Safety and Toxicity Analysis of Oxaliplatin Combined With Fluorouracil or as a Single Agent in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 2904-2911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Jeffery W. Clark ◽  
Nancy E. Kemeny ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Kim O. Gococo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose: Two consecutive compassionate use studies of oxaliplatin were conducted in the United States and Canada in more than 5,000 patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma who had experienced treatment failure after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Patients and Methods: The main focus was safety. Patients were assigned to treatment with either single-agent oxaliplatin or oxaliplatin in combination with fluorouracil (FU) and with or without leucovorin (LV) in various regimens. Response data collection was not a trial objective, but time to treatment failure (TTF) was recorded in the first cohort (1,370 patients). Results: All treatment regimens were well tolerated, with an overall incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity of 23.2%, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related gastrointestinal toxicity of 26.4% (including diarrhea, vomiting, and mucositis), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity 3.9%. Similar results were reported in the second cohort (3,806 patients), in which the eligibility criteria were much less restrictive. In the first cohort (in which 83% received prior irinotecan), median TTF was 14 weeks, and was similar for the five regimens combining oxaliplatin and FU with or without LV, but significantly shorter for the single-agent oxaliplatin arm. The overall dose-intensity of oxaliplatin was maintained at 85.5% (range, 80.6% to 94.3%) of that prescribed by protocol (average 36.7 mg/m2/wk). Conclusion: These data in a heavily pretreated patient population confirm that oxaliplatin is safe when used as a single agent or with a variety of FU-based regimens as salvage therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals Belinostat in combination with standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone as first-line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick B. Johnston ◽  
Amanda F. Cashen ◽  
Petros G. Nikolinakos ◽  
Anne W. Beaven ◽  
Stefan Klaus Barta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background Belinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor approved for relapsed refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of belinostat combined with CHOP (Bel-CHOP). Secondary objectives included safety/tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), and belinostat pharmacokinetics (PK). Methods Patients were ≥ 18 years with histologically confirmed, previously untreated PTCL. Patients received belinostat (1000 mg/m2 once daily) + standard CHOP for 6 cycles with varying schedules using a 3 + 3 design in Part A. Part B enrolled patients at MTD dose. Results Twenty-three patients were treated. One patient experienced DLT (Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity) on Day 1–3 schedule, resulting in escalation to Day 1–5 schedule (n = 3). No DLTs were observed and Day 1–5 schedule with 1000 mg/m2 was declared as MTD. Twelve additional patients were enrolled in Part B using MTD. Median relative dose intensity was 98%. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), including nausea (78%), fatigue (61%), and vomiting (57%). Serious AEs occurred in 43%, with febrile neutropenia (17%) and pyrexia (13%). Overall ORR was 86% with 71% reported CR at MTD. Belinostat PK parameters were similar to single-agent. Conclusions Bel-CHOP was well tolerated and MTD in CHOP combination was the same dose and schedule as single agent dosing. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01839097.

Capecitabine, an Oral Fluoropyrimidine Carbamate With Substantial Activity in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase II Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1337-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Michael Findlay ◽  
Bruno Osterwalder ◽  
Walter Kocha ◽  
David Dalley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

PURPOSE: To evaluate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) three treatment regimens of oral capecitabine in order to select the most appropriate regimen for testing in phase III. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three capecitabine schedules were evaluated in a randomized phase II design: arm A, 1,331 mg/m2/d bid continuously; arm B, 2,510 mg/m2/d bid intermittently (2 weeks on/1 week off); and arm C, 1,657 mg/m2/d plus oral leucovorin 60 mg/d bid intermittently (2 weeks on/1 week off). RESULTS: One hundred nine patients were randomized; 39 patients were assessable for efficacy in arm A, 34 in arm B, and 35 in arm C. Patient characteristics were balanced in the arms. Confirmed tumor responses (partial response [PR] + complete response [CR]) were reported for eight patients with two CRs (21%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9% to 36%) in arm A, eight patients with one CR (24%; 95% CI, 11% to 41%) in arm B, and eight patients with two CRs (23%; 95% CI, 10% to 40%) in arm C. Median times to progression (TTP) in arms A, B, and C were 127, 230, and 165 days, respectively. Overall, more toxicity was seen with capecitabine plus leucovorin, particularly diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome. There was no grade 3 or 4 marrow toxicity. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine offers a new, effective treatment option as an oral single agent in advanced CRC. Promising overall response rates were reported for all three regimens. The addition of leucovorin to the intermittent regimen had no marked effect on tumor response or median TTP. The intermittent single-agent capecitabine schedule is proposed for phase III evaluation, based on considerations of toxicity, dose-intensity, response rate, and TTP.

FOLFOX-4 + cetuximab in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A phase II study of the Gruppo Oncologico dell’Italia Meridionale (prot. GOIM 2402)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3559-3559 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Colucci ◽  
F. Giuliani ◽  
R. Mattioli ◽  
C. Garufi ◽  
R. Mallamaci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
First Line ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Setting ◽  
Ecog Ps

3559 Background: Cetuximab is an IgG monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR showing to be effective both as single agent or in combination with Irinotecan (CPT-11) or Irinotecan/FU/FA in patients (pts) with EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in the first and second/subsequent-line setting. The current trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of Cetuximab plus Folfox-4 as first -line treatment. The main objective was the percentage of confirmed objective response rate. Methods: Chemonaivepts with non-resectable metastatic CRC and expressing EGFR were treated with Cetuximab (400 mg/m2 week 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter) plus Folfox-4 (every 2 weeks: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, day 1; FA 100 mg/m2 2h, simultaneously with OH-P, and FU 400 mg/m2 iv bolus followed by 600 mg/m2 iv for 22h on days 1 and 2). The first evaluation of disease status (Recist criteria) was performed after the first 4 cycles and confirmed after one month. The treatment was continued until a maximum of 12 cycles of chemotherapy; the maintenaice with Cetuximab was permitted. Preliminary results: On the 65 screened pts, 47 (72%) had EGFR-expressing metastatic disease and were enrolled. Their main characteristics were: median Ecog PS 0; median age 66 yrs (range 43–74); main sites of disease: liver 31, lung 12, lymph-nodes 3, others 8. To date twenty-two pts are evaluable for activity and 27 for toxicity; 2 pts are not evaluable and 25 are too early. We observed 16 PR (72.7%), 5 NC (22.7%) and 1 PD (4.6%) for an ORR of 72.7% and a TGCR of 95.4%; the confirmed PR were 15 (68%). To date 2 pts undergone surgery of their metastases both for lung. The main adverse events grade 3/4 (NCI criteria) were: acne-like rush 18.5%, diarrea 7%, nausea/vomiting 4% and anemia 4%. Conclusions: Our preliminary results confirm that the combination of Cetuximab plus Folfox-4 has an high activity and a good safety profile in advanced CRC pts. The study is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

First-line single-agent cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3553-3553 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pessino ◽  
S. Artale ◽  
A. Guglielmi ◽  
S. Sciallero ◽  
G. Fornarini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Grade 3

3553 Background: The most relevant recent advance in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is the fact that cure is still possible under very selected conditions. However the goal of chemotherapy remains palliative in the great majority of patients, justifying less toxic innovative approaches in so- called “window of opportunity trials”. We have pursued this idea in a phase II study of cetuximab monotherapy in chemo-naive patients with advanced colorectal cancer beyond any possibility of curative resection. Methods: Patients with non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (at least two metastatic sites and/or otherwise inoperable metastatic disease) were treated with cetuximab (400 mg/m2 week 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter) until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was objective response; secondary end-points were: stable disease, time to treatment failure and time to progression. According to Simon’s two-stage design, the number of responses/patients to stop the trial was 0/10 for stage 1 and 3/29 for stage 2. Results: Of the 44 patients screened, 42 (97%) had EGFR-expressing tumors. Thirty-nine patients (median age: 69) initiated the treatment. Two had grade 3 allergic reactions to cetuximab at the first administration leading to treatment discontinuation. The most common adverse event was skin toxicity, which occurred in 90% of the patients ( 31% grade 2, 10 % grade 3). We observed 1 complete response, 3 partial responses, 13 stable diseases (5 of which were minor responses), and 22 PD. The duration of the 4 responses were 12, 9, 9 and 6 months. Median time to progression was 2.0 months. Conclusions: The study is negative because the response rate is low. However, the duration of benefit in the few responding patients is such that it is imperative to find the molecular determinants of cetuximab activity in these cases. [Table: see text]

Gemcitabine plus docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients (pts) with HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A randomized phase III study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1015-1015
Author(s):  
D. L. Nielsen ◽  
S. T. Langkjer ◽  
K. Bjerre ◽  
S. Cold ◽  
L. Stenbygaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Grade 3

1015 Background: Gemcitabine (G), either as a single agent or in combination with taxanes, has demonstrated efficacy in MBC in phase II and III studies. We conducted a phase III study to compare time to progression (TTP) of G plus docetaxel (T) versus (vs.) T alone. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Methods: Females with HER-2-negative locally advanced or MBC and a WHO performance status ≤ 2 were randomized to GT (G 1,000mg/m2 day 1 + 8; T 75mg/m2 day 1) or T (100mg/m2 day 1) every 21 days. Pts were previously untreated, had prior anthracycline-based (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy or had received a single prior anthracycline-bsed chemotherapy regimen for MBC. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was applied for comparisons between regimens. The planned sample size was 254 evaluable pts with α I and β of 0.05 and 0.90, respectively. Results: A total of 336 pts were randomized (170 GT; 166 T), data from one centre are yet missing and the present evaluation is based on data from 306 pts (155 GT; 151 T). The pts had a median age of 58 years in both regimens; range 36–73 years and 30–74 years, respectively. The median TTP was 7.5 months for the GT regimen vs. 6.5 months for the T regimen. The GT arm demonstrated an ORR of 44% vs. 38% in the T arm with 4 and 3 % complete responses, respectively. The OS was 13.4 vs. 13.2 months in the GT and T arm, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was common, especially grade 3–4 neutropenia (GT = 69%; T = 61%); infection was reported in 22 and 20% of the pts, respectively (none of the pts received G-CSF). The most commonly reported non-hematologic toxicities of grade 3–4 included mucositis (GT = 2%; T = 5%), diarrhea (GT = 4%; T = 7 %), fatigue (GT = 6%; T = 11%), oedema (GT = 10%; T = 3%), and peripheral neuropathy (GT = 9%; T = 28%). Conclusions: Preliminary data of GT as first- or second-line chemotherapy demonstrates a TTP advantage among HER-2-negative pts with advanced breast cancer. Updated results and proper statistical analyses will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Impact of Young Age on Treatment Efficacy and Safety in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Patients From Nine First-Line Phase III Chemotherapy Trials

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (20) ◽  
pp. 2781-2786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles D. Blanke ◽  
Brian M. Bot ◽  
David M. Thomas ◽  
Archie Bleyer ◽  
Claus-Henning Kohne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Young Age ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Colorectal cancer predominantly occurs in the elderly, but approximately 5% of patients are 50 years old or younger. We sought to determine whether young age is prognostic, or whether it influences efficacy/toxicity of chemotherapy, in patients with advanced disease. Methods We analyzed individual data on 6,284 patients from nine phase III trials of advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) that used fluorouracil-based single-agent and combination chemotherapy. End points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and grade 3 or worse adverse events. Stratified Cox and adjusted logistic-regression models were used to test for age effects and age-treatment interactions. Results A total of 793 patients (13%) were younger than 50 years old; 188 of these patients (3% of total patients) were younger than 40 years old. Grade 3 or worse nausea (10% v 7%; P = .01) was more common, and severe diarrhea (11% v 14%; P = .001) and neutropenia (23% v 26%; P < .001) were less common in young (younger than 50 years) than in older (older than 50 years) patients. Age was prognostic for PFS, with poorer outcomes occurring in those younger than 50 years (median, 6.0 v 7.5 months; hazard ratio, 1.10; P = .02), but it did not affect RR or OS. In the subset of monotherapy versus combination chemotherapy trials, the relative benefits of multiagent chemotherapy were similar for young and older patients. Results were comparable when utilizing an age cut point of 40 years. Conclusion Young age is modestly associated with poorer PFS but not OS or RR in treated patients with aCRC, and young patients have more nausea but less diarrhea and neutropenia with chemotherapy in general. Young versus older patients derive the same benefits from combination chemotherapy. Absent results of a clinical trial, standard combination chemotherapy approaches are appropriate for young patients with aCRC.

Concomitant administration of weekly oxaliplatin, 5FU continuous infusion and radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): A GERCOR phase II study

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4039-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Moureau-Zabotto ◽  
J. Phélip ◽  
P. Afchain ◽  
L. Mineur ◽  
T. André ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Concomitant Administration ◽  
Metastatic Progression ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Concomitant Boost ◽  
Grade 3

4039 Background: According to previous GERCOR studies in LAPC, concomitant chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) is indicated for non-progressive patients (pts) after systemic chemotherapy (CT). In order to improve the results of a classical 5FU-based CCRT, this study was designed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of weekly oxaliplatin (Ox), 5FU continuous infusion (c.i.) and radiation therapy (RT) in LAPC pts. Methods: Eligibility criteria included non resectable pathologically-proven LAPC, age > 18 yrs, PS < 2, and no prior CT or RT. All patients were first treated with 4 cycles of GEMOX (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, 100 min IV, d1; Ox 100 mg/m2, 2h IV, d2, every 2 wk). One month after cycle 4, non-progressive pts with PS < 2 received 45 Gy (25 fractions, 5 d/wk) + 10 Gy (concomitant boost in macroscopic tumor during wks 4 & 5, six hours apart large volume irradiation), combined with 250 mg/m2/d 5FU c.i. and weekly Ox. Initial 50 mg/m2 Ox dose was increased to 60 mg/m2 in absence of unacceptable toxicity after the 3 first included pts. Results: 60 pts were included (29 F/ 31 M, age 65.8 ± 9.6 yrs, range 37 - 80). 50 pts (83%) received CCRT, while 10 did not for the following reasons: metastatic progression (7 pts), OMS>2 (1), and CT toxicity (2). 44 pts (73 %) received the full planned CCRT dose-intensity. NCI-CTC grade 3–4 toxicities during CCRT and the following month (% of pts) were : neutropenia (14%), thrombocytopenia (10%), nausea-vomiting (20%), diarrhea (12%) and neuropathy (2%). 2 toxic deaths occurred during CCRT. With a median follow up of 15 mo, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole population were 7.6 mo and 13.8 mo, respectively. For pts who received CCRT, median PFS and OS were 9.4 and 13.9 mo, respectively (2.6 and 9.9 mo, respectively, for pts who did not received CCRT). Conclusion: Chemotherapy before CCRT can identify pts who might potentially benefit of CCRT. Concomitant administration of weekly Ox, continuous IV FU and RT in LAPC is feasible with an acceptable toxicity. The results in terms of PFS and OS compare favourably with a classical 5FU-based CCRT. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Efficacy and toxicities of combination maintenance therapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanzhong Lin ◽  
Hongyun Li ◽  
Jianzhu Wang ◽  
Fang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and toxicities of combination maintenance therapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Relevant trials were identified by searching electronic databases and conference meetings. Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing combination maintenance therapy in advanced CRC patients were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and grade 3-4 toxicities. Results: A total of 3,174 advanced CRC patients received combination maintenance treatment from 6 RCTs were included for analysis. The use of combination maintenance therapy did not significantly improved PFS (HR 0.95, 95%CI: 0.75-1.20, p=0.67) and OS (HR 1.05, 95%CI: 0.93-1.17, p=0.45) in comparison with single bevacizumab maintenance therapy for the treatment of advanced CRC, similar results were observed in sub-group analysis according to treatment regimens. In addition, combination maintenance therapy significantly improved PFS (HR 0.57, 95%CI: 0.41-0.80, p=0.001), but not for OS (HR 0.93, 95%CI: 0.76-1.14, p=0.47) in comparison with observation. Additionally, more incidences of any grade 3-4 toxicities (diarrhea, fatigue and hand-foot skin reaction) were observed in the combination maintenance therapy. Conclusions: The findings of this study show that the efficacy of combination maintenance therapy is comparable to that of bevacizumab alone in terms of PFS and OS for advanced CRC patients, but at the cost of increased grade 3-4 toxicities. Thus single agent bevacizumab remains the recommended maintenance treatment for advanced CRC patients.

Phase II study of S-1 plus irinotecan (SIR) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13508-13508
Author(s):  
A. Goto ◽  
Y. Yamada ◽  
Y. Shimada ◽  
K. Shirao ◽  
T. Hamaguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

13508 Background: Infusional fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus irinotecan is one of the standard regimens for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). S-1, a combination of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine, and oxonic acid, is an oral DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidine shown to be very effective as first-line treatment for MCRC. The response rate with S-1 was 35–40% in patients with chemo-naïve MCRC. This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of S-1 plus irinotecan (SIR). Methods: Eligible patients had untreated MCRC as confirmed histologically, PS 0–1, adequate organ function, and provided written informed consent. First-line SIR was given in 3-week treatment cycles: intravenous irinotecan 150 mg/m2 (day 1) and oral S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days followed by 7 days of rest. Results: Forty-one patients were enrolled; 40 fulfilled all eligibility criteria, and 1 had double cancers. There were 28 men; median age 60 years (range, 23–74); ECOG PS 0/1, 35/6. The overall response rate was 63% (95%CI, 48–78%). Five patients had a CR, 20 a PR, 11 SD, and 2 PD. Median TTP was 8.0 months (range, 1.4–13.8 months); MST was not reached. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included: neutropenia (17%), diarrhea (15%), and anorexia (12%). One patient had Grade 4 constipation. The relative dose intensity of irinotecan was 84%, and that of S-1 was 79%. Dose reduction of irinotecan was required in 41 of 327 administered cycles, and that of S-1 was required in 15 of 327. Conclusions: SIR is a highly active and convenient first-line therapy for MCRC, with an acceptable toxicity profile. S-1 has the potential to replace infusional 5-FU/LV plus irinotecan for MCRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Clinical benefits TH-302, a tumor-selective, hypoxia-activated prodrug, and gemcitabine in first-line pancreatic cancer (PanC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 265-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Borad ◽  
E. G. Chiorean ◽  
J. R. Molina ◽  
A. C. Mita ◽  
J. R. Infante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Head Neck Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Grade 3

265 Background: Gemcitabine (G) is the standard treatment for first- line PanC. PanC is one of the most hypoxic solid tumors. TH-302 is an inert prodrug of brominated isophosphoramide mustard and undergoes selective activation in deep hypoxia. As a single agent, tumor responses were reported in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma, SCLC, and head/neck cancer at TH-302 weekly doses of 480-575 mg/m2. Methods: Eligible pts for the PanC expansion of this phase I/II study ( NCT00743379 ) had ECOG <1, locally advanced or metastatic PanC previously untreated with systemic chemotherapy other than adjuvant G, 5FU, and/or radiation. IV TH-302 was dosed at 240-575 mg/m2 (240 or 340 in expansion) with standard dose G (1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Serum protein and microRNA hypoxia biomarkers were analyzed at baseline, start of cycle 3 and end of study. Results: 46 PanC subjects (12 locally advanced, 34 distant mets); median age: 63 (range 41-83); 24 male; ECOG 0/1 in 29/17 pts; RECIST response rate (RR) of 21%, median PFS of 6.1 mo (95%CI 4.8, 7.7) and median survival of 11.4 mo (95%CI 6.0, not reached) were observed. RR was 23% with median survival of 7.4 mo in pts with distant mets. 52% of pts had a >50% decrease in CA19-9. Common adverse events were skin or mucosal toxicity, nausea, fatigue and vomiting; most grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 68%, 64%, and 20% of pts respectively. The dose intensities at 240 mg/m2 and 340 mg/m2 were similar and related to hematologic toxicities. Skin toxicities were less common at 240 mg/m2. A TH-302 dose response was present with higher RR and PFS at 340 mg/m2. Initial serum hypoxia biomarkers did not identify a preferential pt population. Conclusions: The activity and clinical benefits of the combination of TH-302 with G in first line PanC are promising as compared to previous studies of G alone. TH-302 adds to the hematologic toxicity of G, but the regimen is well tolerated. The safety and activity provided rationale for comparing TH-302 plus G versus G alone in a randomized phase II trial ( NCT01144455 ) and indicate TH-302 may complement G by penetrating into the hypoxic regions of the PanC tumors where activation induces cytotoxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document