on linear measurements, was present by applying propensity score matching (PSM). Methods The study was designed as a hospital-based case-control study. Between March 2018 and May 2019, 208 cases and 340 controls were retrospectively reviewed. Information on menarche, smoking, feeding mode, oral contraceptives, reproductive history and family history was obtained through a structured questionnaire. Breast volume was calculated using a formula based on linear measurements of breast parameters. Cox regression and PSM were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for breast cancer using risk factors adjusted for potential confounders. Results There was a significant difference in breast volume between the two groups before propensity score matching (P = 0.014). Binary logistic regression showed that the risk of breast cancer was slightly higher in the case group with larger breast volumes than in the control group(P = 0.009, OR = 1.002, 95%CI:1.000 ~ 1.003). However, there was no significant statistical difference between the two groups using an independent sample Mann-Whitney U test (P = 0.438) or conditional logistic regression (P = 0.446). Conclusions After PSM for potential confounding factors, there is no significant difference in breast volume estimated by BREAST-V formula between the case group and the control group. The risk of breast cancer may not be related to breast volume in Chinese women.

Download Full-text