scholarly journals Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Complications and Outcomes of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Breast Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (13) ◽  
pp. 2170-2176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz P. Srokowski ◽  
Shenying Fang ◽  
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi ◽  
Sharon H. Giordano

Purpose To evaluate whether diabetes affects patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy use, toxic effects of chemotherapy, and breast cancer outcomes. Patients and Methods By using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare database, we identified patients aged 66 years or older who had stages I through III breast cancer that was diagnosed between 1992 and 2002. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of diabetes on use of chemotherapy, toxicities, and outcomes. The risks of all-cause mortality and breast cancer–specific (BCS) mortality were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Our cohort had 70,781 men and women, of whom 14,414 (20.36%) had diabetes. Among people who received chemotherapy (n = 11,826), 21.0% were diabetics. In this group, diabetics had lower odds of receiving anthracyclines (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.87) and taxanes (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.99). Diabetes was associated with increased odds of being hospitalized for any chemotherapy toxicity (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.56), for infection or fever (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.7), for neutropenia (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.45), for anemia (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.47), and for any cause (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.46). Patients with diabetes had higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.39). There was a significant interaction between diabetes and chemotherapy use for BCS mortality. Diabetic and nondiabetic patients who did not receive chemotherapy had similar BCS mortality, but diabetic patients who did receive chemotherapy had higher BCS mortality than nondiabetic patients (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.35). Conclusion In this observational, hypothesis-generating study, patients who have breast cancer and diabetes are at increased risk of chemotherapy-related toxicities compared with nondiabetic patients who are receiving chemotherapy and have higher all-cause mortality.

2021 ◽  
pp. svn-2020-000693
Author(s):  
Yanan Qiao ◽  
Siyuan Liu ◽  
Guochen Li ◽  
Yanqiang Lu ◽  
Ying Wu ◽  
...  

Background and purposeThe role of depression in the development and outcome of cardiometabolic diseases remains to be clarified. We aimed to examine the extent to which depressive symptoms affect the transitions from healthy to diabetes, stroke, heart disease and subsequent all-cause mortality in a middle-aged and elderly European population.MethodsA total of 78 212 individuals aged ≥50 years from the Survey of Health Ageing and Retirement in Europe were included. Participants with any baseline cardiometabolic diseases including diabetes, stroke and heart disease were excluded. Depressive symptoms were measured by the Euro-Depression scale at baseline. Participants were followed up to determine the occurrence of cardiometabolic diseases and all-cause mortality. We used multistate models to estimate the transition-specific HRs and 95% CIs after adjustment of confounders.ResultsDuring 500 711 person-years of follow-up, 4742 participants developed diabetes, 2173 had stroke, 5487 developed heart disease and 7182 died. Depressive symptoms were significantly associated with transitions from healthy to diabetes (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.20), stroke (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.44), heart disease (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.34) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.34 to 1.49). After cardiometabolic diseases, depressive symptoms were associated with the increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.89), patients who had stroke (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.61) and patients with heart disease (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.44).ConclusionsDepressive symptoms increase the risk of diabetes, stroke and heart disease, and affect the risk of mortality after the onset of these cardiometabolic conditions. Screening and treatment of depressive symptoms may have profound implications for the prevention and prognosis of cardiometabolic diseases.


Author(s):  
Hua Ma ◽  
QIng Gu ◽  
Huining Niu ◽  
Xiaohua Li ◽  
Rong Wang

Background: The use of Aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still a topic of debate, especially in patients with diabetes. The present meta-analysis aims to rule out the efficacy of Aspirin in patients with diabetes and to compare the effectiveness of Aspirin with a placebo (or no treatment) for the primary prevention of CVD and all-cause mortality events in people with diabetes. Materials and Methods: An extensive and systematic search was conducted in Medline (via PubMed), Cinahl (via Ebsco), Scopus, and Web of Sciences from 1988 to December 2020. A detailed literature search was conducted using Aspirin, cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, and efficacy to identify trials of patients with diabetes who received Aspirin for primary prevention of CVD. Demographic details with the primary outcome of events and bleeding outcomes were analyzed. The risk of bias (RoB) in included studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results: A total of 5 studies out of 13 were included with 23,570 diabetic patients; 11,738 allocated to Aspirin and 11,832 allocated to the placebo group. In patients with diabetes, there was no difference between Aspirin and placebo with respect to the risk of all-cause death with a confidence interval (CI) varying 0.63 to 1.17. In addition, there were no differences in the bleeding outcomes with an odds ratio of 1.4411 (CI 0.47 to 4.34). Conclusion: Aspirin has no significant risk on primary endpoints of cardiovascular events and the bleeding outcomes in diabetic patients compared to placebo. More research on the use of Aspirin alone or in combination with other antiplatelet drugs is required in patients with diabetes to supplement currently available research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (19) ◽  
pp. 10643
Author(s):  
Lucia La Sala ◽  
Antonio E. Pontiroli

The goal of diabetes care is to achieve and maintain good glycemic control over time, so as to prevent or delay the development of micro- and macrovascular complications in type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, numerous barriers hinder the achievement of this goal, first of all the frequent episodes of hypoglycemia typical in patients treated with insulin as T1D patients, or sulphonylureas as T2D patients. The prevention strategy and treatment of hypoglycemia are important for the well-being of patients with diabetes. Hypoglycemia is strongly associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients, due probably to the release of inflammatory markers and prothrombotic effects triggered by hypoglycemia. Treatment of hypoglycemia is traditionally based on administration of carbohydrates or of glucagon via intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous injection (SC). The injection of traditional glucagon is cumbersome, such that glucagon is an under-utilized drug. In 1983, it was shown for the first time that intranasal (IN) glucagon increases blood glucose levels in healthy volunteers, and in 1989–1992 that IN glucagon is similar to IM glucagon in resolving hypoglycemia in normal volunteers and in patients with diabetes, both adults and children. IN glucagon was developed in 2010 and continued in 2015; in 2019 IN glucagon obtained approval in the US, Canada, and Europe for severe hypoglycemia in children and adults. In the 2010s, two ready-to-use injectable formulations, a stable non-aqueous glucagon solution and the glucagon analog dasiglucagon, were developed, showing an efficacy similar to traditional glucagon, and approved in the US in 2020 and in 2021, respectively, for severe hypoglycemia in adults and in children. Fast-acting glucagon (nasal administration and injected solutions) appears to represent a major breakthrough in the treatment of severe hypoglycemia in insulin-treated patients with diabetes, both adults and children. It is anticipated that the availability of fast-acting glucagon will expand the use of glucagon, improve overall metabolic control, and prevent hypoglycemia-related complications, in particular cardiovascular complications and cognitive impairment.


Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Szepietowska ◽  
Valentina Kutyifa ◽  
Martin H Ruwald ◽  
Scott D Solomon ◽  
Anne-Christine H Ruwald ◽  
...  

Methods: We aimed to analyze the risk for death and HF and the effect of CRT on HF/death in diabetic patients with or without insulin treatment compared to none diabetic population. The study comprised 1278 patients with left bundle branch block in the MADIT-CRT trial with an average follow-up of 3.3y. We used time dependent survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression method. Results: In ICD arm patients with diabetes receiving insulin treatment had 2.4-fold higher risk of all-cause mortality (p=0.008), and 2.2-fold higher risk of HF (p<0.001) when compared to non diabetic patients, and 2.8-fold higher risk of death (p=0.01), and 1.6-fold higher risk of HF (p=0.06) when compared to patients with diabetes not treated with insulin. Treatment with CRT-D was associated with a significant 75% risk reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR ] 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08-0.77; p=0.016) in patients with diabetes receiving insulin. Noteworthy, during the 3-year follow-up, reduction in all-cause mortality was not observed in patients not treated with insulin or in patients with no diabetes (interaction p-value=0.038). Significant risk reduction in HF and in HF/death after CRT treatment was observed across all three investigated groups. There were not significant differences in left ventricular reverse remodeling after CRT-D among diabetic patients with or without insulin treatment compared to the nondiabetic population. Conclusions: Patients with insulin treated diabetes derive significant reduction in mortality and heart failure after implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Patients with diabetes and no insulin and patient without diabetes benefit from CRT by reduction of HF events.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lance S Longmore ◽  
Kimberly J Reid ◽  
Mikhail Kosiborod ◽  
Frederick A Masoudi ◽  
Verna Welch ◽  
...  

While diabetes is known to be associated with increased mortality after MI, whether these differences in outcome are due to patient characteristics, treatment, or other biological factors is unknown. We analyzed a contemporary cohort of MI survivors to comprehensively adjust for demographics, comorbidities, psychosocial, health status, clinical and treatment factors to determine if residual disparities in outcomes exist. We studied 2481 hospital survivors of MI in the prospective, 19-center PREMIER study (29% with diabetes). Multivariable models with sequential adjustment were employed to identify the extent to which variation in a wide range of patient characteristics (Figure ) accounted for differences in 3-year mortality in patients with and without diabetes. Unadjusted mortality was more than 2.5-fold greater for patients with diabetes (HR 2.55, 95% CI 2.08–3.14). Mortality was most attenuated by diabetes-related comorbidities (Figure ). The fully-adjusted model identified a significant, albeit attenuated, excess 3-year mortality among patients with diabetes (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.22–1.99). Patients with diabetes experience a substantially increased risk for 3-year mortality after MI, even after accounting for a wide range of patient and treatment characteristics. This suggests that unmeasured, biologic variables associated with diabetes may mediate this difference. Further inquiry into the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiovascular disease is needed to identify new opportunities to improve the prognosis of patients with diabetes.


Author(s):  
Abdonas Tamosiunas ◽  
Laura Sapranaviciute-Zabazlajeva ◽  
Dalia Luksiene ◽  
Dalia Virviciute ◽  
Martin Bobak

Background: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the association between cognitive function and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality during 10 years of the follow-up. Methods: 7087 participants were assessed in the baseline survey of the Health Alcohol Psychosocial Factors in Eastern Europe (HAPIEE) study in 2006–2008. During 10 years of follow-up, all-cause and CVD mortality risk were evaluated. Results: During 10 years of follow-up, 768 (23%) men and 403 (11%) women died (239 and 107 from CVD). After adjustment for sociodemographic, biological, lifestyle factors, and illnesses, a decrease per 1 standard deviation in different cognitive function scores increased risk for all-cause mortality (by 13%–24% in men, and 17%–33% in women) and CVD mortality (by 19%–32% in men, and 69%–91% in women). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause and CVD mortality, according to tertiles of cognitive function, revealed that the lowest cognitive function (1st tertile) predicts shorter survival compared to second and third tertiles (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The findings of this follow-up study suggest that older participants with lower cognitive functions have an increased risk for all-cause and CVD mortality compared to older participants with a higher level of cognitive function.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Hatoum ◽  
Eileen M. McGowan

There is substantial epidemiological evidence pointing to an increased incidence of breast cancer and morbidity in obese, prediabetic, and diabetic patients.In vitrostudies strongly support metformin, a diabetic medication, in breast cancer therapy. Although metformin has been heralded as an exciting new breast cancer treatment, the principal consideration is whether metformin can be used as a generic treatment for all breast cancer types. Importantly, will metformin be useful as an inexpensive therapy for patients with comorbidity of diabetes and breast cancer? In general, meta-analyses of clinical trial data from retrospective studies in which metformin treatment has been used for patients with diabetes and breast cancer have a positive trend; nevertheless, the supporting clinical data outcomes remain inconclusive. The heterogeneity of breast cancer, confounded by comorbidity of disease in the elderly population, makes it difficult to determine the actual benefits of metformin therapy. Despite the questionable evidence available from observational clinical studies and meta-analyses, randomized phases I–III clinical trials are ongoing to test the efficacy of metformin for breast cancer. This special issue review will focus on recent research, highlightingin vitroresearch and retrospective observational clinical studies and current clinical trials on metformin action in breast cancer.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Erickson ◽  
Ruth E. Patterson ◽  
Shirley W. Flatt ◽  
Loki Natarajan ◽  
Barbara A. Parker ◽  
...  

Purpose Self-reported diabetes has been associated with poor breast cancer outcomes. Research is needed to investigate the relationship between biologically determined glycemic control and breast cancer prognosis. Methods Archived baseline blood samples from the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study were used to measure hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) among 3,003 survivors of early-stage breast cancer (age of diagnosis, 28 to 70 years) observed for a median of 7.3 years for additional breast cancer events and 10.3 years for all-cause mortality. HbA1C levels provide an accurate, precise measure of chronic glycemic levels. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess whether baseline HbA1C levels predicted disease-free and overall survival. Results Only 5.8% of women had chronic hyperglycemia (defined as HbA1C levels ≥ 6.5%). Those with HbA1C ≥ 6.5% were older and more likely to be less educated, have nonwhite ethnicity, be obese, and have more advanced breast cancer at diagnosis. HbA1C was significantly associated with overall survival (Ptrend < .001). After adjusting for confounders, risk of all-cause mortality was twice as high in women with HbA1C ≥ 7.0% compared with women with HbA1C less than 6.5% (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35; 95% CI, 1.56 to 3.54). For disease-free survival, there was a nonsignificant 30% increase in risk for HbA1C levels ≥ 7.0% (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.78 to 2.02). During study follow-up, previously diagnosed rather than undiagnosed diabetes seemed to account for the increased risk. Conclusion Chronic hyperglycemia is statistically significantly associated with reduced overall survival in survivors of early-stage breast cancer. Further study of diabetes and its relationship to breast cancer outcomes is warranted.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Proietti ◽  
M Vitolo ◽  
S Harrison ◽  
G.A Dan ◽  
A.P Maggioni ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Frailty is a major health determinant for cardiovascular disease. Thus far, data on frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited. Aims To evaluate frailty in a large contemporary cohort of European AF patients, the relationship with oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription and with risk of all-cause death. Methods We analyzed patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. A 38-items frailty index (FI) was derived from baseline characteristics according to the accumulation of deficits model proposed by Rockwood and Mitnitsky. All-cause mortality was the primary study outcome. Results Out of the 11096 AF enrolled patients, data for evaluating frailty were available for 6557 (59.1%) patients who have been included in this analysis (mean [SD] age 68.9 [11.5], 37.7% females). Baseline median [IQR] CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED were 3 [2–4] and 1 [1–2], respectively. At baseline, median [IQR] FI was 0.16 (0.12–0.23), with 1276 (19.5%) patients considered “not-frail” (FI&lt;0.10), 4033 (61.5%) considered “pre-frail” (FI 0.10–0.25) and 1248 (19.0%) considered “frail” (FI≥0.25). Age, female prevalence, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED progressively increased across the FI classes (all p&lt;0.001). Use of OAC progressively increased among FI classes; after adjustments FI was not associated with OAC prescription (odds ratio [OR]: 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98–1.19 for each 0.10 FI increase). Conversely, FI was directly associated with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) use (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.18–1.34 for each 0.10 FI increase) and inversely associated with non-VKA OACs (NOACs) use (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.77–0.88). FI was significantly correlated with CHA2DS2-VASc (Rho= 0.516, p&lt;0.001). Over a median [IQR] follow-up of 731 [704–749] days, there were 569 (8.7%) all-cause death events. Kaplan-Meier curves [Figure] showed an increasing cumulative risk for all-cause death according to FI categories. A Cox multivariable analysis, adjusted for age, sex, type of AF and use of OAC, found that increasing FI as a continuous variable was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.40–1.73 for each 0.10 FI increase). An association with all-cause death risk was found across the FI categories (HR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.23–2.38 and HR: 2.88, 95% CI: 2.02–4.12, respectively for pre-frail and frail patients compared to non-frail ones). FI was also predictive of all-cause death (c-index: 0.660, 95% CI: 0.637–0.682; p&lt;0.001). Conclusions In a European contemporary cohort of AF patients the burden of frailty is significant, with almost 1 out of 5 patients found to be “frail”. Frailty influenced significantly the choice of OAC therapy and was associated with (and predictive of) all-cause death at follow-up. Kaplan-Meier Curves Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Since the start of EORP programme, several companies have supported it with unrestricted grants.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Cenko ◽  
M Van Der Schaar ◽  
J Yoon ◽  
Z Vasiljevic ◽  
S Kedev ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patients with diabetes and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) have an increased risk of mortality and adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose We aimed to investigate the impact of early, within 24 hours PCI compared with only routine medical treatment on clinical outcomes in a large international cohort of patients with NSTE-ACS and diabetes. Methods We identified 1,250 patients with diabetes and NSTE-ACS from a registry-based population between October 2010 and April 2016. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was the composite outcome of 30-day all-cause mortality and left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%). We undertook analyses to explore the heterogeneity of treatment effects using meta-classification (MC) algorithms followed by propensity score matching and inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) from a landmark of 24 hours from hospitalization. Results Of 1,250 NSTE-ACS first-day survivors with diabetes (median age 67 years; 59%, men), 470 (37.6%) received early PCI and 780 routine medical treatment. The overall 30-day all-cause mortality rates were higher in the routine medical treatment than the early PCI group (6.3% vs. 2.5%). The prediction results of the MC algorithms accounted for only one interaction term that was statistically significant: age ≥65 years. After propensity-matched analysis as well as IPTW, early PCI was associated with reduced 30-day all-cause mortality in the older age (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.92 and 0.43; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.86, respectively), whereas younger age had no association with the primary endpoint. Similar results were also obtained for the secondary endpoint. Conclusions Among patients with diabetes hospitalized for NSTE-ACS, an early, within 24 hours, PCI strategy is associated with reduced odds of 30-day mortality only for patients aged 65 years or over. MC algorithms provide accurate identification of treatment effect modifiers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document