Association between neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) and efficacy outcomes in the JAVELIN Renal 101 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4549-4549
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Tucker ◽  
Martin H Voss ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Mehmet Asim Bilen ◽  
Marc-Oliver Grimm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Binary Variable ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cutoff Date ◽  
Therapy Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

4549 Background: Baseline NER has been reported to be associated with outcomes of immuno-oncology based combination treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report outcomes by baseline NER of patients with aRCC in the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial who received avelumab + axitinib (A + Ax) or sunitinib (S). Methods: We calculated the median NER (mNER) for patients in the A + Ax and the S arms at the data cutoff (April 20, 2020) for the 3rd interim analysis (IA3). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response (OR) by NER are reported. Multivariate Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS were also conducted. Results: At the IA3 cutoff date, the mNERs for the A + Ax arm (n = 383) and S arm (n = 396) were 29.2 and 27.0, respectively. OR, PFS and OS for both arms are summarized in the table below. Better observed treatment outcomes in OR (63.9% vs 55.2%) and median PFS (15.5 vs, 11.1 months) were observed for patients with a NER < median vs. NER ≥ median in the A + Ax arm, while there were not major differences in outcome based on NER in the S arm. The stratified hazard ratio (HR) for PFS in patients with a NER < median compared with those with a NER ≥ median in the A + Ax arm was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.630-1.035) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.728-1.181) in the S arm. Patients with a NER < median had improved OS compared with those with a NER ≥ median in the A + Ax arm (stratified HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.481-0.940) and the S arm (stratified HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.424-0.779). Multivariate analysis showed that a low NER was associated with longer PFS and OS by treating baseline NER as either a continuous variable or a binary variable (dichotomized by median). Conclusions: Baseline NER may be predictive of OR and PFS in aRCC patients treated with A + Ax, and prognostic for overall survival regardless of therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006. [Table: see text]

Association of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with efficacy from JAVELIN Renal 101.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5061-5061
Author(s):  
Mehmet Asim Bilen ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
James M. G. Larkin ◽  
John B. A. G. Haanen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

5061 Background: The phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006) in treatment-naive patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56, 0.84; P < 0.001) and higher objective response rate (ORR; 51.4% vs 25.7%) with avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib (Motzer RJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1103-15). NLR has emerged as a potential prognostic biomarker in aRCC; elevated NLR is associated with poorer prognosis. Here, we describe the association of NLR with the efficacy of avelumab + axitinib from JAVELIN Renal 101. Methods: We examined baseline NLR and its association with efficacy outcomes. PFS, best overall response (per blinded independent central review using RECIST 1.1), and overall survival (OS) data from the avelumab + axitinib arm from the first interim analysis of JAVELIN Renal 101 were analyzed (data cutoff, June 20, 2018). Multivariate Cox regression analyses of PFS and OS were also conducted. Results: In the avelumab + axitinib arm, patients with < median NLR (N = 217) had longer observed PFS (stratified HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.634, 1.153) and longer observed OS (stratified HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.300, 0.871) than patients with ≥ median NLR (N = 217). The ORR was 57.1% in patients with < median NLR vs 47.5% in patients with ≥ median NLR, with complete response in 5.5% vs 1.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that low NLR was associated with longer PFS and OS by treating baseline NLR as either a continuous variable or a binary variable (dichotomized by median). Conclusions: Low NLR was associated with better observed treatment outcomes in patients with aRCC who received avelumab + axitinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006 .

Potential impact of prior high-dose IL-2 on the outcomes of sunitinib (Su) treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 494-494
Author(s):  
Eli Rosenbaum ◽  
Maya Gottfried ◽  
Hans J. Hammers ◽  
Mario A. Eisenberger ◽  
Michael Anthony Carducci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival

494 Background: Targeted txs are the tx of choice in most mRCC pts. However, HDIL2 which may produce durable responses in a small percentage of cases, is still an option in carefully selected pts. While the effect of prior HDIL2 on the outcome of targeted txs in mRCC pts is poorly defined, a recent single center report (Birkhäuser FD, Cancer J 2013) revealed an improved disease-specific survival in pts treated with prior HDIL2. We aimed to study the effect of prior HDIL2 tx on outcome of mRCC pts treated with sunitinib. Methods: Records from 302 mRCC pts treated with Su from 2004 to 2013 in 9 centers across 2 countries were retrospectively reviewed. We compared the response rate, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), between post HDIL2 pts (n=27) and individually matched tx naïve pts (n=27). Progression free survival and overall survival were determined by Cox regression. Results: All pts had prior nephrectomy and clear cell histology. The groups were matched by age (median 61), gender (male 74%), Heng risk (favorable 37%, intermediate 59%, poor 4%), sunitinib induced hypertension (67%), sunitinib dose reduction/treatment interruption (41%), smoking status (active 7%), use of angiotensin system inhibitors (41%), the presence of more than one metastases site (96%), and pre-tx neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (> 3 in 22%). Furthermore, they were balanced regarding the presence of lung (68%), liver (31%), and bone (43%) metastases, and the use of bisphosphonates (32%). In prior HDIL2 versus tx naïve pts, objective response was partial response/stable disease 89% (n=24) versus 74% (n=20), and progressive disease at first imaging evaluation within the first 3 months (mos) 11% (n=3) versus 26% (n=7) (p=0.29, OR 2.4). Median progression free survival was 21 versus 12 mos (HR 2.3, p=0.005), and median overall survival 25 versus 20 mos (HR 2.2, p=0.013). Conclusions: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with sunitinib, prior high dose IL-2 therapy may improve the outcome.

Comparison between the outcome of metastatic RCC patients treated with sunitinib as part of clinical trials and matched nonparticipants receiving sutent as standard therapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15597-e15597
Author(s):  
Raanan Berger ◽  
Maya Ish-Shalom ◽  
Natalie Maimon ◽  
Maya Gottfried ◽  
Roberto Pili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Clinical Trial Participation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Trial Participants

e15597 Background: Several studies have suggested the existence of a “trial effect”, in which for a given treatment, participation in a clinical trial is associated with a better outcome of cancer patients. The VEGFR inhibitor sunitinib is a standard treatment for mRCC. The effect of clinical trial participation on the outcome of sunitinib treatment in mRCC is poorly defined. Aims: To study the effect of clinical trial participation on outcome of mRCC patients treated with sunitinib. Methods: Records from 275 mRCC patients treated with sunitinib from 2004 to 2012 in 7 centers across 2 countries were reviewed. We compared the response rate, progression free survival, and overall survival, between clinical trial participants (n=49) and a matched cohort of non participants (n=49) who who received standard therapy. Each patient participating in a clinical trial was individually matched with a non participant by clinicopathologic factors. Progression free survival and overall survival were determined by Cox regression. Results: The groups were matched by age (median 64), gender (male 67%), Heng risk (favorable 24%, intermediate 60%, poor 16%), ECOG performance status (0-1 92%), prior nephrectomy (92%), renal cell carcinoma histology (clear cell 80%), sunitinib induced hypertension (56%), and sunitinib dose reduction/treatment interruption (41%). In clinical trial participants versus non participants, objective response was partial response/stable disease 80% (n=39) versus 73% (n=36), and progressive disease at first imaging evaluation within the first 3 months (mos) 20% (n=10) versus 27% (n=13) (p=0.63, OR 1.2). Median progression free survival was 10 versus 11 mos (HR=0.96, p=0.84), and median overall survival 23 versus 24 mos (HR=0.97, p=0.89). Conclusions: In mRCC patient treated with sunitinib, the outcome of clinical trial participants was similar to matched non participants who received standard therapy.

scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab combined with or without docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Jun Nie ◽  
Ling Dai ◽  
Weiheng Hu ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Doublet Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Doublet

Abstract Background The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and chemotherapy has been clinically confirmed to be beneficial as the first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. This study aimed to assess the effect of nivolumab + docetaxel versus nivolumab monotherapy in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods The efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab + docetaxel combination therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy were compared in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results Between November 2017 and December 2019, 77 patients were included in this study, with 58 patients in the nivolumab group and 19 in the nivolumab + docetaxel group. The median follow-up was 18 months, and the PFS was 8 months for patients receiving nivolumab + docetaxel and 2 months for those receiving nivolumab alone (p = 0.001), respectively. Nivolumab + docetaxel showed superior OS compared with nivolumab, with the median OS unreached versus 7 months (p = 0.011). Among patients without EGFR/ALK variation, compared to nivolumab monotherapy, nivolumab + docetaxel showed better PFS (p = 0.04) and OS (p  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) between the two groups (p = 0.253). Conclusions The combination of nivolumab and docetaxel demonstrated a meaningful improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival compared to nivolumab monotherapy, in patients with NSCLC after the failure of platinum doublet chemotherapy, irrespective of EGFR/ALK variation status.

Hyaluronan heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, primary tumors, and sites of metastasis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16231-e16231
Author(s):  
Veronica Placencio-Hickok ◽  
Marie Lauzon ◽  
Natalie Moshayedi ◽  
Michelle Guan ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
High Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pdac Tissue ◽  
Treatment Naïve

e16231 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers with an estimated five-year survival rate of 10%. The dense desmoplastic stroma in PDAC contributes to its aggressive nature and treatment resistance. Among the components comprising the stroma, hyaluronan (HA) has been demonstrated to play a critical role in tumor progression and survival. Previous preliminary studies have suggested differences in HA expression in primary and metastatic foci in PDAC. However, the effects of treatment and location of HA expression as well as the role of CD44, a known receptor for HA, on HA as a biomarker signature remain unknown. Thus, we investigated the potential of HA as a biomarker in primary PDAC and metastases. Methods: PDAC tissue from primary (n = 43) and metastatic (n = 66) sites were obtained from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center along with associated clinical data. Tissue slides were stained with H&E, HA using a histochemical assay, and CD44 by immunohistochemistry. HA staining was scored according to the proportion of stromal staining at an intensity greater than the background stroma. HA status was defined as ≥ 50% staining being HA high and < 50% as being HA low. CD44 staining was recorded as an H-score (percentage of tumor cells staining multiplied by intensity of staining on a scale from 0 to 3). Associations between HA levels and the requested variables were examined with t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, or Cox regression model where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to assess progression free survival and overall survival. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 with two-sided tests and a significance level of 0.05. Results: HA score was significantly higher in primary PDAC tissue compared to sites of metastases (p = 0.0148). Within the metastases, HA score was significantly higher in liver metastasis compared to other sites of metastasis (p = 0.0478). In the liver metastasis tissue, HA score trended lower in patients with previously treated tissue compared to treatment naïve tissue (p = 0.0622). In the treatment naive liver metastasis cohort, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status (p = 0.0032 and p = 0.0478, respectively). Using HA score and CD44 in a Cox regression model demonstrated that for every one unit increase in HA score, the risk for recurrence/progression increased by 4.4% at any fixed point in time, adjusting for CD44 score (p = 0.0049). Conclusions: HA score is variable between primary PDAC, PDAC metastatic to the liver, and PDAC metastatic to other sites. Within liver metastases, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status. HA levels can serve as a potential biomarker to guide pancreatic cancer treatments and trial design for agents targeting the stroma.

The predictive value of MAP2K1/2 mutations for efficiency of immunotherapy in melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21587-e21587
Author(s):  
Ting Ye ◽  
Jieying Zhang ◽  
Xinyi Liu ◽  
Mengmei Yang ◽  
Yuhan Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Melanoma Patients ◽  
The Impact

e21587 Background: Immunotherapies targeting immune checkpoint receptors have become the cornerstone of systemic treatment options for malignant melanoma. The response to these immunotherapies may correlate with driver mutations. MAP2K1/2 genes are mutated in approximately 10% of melanomas, however, the impact of MAP2K1/2 gene alterations on the efficiency of immunotherapy has not been clarified. Methods: Six metastatic melanoma clinical cohorts treated with ICIs were included to investigate the association between clinical efficacy of immunotherapy and MAP2K1/2 mutations. Survival analyses were conducted in cohorts receiving two kinds of ICB agents, namely anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1. RNA expression profiling from these cohorts and from the TCGA melanoma cohort were used to explore the potential mechanism related to immune activation. Results: In an independent anti-CTLA-4-treated cohort (n = 110), we found that MAP2K1/2 mutations are predictive of high objective response rate (17.6% vs 1.3%, p = 0.0185) and long progression-free survival [median OS, 49.2 months vs 8.3 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15–0.91; p = 0.0307] and overall survival (median PFS, 19.4 months vs 2.8 months; HR = 0.2; 95% CI, 0.05–0.83; p = 0.0262). This predictive value was further validated in a pooled anti-CTLA-4-treated cohort (n = 235) in terms of overall survival (median OS, 49.3 months vs 22.0 months; HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22–0.91; p = 0.0255). However, no correlation between MAP2K1/2 mutations and overall survival was observed in the anti-PD-1-treated cohort (n = 285). Subgroup Cox regression analysis indicated that MAP2K-mutated patients receive less benefit from the anti-PD-1 monotherapy than from the anti-CTLA-4 treatment (median OS, 27.0 months vs 49.3 months; HR = 3.26; 95% CI, 1.18–9.02; p = 0.0225), which was contrary to the result obtained for the total population. Furthermore, transcriptome profiling analysis revealed that MAP2K-mutated tumors are enriched in CD8+ T cells, B cells, and neutrophil cells and also express high levels of CD33 and IL10, which might be the underlying mechanism for melanoma patients with MAP2K1/2-mutated benefit more from anti-CTLA-4 treatment. Conclusions: We identified mutations in MAP2K1/2 genes as the independent predictive factors for anti-CTLA-4 therapy in melanoma patients and found that anti-CTLA-4 treatment in patient harbouring MAP2K1/2 mutations might be more effective than the anti-PD-1 therapy.

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342
Author(s):  
Irena Ilic ◽  
Sandra Sipetic ◽  
Jovan Grujicic ◽  
Milena Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

Progression-Free Survival in Children With Optic Pathway Tumors: Dependence on Age and the Quality of the Response to Chemotherapy—Results of the First French Prospective Study for the French Society of Pediatric Oncology

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 4572-4578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Laithier ◽  
Jacques Grill ◽  
Marie-Cécile Le Deley ◽  
Marie-Madeleine Ruchoux ◽  
Dominique Couanet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Optic Pathway ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Risk Of Disease

Purpose: To evaluate a strategy aimed at avoiding radiotherapy during first-line treatment of children with progressive optic pathway tumors (OPT), by exclusively administering multiagent chemotherapy during 16 months. Patients and Methods: Between 1990 and 1998, 85 children with progressive OPT were enrolled onto this multicenter nationwide trial. Chemotherapy alternating procarbazine plus carboplatin, etoposide plus cisplatin, and vincristine plus cyclophosphamide was given every 3 weeks. At the time of relapse or progression, second-line chemotherapy was authorized before recourse to radiotherapy. Results: Objective response rate (partial response [PR] + complete response [CR]) to chemotherapy was 42%. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 34% and 89%, respectively. The 5-year radiotherapy-free survival rate was 61%. In the multivariate analysis of the 85 patients that entered onto the study, factors associated with the risk of disease progression were age younger than 1 year at diagnosis (P = .047) and absence of neurofibromatosis type 1 (P = .035). In the multivariate analysis of the 74 patients that remained on study after the first cycle of chemotherapy, factors associated with the risk of disease progression were age younger than 1 year at diagnosis (P = .0053) and no objective response to chemotherapy (P = .0029). Three-year PFS was 44% in infants ≤ 1 year versus 66% in children older than 1 year. Three-year PFS was 53% in the absence of an objective response to chemotherapy versus 68% after a PR or CR. Conclusion: A significant proportion of children with OPT can avoid radiotherapy after prolonged chemotherapy. Deferring irradiation with chemotherapy protocols did not compromise overall survival of the entire population or visual function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document