Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction: Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4144-TPS4144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Claudia Pauligk ◽  
Thorsten Oliver Goetze ◽  
Jorge Riera-Knorrenschild ◽  
Eray Goekkurt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type I Error ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line

TPS4144 Background: The majority of patients (pts) with gastroesophageal cancer present with inoperable or metastatic disease and there is a strong need for efficient and tolerable first-line (1L) treatment. Oxaliplatin-based regimens like FOLFOX have become one standard of care. However, median survival is still below 12 months. Results from trials using nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment of subjects with advanced/metastatic GC and GEJ cancers demonstrated clinical activity, in pts whose tumors did or did not express PD-L1; in addition, nivolumab alone and in combination with ipilimumab demonstrated clinical benefits in various other tumor types. Based on this clinical experience, the AIO-STO-0417 trial (Moonlight) has been designed to evaluate the combination of chemotherapy with two checkpoint inhibitors in first-line therapy of pts with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated phase II trial. Pts with Her2-negative, inoperable, advanced or metastatic gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer will be randomized 1:1 to 1L treatment with FOLFOX (Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m²; Leucovorin 400 mg/m²; 5FU 400 mg/m² on d1 of each treatment cycle and 5FU 1200 mg/m² continuous infusion over 24 hrs d1 and d2) every 2 weeks plus Nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks and Ipilimumab 1mg/kg every 6 weeks (Arm A) or FOLFOX alone (Arm B). Primary endpoint of the trial is progression-free survival based on the ITT population. Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, Safety and Quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30). 118 pts (59 per arm) will be enrolled to provide 80% power for detecting an average HR of 0.68 using the log rank test at a one-sided type I error of 10%. At the date of submission, (Feb 2019), 28 of planned 118 pts are randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT03647969.

Axitinib with or without dose titration for first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Unblinded results from a randomized phase II study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA349-LBA349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Viktor Gruenwald ◽  
Mayer N. Fishman ◽  
Bohuslav Melichar ◽  
Takeshi Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Dose Titration ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line ◽  
Antihypertensive Medications ◽  
Double Blind

LBA349 Background: Patients receiving the 5-mg twice daily (BID) axitinib starting dose exhibit variable drug exposure; prior pharmacokinetic analyses indicate higher exposure is associated with better outcomes in mRCC. Dose titration based on individual tolerability may optimize exposure and improve efficacy. Methods: Patients (N=213) with treatment-naïve mRCC received axitinib 5 mg BID for a 4-week lead-in period. Then, patients with 2 consecutive weeks of blood pressure ≤150/90 mmHg, no axitinib-related toxicities >grade 2, no dose reductions, and ≤2 antihypertensive medications were randomized (double-blind) to axitinib 5 mg BID + dose titration to 10 mg BID maximum with axitinib or placebo. Those not eligible for randomization continued axitinib 5 mg BID or lower. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in randomized arms. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety were secondary endpoints. Assuming response rate under the null hypothesis is 0.15, this study had ≥80% power (1-sided type I error 10%) to detect a ≥25% absolute improvement in ORR with active vs placebo titration. Results: In all, 56 patients each were randomized to active and placebo titration arms, 91 were not randomized, and 10 withdrew during the lead-in period. As of Oct 12, 2012, ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 54% (40–67) in the active titration arm vs 34% (22–48) in the placebo titration arm (1-sided P=0.019), and 59% (49–70) in the non-randomized arm. Median PFS (95% CI) from first dose was 14.5 mo (9.2–24.5) in the active titration arm vs 15.7 mo (8.3–19.4) in the placebo titration arm (hazard ratio favored active titration, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54–1.35; 1-sided P=0.244), and 16.6 mo (11.2–22.5) in the non-randomized arm. Most frequent all-grade, all-causality adverse events in active titration, placebo titration, and non-randomized arms, respectively, were diarrhea (61% vs 63% vs 63%), hypertension (61% vs 43% vs 82%), and fatigue (45% vs 46% vs 54%). Conclusions: Axitinib is effective and well tolerated in first-line mRCC with prolonged median PFS in all treatment arms compared to historical controls. Axitinib dose titration significantly improved ORR vs placebo. Clinical trial information: NCT00835978.

Assessment of the Fanconi anemia repair pathway as a predictor of clinical activity of pembrolizumab (PEM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Villalona-Calero ◽  
John Paul Diaz ◽  
Zuanel Diaz ◽  
Wenrui Duan ◽  
Eric Douglas Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

2555 Background: Given the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient tumors, we evaluated if homologous recombination repair deficiency associates with solid tumor response to ICI. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial (NCT03274661) of PEM in metastatic solid tumor patients progressing on standard of care and for whom PEM had no FDA approved indication. We evaluated a triple stain (FANCD2foci/DAPI/Ki67) immunofluorescence functional assay of the Fanconi Anemia pathway (FATSI) in treated patients’ archived tumors as a correlative biomarker. Patients with microsatellite unstable tumors were not eligible. The primary objective was objective response rate (iORR, CR+PR) by Immune Response Criteria, with the hypothesis that patients with FATSI negative tumors will have better clinical outcome. Secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), 6 months PFS and survival. PEM was given every 3 weeks and computed tomography scans were performed every 6 weeks. We utilized a two-stage phase II trial design to detect an iORR ≥ 20% in the whole population tested vs. the null hypothesis that the true iORR ≤5%. If ≥ 2 of the first 20 evaluable patients had an objective response the trial proceeded to full accrual of 39 evaluable patients. Outcomes were evaluated according to FATSI staining. Results: 42 patients (40 evaluable) (35F,7M; median age 62[36-83]) enrolled. Median # of prior regimens was 2[1-7]. Primary Dx included ovarian/fallopian (13), endometrial (10), colorectal (3), cervix (2), pancreatic(2), vaginal (2) and 1 each of various others. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Response evaluation showed 2 CR, 5 PR, 11 SD, 22 PD and 2 NE (iORR 18%). FATSI tumor analyses results are available in 34 patients; 25 FATSI positive, 9 negative. 2 PR, 8 SD, 14 PD, 1 NE occurred among the FATSI (+) (iORR 8%) and 2 CR, 2 PR, 2 SD, 3 PD among the FATSI (-) patients (iORR 44%). mPFS and 6m-PFS were 54 days and 12% (3/25) in FATSI (+), versus 248 days and 56% (5/9) in FATSI (-) patients; p = 0.017. Conclusions: PEM has meaningful antitumor activity in non MSI-high malignancies with no current FDA approved indications. Evaluation of FATSI as a biomarker supports a biomarker selected population approach. Clinical trial information: NCT03274661.

A randomized, open-label phase II study of nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI)-containing regimens versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS482-TPS482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Dean ◽  
Li-Tzong Chen ◽  
Ramesh K. Ramanathan ◽  
Sarah Blanchette ◽  
Bruce Belanger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

TPS482 Background: Two combination chemotherapy regimens have emerged as standard of care options for first-line treatment of mPAC: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), and nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine. Nal-IRI (MM-398) is a nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan. In a randomized phase 3 study (NAPOLI-1), of patients with mPAC who had been previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV demonstrated its safety and significant clinical activity, increasing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) relative to 5-FU/LV. The goal of this current study is to determine the preliminary safety and efficacy of nal-IRI+ + 5-FU/LV with or without oxaliplatin as compared to nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with mPAC. Methods: This open-label, phase 2 comparative study will be conducted in two parts. Part 1 is a safety run-in of a nal-IRI+5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin regimen. The safety run-in will enroll small cohorts of patients following a traditional 3 + 3 dose escalation design to confirm the target dose of oxaliplatin (n = ~6-18). The primary objective of Part 1 is the safety and tolerability of nal-IRI + 5FU/LV + oxaliplatin. Part 2 is a randomized, efficacy study of a nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin regimen (Arm 1), the nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV combination that previously demonstrated efficacy in the NAPOLI-1 trial (Arm 2), versus a nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine control arm (Arm 3) (n = ~156-168). The primary objective of Part 2 is to assess the efficacy of nal-IRI-containing regimens in first-line mPAC patients compared to nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine using the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks as the primary endpoint. Secondary of part 1 is a PK study and Part 2 secondary endpoints will include OS, PFS, objective response rate (per RECIST, v1.1), decrease in CA19-9 levels and quality of life assessments. Clinical trial information: NCT02551991.

scholarly journals Promising Immunotherapy in Metastatic Testicular Sex Cord Stromal Tumours After First-Line Chemotherapy

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingqing Shang ◽  
Chuanzhen Cao ◽  
Weixing Jiang ◽  
Hongzhe Shi ◽  
Xingang Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
First Line ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

BackgroundTesticular sex cord stromal tumours (TSCSTs) are rare, with few studies focusing on the metastatic TSCST prognosis. The value of treatments, including radical orchiectomy (RO) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), in preventing metastasis is controversial. Additionally, metastatic TSCSTs are resistant to chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in metastatic TSCSTs after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsWe retrospectively screened patients with testicular tumours undergoing testis surgery between January 2005 and January 2019. Patients with TSCSTs who had undergone testis-sparing surgery (TSS) or RO were identified. The malignant type was defined as metastasis confirmed by pathology. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were analysed.ResultsAmong the 494 testicular tumour patients who received TSS or RO, 11 (2.2%) patients with histologically proven TSCSTs were identified. At the last follow-up, 7 patients survived without tumours, and 4 patients developed metastasis and received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with 1 of them achieving an objective response. Their PFS times were 1.5, 2.2, 9.0, and 17.0 months, respectively. Two patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after developing chemotherapy resistance and achieved a partial response up to the last follow-up; one of them experienced Grade 1 adverse events, and the other experienced Grade 2 adverse events during immunotherapy. The median OS time of the 4 patients with metastatic TSCSTs was 32 months.ConclusionsTSCSTs are rare, and most are benign with a good prognosis. ICIs represent a promising option for improving clinical outcomes in metastatic TSCSTs.

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Ramucirumab in the Treatment of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hongqiong Yang ◽  
Yaojun Zhou ◽  
Liangzhi Wang ◽  
Tianyi Gu ◽  
Mengjia Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Five electronic databases were searched for eligible records. Outcomes were presented and analyzed according to the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and overall survival (OS) rate. Five records involving 2,024 participants were included in the study. The pooled analysis of OS and PFS were longer with ramucirumab (RAM) therapy than without RAM for OS (odds ratio OR = 0.90 , 95% confidence interval CI = 0.82 – 1.00 , p = 0.05 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.74 , 95 % CI = 0.57 – 0.96 , p = 0.02 ). Moreover, compared with the current first-line chemotherapy, the OS ( OR = 0.93 , 95 % CI = 0.83 – 1.04 , p = 0.19 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.82 , 95 % CI = 0.64 – 1.06 , p = 0.13 ) results were not significantly higher with RAM. The ORRs of the patients in the RAM therapy groups were significantly higher than those in the groups without RAM ( OR = 1.40 , 95 % CI = 1.14 – 1.73 , p = 0.001 ).

Phase II study of pembrolizumab-based therapy in previously treated extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: Results of Part B (pembrolizumab + chemotherapy).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4148-4148
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. Chan ◽  
Nitya Prabhakar Raj ◽  
Rahul Raj Aggarwal ◽  
Susan Calabrese ◽  
April DeMore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Large Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Type I ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Total N ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

4148 Background: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has not been established in extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-PDNECs). In small cell lung cancer, CPI therapy is approved for use in the first-line and salvage settings. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (PEM)-based therapy in biomarker-unselected patients (pts) with EP-PDNECs. PEM alone (Part A, N=14) was inactive (ASCO GI 2019; Abstr#363). We now report the results of Part B (PEM plus chemotherapy). Methods: We conducted an open label, multicenter, phase 2 study of PEM-based therapy in pts with EP-PDNECs, excluding Merkel cell carcinoma and well differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET), with disease progression on first-line systemic therapy. In Part B of this trial, patients were treated with PEM 200 mg IV every 3 week cycle plus dealers’ choice chemotherapy (chemo): weekly irinotecan (IRI, 125 mg/m2 day 1,8 of every 21 day cycle) or weekly paclitaxel (PAC, 80 mg/m2). After PEM/IRI safety lead-in (N=6), 16 additional pts (total N=22) were enrolled. This was based on a primary endpoint of objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 and a plan to test Ha ORR 31% vs H0 ORR 10% with 80% power at a type I error rate of 0.05. Secondary endpoints include safety, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Serial blood samples and baseline tumor biopsies were required in all pts. Results: Preliminary data from Part B are available. Of 22 pts enrolled, male/female 15/7; median age 57 years (range 34-75); ECOG PS 0/1: 10/12; 6 large cell, 8 small cell, 8 NOS. Primary sites of disease: GI 73%, GYN 5%, unknown 23%. Ki67 index (available for 18 pts) median 68% (range 30 to >95%). Chemo choice: 17 IRI (77%) and 5 PAC (23%). PEM/IRI was safe based on lead-in. Median number of cycles of therapy administered was 3 (range 0-13). Treatment-related Gr 3 or 4 AE occurred in 7 (32%) of 22 pts overall: 4 (18%) had at least one Gr 3 AE attributed to PEM (1 pt each with pain, ALT increase, or nausea; 2 with fatigue); 7 (32%) had at least one Gr 3/4 AE attributed to chemo (2 with fatigue, 2 with neutropenia; 1 each with pain, ALT increase, hyponatremia, diarrhea, nausea, and/or acute kidney injury). No grade 5 AE. ORR was 9%: PR in 2 pts (9%), SD 3 pts (14%), PD 13 pts (60%); 4 pts (18%) unevaluable (off study before first scheduled scan). Median PFS 2 mo. At last follow-up, 5 pts (23%) were alive with 1 pt still on treatment. Median OS 4 mo. Of 21 pts off treatment, 76% off for PD, 10% off for AE, 14% off for withdrawal of consent/other therapy. Conclusions: PEM + chemotherapy was not effective in this pretreated, biomarker-unselected population of EP-PDNECs arising in different organs. Biomarker studies are planned (Parts A/B). Clinical trial information: NCT03136055.

scholarly journals Ramucirumab in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Treatment-Naïve Advanced Gastric or GEJ Adenocarcinoma: Safety and Antitumor Activity from the Phase 1a/b JVDF Trial

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2985
Author(s):  
Ian Chau ◽  
Nicolas Penel ◽  
Andres O. Soriano ◽  
Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau ◽  
Jennifer Cultrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Combined Positive Score ◽  
Grade 3

Ramucirumab (anti-VEGFR2) plus pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) demonstrated promising antitumor activity and tolerability among patients with previously treated advanced cancers, supporting growing evidence that combination therapies modulating the tumor microenvironment may expand the spectrum of patients who respond to checkpoint inhibitors. Here we present the results of this combination in first-line patients with metastatic G/GEJ cancer. Twenty-eight patients (≥18 years) with no prior systemic chemotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting received ramucirumab (8 mg/kg days 1 and 8) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg day 1) every 3 weeks as part of JVDF phase 1a/b study. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Tumors were PD-L1-positive (combined positive score ≥ 1) in 19 and -negative in 6 patients. Eighteen patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, most commonly hypertension (14%) and elevated alanine/aspartate aminotransferase (11% each), with no grade 4 or 5 reported. The ORR was 25% (PD-L1-positive, 32%; PD-L1-negative, 17%) with duration of response not reached. PFS was 5.6 months (PD-L1-positive, 8.6 months; PD-L1-negative, 4.3 months), and OS 14.6 months (PD-L1-positive, 17.3 months; PD-L1-negative, 11.3 months). Acknowledging study design limitations, ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab had encouraging durable clinical activity with no unexpected toxicities in treatment-naïve biomarker-unselected metastatic G/GEJ cancer, and improved outcomes in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of first-line platinum/docetaxel with or without erlotinib (E) in patients (pts) with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6017-6017 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Nassib William ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Merrill S. Kies ◽  
Salmaan Ahmed ◽  
George R. Blumenschein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

6017 Background: In a single-arm, phase 2 study, we previously demonstrated that in pts with R/M HNSCC, cisplatin, docetaxel and E improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to historical data (Kim et al., ASCO 2006). Herein, we evaluated this regimen in a single center, randomized, phase 2 trial. Methods: Pts with R/M HNSCC, with a performance status (PS) 0-2, were randomized (1:1) to receive up to 6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (or carboplatin AUC 6) and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 every 21 days, plus placebo (P) vs. E 150 mg p.o. daily, followed by maintenance P or E until disease progression. The primary endpoint was PFS. With 120 pts, the study had 80% power to detect an improvement in median PFS from 3.0 to 4.9 months with a two-sided type I error rate of 0.1. Results: From 05/2010 to 07/2015, 120 pts were randomized to the P (N = 60) or E (N = 60) groups. All pts but one initiated treatment and were eligible for evaluation of the primary endpoint – 92 males; median age 62 years; 52 oropharynx, 40 oral cavity, 19 larynx, 8 hypopharynx cancer pts; 86 current/former smokers; 43 with recurrence within 6 months of completion of local treatment; 27 with prior exposure to EGFR inhibitors. Median PFS was 4.4 vs. 6.1 months for the P and E groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.95 months, p = 0.026). Response rates were 44% vs. 56% for P vs. E (p = 0.21). Median overall survival (OS) for P- and E-treated pts was 13.7 vs. 17.0 months (HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.43-1.04, p = 0.07). Benefits from E on PFS and OS were more pronounced in pts with oropharyngeal tumors (p≤0.05 for interaction). In the E group, first-cycle rash grade 2-4 (34% pts) was associated with longer OS (HR = 0.40, p = 0.02). E-treated pts experienced a higher incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events (33.9 vs. 53.3%), including diarrhea (3 vs.17%), dehydration (5 vs. 15%), nausea (5 vs. 14%), rash (0 vs. 12%). Conclusions: This study met its primary endpoint. Addition of E to first-line platinum/docetaxel improved PFS and OS. This regimen may warrant further evaluation in randomized, phase 3 trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01064479.

Phase 1/2 study of safety/efficacy using trabectedin, ipilimumab, and nivolumab as first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS46-TPS46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlinda Maria Gordon ◽  
Victoria S. Chua-Alcala ◽  
Katherine Kim ◽  
William W. Tseng ◽  
Doris M Quon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Number Of Patients

TPS46 Background: Sarcoma cells are most immunogenic at the onset of cancer when the immune system can recognize and destroy them. Hence, immune checkpoint inhibitors would be most effective when given as first line therapy. Objectives: (1) To investigate the maximum tolerated dose of trabectedin, an alkylating agent, when given sequentially with ipilimumab, a CTLA4 inhibitor, and nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in advanced STS, (2) To investigate the objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) , and (3) To correlate PFS with PD-L1 and other biomarker expression in patients’ tumors. Methods: Forty patients ≥18 years of age with advanced STS will be enrolled. This is a phase 1/2 study using a defined dose of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg i.v. q 12 weeks), nivolumab (3 mg/kg i.v. q 2 weeks), and escalating doses of trabectedin (1.0, 1.3, 1.5 mg/m2 i.v. q 3 weeks). I. Dose Escalation Phase 1 (previously treated patients): The study will employ the standard “cohort of three” design. The maximum tolerated dose is defined as the highest safely tolerated dose, where not more than one patient experienced DLT, with the next higher dose level having at least two patients who experienced DLT. II. Expansion Phase 2 (previously untreated patients): An additional 22-28 patients will receive trabectedin at the MTD and defined doses of ipilimumab and nivolumab to assess overall safety and potential efficacy in a greater number of patients. Patients may continue treatment until significant disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Statistical Considerations: NIH CTCAE v4.03 and RECIST v1.1 will be used. Categorical variables will be summarized by the n and percent in each category. Point estimates for efficacy endpoint incidences will be accompanied by a 2-sided 95% exact binomial CI. Time to event endpoints will be summarized descriptively using the KM method. The analyses of all study objectives will be descriptive and hypothesis generating, for planning Phase 2/3 studies. Clinical trial information: NCT 03138161.

Efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid (S/R) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 66-66
Author(s):  
Ziad Bakouny ◽  
Sarah Abou Alaiwi ◽  
Amin Nassar ◽  
John A. Steinharter ◽  
Xiao X. Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Logistic Regressions

66 Background: Patients with mRCC with S/R components tend to have a poor prognosis with few therapeutic options available. Recent data suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies may be especially effective for these patients. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ICI-based therapies in patients with S/R mRCC. Methods: We retrospectively assessed objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) & overall survival (OS) of patients with S/R mRCC treated at our institution with first-line ICI-based therapies and compared these to those of patients treated with first-line non-ICI-based therapies. Univariable and multivariable (adjusted for IMDC group) Cox and logistic regressions were performed. Results: 92 patients (70 S, 9 R, and 13 S&R) patients were included, of which 74 with a clear-cell component. For all patients (regardless of therapy), 74 (80.4%) patients experienced a PFS event (progression or death) and 52 (56.5%) died at 25.3 months (m) median follow-up. Overall median PFS was 5.3 m (95% CI= 3.4–7.2) and 24 m OS rate was 39.5% (27.4–51.7). Out of 78 patients in whom response was evaluable, ORR was 30.8% (20.4–41.2). Patients treated with ICI-based therapies had significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS on multivariable analysis (table). Conclusions: mRCC patients with S/R components have significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS with first-line ICI-based compared to non-ICI-based therapies. These data support the use of ICI-based therapies for patients with S/R mRCC. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document