Practical Considerations for Antibodies in Myeloma

2018 ◽  
pp. 667-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
Niels van de Donk ◽  
Faith E. Davies ◽  
Joseph Mikhael
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Great Improvement ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Drug Combinations ◽  
Therapeutic Antibodies ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Favorable Safety

The development of the monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and elotuzumab has expanded treatment options for multiple myeloma and led to great improvement in patient outcomes. These agents have favorable safety profiles and synergize effectively with established agents used in the management of myeloma, namely immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors. This article reviews the rationale for use of monoclonal antibodies in myeloma, current approved indications for daratumumab and elotuzumab, the manner in which these agents are used in the overall management of myeloma, and specific challenges associated with their use in the clinic. It also highlights other, emerging drug combinations that incorporate daratumumab or elotuzumab and profiles new therapeutic antibodies currently under development.

scholarly journals Molecularly Targeted Therapies in Multiple Myeloma

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar de la Puente ◽  
Barbara Muz ◽  
Feda Azab ◽  
Micah Luderer ◽  
Abdel Kareem Azab
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Cell Signaling ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Therapeutic Outcomes

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy that remains incurable because most patients will eventually relapse or become refractory to the treatments. Although the treatments have improved, the major problem in MM is the resistance to therapy. Novel agents are currently in development for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, cell signaling targeted therapies, and strategies targeting the tumor microenvironment. We have previously reviewed in detail the contemporary immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies therapies for MM. Therefore, in this review, we focused on the role of molecular targeted therapies in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, including cell signaling targeted therapies (HDAC, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, p38 MAPK, Hsp90, Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, and cell cycle) and strategies targeting the tumor microenvironment (hypoxia, angiogenesis, integrins, CD44, CXCR4, and selectins). Although these novel agents have improved the therapeutic outcomes for MM patients, further development of new therapeutic agents is warranted.

scholarly journals Targeted Therapies for Multiple Myeloma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Christopher Chang-Yew Leow ◽  
Michael Sze Yuan Low
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Surface Antigens ◽  
Cellular Proteins ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Malignant Plasma Cell ◽  
Novel Drugs ◽  
Druggable Targets

Multiple myeloma continues to be a challenging disorder to treat despite improved therapies and the widespread use of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. Although patient outcomes have improved, the disease continues to invariably relapse, and in the majority of cases, a cure remains elusive. In the last decade, there has been an explosion of novel drugs targeting cellular proteins essential for malignant plasma cell proliferation and survival. In this review, we focus on novel druggable targets leading to the development of monoclonal antibodies and cellular therapies against surface antigens (CD38, CD47, CD138, BCMA, SLAMF7, GPRC5D, FcRH5), inhibitors of epigenetic regulators such as histone deacetylase (HDAC), and agents targeting anti-apoptotic (BCL-2), ribosomal (eEF1A2) and nuclear export (XPO1) proteins.

Real-world treatment patterns in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Clinical and economic outcomes in patients treated with pomalidomide or daratumumab

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199553
Author(s):  
Joshua Richter ◽  
Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi ◽  
Jason Yeaw ◽  
Suneel Kudaravalli ◽  
Stojan Zavisic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Economic Outcomes ◽  
Office Visits ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Real World Evidence ◽  
New Treatment

Introduction Real-world evidence on later line treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is sparse. We evaluated clinical outcomes among RRMM patients in the 1-year following treatment with pomalidomide or daratumumab and compared economic outcomes between RRMM patients and non-MM patients. Patient and Methods Adult patients with ≥1 claim of pomalidomide or daratumumab were identified between January 2012 and February 2018 using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus US claims database. Patients were required to have a diagnosis or treatment for MM and a claim of any immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors before the index date. Mean time to new therapy, overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier curve and adverse events (AEs) were reported over the 1-year post-index period. RRMM patients were also matched to a non-MM comparator cohort and economic outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Results 289 RRMM patients were matched to 1,445 patients without MM. Most prevalent hematological AE was anemia (72.0%) and non-hematological AE was infections (75.4%). Mean (SD) time to a new treatment was 4.7 (5.3) months and median OS was 14.6 months. RRMM patients had significantly higher hospitalizations and physician office visits (Both P < .0001) compared to non-MM patients. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with RRMM had 4.9 times (95% CI 3.8-6.4, P < .0001) the total healthcare costs compared with patients without MM. The major driver of total costs among RRMM patients was pharmacy costs (67.3%). Conclusion RRMM patients showed a high frequency of AEs, low OS, and a substantial economic burden suggesting need for effective treatment options.

scholarly journals Role and Modulation of NK Cells in Multiple Myeloma

Hemato ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-181
Author(s):  
Marie Thérèse Rubio ◽  
Adèle Dhuyser ◽  
Stéphanie Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Killer Cell ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Evolution ◽  
Cell Functions

Myeloma tumor cells are particularly dependent on their microenvironment and sensitive to cellular antitumor immune response, including natural killer (NK) cells. These later are essential innate lymphocytes implicated in the control of viral infections and cancers. Their cytotoxic activity is regulated by a balance between activating and inhibitory signals resulting from the complex interaction of surface receptors and their respective ligands. Myeloma disease evolution is associated with a progressive alteration of NK cell number, phenotype and cytotoxic functions. We review here the different therapeutic approaches that could restore or enhance NK cell functions in multiple myeloma. First, conventional treatments (immunomodulatory drugs-IMids and proteasome inhibitors) can enhance NK killing of tumor cells by modulating the expression of NK receptors and their corresponding ligands on NK and myeloma cells, respectively. Because of their ability to kill by antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity, NK cells are important effectors involved in the efficacy of anti-myeloma monoclonal antibodies targeting the tumor antigens CD38, CS1 or BCMA. These complementary mechanisms support the more recent therapeutic combination of IMids or proteasome inhibitors to monoclonal antibodies. We finally discuss the ongoing development of new NK cell-based immunotherapies, such as ex vivo expanded killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR)-mismatched NK cells, chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-NK cells, check point and KIR inhibitors.

scholarly journals Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Multiple Myeloma: A Challenge to Develop Novel Targets

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroko Nishida ◽  
Taketo Yamada
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
The Past ◽  
Deacetylase Inhibitor ◽  
Car T ◽  
Immune Therapies

The treatment options in multiple myeloma (MM) has changed dramatically over the past decade with the development of novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs); bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs); thalidomide, and lenalidomide which revealed high efficacy and improvement of overall survival (OS) in MM patients. However, despite these progresses, most patients relapse and become eventually refractory to these therapies. Thus, the development of novel, targeted immunotherapies has been pursued aggressively. Recently, next-generation PIs; carfilzomib and ixazomib, IMiD; pomalidomide, histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDADi); panobinostat and monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs); and elotuzumab and daratumumab have emerged, and especially, combination of mAbs plus novel agents has led to dramatic improvements in the outcome of MM patients. The field of immune therapies has been accelerating in the treatment of hematological malignancies and has also taken center stage in MM. This review focuses on an overview of current status of novel MoAb therapy including bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody (BsAb), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, in relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Lastly, investigational novel MoAb-based therapy to overcome immunotherapy resistance in MM is shown.

scholarly journals Refractory IgD Multiple Myeloma Treated with Daratumumab: A Case Report and Literature Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Husnain ◽  
Sandra Kurtin ◽  
Nikki Barkett ◽  
Irbaz Bin Riaz ◽  
Amit Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Recent Analysis ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma have poor prognosis. A recent analysis of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who were refractory to both proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs showed the median overall survival of 9 months only. Daratumumab is the first-in-class human monoclonal antibody against CD38 cells which was studied in phase I/II trials for treatment of these patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. It showed an overall response rate of 36% and a median overall survival (OS) of 17 months in these patients. We report a case of 40-year-old man with immunoglobulin D (IgD) multiple myeloma whose disease was refractory to at least 5 different chemotherapy regimens including proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. The clinical studies assessing daratumumab did not include any patients with IgD myeloma which is a rare form of multiple myeloma and to our knowledge is the first study reporting use of daratumumab in IgD myeloma.

scholarly journals Clinical efficacy and management of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 and SLAMF7 in multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 681-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels W. C. J. van de Donk ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Torben Plesner ◽  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Francesca Gay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Blood Compatibility ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Therapeutic Antibody ◽  
Drug Discontinuation ◽  
Therapeutic Antibodies

AbstractImmunotherapeutic strategies are emerging as promising therapeutic approaches in multiple myeloma (MM), with several monoclonal antibodies in advanced stages of clinical development. Of these agents, CD38-targeting antibodies have marked single agent activity in extensively pretreated MM, and preliminary results from studies with relapsed/refractory patients have shown enhanced therapeutic efficacy when daratumumab and isatuximab are combined with other agents. Furthermore, although elotuzumab (anti-SLAMF7) has no single agent activity in advanced MM, randomized trials in relapsed/refractory MM have demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival when elotuzumab is added to lenalidomide-dexamethasone or bortezomib-dexamethasone. Importantly, there has been no significant additive toxicity when these monoclonal antibodies are combined with other anti-MM agents, other than infusion-related reactions specific to the therapeutic antibody. Prevention and management of infusion reactions is important to avoid drug discontinuation, which may in turn lead to reduced efficacy of anti-MM therapy. Therapeutic antibodies interfere with several laboratory tests. First, interference of therapeutic antibodies with immunofixation and serum protein electrophoresis assays may lead to underestimation of complete response. Strategies to mitigate interference, based on shifting the therapeutic antibody band, are in development. Furthermore, daratumumab, and probably also other CD38-targeting antibodies, interfere with blood compatibility testing and thereby complicate the safe release of blood products. Neutralization of the therapeutic CD38 antibody or CD38 denaturation on reagent red blood cells mitigates daratumumab interference with transfusion laboratory serologic tests. Finally, therapeutic antibodies may complicate flow cytometric evaluation of normal and neoplastic plasma cells, since the therapeutic antibody can affect the availability of the epitope for binding of commercially available diagnostic antibodies.

scholarly journals Salvage Therapy of Multiple Myeloma: The New Generation Drugs

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Romano ◽  
Concetta Conticello ◽  
Maide Cavalli ◽  
Calogero Vetro ◽  
Cosimo Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
The Past ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Incurable Disease ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Historical Treatment

During the past decade, overall results of treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) have been improved and survival curves are now significantly better with respect to those obtained with historical treatment. These improvements are linked to a deeper knowledge of the biology of disease and to the introduction in clinical practice of drugs with different mechanism of action such as proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). However, MM remains in most cases an incurable disease. For patients who relapse after treatment with novel agents, the prognosis is dismal and new drugs and therapeutic strategies are required for continued disease control. In this review, we summarize new insights in salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory MM as emerging from recent clinical trials exploring the activity of bendamustine, new generation proteasome inhibitors, novel IMiDs, monoclonal antibodies, and drugs interfering with growth pathways.

scholarly journals MP0250 Combined with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Multiple Myeloma Patients Previoulsy Exposed to Proteasome Inhibitors and Immunomodulatory Drugs

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1980-1980
Author(s):  
Stefan Knop ◽  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Marc S Raab ◽  
Monika Szarejko ◽  
Artur Jurczyszyn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Multiple Cycles ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background MP0250 is a first-in-class selective tri-specific multi-DARPin® drug candidate neutralizing VEGF-Α and HGF as well as binding to human serum albumin to increase its plasma half-life. Preclinical studies have shown that MP0250 enhances sensitivity of Multiple Myeloma (MM) cells to bortezomib, inhibits tumor growth and reduces bone destruction. In this clinical phase 2 trial (NCT03136653), we are investigating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination of MP0250 plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (dex) in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM previously exposed to proteasome inhibitors (PI) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD). Aims To study the efficacy and safety of MP0250 in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with RRMM. Trial Design This trial is recruiting adults ≥18 years of age with RRMM who have progressed after at least two prior treatment regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD. A dose-escalation phase (part 1) consisting of two cohorts will define a safe dose of the combination of MP0250 plus bortezomib + dex followed by a dose-expansion phase (part 2). Patients were enrolled to receive iv MP0250 on day 1 + subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, oral dexamethasone (dex) 20 mg on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12 of each 21-day cycle. Up to 40 patients will be enrolled. Patients will receive treatment until there is documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Methods The primary endpoint is efficacy in terms of overall response rate (ORR) per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety, immunogenicity, progression free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR). Exploratory endpoints include overall survival, pharmacokinetics and potential biomarkers that include MM specific markers and cytokines monitoring bone homeostasis. The safety analysis set (SAF) is defined as patients who have received at least 1 dose of the combination of MP0250 plus bortezomib + dex. Results Data cut off was 21 July 2018. 8 pts have been treated in cohort 1 and 3 pts in cohort 2. Median time from initial diagnosis to first dose was 4.8 years (range, 1-10). Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-5). All 11 pts had prior exposure to IMiDs and PIs and 4 pts were considered PI refractory. Four patients received PI immediately prior to receive MP250 in combination. The most frequent drug-related grade ≥ 3 AEs: hypertension in 3 pts, thrombocytopenia in 6 pts, proteinuria in 2 pts and transient liver enzyme elevation in 1 patient. One dose-limiting toxicity has been reported in cohort 1 (grade 3 hypertension) and two in cohort 2 (grade 3 epistaxis, grade 3 proteinuria). There were no infusion-related reactions. Best response achieved in the 8 efficacy evaluable pts in cohort 1 was VGPR in 1 and PR in 4 for an overall response rate (ORR, ≥PR) of 62.5%. In cohort 2, 1 patient achieved Minimal Response (MR), 1 patient stable disease and 1 progressive disease. Three of four patients who were coming immediately from a PI based regimen achieved a response. Pharmacokinetics data in cohort 1 show sustained exposure over multiple cycles with a mean half-life of 11 days, and no indication of ADA mediated drug clearance was observed. Data from cohort 1 patients show accumulation of MP0250-HGF complexes over multiple cycles confirming the stable binding of MP0250 to HGF suggesting that all circulating HGF is neutralized. Summary Data from cohort 1 (8 mg/Kg q3w) suggest that MP0250 can be safely combined with bortezomib and dex in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Durable responses were seen in patients who came from PI based pretreatment suggesting that MP0250 might be capable to reverse PI resistance. Disclosures Knop: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldschmidt:Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; ArtTempi: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Raab:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Dürig:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Castellano Acosta:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Lemaillet:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Cortijo:Molecular Partners AG: Employment. Sudhir:Molecular Partners AG: Employment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document