Open-label phase 1 study evaluating the tolerability and anti-tumor activity of selinexor and pembrolizumab in colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15579-e15579
Author(s):  
Talia Golan ◽  
Talia Shentzer Kutiel ◽  
Ravit Geva ◽  
Maya Gottfried ◽  
Aviad Zick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ras Mutations ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

e15579 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and is heterogenous in its molecular features. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are approved for only about 5% of unresectable or metastatic CRC with MSI-high (MSI-H)/deficient MMR (dMMR); however, they do not benefit the majority of advanced CRC patients. Selinexor is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound with demonstrated activity in cancers with RAS mutations which are found in ̃50% of CRC. This study aims to evaluate the combination of selinexor with pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 CPI, in chemotherapy refractory CRC. Methods: This phase 1/2, open-label study enrolled patients with advanced/metastatic CRC with progression after prior chemotherapy (1-3 lines for KRAS wild-type (wt), 1-2 for KRAS mutant (mut)), initially into a selinexor monotherapy period to evaluate bioavailability/bioequivalence of a new selinexor formulation, followed by a combination therapy where patients were treated with selinexor 80 mg PO QW and pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks. Patients were assessed for anti-tumor activity, safety, and tolerability of the combination therapy. Results: Enrollment in this study has been completed, and 29 patients have received at least 1 dose of combination therapy: median age was 56 years, 19 (65.5%) male, and 15 (51.7%) have RAS mutations. Median number of lines of prior antineoplastic therapies was 2. Median duration of combination treatment is 39 days (range: 1-246 days). Seventeen patients (58.6%) discontinued therapy mostly due to progressive disease, and 18 patients are evaluable for response. Best response was stable disease in 7 patients (6 of them (85.7%) had RAS mut CRC), and progressive disease in 11 patients (8 of them (72.7%) had RAS wt CRC. Median progression free survival (PFS) is 120 days for patients with RAS mut CRC and 41 days for those with RAS wt CRC. Notably, none of the RAS mut had MSI-H/dMMR CRC while one RAS wt with SD had MSI-H/dMMR CRC. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (total; ≥Grade 3) were nausea (72.4%; 0%), vomiting (41.4%; 0%), decreased appetite (34.5%; 0%), and fatigue (34.5%; 10.3%). Seven patients (24.1%) had at least 1 treatment-emergent serious adverse event. Conclusions: Selinexor in combination with pembrolizumab has demonstrated disease control in patients with chemotherapy refractory advanced/metastatic CRC. Greater anti-tumor activity was observed in patients with RAS mutations despite absence of MSI-H/dMMR. The therapy was well tolerated with no unanticipated adverse events observed. These results warrant further investigation of selinexor in combination with pembrolizumab in CRC, particularly in CRC with RAS mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT04256707.

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of panitumumab in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil for pre-treated patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type RAS: The phase 1/2 APOLLON study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Kato ◽  
Yoshinori Kagawa ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
Makio Gamoh ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Multicentre Phase

Abstract Background We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with panitumumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who were refractory/intolerant to standard therapies other than anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. Methods APOLLON was an open-label, multicentre, phase 1/2 trial. In the phase 1 part, 3 + 3 de-escalation design was used to investigate the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D); all patients in the phase 2 part received the RP2D. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and safety. Results Fifty-six patients were enrolled (phase 1, n = 7; phase 2, n = 49) at 25 Japanese centres. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in patients receiving panitumumab (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily; days 1–5 and 8–12 in a 28-day cycle), which became RP2D. PFS rate at 6 months was 33.3% (90% confidence interval [CI] 22.8–45.3). Median PFS, OS, ORR, DCR, and TTF were 5.8 months (95% CI 4.5–6.5), 14.1 months (95% CI 12.2–19.3), 37.0% (95% CI 24.3–51.3), 81.5% (95% CI 68.6–90.8), and 5.8 months (95% CI 4.29–6.21), respectively. Neutrophil count decreased (47.3%) was the most common Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion Panitumumab plus FTD/TPI exhibited favourable anti-tumour activity with a manageable safety profile and may be a therapeutic option for pre-treated mCRC patients.

scholarly journals Nervous and Muscular Adverse Events after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 939
Author(s):  
Jiaxin Chen ◽  
Yuangui Cai ◽  
Yicong Chen ◽  
Anthony P. Williams ◽  
Yifang Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label

Background: Nervous and muscular adverse events (NMAEs) have garnered considerable attention after the vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, the incidences of NMAEs remain unclear. We aimed to calculate the pooled event rate of NMAEs after COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on the incidences of NMAEs after COVID-19 vaccination was conducted. The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched from inception to 2 June 2021. Two independent reviewers selected the study and extracted the data. Categorical variables were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square test. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and generated with random or fixed effects models. The protocol of the present study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021240450). Results: In 15 phase 1/2 trials, NMAEs occurred in 29.2% vs. 21.6% (p < 0.001) vaccinated participants and controls. Headache and myalgia accounted for 98.2% and 97.7%, and their incidences were 16.4% vs. 13.9% (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.28–3.06, p = 0.002) and 16.0% vs. 7.9% (OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.05–5.35, p < 0.001) in the vaccine and control groups, respectively. Headache and myalgia were more frequent in the newly licensed vaccines (OR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.28–3.06, p = 0.02 and OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.05–5.35, p < 0.001) and younger adults (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.12–1.75, p = 0.003 and OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.20–1.96, p < 0.001). In four open-label trials, the incidences of headache, myalgia, and unsolicited NMAEs were 38.7%, 27.4%, and 1.5%. Following vaccination in phase 3 trials, headache and myalgia were still common with a rate of 29.5% and 19.2%, although the unsolicited NMAEs with incidence rates of ≤ 0.7% were not different from the control group in each study. Conclusions: Following the vaccination, NMAEs are common of which headache and myalgia comprised a considerable measure, although life-threatening unsolicited events are rare. NMAEs should be continuously monitored during the ongoing global COVID-19 vaccination program.

A phase IIb, open-label, single-arm study of zanidatamab (ZW25) monotherapy in subjects with advanced or metastatic HER2-amplified biliary tract cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS352-TPS352
Author(s):  
Shubham Pant ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
James J. Harding ◽  
Milind M. Javle ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Her2 Amplification ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancers ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

TPS352 Background: Advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs), including gallbladder cancer (GBC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC), have a poor prognosis. Zanidatamab (ZW25) is a novel bispecific antibody that targets HER2 domains ECD2 and ECD4, resulting in increased antibody binding density and improved receptor internalization and downregulation relative to trastuzumab. In an ongoing phase I trial (ZWI-ZW25-101; NCT02892123), single-agent zanidatamab was well tolerated and showed promising anti-tumor activity across HER2-expressing solid tumors, including BTCs. These results formed the basis for a phase IIb study of zanidatamab in patients with BTC. Methods: Study ZWI-ZW25-203 (NCT04466891) is a global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase IIb trial designed to evaluate the anti-tumor activity of zanidatamab monotherapy in patients with HER2-amplified, inoperable and advanced or metastatic BTCs, including GBC and CC. Patients must have received at least 1 prior gemcitabine-containing systemic chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease and have experienced disease progression after (or developed intolerance to) their most recent prior therapy. New or archival tumor tissue is required from all patients for HER2 amplification and protein expression testing at a central lab using in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays. Approximately 100 patients with HER2 amplification by ISH will be enrolled. Zanidatamab 20 mg/kg will be administered intravenously every 2 weeks until one of the treatment discontinuation criteria is met. The primary endpoint of the study is the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent central review per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), proportion of patients with DOR ≥ 16 weeks, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, quality of life, and disease-related pain. The safety and tolerability of zanidatamab will be assessed by recording the frequency and severity of adverse events, serious adverse events, and laboratory abnormalities, as well as the frequency of zanidatamab dose modifications. The study is currently open for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04466891.

scholarly journals MLTI-14. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TREATMENT PARADIGMS FOR PATIENTS WITH BREAST CANCER AND ONE OR MORE BRAIN METASTASES

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i17-i17
Author(s):  
Yosef Ellenbogen ◽  
Karanbir Brar ◽  
Nebras Warsi ◽  
Jetan Badhiwala ◽  
Alireza Mansouri
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND: Upwards of 50% of patients with advanced breast cancer are diagnosed with brain metastases (BM). Treatment options for these patients have been rapidly evolving due to increased understanding of the tumor pathophysiology and its genetic underpinnings. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to clarify the evidence guiding the treatment of brain metastases from breast cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, ClincialTrials.gov, and Web of Science were searched from inception to October 2018 for RCTs comparing treatments for breast cancer BM. We screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias independently and in duplicate. Outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (Grade 3+). RESULTS: Among 3188 abstracts, only 3 RCTs (N=412; mean sample size per group N=54.7) meeting inclusion criteria were identified. The studies were phase II or III open-label parallel superiority trials. Inclusion criteria among these trials consisted of age &gt;18 with radiologic evidence of &gt;1 BM. Exclusion criteria consisted of poor-performance functional status (ECOG &gt;2 or KPS &lt; 70). The treatment groups included whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) vs WBRT + Temozolomide, WBRT vs WBRT + Efaproxiral, and Afatinib vs Vinorelbine vs investigators’ choice (86% of these patients received WBRT or SRS prior to study enrolment). While two trials found no significant difference in OS, one trial found significant improvement in OS with Efaproxiral in addition to WBRT compared to WBRT alone (HR 0.52; 95%CI 0.332–0.816). No significant differences were found with PFS or rate of adverse events amongst treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Considering the high prevalence of breast cancer BM and our improved understanding of genomic/molecular features of these tumors, a greater number of RCTs dedicated at this disease are needed.

NE-180, a Novel glycoPEGylated Erythropoietin Demonstrates Dose-Dependent Activity in a Phase 1 Single Dose, Dose Escalating Study in Normal Human Volunteers (NHV).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1149-1149
Author(s):  
Bruce A. Wallin ◽  
Denise Ramjit ◽  
Michael Seiberling ◽  
David Zopf
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Stopping Rules ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Maximal Increase ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dose Dependent

Abstract NE-180 is a glycoPEGylated recombinant human erythropoietin that binds to and activates the erythropoietin (EPO) receptor. It has demonstrated in vitro activities comparable to EPO and an extended serum half-life in animal studies. This may allow less frequent dosing in patients being treated with chronic anemia. METHODS: A single center, open-label study of NE-180, administered as single escalating doses given by the SC or IV route, was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, PK and PD. Subjects (male or female NHV) were planned to be assigned to one of 4 dose groups, 10 subjects per dose with 5 SC and 5 IV subjects per group: 0.5, 1.5, 3, or 4.5 mg/kg. Each dose group was planned to be initiated in an ascending, sequential fashion unless or until stopping rules were met. RESULTS: 25 NHV (16 females) were enrolled in the first two dose cohorts and have completed 56 day follow-up. The 1.5 mg/kg IV cohort met the protocol-specified Hb rate of rise stopping rule (change in Hb greater than 1 g/dL during any 14 day period). Injections were generally well tolerated with no discontinuations for adverse events or serious adverse events. Reticulocyte increases were dose proportional. Average reticulocyte count at baseline was 1.0±0.3%. The maximal increase occurred at day 7. The mean change from baseline for the 0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg SC group was: 0.9±0.4% and 2.2±0.9%, respectively. The mean change from baseline for the 0.5 and 1.5 mg/kg IV group was: 1.7±0.8% and 2.3±0.8%, respectively. PK data will be presented. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses up to 1.5 mg/kg of NE-180 administered to NHV were generally well tolerated and demonstrated potent dose-dependent erythropoietic activity.

An Open-Label, Dose Escalation, Multi-Center Phase 1 Study of PRLX 93936, an Agent Synthetically Active Against the Activated Ras Pathway, in the Treatment of Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2140-2140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M Voorhees ◽  
Robert L. Schlossman ◽  
Cristina J Gasparetto ◽  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
John Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Ras Pathway ◽  
Label Dose

Abstract Introduction: Overall survival for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has improved, but most patients relapse and eventually succumb to complications of the disease. The development of new therapeutic agents to treat relapsed and relapsed/refractory MM is therefore vital. Proteins of the Ras family are frequently mutated in human cancers, including MM. However, direct, selective, potent inhibitors of mutant Ras proteins are not clinically available. Extensive efforts have been made to identify agents which are "synthetically active" against the activated Ras pathway which may not inhibit the Ras protein itself, but target other molecules selectively important for cells with, but not those without, Ras mutation. PRLX 93936, 3-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-2-[(1-piperazinyl)methyl]-4(3H)-quinazolinone, is an analog of such a "synthetically active" compound against the activated Ras pathway. The compound has demonstrated promising efficacy in preclinical laboratory studies and mouse models of MM with an improvement in survival and 30% suppression in tumor growth at the lowest tested dose. A phase 1, multi-center, open-label, dose escalation trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), assess toxicities, and evaluate response to treatment with monotherapy of PRLX 93936 in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM. Methods: Patients (Pts) with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM in whom at least two prior anti-myeloma regimens had failed (including a proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug) were considered. PRLX 93936 as a single agent was given intravenously 3 days/week for 3 weeks followed by a 9 day rest period constituting a 28-day treatment cycle. Sequential cohorts of at least three pts were treated with escalating doses of PRLX 93936 beginning at 10 mg/m2 and increasing the dose in increments of 5mg/m2 until the MTD was established. Pts received a minimum of 2 cycles of treatment at their assigned dose level for evaluation of anti-myeloma activity of PRLX 93936 and could receive up to 8 cycles followed by an option of maintenance therapy. Dexamethasone at a dose of 20 mg provided on each day of PRLX 93936 infusion could be added at the investigator’s discretion after a minimum of 2 cycles or after cycle 1 for patients with progressive disease. Adverse events were assessed according to version 4.0 of the CTC, and response per the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria, incorporating the modified EBMT response criteria, were assessed with each cycle. Correlative studies from peripheral blood and bone marrow were collected. Results: To date, 14 pts (4 women, 10 men) enrolled in the trial and 13 have completed therapy. Mean age was 61 years (range, 48-81). Prior to enrollment, pts had received an average of 5 lines of therapy (median 4, range 2-9) including 6 who received stem cell transplantation (4 autologous, 2 allogeneic). The median time since diagnosis was 5 years (range 2-11.5). Of the 13 pts whom completed treatment, 11 completed at least one full 28 day cycle (range 1-15). This includes 3 pts at the 10mg/m2 dose, 3 pts at the 15mg/m2 dose, 5 pts at the 20 mg/m2 dose, and 2 pts at the 25mg/m2 dose. Of the 13 pts who completed study therapy, 7 experienced at least one serious adverse event (SAE). The most frequently reported SAEs (2 each) included sepsis and cellulitis. Four SAEs were considered related to PRLX 93936 by the investigator (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, nausea, and vomiting). The MTD was determined to be 20 mg/m2. Dose limiting toxicities that occurred at the next higher level of 25mg/m2 included nausea, vomiting, and neutropenia (both pts) and thrombocytopenia, weakness, elevated AST, and elevated creatinine (1 pt). The best response among 11 evaluable pts was minimal response (MR) in 2 pts (18%). Stable disease (n=4) and progressive disease (n=5) was observed in the remaining pts. Analysis of the impact of dexamethasone is on-going, but no significant additive toxicity has been seen. Conclusions: PRLX 93936, a “synthetically active” compound against the activated Ras pathway, has demonstrated activity as a single agent in relapsed and refractory MM patients with MR in 18% of patients to date. Toxicity has proven manageable and the MTD has been defined at 20 mg/m2. Additional studies, including those involving PRLX 93936 as part of combination therapy and correlative studies to determine those pts most likely to benefit, are warranted. Disclosures Voorhees: Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company : Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: PRLX 93936 is a non-FDA approved drug currently in phase 1 development in multiple myeloma. Gasparetto:Millenium: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jacobstein:Prolexys Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Anderson:BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Oncopep/Acetylon: Equity Ownership. Mitsiades:Millennium: A Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Laubach:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millennium: A Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding. Richardson:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Co.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Phase Ib study of cancer stem cell (CSC) pathway inhibitor BBI-608 administered in combination with FOLFIRI with and without bevacizumab (Bev) in patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 569-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joleen Marie Hubbard ◽  
Bert H. O'Neil ◽  
Derek J. Jonker ◽  
Thorvardur Ragnar Halfdanarson ◽  
Alexander Starodub ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cancer Stemness ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

569 Background: BBI-608 is an oral first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor that blocks STAT3-mediated transcription of cancer stemness genes. Potent anti-CSC activity was observed in vitro and in vivo,in mono and combination therapy. In phase I studies, BBI-608 was generally well tolerated with encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity. Methods: A phase Ib open label, multi-center study in pts with advanced CRC was undertaken to confirm the RP2D of BBI-608 in combination with FOLFIRI with or without BEV. BBI-608 was administered at 240 mg BID in combination with FOLFIRI (5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus with 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, and leucovorin 400 mg/m2infusion) with or without BEV 5 mg/kg, administered bi-weekly until progression of disease, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criterion was met. Results: 18 heavily pretreated pts with an average of > 3 prior lines of therapy of which 10 pts (56%) previously progressed on FOLFIRI were enrolled. Of the 17 pts evaluable for response, 8 pts received FOLFIRI and 9 pts received FOLFIRI with BEV in combination with BBI-608. Most common adverse events included grade 1 and 2 diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. No dose limiting toxicity or new adverse events were seen, and the safety profile was similar to that of each regimen as monotherapy. Grade 3 events related to protocol therapy included diarrhea occurring in 3 pts, fatigue in 2 pts and dehydration in 1 pt. All events resolved after dose reduction and/or start of anti-diarrheal medications. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Disease control (PR+SD) was observed in 16 of 17 evaluable pts (94%) with 2 PR (per RECIST 1.1 criteria: 44% and 33% regression) and 14 SD (of which 13 (93%) had tumor regression < 25%). In the evaluable pts, median progression free survival was 5.54 months. Of 17 pts, 7 (41%) had prolonged SD of > 6 months. Conclusions: This phase Ib study confirmed that BBI-608 at 240 mg bid can be safely combined with FOLFIRI with and without BEV, and shows encouraging anti-tumor activity in heavily pretreated CRC pts, even in pts with prior progression on FOLFIRI-based therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02024607.

Phase 1 trial of OCV-C02, a peptide vaccine for metastatic colorectal cancer patients refractory to all standard chemotherapies.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 706-706
Author(s):  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Hiroya Taniguchi ◽  
Kentaro Yamazaki ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Chika Kiryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Peptide Vaccine ◽  
Injection Site Reaction ◽  
Delayed Type Hypersensitivity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Peptide Epitopes ◽  
Immunological Responses ◽  
Grade 3

706 Background: OCV-C02 is a peptide vaccine consisting of 2 peptide epitopes derived from ring finger protein 43 and translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 34. In colorectal cancer (CRC), they are upregulated in approximately 80% of tumor tissues. This study was conducted to assess safety, preliminary efficacy and immunological responses to OCV-C02. Methods: Key eligibility criteria for this open label, sequential cohort, dose escalation study were patients (pts) with unresectable metastatic CRC (mCRC) refractory to all standard chemotherapies and HLA-A*24:02. Pts in cohorts 1 to 4 received OCV-C02 0.3, 1, 3 and 6 mg/body respectively, subcutaneously, on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of the 28-day treatment cycle. Cycle was repeated in pts without progressive disease, until occurrence of unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was dose limiting toxicity (DLT) that was defined as treatment-related ≥ grade 3 or 4 hematological or ≥ grade 3 non-hematological adverse events (AEs) observed from days 1 to 29 of Cycle 1. Secondary endpoints were treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs), efficacy and immunological responses. Efficacy was evaluated by overall response rate, disease control rate (DCR), time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Immunological responses were evaluated by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH). Results: A total of 24 pts were treated. No DLT occurred in cycle 1 and no major safety issues throughout the trial. All pts had ≥ 1 TEAE. Frequently reported TEAEs included injection site reaction (25%), vomiting (25%), decreased appetite (20.8%) and pyrexia (16.7%). More than 50% of TEAEs were of grade 1 or 2 in severity. None achieved complete or partial response. Six pts had stable disease and DCR were 16.7%, 50% and 33.3% for cohorts 2, 3 and 4, respectively. TTF was 1.8, 0.9, 2.3 and 1.6 months and OS was 7.9, 11.6, 8.4 and 7.4 months for cohorts 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. CTL and DTH responses following vaccination were observed across the 4 cohorts. Conclusions: OCV-C02 at 0.3 to 6 mg/body exhibited a safe and well tolerated profile, and showed immunological responses in mCRC pts refractory to all standard chemotherapies. Clinical trial information: NCT01801930.

A phase Ib study of oral Chk1 inhibitor LY2880070 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3581-3581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quincy S. Chu ◽  
Derek J. Jonker ◽  
Diane M. Provencher ◽  
Wilson H. Miller ◽  
Nathaniel Bouganim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Total Daily Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Multi Center Study ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

3581 Background: LY2880070 (LY) is an oral, selective competitive inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1). Chk1 inhibitors are known to increase the anti-tumor efficacy of agents such as gemcitabine (GEM), which induce replication stress. Synergy between these two agents has been applied to the clinical setting. Methods: This two-part, open-label multi-center study explores the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity of LY in patients with advanced or metastatic cancers. The primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for multiple escalating oral doses of LY in combination with GEM. Secondary objectives were to: 1) Characterize the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and overall safety profile for LY; 2) Evaluate the PK of LY; and 3) Evaluate the anti-tumor activity of LY. Patients received LY in a variety of different dose regimens, in combination with GEM (50 to 800 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 (optional) of a 21-day cycle. Results: The combination of LY with GEM required lower doses of both LY (vs 200 mg BID monotherapy RP2D dose) and GEM (vs approved doses). The dose levels explored ranged from LY:GEM of 10 mg QD:800 mg/m2 to 50 mg BID:100 mg/m2. BID dosing of LY was implemented in order to maximize the total daily dose and avoid the adverse events that appeared to correlate with Cmax. Treatment-emergent adverse events in > 40% of patients included vomiting, nausea, and fatigue. DLTs included reduced platelet count (Gr2), fatigue (Gr3), diarrhea (Gr3), and thrombocytopenia (x2, Gr2). The t1/2 of LY was ~ 5 h, and was not significantly affected by combination with GEM. Two patients had a best overall response of SD for a duration of ≥ 6 cycles, and a confirmed PR was observed in an ovarian cancer patient who had failed multiple regimens. Conclusions: LY was tolerated in combination with lower dose GEM. The toxicity profile can be modulated by changing the dosing frequency from QD to BID while administering the same daily dose. LY may be good candidate for combination therapy with DNA damaging agents. Clinical trial information: NCT02632448 .

A phase I/II study of Pexa-Vec oncolytic virus in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition in refractory colorectal cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
M. Cecilia Monge B. ◽  
Changqing Xie ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
Suzanne Fioraventi ◽  
Melissa Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition

117 Background: The benefit of immune checkpoint inhibition is limited to the small percentage of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients whose tumors present mismatch repair (MMR) gene abnormalities; immunotherapy has not shown benefit in patients with MMR proficient CRC. Oncolytic immunotherapy represents a unique therapeutic platform. This phase I trial tests the safety of the combination of pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) plus durvalumab (durva) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CRC. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced proficient mixed match repair (pMMR) CRC received intravenous infusion of Pexa-Vec at dose level 3 x 108 plaque forming units (pfu) (DL1) or at 109 pfu (DL2) every 2 weeks for 4 doses and durva 1500 mg every 28 days. Response was assessed with CT every 8 weeks. Adverse events were recorded and managed. The primary endpoint included safety, tolerability and feasibility of this combination therapy. Samples of tumor and peripheral blood were collected for assessment of immune parameters. Results: Sixteen patients (6 males and 10 females) enrolled with a median age of 52.1 years (range 39-69) from Dec, 2017 to Oct, 2018. Four patients were treated with Pexa-Vec at DL1 and durva;twelve patients were treated with Pexa-Vec at DL2 and durva.The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAE) included fever 15/16 (94 %), hypotension 12/16 (75 %), chills 12/16 (75%), fatigue 8/16 (50%), sinus tachycardia 7/16 (44%) and rash 6/16 (38%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 8/16 (50%)patients; the most common were fever 7/16 (44 %), lymphopenia 2/16 (13%), neutropenia 1/16 (6%) and anemia 1/16 (6%). 14 patients were evaluable for response analysis; one patient 1/14 (7 %) achieved a confirmed partial response (lasting 7.1 months) and continues to receive treatment, while 13 patients had progressive disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.2 months (95% CI: 2.2-2.3 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (CI: 4.9-10.1 months). Conclusions: Combination therapy of Pexa-Vec with durva ICI issafe, well tolerated and demonstrates possible activity in patients with advanced pMMR CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03206073.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document