scholarly journals Arabic translation and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samy Elwany ◽  
Ahmed Atef ◽  
Ahmed Soliman Ismail ◽  
Wael K. A. Hussein ◽  
Ahmed Aly Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Test Reliability ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Airway Patency ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Methods Of Evaluation ◽  
Symptom Evaluation ◽  
Arabic Speaking ◽  
And Control ◽  
Translation And Validation

Abstract Background The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale has been developed and validated in English to overcome the controversies concerning other methods of evaluation of nasal obstruction. The scale is currently used worldwide and has been translated into several languages. The purpose of the present work was to translate the English (NOSE) scale into Arabic (A-NOSE) and to assess its validity and reliability in Arabic-speaking patients. Results The internal consistency and test-to-test reliability of the Arabic scale were statistically good. The differences between the scores of the patients and control subjects were statistically significant. Postoperative scores of the patients were significantly higher than preoperative scores. All participants completed the Arabic questionnaire easily and few of them required slight assistance. Conclusions The translated NOSE scale is easy to administer and can be a robust and usable outcome measure for patients with nasal obstruction. The translated scale is sensitive to changes in nasal airway patency and can be used in clinical practice and outcome research.

scholarly journals Respiratory mode, nasal patency and palatine dimensions

CoDAS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Elaine Trevisan ◽  
José Humberto Bellinaso ◽  
Andrielle de Bitencourt Pacheco ◽  
Luciana Barros Augé ◽  
Ana Maria Toniolo da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Negative Correlation ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Nasal Patency ◽  
Nasal Breathing ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Symptom Evaluation ◽  
Plaster Models ◽  
Digital Caliper ◽  
Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow

Purpose: To investigate the influence of breathing mode and nasal patency in the dimensions of the hard palate by comparing mouth breathing (MB) and nasal breathing (NB) adults. Methods: Seventy-seven individuals, distributed into the MB group (n=38) and the NB group (n=39), of both genders and aged between 18 and 30 years old, took part in the study. The respiratory mode diagnosis was based on anamnesis, physical characteristics, and otorhinolaryngological examination. The volunteers were evaluated in terms of nasal patency, with a peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) meter, and obstruction symptoms, by a Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale, and had their transversal and vertical hard palate dimensions measured with a digital caliper in plaster models. Results: Comparing both groups, the MB group presented significantly higher values in the NOSE scale, lower values in the PNIF, lower values in the transversal distance of the palate in the intercanine region, and significantly higher values in the vertical distance in the regions of the first and second premolars and molars. There was a negative correlation between PNIF and NOSE, and a positive correlation between PNIF and transversal distance of the palate in the region of the first premolars. Conclusion: MB adults presented reduced nasal patency and a higher degree of nasal obstruction symptoms. The hard palate was morphologically narrower and deeper in adults with the MB mode compared to the NB mode. Moreover, it was concluded that the smaller the nasal patency, the greater the obstruction symptoms and the narrower the hard palate.

Nasale Obstruktion wie operativ behandeln?

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (06) ◽  
pp. 348-350
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Symptom Evaluation ◽  
Nasale Obstruktion

Standlee AG et al. Evaluating the Effect of Spreader Grafting on Nasal Obstruction Using the NOSE Scale. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017; 126: 219–223 Die Nasenobstruktion ist das am häufigsten auftretende Symptom bei Erkrankungen von Nase und Nebenhöhlen. Der Therapieerfolg eines operativen Eingriffs lässt sich anhand der Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE)-Scale beurteilen. Amerikanische Ärzte bewerteten nun die NOSE-Scores, um Wirksamkeit von Dehnungsimplantaten auf die postoperative nasale Funktion zu bestimmen.

Urdu Translation and Validation of Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 3505-3508
Author(s):  
Noor Ul Ain Fatima ◽  
Qurat-Ul- Ain ◽  
Fareeha Kausar ◽  
Mian Ali Raza ◽  
Misbah Waris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Test Reliability ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
A Value ◽  
Abc Scale ◽  
Translation And Validation

Objective: To translate and validate the ABC-Scale in Urdu language to predict risk of fall in older population. Study design: Cross-cultural Translation and validation Place and Duration: Study was conducted in older adult community of Sialkot from March 2020 to December 2020. Methodology: Translation of ABC in Urdu was conducted by using Beaton et al guidelines. Two bilingual translators translated the original version into Urdu language step wise, correction process was followed. Then two backward translations were done by language expert. After all this process, the translated version was reviewed by the professionals and the final version was applied on 15 individuals. Its reliability and validity was tested on 60 older adults. Results: For test re test reliability, intra class correlation coefficient ICC was measured with a value of 0.984 Which shows good test re-test reliability. The internal consistency and reliability of ABC was calculated by Cronbach’s alpha for total score with a value of 0.985. Content validity was good with values of CVI ranging from 0.767 to 0.955. To test the discriminative validity, independent t test was used to show the difference between the healthy and unhealthy adults. Factor analysis of UABC showed total variance 81.277 and cumulative variance was also 81.277. To calculate construct validity of U-ABC Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used and measured as 0.558. Conclusion: It was concluded that Urdu version of UABC is a valid assessment tool for older adults with fear of fall. It has good content validity, construct validity and reliability. Keywords: activities specific balance scale, validation, Urdu translation, reliability, tool translation

scholarly journals Nasal airway function after Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary impaction: A prospective study using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68
Author(s):  
Hyo Seong Kim ◽  
Ji Hwan Son ◽  
Jee Hyeok Chung ◽  
Kyung Sik Kim ◽  
Joon Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Nasal Airway ◽  
Le Fort I Osteotomy ◽  
Le Fort ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Airway Function ◽  
Symptom Evaluation ◽  
Le Fort I

Background This study evaluated changes in nasal airway function following Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary impaction according to the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale.Methods This cohort study included 13 patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary impaction. Nasal airway function was evaluated based on the NOSE scale preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. The change in the NOSE score was calculated as the preoperative score minus the postoperative score. If the normality assumptions for changes in the NOSE score were not met, a nonparametric test (the Wilcoxon signed-rank test) was used. Differences in NOSE score changes according to patient characteristics and surgical factors were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney test.Results Patients ranged in age from 18 to 29 years (mean±standard deviation [SD], 23.00±3.87 years). Three were men and 10 were women. Eleven patients (84%) had an acquired dentofacial deformity with skeletal class III malocclusion. The preoperative NOSE scores ranged from 40 to 90 (mean±SD, 68.92±16.68), and the postoperative NOSE scores ranged from 25 to 80 (53.84±18.83). The cohort as a whole showed significant improvement in nasal airway function following maxillary impaction (P=0.028). Eleven patients (84%) had either improved (n=8) or unchanged (n=3) postoperative NOSE scores. However, nasal airway function deteriorated in two patients. Patient characteristics and surgical factors were not correlated with preoperative or postoperative NOSE scores.Conclusions Nasal airway function as evaluated using the NOSE scale improved after maxillary impaction.

scholarly journals Assessment of Septoplasty Outcome using Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-146
Author(s):  
Kundan Kumar Shrestha ◽  
R.R. Joshi ◽  
A.S. Rijal ◽  
A. Dhungana ◽  
S. Maharjan
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Septal Deviation ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Outcome Instrument ◽  
Symptom Evaluation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Nasal Septoplasty

 Nasal obstruction, the most common presenting symptom in nasal and sinus disease, is defined as patient discomfort manifested as a sensation of insufficient airflow through the nose. Nasal septal deviation is the most common anatomical cause of nasal obstruction. Surgical correction of a deviated septum, nasal septoplasty, is the definitive treatment for septal deviation. Many studies have discussed about outcomes of septoplasty. However, there is limited published literature on nasal septoplasty and its outcome in Nepal. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of septoplasty using Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale, a validated outcome instrument assessing quality of life (QoL) related to nasal obstruction. A total of 52 patients aged 18 years and above, with nasal obstruction at least for 3 months, undergoing septoplasty alone were included in the study. Baseline NOSE score was calculated a week before surgery. The patients were followed up after 3 months to record postoperative NOSE score. On statistical analysis, the mean NOSE scores before and 3 months after septoplasty were 45.58±21.38 and 8.46±8.37 respectively. The mean difference was 37.11± 21.22 and p value on paired t test was less than 0.001(highly significant). The mean differences of each component of the NOSE scale questionnaire were also found to be highly significant statistically with p values less than 0.001. Gender and age did not seem to affect the outcomes. In conclusion, NOSE scale is a valid, reliable and responsive instrument that is brief and easy to complete and has potential use for outcome studies in adults with nasal obstruction. This instrument showed that septoplasty, if done in properly selected patients, results in significant improvement in nasal obstruction and disease specific quality of life with high patient satisfaction.

scholarly journals Assessment of Screening for Nasal Obstruction among Sleep Dentistry Outpatients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Arisa Sawa ◽  
Hiroshi Suzuki ◽  
Hideo Niwa ◽  
Sumito Oguchi ◽  
Tatsuo Yagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Standard Technique ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Nasal Airflow ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Symptom Evaluation ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Scale Scores

Oral appliances (OA), a common treatment modality for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), are not suitable for patients with nasal obstruction. Rhinomanometry, the gold standard technique to assess nasal airway resistance, is not readily available in sleep dentistry clinics. We demonstrate the use of a portable lightweight peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) rate meter to objectively assess nasal airflow and utilized the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale to subjectively assess nasal obstruction in 97 patients with OSA and 105 healthy controls. We examined the correlations between the following variables between the groups: demographics, body mass index, PNIF, NOSE scale scores, apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), minimum SpO2 (SpO2min), Mallampati classification, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scores. Patients with OSA had significantly lower PNIF values and higher NOSE scores than controls. In the patient group, PNIF was not significantly correlated with AHI, SpO2min, Mallampati classification, or NOSE or ESS scores. Lower PNIF values and higher NOSE scores suggested impaired nasal airflow in the OSA group. As daytime PNIF measurement bears no relationship to AHI, this cannot be used alone in predicting the suitability of treatment for OSA with OA but can be used as an adjunct for making clinical decisions.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of a Polish Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 7958-7964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justyna Dąbrowska-Bień ◽  
Henryk Skarżyński ◽  
Elżbieta Gos ◽  
Iwonna Gwizdalska ◽  
Katarzyna Bożena Lazecka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Cross Cultural Adaptation ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Symptom Evaluation

Development and Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale

2004 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Stewart ◽  
David L. Witsell ◽  
Timothy L. Smith ◽  
Edward M. Weaver ◽  
Bevan Yueh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Symptom Evaluation ◽  
Development And Validation

Validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scale for Greek Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (5) ◽  
pp. 819-823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasileios A. Lachanas ◽  
Stergiani Tsiouvaka ◽  
Malamati Tsea ◽  
Jiannis K. Hajiioannou ◽  
Charalampos E. Skoulakis
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Obstruction ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cronbach’S Alpha ◽  
Altman Plot ◽  
Bland Altman Plot ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Cronbach's Alpha ◽  
Nose Scale ◽  
Symptom Evaluation

Objective Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale is a validated disease-specific questionnaire for the assessment of Nasal Obstruction (NO). The aim of this study was to validate the Greek-NOSE questionnaire. Study Design Prospective instrument validation study. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods NOSE questionnaire was translated into Greek and then translated back into English. A prospective study was conducted on adult patients with NO due to septal deviation (SD). Test-retest evaluation of SD patients was carried out. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha test and test-retest reliability with Pearson’s test (correlation), kappa (reproducibility), and Bland-Altman plot (extent of agreement). Validity was assessed by comparing scores of a control group of volunteers without NO to preoperative scores of SD patients undergoing septoplasty with Mann-Whitney test. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing preoperative to 3 months postoperative scores of SD patients with paired t test and evaluating the magnitude of surgery effect. Results Test-retest evaluation was accepted on 109 patients. The Greek-NOSE had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.74 for test and 0.76 for retest). All its items were significantly correlated between test and retest evaluation. NOSE showed high reproducibility (mean kappa: 0.75), and almost all differences in Bland-Altman plot were between agreement thresholds. Controls (123 volunteers) had significant lower score. Postoperative scores were significantly lower than preoperative, and magnitude of surgery effect was high, both indicating good responsiveness. Conclusion The Greek-NOSE questionnaire is a valid instrument with satisfactory internal consistency, reliability, reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document