Phase III trial (EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01) assessing the value of p53 using a functional assay to predict sensitivity to a taxane versus nontaxane primary chemotherapy in breast cancer: Final analysis.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA503-LBA503 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. R. Bonnefoi ◽  
J. Bogaerts ◽  
M. Piccart ◽  
L. Mauriac ◽  
P. Fumoleau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Cell Content ◽  
Sufficient Power ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Tumor Biopsies

LBA503 Background: Predictive markers of response to chemotherapy are lacking. Preclinical data suggest that p53 mutated tumors are resistant to anthracyclines and sensitive to taxanes. However, clinical data are contradictory. Using a functional yeast assay to detect biologically important mutations, this study tested the hypothesis that docetaxel confers a greater advantage over anthracyclines in p53 mutated tumors (mut) than p53 wild type (wt). Methods: Patients (pts) with locally advanced/inflammatory or large operable tumors were randomized to either a standard anthracycline regimen (arm A) or a taxane-based treatment (arm B). In arm A pts received 6 cycles of FEC 100, or tailored FEC + G-CSF (Swedish cohort). In arm B docetaxel (T) 100mg/m2 was given for 3 cycles, followed by 3 cycles of epirubicin 90mg/m2and T 75mg/m2 q3 weeks (T-ET). After chemotherapy, pts underwent surgery followed by radiotherapy. Endocrine therapy and/or trastuzumab were given according to each center's policy. Fresh frozen tumor biopsies were mandatory before starting chemotherapy: frozen sections were examined centrally and the p53 test was done when the invasive tumor cell content was > 20%. cDNA derived from tumor-extracted RNA was transfected into yeast (Flaman et al. PNAS 1995): tumors were deemed p53 wt when there were < 20% red colonies (background) and p53 mut > 20%. The three co-primary comparisons for the endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) were between arms A and B in p53 mut, p53 wt, and the entire trial population, each at a p=0.02. The sample size gave sufficient power for an interaction test for outcomes between p53 mut and wt at p<0.05. Results: From April 2001 to November 2006, 1,856 patients were included. A total of 386 pts (21%) were ineligible (including 292 pts with <20% tumor cells and 67 without sample). No unexpected toxicity was observed. At the time of analysis 675 events were registered after a median follow-up time of 57 months. The results are summarized below. Conclusions: p53 is not a predictive factor of response or resistance to taxanes, although it is, as expected, prognostic (<0.001). PFS is not statistically significantly different between FEC and T-ET arms at the 2% cutoff level. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

JUPITER-02: Randomized, double-blind, phase III study of toripalimab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA2-LBA2
Author(s):  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Hai-Qiang Mai ◽  
Qiu-Yan Chen ◽  
Dongping Chen ◽  
Chaosu Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

LBA2 Background: Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy is the standard 1st line treatment for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic (r/m) NPC. Toripalimab, a humanized IgG4K monoclonal antibody specific for PD-1, provided durable responses in patients (pts) with r/m NPC as monotherapy in the ≥2nd line setting (POLARIS-02 study). The results of JUPITER-02, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded Phase III trial of toripalimab in combination with GP chemotherapy as first-line treatment for r/m NPC are summarized. Methods: Pts with advanced NPC with no prior chemotherapy in the r/m setting were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab 240 mg or placebo d1 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1, d8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 d1 every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 6 cycles, followed by monotherapy with toripalimab or placebo Q3W until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Stratification factors were ECOG PS (0 vs. 1) and extent of disease (recurrent vs. primary metastatic) at enrollment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and response were assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was PFS by IRC in the ITT population. Secondary end points included ORR, DOR and OS. There was one prespecified interim analysis of PFS at 130 PFS events with a planned final analysis at 200 PFS events. Results: 289 pts were randomized: 146 to the toripalimab arm and 143 to the placebo arm. By May 30, 2020 as the interim analysis cutoff date, the median treatment duration was 39 weeks in the toripalimab arm and 36 weeks in the placebo arm. A significant improvement in PFS was detected for the toripalimab arm compared to the placebo arm (HR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.36-0.74] two-sided p = 0.0003), with median PFS of 11.7 vs. 8.0 months. The 1-year PFS rates were 49% and 28% respectively. An improvement in PFS was observed across relevant subgroups, including all PD-L1 subgroups. The ORR was 77.4% vs. 66.4% (P = 0.033) and the median DOR was 10.0 vs. 5.7 months (HR = 0.50 [95% CI: 0.33-0.78]). As of Jan 15, 2021, OS was not mature, with 25 deaths in the toripalimab arm and 35 in the placebo arm (HR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.41-1.14], P = 0.14). The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (89.0% vs 89.5%); AEs leading to discontinuation of toripalimab/placebo (7.5% vs 4.9%); and fatal AEs (2.7% vs 2.8%) were similar between two arms; however, immune-related (irAEs) (39.7% vs. 18.9%) and Grade ≥3 irAEs (7.5% vs. 0.7%) were more frequent in the toripalimab arm. Conclusions: The addition of toripalimab to GP chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for pts with advanced NPC provided superior PFS and ORR and longer DOR than GP alone with a manageable safety profile. These results support the use of toripalimab with GP chemotherapy as the new standard care for this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03581786.

Phase III randomized study of sorafenib plus doxorubicin versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): CALGB 80802 (Alliance).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 192-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa ◽  
Donna Niedzwieski ◽  
Jennifer J. Knox ◽  
Andreas Kaubisch ◽  
James Posey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hepatic Failure ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Malignancy ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy

192 Background: An exploratory analysis of a randomized phase II study in HCC comparing doxorubicin (D) alone to doxorubicin plus sorafenib (D+S) showed a significant improvement in overall survival favoring D+S (JAMA, 2011). The results appeared promising compared to the historic outcomes seen in the pivotal sorafenib (S) trials. CALGB 80802 was designed to determine if D+S improved survival compared to S alone. Methods: Patients with histologically proven advanced HCC, no prior systemic therapy and Child-Pugh A were randomized to receive D 60 mg/m2 every 21 days plus S 400 mg PO twice daily (D+S) or S alone. For bilirubin ≥ 1.3x normal, D and S doses were halved. D was maxed out at 360 mg/m2. The study was stratified by extent of disease (locally advanced; metastatic), the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); and secondary endpoint progression-free survival (PFS). The final analysis was to occur when 364 events were observed among 480 total patients, with 90% power to detect a 37% increase in median OS (10.7 to 14.7 months; 1-sided α = 0.05). Results: The Alliance DSMB halted the study after accrual of 346 patients (173 on each of D+S and S) when a futility boundary was crossed at a planned interim analysis. With 107 events in each arm, median OS was 9.3 months (95%CI 7.1-12.9) for D+S, and 10.5 months (95% CI 7.4-14.3) for S with a hazard ratio (HR) 1.06 (95% CI 0.8-1.4) for D+S vs. S. Median PFS was 3.6 (95% CI 2.8-4.6) and 3.2 months (95% CI 2.3-4.1), respectively (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.72-1.2). There were 38 deaths on treatment: 18 on D+S and 20 on S. Among these 8 [sepsis (1), dysphagia (1), pneumonia (1), cardiac (2), hepatic failure (2), and not otherwise specified (1)] on D+S, and 3 [fatigue (1), hepatic failure (1), and a secondary malignancy (1)] on S, were at least possibly related to treatment. A maximum grade 3 or 4 only hematologic adverse events (AE) occurred in 37.8% of patients on D+S and 8.1% of patients on S. Non-hematologic AEs were comparable, in 63.6% and 61.5% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of D to S resulted in higher toxicity and did not improve OS or PFS. The S median OS of about 10 months is consistent with previous reports. NCI Grant U10CA180821 Clinical trial information: NCT01015833.

Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Oxaliplatin Plus Fluorouracil/Leucovorin Versus Doxorubicin As Palliative Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Asia

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (28) ◽  
pp. 3501-3508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Yuxian Bai ◽  
Ho Yeong Lim ◽  
Sumitra Thongprasert ◽  
Yee Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
End Point

Purpose To determine whether FOLFOX4 (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) administered as palliative chemotherapy to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) provides a survival benefit and efficacy versus doxorubicin. Patients and Methods This multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III study in mainland China, Taiwan, Korea, and Thailand involved 371 patients age 18 to 75 years who had locally advanced or metastatic HCC and were ineligible for curative resection or local treatment. They were randomly assigned at a ratio of one to one to receive either FOLFOX4 (n = 184) or doxorubicin (n = 187). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) by RECIST (version 1.0), and safety. Results At the prespecified final analysis, median OS was 6.40 months with FOLFOX4 (95% CI, 5.30 to 7.03) and 4.97 months with doxorubicin (95% CI, 4.23 to 6.03; P = .07; hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.02). Median PFS was 2.93 months with FOLFOX4 (95% CI, 2.43 to 3.53), and 1.77 months with doxorubicin (95% CI, 1.63 to 2.30; P < .001; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79). RR was 8.15% with FOLFOX4 and 2.67% with doxorubicin (P = .02). On continued follow-up, the trend toward increased OS with FOLFOX4 was maintained (P = .04; HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.99). Toxicity was consistent with previous experiences with FOLFOX4; proportions of grade 3 to 4 adverse events were similar between treatments. Conclusion Although the study did not meet its primary end point, the trend toward improved OS with FOLFOX4, along with increased PFS and RR, suggests that this regimen may confer some benefit to Asian patients, but an OS benefit cannot be concluded from these data.

A randomized phase III multicenter trial of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) versus neoadjuvant PF in patients with locally advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Final analysis of EORTC 24971

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5516-5516 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Remenar ◽  
C. Van Herpen ◽  
J. Germa Lluch ◽  
S. Stewart ◽  
T. Gorlia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Treatment Center ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

5516 Background: So far, the Wayne State regimen combining 100 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1000 mg/m2/d continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil over 5 days (PF), is the gold standard in advanced SCCHN. Improvement of PF induction chemotherapy by adding a taxane has been suggested from phase II studies and 2 randomized phase III trials. We now report the final analysis of EORTC 24971. Methods: Eligible were patients (pts) with unresectable stage III/IV SCCHN (no distant metastases), 18 to 70 yrs of age, PS≤1, and adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function. Pts were stratified by primary disease site (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx) and treatment center and randomized to PF (as above) or TPF (T 75 mg/m2/1h, P 75 mg/m2/1h, both d1, F 750 mg/m2/d, d1–5) q 3 wks, for 4 cycles unless progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity, or refusal. Thereafter (interval 4–7 wks), all pts not in PD received radiotherapy (RT: conventional [66–70 Gy], accelerated [max. 70 Gy] / hyperfractionated [max. 74 Gy]). Surgery was allowed before RT (neck) or 3 months after RT (primary, neck). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and 348 pts and 260 events were needed to detect a 50% increase in median PFS (10 vs 15 mo) with 85% power. Results: Between April 1999 and March 2002, 358 pts were accrued (181 PF, 177 TPF). At a median follow-up (FUP) of 32 mo, PFS was significantly improved with TPF (HR 0.72, p = 0.0071; median 8.2 vs 11.0 mo). A 51 mo median FUP showed an overall survival (OS) benefit with TPF (HR 0.71, p = 0.0052; median 14.2 vs 18.6 mo). Estimated 3-yr survival rates are 23.9% (95% CI: 17.9%;30.5%) for PF and 36.5% (29.3%;43.6%) for TPF. Response rate also favored TPF (53.6% vs 67.8%, p = 0.006). There was more severe (G3+4) leucopenia (41.6% vs 22.9%) and neutropenia (76.9% vs 52.5%) with TPF, and more severe thrombocytopenia with PF (17.9% vs 5.2%). Severe alopecia occured more with TPF (55.5% vs 11.7%); hearing loss (2.8% vs 0%) and toxic death (7.8% vs 3.7%) more with PF. Conclusions: TPF (→ RT) is superior to PF (→ RT) for PFS, OS (including long-term), response rate, and is better tolerated. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFOX4) versus doxorubicin in advanced HCC: Updates on the EACH study.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 160-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Thongprasert ◽  
S. Qin ◽  
H. Lim ◽  
V. Bhudhisawasdi ◽  
X. Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advanced Hcc

160 Background: In Asia, where hepatitis B is very common, patients often present with locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and their prognosis is poor. The EACH study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX4 vs. doxorubicin as palliative systemic chemotherapy in advanced HCC. Methods: The open-label, randomized, multicenter phase III study was conducted in 371 patients in China, Taiwan, Korea and Thailand, who had locally advanced or metastatic HCC and were ineligible for resection. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 i.v. d1; LV 200 mg/m2 i.v. h0–h2 d1 and d2; 5FU 400 mg/m2 i.v. bolus h2, then 600 mg/m2 over 22 hours d1 and d2 q2w) or doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 i.v. q3w). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) by RECIST and safety. Data from final and follow-up analyses of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and selected subgroup analyses are presented. Results: At the final analysis, median OS with FOLFOX4 (N = 184) was 6.40 months (95% CI: 5.30, 7.03) vs. 4.97 months (95% CI: 4.23, 6.03) with doxorubicin [N = 187; p = 0.0695 using a stratified log-rank test; statistical significance (p = 0.0425) was achieved at the post hoc follow-up analysis conducted 7 months later]. Median PFS with FOLFOX4 was 2.93 months (95% CI: 2.43, 3.53) vs. 1.77 months with doxorubicin (95% CI: 1.63, 2.30; p = 0.0002). The RR was 8.2% vs. 2.7% of patients with FOLFOX4 and doxorubicin, respectively (p = 0.0233), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 52.2% vs. 31.6% (p < 0.0001). In the Chinese sub-population, OS, PFS, RR and DCR were significantly improved with FOLFOX4 vs. doxorubicin at both the final and follow-up analyses. In the other subgroups analyzed, the OS and PFS benefits of FOLFOX4 vs. doxorubicin were generally consistent. Conclusions: In the ITT population, median OS was greater with FOLFOX4 than doxorubicin throughout the study and statistical significance was achieved after continued follow-up. FOLFOX4 can benefit patients with advanced HCC, as it significantly increases median OS, PFS, RR and DCR compared with doxorubicin. [Table: see text]

Silmitasertib (CX-4945) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: A phase Ib/II study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 312-312
Author(s):  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
Li-Yuan Bai ◽  
Ming-Huang Chen ◽  
Joleen M. Hubbard ◽  
Kabir Mody ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Almost All

312 Background: Silmitasertib (CX-4945), an oral small molecule inhibitor of casein kinase 2 (CK2), has exhibited preclinical antitumor activity and strong synergism with gemcitabine + cisplatin. We investigated the safety and efficacy of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: S4-13-001 is a multicenter, open-label, phase Ib/II study of silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. The phase Ib portion included dose-escalation, expansion, and exploratory cohorts of silmitasertib with doses ranging from 200 to 1000 mg bid (6 days for the escalation/expansion cohorts and 10 and 21 days’ continuous dosing for the exploratory cohorts). In the phase II portion patients received silmitasertib 1000 mg bid for 10 days in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin on days 1 & 8 over a 21-day cycle. In this interim analysis, we present findings from the combined population of patients from the phase Ib and II portions of the study. Response to treatment was assessed by RECIST v1.1 every 6 weeks. Primary efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02128282). Results: A total of 87 patients were enrolled and received silmitasertib in the phase Ib (n=50) and phase II (n=37) portions of the study. Of these, 55 patients were evaluable for efficacy with details as follows: median PFS 11.1 (95% CI 7.6–14.7) months; median overall survival (OS) 17.4 (95% CI 13.4–25.7) months; overall response rate (ORR) 32.1%; and disease control rate (DCR) 79.3%. Almost all patients (79/87; 90.8%) evaluable for safety reported ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAEs (all grades) with silmitasertib were diarrhea (65.5%), nausea (50.6%), vomiting (33.3%), fatigue (31.0%), and anemia (21.8%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were diarrhea (13.8%), neutropenia (11.5%), nausea (9.2%), anemia (8.0%), and thrombocytopenia (8.0%). Eleven patients (12.6%) discontinued treatment due to TEAEs. Conclusions: Silmitasertib in combination with gemcitabine + cisplatin yields promising preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA. Based on these data a randomized phase III trial is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02128282.

Efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib (A + Ax) versus sunitinib (S) by number of IMDC risk factors and tumor sites at baseline in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Extended follow-up results from JAVELIN Renal 101.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 302-302
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Tomita ◽  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Hideaki Miyake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
To Receive

302 Background: In the phase III JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), A + Ax demonstrated progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) benefit across IMDC risk groups (favorable, intermediate, and poor) vs S in patients with previously untreated aRCC. Here we report efficacy of A + Ax vs S by number of IMDC risk factors (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4-6) and target tumor sites (1, 2, 3, and ≥4) at baseline from the second interim analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive A 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 wk + Ax 5 mg orally twice daily or S 50 mg orally once daily for 4 wk (6-wk cycle). PFS and ORR per independent central review (RECIST 1.1) and OS were assessed. Results: At data cut-off (Jan 2019), median (m) follow-up for OS and PFS was 19.3 vs 19.2 mo and 16.8 vs 15.2 mo for the A + Ax vs S arm, respectively. The table shows OS, PFS, and ORR by number of IMDC risk factors and target tumor sites at baseline. A + Ax generally demonstrated efficacy benefit vs S across subgroups. Conclusions: With extended follow-up, A + Ax generally demonstrated efficacy benefit vs S across the number of IMDC risk factors and tumor sites at baseline in aRCC. OS was still immature; follow-up for the final analysis is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals CheckMate-032 Study: Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab and Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Esophagogastric Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (28) ◽  
pp. 2836-2844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yelena Y. Janjigian ◽  
Johanna Bendell ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Paolo A. Ascierto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Programmed Death Ligand 1 ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Esophagogastric Cancer

Purpose Metastatic esophagogastric cancer treatments after failure of second-line chemotherapy are limited. Nivolumab demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) versus placebo in Asian patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers. We assessed the safety and efficacy of nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in Western patients with chemotherapy-refractory esophagogastric cancers. Patients and Methods Patients with locally advanced or metastatic chemotherapy–refractory gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal junction cancer from centers in the United States and Europe received nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The primary end point was objective response rate. The association of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 status with response and survival was also evaluated. Results Of 160 treated patients (59 with nivolumab 3 mg/kg, 49 with nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, 52 with nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg), 79% had received two or more prior therapies. At the data cutoff, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 12% (95% CI, 5% to 23%), 24% (95% CI, 13% to 39%), and 8% (95% CI, 2% to 19%) in the three groups, respectively. Responses were observed regardless of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 status. With a median follow-up of 28, 24, and 22 months across the three groups, 12-month progression-free survival rates were 8%, 17%, and 10%, respectively; 12-month OS rates were 39%, 35%, and 24%, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 17%, 47%, and 27% of patients in the three groups, respectively. Conclusion Nivolumab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity, durable responses, encouraging long-term OS, and a manageable safety profile in patients with chemotherapy-refractory esophagogastric cancer. Phase III studies evaluating nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in earlier lines of therapy for esophagogastric cancers are underway.

scholarly journals Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Response to Chemotherapy

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safi Shahda ◽  
Kirsten M. Timms ◽  
Ashley A. Ibrahim ◽  
Julia E. Reid ◽  
Harvey M. Cramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded ◽  
Mutation Data

Purpose Mutations or copy number abnormalities of genes involved in homologous recombination (HR) occur in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). DNA-based measures of HR deficiency (HRD) have been developed and may help identify tumors with better response to DNA-damaging agents. This study aimed to describe the HR pathway mutations and HRD status and determine their association with treatment response and outcome in patients with PDAC. Patients and Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of tumor samples from patients treated at Indiana University for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. Patients were included if they received gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (control) or fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) and had adequate follow-up to assess survival and response to therapy. Tumor analysis generated a three-biomarker HRD score and mutation data for 44 genes. Results Ninety-one samples met inclusion criteria, and 78 samples (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded, n = 15; fine-needle aspiration, n = 63) generated mutation data. HRD analysis was successful for 57 samples (HRD score: median, 18; range, 5 to 61); the primary cause of failure was low tumor cellularity. Six BRCA1/ 2 mutations were detected, four with HRD scores in the top decile ( P = .011). There was no statistically significant correlation between HRD score and radiographic response (odds ratio per interquartile range, 1.40; P = .32 adjusted for treatment) in either treatment group. In patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, HRD score dichotomized at the median was not associated with progression-free survival (median, 5.3 v 9.4 months for low v high HRD score, respectively; P = .083) or overall survival (median, 11.9 v 10.7 months for low v high HRD score, respectively; P = .76). Conclusion Mutations in DNA repair genes occur in PDAC, and HRD scores can be generated in the majority of patients. The HRD score was not significantly associated with higher response rate or prolonged survival in patients treated with FOLFIRINOX.

Once-a-Week Versus Once-Every-3-Weeks Cisplatin Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Noninferiority Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1064-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Jaiprakash Agarwal ◽  
Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Chemoradiation with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks is the standard of care in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC). Increasingly, low-dose once-a-week cisplatin is substituted because of perceived lower toxicity and convenience. However, there is no level 1 evidence of comparable efficacy to cisplatin once every 3 weeks. Patients and Methods In this phase III randomized trial, we assessed the noninferiority of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 given once a week compared with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks, both administered concurrently with curative intent radiotherapy in patients with LAHNSCC. The primary end point was locoregional control (LRC); secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Between 2013 and 2017, we randomly assigned 300 patients, 150 to each arm. Two hundred seventy-nine patients (93%) received chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant setting. At a median follow-up of 22 months, the estimated cumulative 2-year LRC rate was 58.5% in the once-a-week arm and 73.1% in the once-every-3-weeks arm, leading to an absolute difference of 14.6% (95% CI, 5.7% to 23.5%); P = .014; hazard ratio (HR), 1.76 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.79). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71.6% of patients in the once-a-week arm and in 84.6% of patients in the once-every-3-weeks arm ( P = .006). Estimated median progression-free survival in the once-a-week arm was 17.7 months (95% CI, 0.42 to 35.05 months) and in the once-every-3-weeks arm, 28.6 months (95% CI, 15.90 to 41.30 months); HR, 1.24 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.73); P = .21. Estimated median overall survival in the once-a-week arm was 39.5 months and was not reached in the once-every-3-weeks arm (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.65]; P = .48). Conclusion Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 resulted in superior LRC, albeit with more toxicity, than did once-a-week cisplatin at 30 mg/m2, and should remain the preferred chemoradiotherapy regimen for LAHNSCC in the adjuvant setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document