A multicenter, phase II study of trastuzumab plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: Update results of efficacy and toxicity.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Tianshu Liu ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
Li Bai ◽  
Feng Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Drop Out Rate ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

102 Background: The ToGA study showed trastuzumab plus chemotherapy prolonged OS in patients with HER2-positive AGC. Result of REAL2 study suggested that oxaliplatin may be as effective as cisplatin but more tolerable. To further improve treatment options, we initiated a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab plus XELOX in Chinese patients with HER2-positive AGC. Methods: Simon two-stage design with primary endpoint of best confirmed response rate by RECIST 1.0 was applied. The sample size is calculated to be 46, assuming H0=40%, H1=60%, a=0.05, b =0.2. Considering 10% drop-out rate, the total number of subjects was planned to be 51. Patients with previously untreated, HER2-positive (IHC2+/Dual SISH positive, or IHC 3+), histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-esophageal junction were eligible. Trastuzumab was administered at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg infusion every 3 weeks (q3w). Oxaliplatin was administrated as a 130mg/m2 infusion, q3w, up to 6 cycles. Capecitabine was given orally with 2000mg/m2d, d1-14, q3w. Trastuzumab and capecitabine were continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The NCI-CTCAE version 4.0 is used to evaluate safety profiles. Results: 72 patients (362 patients at 13 centers were screened) were HER2 positive, of which 51 patients were enrolled. The majority of patients were HER2 IHC 3+ (38/51). Response was evaluated in 46 patients, one patient achieved CR and thirty-three patients achieved PR. Till June 2013, 29 patients progressed, 14 cases died, showing PFS of 312 days (95%CI:211-360). The most common AEs that are higher than grade 3 were thrombocytopenia (21.6%), neutropenia (13.7%), anemia (7.84%), leucopenia (3.92%), nausea/vomiting (3.92%), hand-foot syndrome (3.92%). 6 patients possess LVEF decrease by ≥10% and one patient discontinued trastuzumab infusion. Conclusions: The addition of trastuzumab to XELOX was well tolerated and the results demonstrated encouraging efficacy. Survival benefit of this regimen needs further follow-up of patients to be concluded. Clinical trial information: NCT01364493.

Life After Capo

1983 ◽  
Vol 3 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-53
Author(s):  
Clair C. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
Dialysis Modality ◽  
Short History ◽  
Drop Out Rate ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Of 508 patients trained for CAPD during the first five years, 115 (22.6%) were transferred to an alternative dialysis modality. Of these 87% were transferred to centre dialysis programs, equally divided between hemodialysis and intermittent peritoneal dialysis. Advanced age favoured transfer to intermittent peritoneal dialysis and failure due to peritonitis, transfer to hemodialysis. Three year survival after transfer from CAPD was 38%. The presence of diabetes and advanced age adversely affected survival after transfer. Dialysis modality and peritonitis as the cause of CAPD failure did not affect survival. Other treatment options are available to patients who fail CAPD. A relatively high drop-out is therefore acceptable and preferable to continuing CAPD in patients encountering complications which might ultimately influence their survival. Since its introduction in Toronto in 1977, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) has achieved increasing prominence in the management of end-stage renal disease. Throughout its comparatively short history, one of the major criticisms of this technique has been the relatively high drop-out rate. This report provides a follow-up of patients transferred from CAPD to alternative dialysis modalities.

Exploration of patients with gastric cancer who benefit from apatinib: An updated real-world study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 161-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guo-ping Sun ◽  
Dongliang Li ◽  
Zhongliang Ning ◽  
Yifu He ◽  
Fenglin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Combined Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

161 Background: A real-world study to observe the efficacy and safety of apatinib treatment in clinical practice, and explored patients (pts) who could benefit from apatinib. Methods: This is an open-label, prospective, observational study, pts (age ≥ 18 yrs) with pathologically or histologically diagnosed GC who were given apatinib treatment met the inclusion criteria. Results: From September 1, 2017 to September 1, 2018. 954 pts were enrolled. 679 pts received palliative treatment were included in the analysis. 499 (73.6%) were males. The age of the pts was (63.1 ± 10.8) yrs. Pts with ECOG PS 0/1 accounted for 78.1%. Pts received first-line treatment, second-line treatment, third-line treatment or above , respectively were 42.2%, 30.5%, 27.3%. 509 (75.1%) pts were treated with apatinib at dose of 500 mg. There were 375 pts available for efficiency evaluation. Among them, 1 achieved CR, 35 achieved PR, 198 had SD, and 57 had PD, resulting in an ORR of 11.9% and a DCR of 77.4%. The mPFS is 4.2 m (95% CI: 3.5-4.8), OS data was still in follow-up. This study showed its efficacy for pts with monotherapy compared with combined chemotherapy (3.3 m vs. 5.0 m, P = 0.003). The mPFS for patients with hypertension were longer than without hypertension (7.1m vs. 3.7m, P = 0.038). And pts also had longer mPFS with good ECOG PS (0-1) compared to those with poor ECOG PS (2-4) (4.7 m vs. 2.9 m, P = 0.003). The incidence of AEs was 402 (88.2%) and the grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs was 14.7%. The most common treatment-related AEs were debilitation (31.2%), hand-foot syndrome (27.5%), hypertension (25.3%), anorexia (11.5%), diarrhea (10.3%), albumin decreased (38.5%), uric acid elevated (31.6%), and total bilirubin increased (29.1%). Conclusions: In the real world, apatinib is confirmed to be effective and safe for GC pts. Factors associated with better prognosis were apatinib combined chemotherapy, ECOG PS 0/1 and occurrence of hypertension. Further analysis is needed to identify pts who benefit from apatinib treatment. Preliminary results of the study were released in ESMO 2018 Congress (683P). Clinical trial information: NCT 03333967.

MAGNIFY phase IIIb interim analysis of induction R2 followed by maintenance in relapsed/refractory indolent NHL.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8046-8046
Author(s):  
David Jacob Andorsky ◽  
Morton Coleman ◽  
Abdulraheem Yacoub ◽  
Jason M. Melear ◽  
Suzanne R. Fanning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Early Relapse ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Phase Iiib ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

8046 Background: Patients (pts) with relapsed iNHL have limited standard treatment options. The immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide shows enhanced activity with rituximab (ie, R2), which recently reported 39.4-mo median PFS in R/R iNHL pts (AUGMENT; J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1188). Methods: MAGNIFY is a multicenter, phase IIIb trial in pts with R/R FL gr1-3a, MZL, or MCL (NCT01996865) exploring optimal lenalidomide duration. Lenalidomide 20 mg/d, d1-21/28 + rituximab 375 mg/m2/wk c1 and then q8wk c3+ (R2) are given for 12c followed by 1:1 randomization in pts with SD, PR, or CR to R2 vs rituximab maintenance for 18 mo. Data presented here focus on induction R2 in efficacy-evaluable FL and MZL pts (MCL not included) receiving ≥ 1 treatment with baseline/post-baseline assessments to analyze the primary end point of ORR by 1999 IWG criteria. Results: As of June 16, 2019, 393 pts (81% FL gr1-3a; 19% MZL) were enrolled with a median follow up of 23.7 mo (range, 0.6-57.8) for censored pts (n = 335). Median age was 66 y (range, 35-91), 83% had stage III/IV disease, with a median of 2 prior therapies (95% prior rituximab-containing). ORR was 69% with 40% CR/CRu (Table). Median DOR was 39.0 mo, and median PFS was 40.1 mo. 199 pts (51%) have completed 12c of R2, and 188 (48%) have been randomized and entered maintenance. 139 pts (35%) prematurely discontinued both lenalidomide and rituximab, primarily due to AEs (n = 52, 13%) or PD (n = 45, 11%). Most common all-grade AEs were 48% fatigue, 43% neutropenia, 36% diarrhea, 31% nausea, and 30% constipation. Grade 3/4 AE neutropenia was 36% (9 pts [2%] had febrile neutropenia); all other grade 3/4 AEs occurred in < 7% of pts. Conclusions: R2 is active with a tolerable safety profile in pts with R/R FL and MZL, including rituximab-refractory, double-refractory, and early relapse pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01996865 . [Table: see text]

Concurrent durvalumab and radiation therapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab in patients with locally advanced urothelial cancer of bladder (DUART): Btcrc-GU15-023.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 513-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Joshi ◽  
Leonard Tuanquin ◽  
Matthew Kaag ◽  
Deepak Kilari ◽  
Sheldon L. Holder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Total N ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

513 Background: Bladder cancer (BC) patients (pts) who are cisplatin ineligible/unfit for surgery, unresectable have limited treatment options. In this study, we investigate if the combination of radiation therapy (RT) and checkpoint inhibitor, durvalumab (durva) is safe and effective in these pts. Our results from phase (ph) Ib suggested that the combination was safe. Here we present the response rate post durvaRT and updated treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) amongst our evaluable pts in ph II. Methods: This is a single arm ph Ib-II study for T2-4 N0-2 M0 pts. The ph II primary endpoints a) PFS rate at 1 yr b) disease control rate (DCR); secondary endpoints were a) CR post durvaRT b) PFS c) OS. Pts were treated with durva (1500mg) Q4 wks x2 doses along with definitive RT (64.8Gy, 36 fractions over 7 wks) to the bladder and involved nodes followed by adjuvant durva Q4 wks x 1 yr. Response was evaluated with CT scan and cystoscopy+biopsy post durvaRT. We anticipated that durvaRT followed by durva would increase PFS at 1 yr from 50% to 75% when compared to RT; we assumed DCR of about 75%. A total of 26 pts were needed to reach a statistical power of at least 80% at one-sided alpha of 5% and to allow for 10% drop out rate. Results: Total N = 26 patients (male 19; female 7, median age 74yr). At the time of data cut off, 21/26 pts were evaluable for response post durvaRT. Post completion of durvaRT time point, clinical CR was seen in 15/21 pts (71.4%); PR 1/21 pts (4.7%); SD 4/21 (19%); PD 1/21 (4.7%). DCR was seen in 20/21 pts (95%) post durvaRT. Median follow up from D1 to last follow up was 6.1 mos. Grade ≥ 3 TRAE amongst 26 pts: anemia (1/26), lipase/amylase (1/26), immune nephritis (1/26), dyspnea (gr 4, copd/immune), fatigue (1/26), lymphopenia (6/26). Other TRAEs: Fatigue was the most common TRAE (16/26); UTI (5/26); cystitis (3/26). No fatal TRAEs were observed. Conclusions: DurvaRT demonstrated promising efficacy with clinical CR of 71.4% and DCR of 95% in unresectable, cisplatin ineligible locally advanced BC. It was generally well tolerated. Ph II study has completed accrual and longer-term results will further our understanding of this regimen’s efficacy in locally advanced BC. Clinical trial information: NCT02891161.

Phase II trial of miniDOX (reduced-dose docetaxel/oxaliplatin/capecitabine) in “suboptimal” patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC): TTD 08-02.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 87-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Rivera ◽  
Bartomeu Massuti ◽  
Matilde Salcedo ◽  
Javier Sastre ◽  
Joaquina Martínez-Galán ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

87 Background: Chemotherapy has improved overall survival (OS) in patients (p) with AGC and docetaxel (D), oxaliplatin (O) and capecitabine (X), have shown consistent activity in this setting. We defined "Suboptimal" p as those with PS ECOG-2 and/or weight loss 10-25% and/or age ≥70 years. This population is usually underrepresented in AGC clinical trials. Methods: We explored in 43 previously untreated "suboptimal" AGC p the "miniDOX" regimen (D: 40 mg/m2 iv, d1; O: 80 mg/m2 iv d1; C: 625 mg/m2 po bid, d1 to 21, every 21d; after 6 courses only C was maintained). D and O dose were allowed to be increased to 45 and 90 mg/m2 respectively (dose level +1) and to 50 and 100 mg/m2 (level +2) if less than grade 2 toxicity after the first 2 courses. One p that did not received any dose of chemotherapy, was included in the ITT efficacy analysis but not in the safety analysis. Primary endpoint was Response Rate (RR), Toxicity, Progression Free Survival (PFS) and OS were secondary objectives. Results: p characteristics: PS ECOG-2:12 p, Weigh loss 10-25%:23 p; median age 73.3 years (40-87); 32 males; locally advanced:8 p/metastatic:35 p; Primary site:Gastric 32 p/ EGJ 11; In 19 p the dose of D and O were increased to level +1 and in 8 of them to level +2. Worst toxicity per p (Grade 3-4): neutropenia: 5 p (3 of them with febrile neutropenia); pulmonary embolism (PE):4 p (3 of them suffered sudden death and the PE was suspected but not confirmed); diarrhea:9 p; paronychia:2 p; CVA:1 p; renal failure:1 p (this p suffered infection/bacteriemia without neutropenia and died); hand-foot syndrome:4 p and asthenia:5 p. Response: CR:1 p, PR:23 p (RR: 56%), SD:12 p, Progression:3 p, No determined:4 p; With a median follow-up of 27 months, 36 p have died (toxicity:4 p, progressive disease:32 p). Median and 1 year actuarial PFS and OS are 5.5 months/19% and 13.3 months/54% respectively. Conclusions: Although relevant the toxicity of miniDOX has been found, its activity is encouraging in "suboptimal" pts with AGC and this combination should be further investigated in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00733616.

A randomized phase II neoadjuvant study (GeparNuevo) to investigate the addition of durvalumab, a PD-L1 antibody, to a taxane-anthracycline containing chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3062-3062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibylle Loibl ◽  
Michael Untch ◽  
Nicole Burchardi ◽  
Jens Bodo Huober ◽  
Jens Uwe Blohmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Drop Out Rate ◽  
Immune Biomarkers ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

3062 Background: Adding an anti-PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab to standard chemotherapy (CT) may increase pathological complete response (pCR) in patients (pts) with TNBC. Methods: GeparNuevo randomizes pts to durvalumab (D) 1.5 g i.v. or placebo (pl) every 4 weeks (wks). D/pl monotherapy (0.75 g i.v.) is given for the first 2 wks (window phase), followed by a biopsy and D/pl plus nab-paclitaxel (nP) 125 mg/m² weekly for 12 wks, followed by D/pl plus epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) q2 wks for 4 cycles. Randomization is stratified by stromal TILs (sTILs) (low (≤10%), intermediate (11-59%), high (≥60%)). Pts with primary cT1b-cT4a-d disease, centrally confirmed TNBC, and sTILs status can be included. Primary objective compares pCR (ypT0 ypN0) rates. Secondary objectives are pCR rates in stratified subpopulations and according to other pCR definitions; response rates; breast conservation rate; toxicity; compliance and survival. Change in sTILs, Ki67 and other immune biomarkers before CT, after the window phase and after CT will be correlated with outcome. The first 10, 20 and 30 pts will be included in safety interim analyses (SIA). Sample size was planned assuming a pCR rate of 48% for pl (nP treated TNBC cohort in GeparSepto) and of 66% for D (as clinically meaningful benefit), requiring 158 pts to show superiority of D (2-sided α = 0.2, 80% power). Assuming a 10% drop-out rate 174 pts will be randomized. Results: Since 6/2016, 50 pts were recruited within 16 sites; data are presented as available until 01/2017. Median age is 49 years; 86% NST and G3 tumors; sTILs categories 40% low, 40% intermediate and 20% high. Blinded SIA was performed. No pt interrupted D/pl, one nP and one EC. Treatment delay was observed in 9 pts (20.0%) in D/pl, 18 (41.9%) in nP and 2 (13.3%) in EC; dose was reduced in 10 pts (23.3%) in nP and in 4 (26.7%) in EC. 10 pts (20%) had at least one grade 3-4 AE: 4 haematological and 6 non-haematological AEs. 4 SAEs and 5 immune related AEs were reported. 2 pts discontinued study treatment prematurely in the EC phase. Conclusions: The addition of D to standard nP-EC is feasible and does not result in an increased toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02685059.

Palbociclib (P) in patients (pts) with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with CDK4 amplification: Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11565-11565
Author(s):  
Scott Schuetze ◽  
Michael Rothe ◽  
Pam K. Mangat ◽  
Liz Garrett-Mayer ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

11565 Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of STS pts with CDK4 amplification treated with P are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced STS, no standard treatment options, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts received P at 125 mg orally once daily for 21 days, followed by 7 days off until disease progression. Pts matched to P had CDK4 amplification and no RB mutations. Simon 2-stage design tested the null disease control (DC) - defined as partial (PR), complete response (CR) or stable disease at 16+ weeks (SD 16+) - rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have DC, 18 more pts are enrolled. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the null DC rate is rejected. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 29 pts (66% male) with STS with CDK4 amplification were enrolled from July 2016 to Nov 2019. 1 pt was not evaluable and excluded from efficacy analyses. Demographics and outcomes are summarized in Table. One pt with partial response (PR) and 12 pts with SD16+ were observed for DC and objective response (OR) rates of 48% (95% CI: 31%, 62%) and 3.7% (95% CI: 0.1%, 19%), respectively, and the null DC rate of 15% was rejected (p<0.001). 9/13 pts with DC continued on treatment for >32 weeks. 14 pts had at least one grade 3-4 AE at least possibly related to P with the most common being low WBC/platelets. Other grade 3 AEs included increased alanine aminotransferase, anemia, and fatigue. Conclusions: Monotherapy P demonstrated anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated pts with STS with CDK4 amplification. Additional study is warranted to confirm the efficacy of P in pts with STS with CDK4 amplification. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Interruzione del trattamento nei pazienti con schizofrenia che ricevono olanzapina o aripiprazolo: metanalisi degli studi clinici controllati

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
Benedetta Santarlasci ◽  
Giovanni Biricolti ◽  
Cecilia Orsi
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Antipsychotic Therapy ◽  
Therapy Discontinuation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Drop Out Rate ◽  
Number Of Patients

BACKGROUND: In schizophrenia the drop-out rate can be used as proxy of effectiveness. The drop-out evaluation is also important considering the relevant economic impact for NHS of an antipsychotic therapy discontinuation in terms of patient hospitalization and other related healthcare resources consumption. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the differences in the rates of drop-out from clinical trials between olanzapine and aripiprazole. METHODS: Literature search was based on MEDLINE, on Iowa-IDIS and Drugdex databases (1966-Dec 2004). Analysis included 12 randomized controlled trials (3.778 patients), 8 for olanzapine (2.559 patients) and 4 for aripiprazole (1.219 patients). RCT inclusion criteria were: a) Patients affected by schizophrenia; b) Randomized assignment to olanzapine or aripiprazole treatment group; c) Number of patients included in the treatment group higher than 100; d) Drop-out frequency evaluation between 4th and 26th weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: The rate of treatment discontinuation was greater for aripiprazole than for olanzapine (42,2% vs. 31,6% respectively). The comparison between drop-out percentages is statistically significant (p

Long-term trend of quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicities (Q-TWiST) of nivolumab+ipilimumab (N+I) versus sunitinib (SUN) for the first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6568-6568
Author(s):  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Jessica May ◽  
Youngmin Kwon ◽  
Nifasha Rusibamayila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Good Health ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Parametric Bootstrapping ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Relative Gains ◽  
Clinical Trial Information ◽  
Over Time

6568 Background: After a minimum follow-up of 48 months (mos), the CheckMate 214 trial (phase 3, NCT02231749) continued to demonstrate a significant overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival benefit for N+I vs. SUN in aRCC patients (pts) with intermediate (I) or poor (P) International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk factors (median OS: 48.1 vs. 26.6 mos, HR: 0.65, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.54, 0.78; 48-mos PFS: 32.7% vs. 12.3%, HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.88) (Albiges et al. ESMO Open 2020). To further understand the clinical benefits and risks of N+I vs. SUN, we evaluated the Q-TWiST over time using up to 57 mos of follow-up in CheckMate 214. Methods: OS was partitioned into 3 states: time with any grade 3 or 4 adverse events (TOX), time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (TWiST), and time after progression (REL). The Q-TWiST is a metric that combines the quantity and quality (i.e., “utility”) of time spent in each of the 3 states TWiST, TOX, and REL. Prior research (Revicki et al, Qual Life Res, 2006) has established that relative gains in Q-TWiST (i.e., Q-TWiST gain divided by OS in SUN) of ≥ 10% and ≥ 15% can be considered as “clinically important” and “clearly clinically important”, respectively. Non-parametric bootstrapping was used to generate 95% CIs. To observe changes in quality-adjusted survival gains over time, absolute and relative Q-TWiST were calculated up to 57 mos at intervals of 12-mos. Results: With 57-mos follow-up, compared to SUN pts, N+I pts (N = 847) had significantly longer time in TWiST state (+7.1 mos [95% CI: 4.2, 10.4]). The between-group differences in TOX state (0.3 mos [95% CI: -0.2, 0.8]) and REL state (-1.2 mos [95% CI: -4.1, 1.5]) were not statistically significant. The Q-TWiST gain in the N+I vs. SUN arms was 6.6 mos (95% CI: 4.1, 9.4), resulting in a 21.2% relative gain. Q-TWiST gains progressively increased over the follow-up period and exceeded the “clinically important” threshold around 27 mos (Table). These gains were driven by steady increases in TWiST gains from 0.4 mos (after 12 mos) to 7.1 mos (after 57 mos). Conclusions: In CheckMate 214, N+I resulted in a statistically significant and “clearly clinically important (≥ 15%)” longer quality-adjusted survival vs. SUN, which increased over the longer follow-up time. Q-TWiST gains were primarily driven by time in “good” health (i.e., TWiST), which largely resulted from the long-term PFS benefits seen for N+I vs. SUN. Clinical trial information: NCT02231749. [Table: see text]

Oesophageal Probe Evaluation in Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation (OPERA): results from a prospective randomized trial

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1487-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Schoene ◽  
Arash Arya ◽  
Friederike Grashoff ◽  
Helge Knopp ◽  
Alexander Weber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Energy Levels ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Peak Temperature ◽  
Drop Out Rate ◽  
Higher Power

Abstract Aims The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of oesophageal lesions after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) with or without the use of oesophageal temperature probes. Methods and results Two hundred patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: the OPERA+ group underwent RFA using oesophageal probes (SensiTherm™); the OPERA− group received RFA using fixed energy levels of 25 W at the posterior wall without an oesophageal probe. All patients underwent post-interventional endoscopy and Holter-electrocardiogram after 6 months. (Clinical.Trials.gov: NCT03246594). One hundred patients were randomized in OPERA+ and 100 patients in OPERA−. The drop-out rate was 10%. In total, 18/180 (10%) patients developed endoscopically diagnosed oesophageal lesions (EDEL). There was no difference between the groups with 10/90 (11%) EDEL in OPERA+ vs. 8/90 (9%) in OPERA− (P = 0.62). Despite the higher power delivered at the posterior wall in OPERA+ [28 ± 4 vs. 25 ± 2 W (P = 0.001)], the average EDEL size was equal [5.7 ± 2.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.7 mm (P = 0.38)]. The peak temperature did not correlate with EDEL size. During follow-up, no patient died. Only one patient in OPERA− required a specific therapy for treatment of the lesion. Cumulative AF recurrence after 6 (3–13) months was 28/87 (32%) vs. 34/88 (39%), P = 0.541. Conclusion This first randomized study demonstrates that intraoesophageal temperature monitoring using the SensiTherm™ probe does not affect the probability of developing EDEL. The peak temperature measured by the thermoprobe seems not to correlate with the incidence of EDEL. Empiric energy reduction at the posterior wall did not affect the efficacy of the procedure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document