Survival and cost associated with chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy among resected pancreas cancer patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 351-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nivethan Vela ◽  
Laura Davis ◽  
Stephanie Y Cheng ◽  
Ahmed Hammad ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
...  

351 Background: Pancreas cancer is expensive to treat, and the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and chemoradiation (CRT) following resection is debated. We compared both survival and healthcare costs by adjuvant therapy after curative-intent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreas adenocarcinoma (PC). Methods: All patients with resected PC in Ontario, Canada diagnosed 2004 to 2014 were identified and linked to administrative healthcare databases. Stratified Kaplan—Meier survival curves and log-rank test compared survival across treatment groups. Costs were assessed from the perspective of Ontario’s single-payer healthcare system and compared between CT and CRT. A one-year time horizon was used from the date of surgery. Results: 677 PC patients met all inclusion/exclusion criteria and underwent curative-intent PD with 77% receiving CT and 23% CRT. Median survival after resection was 21.7 and 18.9 months for CT and CRT groups, respectively. Patients receiving CRT were less likely to have high comorbidity burden (ADG ≥ 10), but were similar across other demographics. CRT patients were more likely to have margin positive disease. In a subgroup of 489 patients with margin negative disease, median survival in the node negative patients (n = 156) was 28.0 months for CRT and 24.7 months for CT (p = 0.8297, logrank). Median survival in the node positive patients (n = 333) was 20.6 months and 21.8 months for the CRT and CT patients, respectively (p = 0.9856, logrank). The median total one-year cost for CT was $52,575 (USD); CRT was $68,216 (Table 1). Conclusions: Patients who underwent adjuvant CT and CRT after PD for PC had similar overall survival, but healthcare expenditures were significantly higher in the CRT group. [Table: see text]

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15164-15164
Author(s):  
A. Badari Badari ◽  
M. Javle ◽  
Y. Pak ◽  
T. Khoury ◽  
N. Ramnath ◽  
...  

15164 Background: ABSTRACT Introduction: . The aim of this study was to analyze demographic, therapy, tumor and clinical outcomes of all cases of neuroendocrine cancer at a tertiary cancer and determine the the markers that may better correlate with outcomes than histologic grade. Patients and Methods: With IRB approval , 126 charts with a diagnosis of neuroendocrine carcinoma were identified between 1–1-1999 and 1–1-2004. Ninety-five cases were selected on the basis of complete availability of baseline, therapy and at least one time point of followup data. Patient demographics, therapy details, TNM stage, tumor marker and survival data were collected. Tumors were graded as well, moderate and poorly differentiated and by site of origin. We attempted to correlate the outcome with NCAM(neural cell adhesion molecule-CD56) status, which is a homophylic binding glycoprotein to have a role in cell adhesion. Descriptive statistics and frequency tables were used to describe the data and kaplan meier methods were used to estimate the median survival. Results: There were 28 patients with lung primaries, 25 had primaries in the gut (extra pancreatic),11 had pancreatic primaries, 31 cases had unknown primaries or primaries at sites other than the lungs or the gastrointestinal tract. The estimated median survival for the whole sample was 34 months.(95% C I :20,54) and the 2 year survival rate was 55.3 %.The estimated median survival for CD56 positive group was 11 months(95% C.I :3,38) and that for CD 56 unknown group was 36(95% C .I :20,n/a). A significant difference in survival between CD56 positive group and CD56 unknown was found,based on log-rank test>(P=.02). Baseline characteristics were as follows: M:F 48:47; 19 were well differentiated, 4 were moderately differentiated and 36 of 95 tumors were poorly differentiated, the differentiation was not known in 36 cases. Surgery with curative intent was done in 52 of the patients(54.74%) and 52 received (54.74%)t chemotherapy, 4 patients(4.2%) received chemoembolization and 2 patients(2.1%) received local ablative treatments. Conclusion: These data summarize our instutions experience with this rare malignancy. In our data survival was as expected in the literature and further investigation of the CD 56 status of all patients is underway. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Elsayeh ◽  
Alexander Brown ◽  
Srinivas Chintapatla ◽  
Michael Lim

Abstract Introduction PC-CRC is an important benchmark of endoscopy performance and results in a delayed diagnosis of cancer for patients. Little is known of the impact of PC-CRC on survival; we chose to study this in a cohort of patient at our institution. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on all PC-CRC from 2015 to 2020. Electronic endoscopic records and case-note review were performed to identify cases. Suitable patients underwent surgery in the absence of widespread metastatic disease after MDT discussion. Survival data were recorded, Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed; the log rank test was used to compare groups, a p-value of < 0.05 was deemed significant. Results There were 32 (24 male) patients with a PC-CRC out of 1207 patients during this interval. The 5-year PC-CRC rate was 2.6%. Median age was 72 (IQR 63-79) years. 10 patients had metastatic disease, 9 with large volume disease that was not resectable. All 9 were palliated with a median survival of 3 (IQR 2-23) months. Twenty-three had potentially curative disease and all underwent surgery. On follow-up a further seven patients died with recurrent disease at a median of 19 (IQR 13-35) months. Sixteen are alive with a median survival of 38 (IQR 27-52) months. The survival curves for the 3 groups are significantly divergent, p-value <0.001. Conclusion The impact of PC-CRC on individual patients is significant as a quarter die within 3 months of diagnosis. A further quarter die within 24 months despite a potentially curative operation due to metastatic disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6061-6061
Author(s):  
Pau Guillen Sentis ◽  
Carmen Castillo Manzano ◽  
Beatriz Quirós ◽  
Francisca Morey Cortes ◽  
Sara Tous ◽  
...  

6061 Background: Treatment (ttm) of cancer patients (pts) was compromised during the first wave of COVID19 pandemic due to collapse of healthcare systems. Standard of care (SOC) for LA-HNSCC pts had to be adapted as operating rooms were temporarily unavailable, and to reduce risk of COVID19 exposure. The IMPACCT study evaluated the outcome of LA-HNSCC pts treated at the Catalan Institute of Oncology during the first semester of 2020 and compared it to a control cohort previously treated in the same institution. Methods: Retrospective single institution analysis of two consecutively-treated cohorts of newly-diagnosed HNSCC pts: from January to June of 2020 (CT20) and same period of 2018 and 2019 (CT18-19). Pt demographics and disease characteristics were obtained from our in-site prospective database. Ttm modifications from SOC as per COVID19-contingency protocol in CT20 for LA-HNSCC were collected. Chi-squared was used to compare variables and ttm response between cohorts. One-year recurrence-free survival (1yRFS) and overall survival (1yOS) of LA-HNSCC pts were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Log-rank test. Results: A total of 306 pts were included: CT20=99; CT18-19=207. Baseline characteristics were balanced between cohorts (Table1). In pts treated with conservative ttm (non-surgical approach), persistence disease was higher in CT20 vs CT18-19 (26 vs. 10% p=0.02). Median follow-up of CT20 and CT18-19 was 6.8 months (IQR 5.1-7.9) and 12.3 (6.7-18.4), respectively. A trend towards lower 1yRFS and 1yOS was observed in CT20 vs CT18-19 (72 vs 83% p=0.06; 80 vs 84% p=0.07), respectively. Within CT20, 37 pts (37%) had one or more ttm modifications: switch from surgery to conservative ttm (n=13); altered radiotherapy fractionation (n=14); reduced cisplatin cumulative dose to 200mg/m2 (n=19); no adjuvant ttm (n=1). Pts who received modified ttm had no differences in 1yRFS vs those who did not (80 vs 66% p=0.31), but higher 1yOS was observed (97 vs 67% p<0.01). When stratified by stage, 1yOS difference remained significant in stage III/IVA (100 vs 61% p<0.01) but not in I/II (100 vs 77% p=0.28) or IVB (67 vs 50% p=0.54). Conclusions: COVID19 pandemic had a negative impact on ttm outcomes and survival in LA-HNSCC pts when compared to our historical cohort. Ttm modifications based on COVID19-contingency protocol did not compromise ttm efficacy in terms of RFS and was associated with better OS in Stage III/IVA.[Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. E36-E42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koki Kawanishi ◽  
Jun Kato ◽  
Tetsuhiro Kakimoto ◽  
Takeshi Hara ◽  
Takeichi Yoshida ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Re-commencement of bleeding (rebleeding) of colonic diverticula after endoscopic hemostasis is a clinical problem. This study aimed to examine whether endoscopic visibility of colonic diverticular bleeding affects the risk of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective review of endoscopic images and medical charts of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding who underwent endoscopic hemostasis. Endoscopic visibility was classified into two types according to visibility of the source of bleeding; source invisibility due to bleeding or attached hematin (type 1), or endoscopically visible responsive vessels (type 2). Rebleeding rates within one year after initial hemostasis were examined. Results Of 93 patients with successful endoscopic hemostasis, 38 (41 %) showed type 1 visibility, while the remaining presented type 2. All patients received hemostasis with clipping, rebleeding developed in 20 patients (22 %). Type 1 visibility was more likely to be observed in patients with rebleeding (65 % vs. 34 %, P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed that after endoscopic hemostasis, type 1 visibility (invisible source) was the only independent risk factor for colonic diverticular rebleeding (odds ratio, 3.05; 95 % confidence interval, 1.03 – 9.59, P = 0.044). Kaplan-Meier curve showed the cumulative incidence of rebleeding was significantly higher in patients with type 1 visibility than those with type 2 visibility (P = 0.0033, log-rank test) Conclusion Hemostasis by clipping for colonic diverticular bleeding without definite observation of the source of bleeding may not be sufficiently effective. Other hemostatic methods, including band ligation, should be considered when the source of bleeding is unclear.


2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (3) ◽  
pp. 531-540
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Wick ◽  
Andriy Krendyukov ◽  
Klaus Junge ◽  
Thomas Höger ◽  
Harald Fricke

Abstract Purpose Glioblastoma is an aggressive malignant cancer of the central nervous system, with disease progression associated with deterioration of neurocognitive function and quality of life (QoL). As such, maintenance of QoL is an important treatment goal. This analysis presents time to deterioration (TtD) of QoL in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving Asunercept plus reirradiation (rRT) or rRT alone. Methods Data from patients with a baseline and ≥ 1 post-baseline QoL assessment were included in this analysis. TtD was defined as the time from randomisation to the first deterioration in the EORTC QLQ-C15, PAL EORTC QLQ-BN20 and Medical Research Council (MRC)-Neurological status. Deterioration was defined as a decrease of ≥ 10 points from baseline in the QLQ-C15 PAL overall QoL and functioning scales, an increase of ≥ 10 points from baseline in the QLQ-C15 PAL fatigue scale and the QLQ-BN20 total sum of score, and a rating of “Worse” in the MRC-Neurological status. Patients without a deterioration were censored at the last QoL assessment. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to describe TtD and treatment groups (Asunercept + rRT or rRT alone) were compared using the log-rank test. Results Treatment with Asunercept + rRT was associated with significant improvement of TtD compared with rRT alone for QLQ-CL15 PAL overall QoL and physical functioning, and MRC Neurological Status (p ≤ 0.05). In the Asunercept + rRT group, QoL was maintained beyond progresison of disease (PoD). Conclusion Treatment with Asunercept plus rRT significantly prolongs TtD and maintains QoL versus rRT alone in recurrent glioblastoma patients.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2726-2726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehul Patel ◽  
Taimur Sher ◽  
Sikander Ailawadhi ◽  
Terry Mashtare ◽  
Wei Tan ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Impaired renal function in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with adverse clinical outcome. Historically, the renal status is reported as serum creatinine (SCr) only. Introduction of novel agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) in MM therapeutics has improved clinical responses and overall survival. An important question that remains largely unanswered is if these agents deliver equal benefit to patients with impaired renal function. Thus we investigate the overall benefit of novel agents in MM patients with renal impairment. METHODS: All MM patients treated between January 2000 and December 2007 at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) where included in this analysis. Extent of disease was assessed based on the Durie-Salmon staging system. We determined glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to asses renal function more accurately. GFR was calculated utilizing the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. Patient cohorts were defined based on severity of renal impairment per the National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKD-KDOQI) guidelines based on the GFR value into normal &gt;90, mild 60–89, moderate 30–59, severe 15–29 and kidney failure &lt;15 ml/min/1.73m^2. Because there were only few patients in the last two groups (GFR of 15–29 =11 and GFR &lt;15 =13), they were combined into a single cohort of severe renal impairment (GFR &lt;30=24). We also defined patient cohorts based on a previously reported classification in MM wherein patients were divided based on severity of renal impairment into normal &gt;80, mild 50–80, moderate 30–49 and severe &lt;30 ml/min/1.73m^2. Survival curves and median survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Survival differences were calculated using a log-rank test. A 0.05 nominal significance level was used in all statistical testing. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients (M=88, F=87) with a median age 60 years (range 34–88) were evaluated. Majority of patients had stage III disease (64%), 57.1% had IgG myeloma and lytic bone disease present in 67.4% of the patients. Median values for SCr, serum calcium, blood urea nitrogen, serum albumin and hemoglobin were 1.1mg/dl (range-0.5–10.3), 9.5 mg/dl (range-7.5- 7.2), 18 mg/dl (range-5–107), 4.0 g/dl (range-2.2–5.5) and 11.5 g/dl (range-6.8–17.1) respectively. SCr &gt;2 mg/dl was seen in only 16% patients and 41.1% patients had GFR in the range of 60–89 ml/min/1.73m^2. Patients received an average of 2 treatments. Use of at least one of the novel agent was seen in 86.3% patients (Immunomodulatory drugs =130, Bortezomib = 97, Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin =65). Median survival for patients with SCr &lt;2.0 and SCr&gt;2.0 was 67.4 months (45.4 – 92.7 months) and 38.4 months (15.3 months – not reached) respectively. Median survival for patients with normal GFR and mild, moderate and severe renal impairment based on the NKD-KDOQI guidelines was 76.1 months (37.5 months – not reached), 55.32 months (34.8 months – not reached), 67.4 months (45.4 months – not reached) and 24.9 months (15.3 months – not reached) respectively. Median survival for patient cohorts defined based on a previously reported classification in MM was similar to that seen with the NKD-KDOQI classification. We noted no significant survival advantage of normal renal function over renally impaired patients (Figure 1 & 2) despite evaluations based either by using the traditional approach of SCr (p=0.15; log rank test) or by more sensitive renal function assessment by GFR (p=0.21; log rank test). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in MM patients the previously reported and commonly perceived adverse prognosis imparted by impaired renal function can no longer be validated and that routine incorporation of novel agents has overcome this adverse prognosis. These findings are consistent with the impact of novel agents reported in context with MM with aggressive molecular profiles. Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier curve for survival by serum creatinine (SCr) Figure 1:. Kaplan-Meier curve for survival by serum creatinine (SCr)


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17088-e17088
Author(s):  
Marco Stellato ◽  
Daniele Santini ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Elena Verzoni ◽  
Chiara Casadei ◽  
...  

e17088 Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) treatment demonstrated to improve Overall Survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The prognostic impact of previous citoreductive nephrectomy (CN) and radical nephrectomy with curative intent in patients (pts) treated with IO is not well defined. Methods: 229 eligible pts, with a least one radiological assessment of response according to the RECIST 1:1 criteria, were retrospectively collected from 16 Italian referral centers. Baseline characteristics, outcome data including progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were collected. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed to compare PFS and OS between groups. Results: 153(66.8%) pts received IO as second line, 61(26.6%) as third line and 15(6.6%) pts as further line. 54 pts (23.6%) were good risk, 144(62.9%) were intermediate and 31(13.5%) were poor risk according to IMDC score. 189(82.5%) pts underwent nephrectomy (of them 72(32.4%) pts had synchronous metastatic disease and underwent CN), while 40(17.4%) pts did not. Nephrectomy was performed before IO treatment. ECOG PS, at the beginning of IO, was 0 for 167 pts (72.9%), the other 62 (27.1%) had ECOG PS 1 or 2. At a median follow up time of 17.5 months (mo), 13 (5.7%) pts are still in treatment while 216 (94.3%) experienced progression. 81 (35.3%) pts were treated after IO progression with mTOR and VEGFR inhibitors. 63 (27.5%) pts continued IO beyond progression. G3-G4 iAE were reported in 46 pts (20%). Median IO-PFS was 4.5 months in pts who did not undergo nephrectomy and 2.9 mo in pts who did (HR log rank 0.713, 95%CI 0.4788 to 1.063; p= 0.0582). Median IO-OS was 18.4 mo in pts who underwent nephrectomy and 10.3 mo in pts who did not (HR log rank 1.915, 95%CI 1.118 to 3.281; p= 0.0024). The difference in OS was irrespective of the IMDC criteria and the lines of treatment. Conclusions: In our real world experience, in mRCC pts treated with IO, previous nephrectomy was associated with a better outcome in terms of OS with all the limitations of a retrospective collection.


Author(s):  
Fatemeh Gohari-Ensaf ◽  
Zeinab Berangi ◽  
Mohamad Abbasi ◽  
Ghodratollah Roshanaei

Introduction: Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of death in the world. Despite the recent advances in controlling and treating the disease, the survival rate of this cancer is relatively low. Various factors can affect the survival of the patients with gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the survival rates and the effective factors in the patients with gastric cancer. Methods: The study population included all the patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in Hamadan Province who were referred to Hamadan Imam Khomeini Specialized Clinic between 2004 to 2017. Patients were followed up by periodical referrals and/or telephone contact. The survival rate of the patients was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and effective survival factors with Cox proportional regression. Data were analyzed using SPSS 23 software at a significance level of 0.05. Results: Out of the 350 patients with gastric cancer, 74.3% were male and 25.7% were female. One-year, three-year and five-year survival rates were 67%, 36% and 27%, respectively. The log -rank test showed that age, type of tumor, stage of disease, type of Surgery and metastasis of the disease were effective on the survival of patients. In Cox's multivariate analysis, the only age variables at the time of diagnosis and chemotherapy were survival variables. (P<0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study showed that age variable is a strong factor in survival, so it is essential to diagnose the disease at the early age and early stages of the disease using a screening program.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3552-3552
Author(s):  
Fernando Tricta ◽  
Mariagrazia Felisi ◽  
Oscar Della Pasqua ◽  
Amal El-Beshlawy ◽  
Hoda Hassab ◽  
...  

Introduction: Agranulocytosis/severe neutropenia is an established adverse event during deferiprone (DFP) use. Less is known about milder episodes, which are frequently transient despite continuous deferiprone use. To provide further insight into this topic, we compared the incidence of neutropenia during DFP or deferasirox (DFX) treatment in the randomized Deferiprone Evaluation in Paediatrics (DEEP-2) trial, where blood neutrophil count was regularly monitored in patients randomized to be treated with DFP or DFX. Methods: DEEP-2 was a multicenter, randomized, 12-month, open-label trial comparing DFP vs DFX in pediatric (&lt;18 years old) patients with transfusion-dependent hemoglobinopathies. 390 patients from 22 centers in 7 countries were randomized (1:1 DFP:DFX) and received at least one dose of the study medication (193 on DFP and 197 on DFX). Neutrophil count was regularly assessed every 7 +/-7 days in all patients. Neutrophil counts &lt;500/mm3 were classified as agranulocytosis/severe neutropenia, 500 - &lt;1,000 /mm3 as moderate neutropenia, and 1,000 - &lt;1,500 /mm3 as mild neutropenia. The incidence of neutrophil counts below the threshold of neutropenia (1,500/mm3) and the rate of reported episodes of neutropenia as identified by the treating physician were compared between the two treatments. An ANOVA model was used to compare the time to neutropenia and time for its resolution between the two treatment groups. To compare the cumulative hazard curves was used the Kaplan-Meier log rank test. Results: 3579 and 4027 neutrophil counts were available for DFP- and DFX-treated patients, respectively. 47 (1.3%) of the total counts in 24 (12.4%) of the 193 DFP-treated patients versus 48 (1.2%) of the total counts in 27 (13.7%) of the 197 DFX-treated patients were below 1,500/mm3. Of these, 28 cases in 23 DFP-treated patients and 15 cases in 11 DFX-treated patients were reported by the treating physician as neutropenia, corresponding to a global incidence rate 11.9% for DFP and 5.6% for DFX (p=0.081, Chi-Square test). 23 (82.1%) of the 28 episodes of neutropenia during DFP use were considered drug related vs 2 (13.3%) of the 15 episodes during DFX use (p-value &lt; 0.001, Fisher Exact test) (table 1). The mean (SD) treatment duration with either DFP or DFX prior to diagnosis of mild or moderated neutropenia was 127 (96.1) days and 101 (85.7) respectively. All those episodes, except for 2, resolved within a mean time of 13 days (1 - 42 days) in DFP-treated patients and 18 days (6 - 46 days) in DFX-treated patients. The 2 cases where neutropenia did not resolve were diagnosed as constitutional neutropenia and bone marrow suppression. There was no significant difference in those results between the two treatment groups as assessed by one-way ANOVA(p = 0.379), Log-Rank test (p = 0.065) or cumulative-hazard and Kaplan-Meier. During the study 3 events of agranulocytosis occurred, all in patients treated with DFP and not included in the present analysis. All 3 episodes resolved. Conclusion: Data from the largest randomized trial of oral chelators in transfusion-dependent pediatric patients provide evidence that, a drop in the neutrophil count below the threshold for mild neutropenia is very common (&gt;10% of patients) for both DFP and DFX treated patients. All episodes of neutropenia, except for 2 with specific etiology, resolved, irrespective of their severity and of chelator used. A causal relationship of neutropenia to chelator use varied based on the chelator; the majority of events observed during DFP use were assessed by the clinician as drug related, whereas the majority of events observed during DFX use were assessed unrelated to its use. These data indicate that while agranulocytosis rate in DFP patients is not changed from previous reports, moderate/mild neutropenia represent discrete events in patients undergoing oral iron chelation therapy. Disclosures Tricta: ApoPharma: Employment. Della Pasqua:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Kattamis:Ionis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ViFOR: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vertex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apopharma: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Reggiardo:CVBF: Consultancy. Spino:ApoPharma: Employment. Tsang:Apotex Inc.: Employment.


ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. e000929
Author(s):  
Susana Roselló ◽  
Claudio Pizzo ◽  
Marisol Huerta ◽  
Elena Muñoz ◽  
Roberto Aliaga ◽  
...  

IntroductionPancreatic cancer (PC), even in the absence of metastatic disease, has a dismal prognosis. One-third of them are borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced unresectable PC (LAUPC) at diagnosis. There are limited prospective data supporting the best approach on these tumours. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) is being increasingly used in this setting.MethodsThis is a retrospective series of consecutive patients staged as BRPC or LAUPC after discussion in the multidisciplinary board (MDB) at an academic centre. All received neoadjuvant ChT, followed by chemoradiation (ChRT) in some cases, and those achieving enough downstaging had a curative-intent surgery. Descriptive data about patient’s characteristics, neoadjuvant treatments, toxicities, curative resections, postoperative complications, pathology reports and adjuvant treatment were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.ResultsBetween August 2011 and July 2019, 49 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and all of them received neoadjuvant ChT. Fluorouracil+folinic acid, irinotecan and oxaliplatin was the most frequently used scheme (77%). The most prevalent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (26.5%), neurotoxicity (12.2%), diarrhoea (8.2%) and nausea (8.2%). 18 patients (36.7%) received ChRT thereafter. In total, 22 patients (44,9%) became potentially resectable and 19 of them had an R0 or R1 pancreatic resection. One was found to be unresectable at surgery and two refused surgery. A vascular resection was required in 7 (35%). No postoperative deaths were observed. Postoperative ChT was given to 12 (66.7%) of resected patients. Median OS of the whole cohort was 24,9 months (95% CI 14.1 to 35.7), with 30.6 months for resected and 13.1 months for non-resected patients, respectively (p<0.001).ConclusionA neoadjuvant approach in BRPC and LAUPC was well tolerated and allowed a curative resection in 38.8% of them with a potential improvement on OS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document