Development and economic trends in cancer therapeutic drugs: An updated analysis of modern and historical treatment costs compared to the contemporary GDP per capita.
259 Background: Cancer drug development is a major industry and clincial success story with new cancer treatment drugs delivering improved healthcare for many more patients each year. Generally new cancer treatment drugs are viewed as being of 'high cost' and there is considerable debate as to how these new treatments can be funded for routine use. Accurate data on the trends of the relative costs of new treatments compared with earlier high cost cancer drugs is limited. In this sudy we have aimed to document all the newly licenced cancer drugs, by year of introduction, and compare the cost of a standard course of treatment relative to the current per capita GDP to allow an assessment of how relative costs of new drugs have changed over time. Methods: Drugs are classified by years of introduction, therapeutic classification, and an assessment of relative treatment cost using a contemporary 'standard' treatment compared with the relevant UK GDP per capita. Results: Prior to 1960, there were 5 cancer drugs available, 2 new drugs were introduced in the 1960s, 18 in the 1970s, 14 in the 1980s, 24 in the 1990s, 23 between 2000-2009 and 15 between 2010-12. Data will be presented on the cost relative to per capita GDP of a standard treatment for each new drug released from 1987 to current. The summary data indicates that the cost at introduction of an average new cancer drug treatment has increased from 33% of per capita GDP for 1995-99, 53% for 2000-2004, 67% for 2005-2009 and is now 114% for 2010-2012. Conclusions: The cost of new cancer drug treatments appears to be rising in absolute and relative terms. The data in this abstract may be of value to those interested in the history of cancer treatment development and the associated current economic issues.