Gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma survival outcomes relative to completion of perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT): A single-center retrospective analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 224-224
Author(s):  
Michael J Allen ◽  
Osvaldo Espin-Garcia ◽  
Elan David Panov ◽  
Lucy Xiaolu Ma ◽  
Chihiro Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Small Population ◽  
Tumour Regression ◽  
World Population ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

224 Background: Perioperative FLOT is standard-of-care for locally advanced resectable gastric and gastroesophageal (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Completion of perioperative chemotherapy (8 cycles) is potentially jeopardised by significant toxicity and intolerance. Only 46% of patients completed all cycles in the initial phase 2/3 trial (FLOT-AIO). We sought to determine the rate of treatment completion in a real-world population and any subsequent impact on survival of incomplete treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma patients treated with perioperative FLOT at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto between September 2017 and July 2020 was performed. The rate of perioperative FLOT administration, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analysed, with outcomes compared between patients that completed perioperative FLOT and those that didn’t. Results: 32 patients were identified as receiving neoadjuvant FLOT. Mean age was 61.5y, 26 (81%) were male and 29 (91%) were non-Asian. All patients were ECOG 0-1. The median number of neoadjuvant cycles was 4. 29 (91%) had surgery (2 = disease progression; 1 = declined surgery). 10 (34%) patients had minimal/nil response upon resection (College of American Pathologists Tumour Regression Grading (TRG) Score 3), 5 of whom received adjuvant FLOT whilst 5 did not (p0.28). 10 (34%) patients did not receive adjuvant FLOT, 18 (62%) did and 1 received 8 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nil demographic differences were observed between ‘yes’ and ‘no’ adjuvant FLOT groups. The reasons for not having adjuvant chemotherapy were: metastatic disease diagnosed post-operatively (n = 2), TRG Score 3 (n = 4), patient declined further chemotherapy (n = 1), reduced performance status and/or toxicity (n = 2), and the patient requiring treatment for a second malignancy (n = 2). 10 (34%) patients completed perioperative chemotherapy. Median DFS was 12.5m (95% CI 7.9-12.5) for ‘no’ FLOT’ and was not-reached for ‘yes’ FLOT (p = 0.29). 18m DFS was 50% (95% CI 27-93) v 81% (95% CI 64-100) respectively. The median OS for ‘no’ adjuvant FLOT was 16.7m (95% CI 11.5-16.7) with 5 deaths. Zero deaths due to malignancy had occurred at 23.3m in those who received adjuvant FLOT (p0.00164). 1 death in the ‘yes’ group occurred due to interstitial lung disease. Conclusions: In our small population size 34% of patients completed perioperative FLOT. Whilst nil statistically significant difference was observed in mDFS, an improved mOS was observed in those that received adjuvant FLOT suggesting an importance in receiving the maximum number of cycles of chemotherapy. Given the challenges of administering adjuvant FLOT future trials into the feasibility and efficacy of 8 cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT should be considered.

Perioperative chemotherapy alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: A 10-year review of the British Columbia (BC) Cancer Registry.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4028-4028
Author(s):  
Shiru Lucy Liu ◽  
Irene S. Yu ◽  
Sally CM Lau ◽  
Yizhou Zhao ◽  
Devin Schellenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

4028 Background: The optimal treatment strategy for resectable cancer of the distal esophagus (ESOPH) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains controversial. This study evaluates patterns of practice in BC, rates of complete surgical resection, and survival outcomes of patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy alone (CA), per MAGIC or FLOT4 protocol, versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), per CROSS protocol. Methods: We undertook a provincial analysis of initially resectable, locally advanced, cancer of the ESOPH and/or GEJ who underwent surgery in BC, from 2008 to 2018. Baseline patient, tumor, treatment, and clinical outcome data were collected from the BC Cancer Registry. Kaplan-Meier survival and multivariate regression analyses were conducted. Results: Among 575 patients, 468 underwent surgery and were included (Table). More surgeries were aborted intraoperatively in the CA cohort compared to CRT (12% vs 2%, p<0.001). There was no difference in age, sex, or ECOG performance status among the cohorts, and 83% were adenocarcinoma. While 82% of ESOPH involving GEJ (N = 251, 54%) is treated with CRT, only 53% of GEJ alone (N=217, 46%) is treated with CRT (p<0.001). CRT is associated with a higher rate of complete or partial pathologic response compared to CA (59% vs 39%, p=0.002). R0 resection rate was 90% and 94% in the CA and CRT cohort, respectively (p=0.383). There is no statistically significant difference in overall survival, with medians of 29.6 and 26.0 months for patients treated with CA and CRT, respectively (p=0.723). Cancer-specific survival is also not significantly different (p=0.565). In the CA cohort, 37% of patients complete all 8 cycles of FLOT and 52% of patients complete all 6 cycles of MAGIC (p=0.396). Conclusions: Patients treated with CRT have higher rates of complete resection and pathologic response, but their survival is not significantly different compared to those treated with CA. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals The Value of Perioperative Chemotherapy for Patients With Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zhou ◽  
Anqiang Wang ◽  
Jingtao Wei ◽  
Ke Ji ◽  
Zhongwu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Radical Gastrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Rare Type ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgery First

BackgroundHepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare type of gastric cancer, but the role of perioperative chemotherapy is still poorly understood. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the associations between perioperative chemotherapy and prognosis of HAS.MethodWe retrospectively analyzed patients with locally advanced HAS who received radical surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital between November 2009 and October 2020. Patients were divided into neoadjuvant chemotherapy-first (NAC-first) group and surgery-first group. The relationships between perioperative chemotherapy and prognosis of HAS were analyzed using univariate, multivariate survival analyses and propensity score matching analysis (PSM).ResultsA total of 100 patients were included for analysis, including 29 in the NAC-first group and 71 in the surgery-first group. The Her-2 amplification in HAS patients was 22.89% (19/83). For NAC-first group, 4 patients were diagnosed as tumor recession grade 1 (TRG1), 4 patients as TRG 2, and 19 patients as TRG 3. No significant difference in prognosis between the surgery-first group and the NAC-first group (P=0.108) was found using PSM analysis. In the surgery-first group, we found that the survival rate was better in group of ≥6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy than that of &lt;6 cycles (P=0.013).ConclusionNAC based on platinum and fluorouracil may not improve the Overall survival (OS) and Disease-free survival time (DFS) of patients with locally advanced HAS. Patients who received ≥6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy had better survival. Therefore, the combination treatment of radical gastrectomy and sufficient adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with locally advanced HAS.

Phase II trial of perioperative chemotherapy + avelumab in locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Preliminary results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4046-4046
Author(s):  
Thierry Alcindor ◽  
Touhid Opu ◽  
Arielle Elkrief ◽  
Farzin Khosrow-Khavar ◽  
Carmen L. Mueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

4046 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy improves cure rate in locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), and immune checkpoint inhibitors are active at the metastatic stage. This trial tests the hypothesis that the addition of avelumab to perioperative chemotherapy will increase the major pathologic response (MPR) rate in comparison with historical controls. Methods: Phase II study of avelumab + chemotherapy (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU or mDCF) given every 2 weeks for 4 cycles before and after surgery. Main inclusion criteria: GEA, cT3 and/or cN+, M0, WHO PS 0-1. Main exclusion criteria: use of immunosuppressants, serious autoimmune disease, daily intake >10 mg prednisone. Staging studies: CT, PET-CT, endoscopic ultrasound, diagnostic laparoscopy. Surgical resection: D2 lymphadenectomy, en-bloc esophagectomy for type I/II gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors. Aim of the study: MPR as defined as tumor regression grades 0-1 (modified Ryan scheme); as per hypothesis, this experimental regimen will result in a 20% rate of MPR, compared with 7% with chemotherapy alone. Simon 2-stage design: if less than 2 MPR are seen in the first 16 patients, the study will be closed. The study hypothesis cannot be rejected if at least 6 MPR are seen in the first 50 patients. All adverse effects are prospectively recorded per CTCAE guidelines in patients who have received at least one treatment cycle. Survival rates are calculated with Kaplan-Meier method. Preliminary results are presented since the study has met its primary endpoint. Results: Feb 2018-Feb 2020: 28 patients enrolled (25 M/3 F, age 45-78). Location: GEJ (23), stomach (5). Staging: cT3 (25), cT4 (1), cN+ (20). Biomarkers expression: mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss (3/28); PD-L1(clone 73-10) expression in 1% (TPS) or more of tumor cells seen in 12/28 samples, and >10% in 6 patients. Grade 3 toxicity: stomatitis (2/28); nausea (2/28); vomiting (1/28); diarrhea (1/28); hypothyroidism (1/28); arthralgia (3/28); neutropenia (1/28). Grade 4 toxicity: pneumonia (1/28); neutropenia (2/28). Postoperative 30-day mortality: 0%. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses for M1 staging; 27 patients underwent surgery, 26 with R0 (96%). Six cases (22%) show MPR: 3 grade 0 (11%) and 3 grade 1 (11%) tumor regressions. No correlation was seen between MMR proteins or PD-L1 expression and tumor regression. With a median follow-up of 1.5 years (range 0.4-2.5), the disease-free survival rate is projected to be 0.92 (95% CI 0.83-1.00) at 12 months and 0.77 (95% CI 0.58-1.00) at 24 months. Conclusions: The combination of mDCF chemotherapy with Avelumab demonstrates a promising safety and activity profile. Ongoing laboratory investigations are underway to correlate our findings with tumor molecular features before exposure to treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03288350.

The influence of overall treatment time to the efficiency of chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-130
Author(s):  
Ekkasit Tharavichitkul ◽  
Panupat Rugpong ◽  
Nisa Chawapun ◽  
Razvan M. Galalae
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Overall Treatment Time ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

AbstractPurposeThis study aims to clarify the influence of overall treatment time (OTT) on the efficiency of combined chemo-radiotherapy in cervical cancer.Material and methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 122 cervical cancer patients who had squamous cell carcinoma and had undergone definitive chemo-radiotherapy from 2009 to 2013. All patients received whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) with the dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions (with central shielding after 44 Gy) plus intracavitary brachytherapy with the dose of 28 Gy in four fractions. During WPRT, all patients received concurrent chemotherapy with weekly platinum-based regimen. The data of patient characteristics, OTT, treatment results and toxicities were collected and evaluated.ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 36 months. The mean age of patients was 52 years old; 68% of patients were stage IIB related to International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics staging. Pelvic control (PC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates did not differ significantly in the data-derived cut points of 55·8 and 53 days. No statistically significant difference in treatment results between the two groups of OTT<49 and OTT≥62 days was observed.ConclusionsIn our data-derived cut point, OTT did not influence to PC, DMFS, DFS and OS. The influence of OTT on treatment results may be found in longer periods.

Role of 18F-PET-CT to Predict Pathological Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment of Rectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Caruso ◽  
Emilio Vicente ◽  
Yolanda Quijano ◽  
Hipolito Duran ◽  
Isabel Fabra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Standardized Uptake Value ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
18F Fdg ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Abstract Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (nCRT) is universally considered to be a valid treatment to achieve downstaging, improve local disease control and obtain better resectability in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The aim of this study is to correlate the change in tumor 18F -FDG PET-CT standardized uptake value (SUV) before and after nCRT, in order to obtain an early prediction of pathologic response (pR) achieved in patients with LARC.Data description: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with LARC diagnosis who underwent curative resection. All patients received nCRT and surgical treatment was carried after 8/12th. All patients underwent a baseline 18F -FDG PET-CT scan within the week prior to the initiation of the treatment (PET-CT SUV1) and a second scan (PET-C T SUV2) within six weeks of the completion of nCRT. Furthermore, we evaluated the prognostic value of 18F -FDG PET-CT in terms of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with LARC.A total of 133 patients with LARC were included in the study. Patients were divided in two groups according to the TRG (tumor regression grade): 107 (80%) as Responders group (TRG0-TRG1) and 26 (25%) as the No-Responders group (TRG2-TRG3). We obtained a significant difference in Δ%SUV between the two different groups responders vs no responders (p<0.012).The results of this analysis have shown that 18F-FDG PET-CT may be an indicator in order to evaluate the pR to nCRT in patients with LARC. The decrease in 18F-FDG PET-CT uptake in the primary tumor may offer primary information in order to early identify those patients more likely to obtain a pCR to nCRT and predict those unlikely to regress significantly.

Kras mutation as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16267-e16267
Author(s):  
Elena Serrano ◽  
Elizabeth Inga Saavedra ◽  
Maria Padilla Vico ◽  
Eduardo Perdomo ◽  
Maria Teresa Cano Osuna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Significant Difference

e16267 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in oncology patients. It has been reported that VTE increases morbidity and mortality in these patients. It’s prevalence in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) ranges around 4-7.5% Preclinic studies suggest that the mutation of the KRAS oncogene (KRASm) is associated with a higher risk of VTE among patients with colorectal cancer. KRASm appears to increase the expression of tissue factor, a physiological trigger of coagulation that is found on the surface of tumor cells. This association has not been studied in mPC, where this mutation can be found in 90% of the cases. Our aim is to determine the prevalence and risk factors associated with VTE taking into consideration the status of KRAS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study within a cohort of patients with mPC that had a determination of the KRAS status. These patients were treated at Medical Oncology between January 2017 and December 2020. We performed a descriptive and survival analysis of our sample. We also studied the prevalence of VTE among the. Results: Our study cohort was 88 patients (pts), 63 (61, 2%) men and 40 (38, 8%) women. The median age was 63 years (32-84). 19 pts (18, 4%) were KRAS wild type (KRASwt), 69 pts (67%) KRASm. There was no statistically significant difference in gender, age, performance status, comorbidities, primary tumor/metastases location, disease control rate and toxicity between KRASwt and KRASm. Median serum levels of Ca 19.9 were higher in KRASm (39.847 U/ml vs 2026 U/ml). At the time of diagnosis, 78 pts (88, 6%) were metastatic and 10 pts (11, 4%) were localized/locally-advanced. Most of metastatic pts (62/78) were KRASm (p = 0, 015). Most common histology (86, 4%) was adenocarcinoma. This histology was more frequent in KRASm, 61, 8% (p = 0, 02). At time of analysis, 72 pts (69, 9%) were dead, most of them (54, 4%) were KRASm (p = 0, 001). 31 pts developed VTE: 4 were KRASwt and 27 KRASm. The prevalence of VTE was 36, 3%. It was greater in KRASm (39, 1%) than in KRASwt (26, 3%). There were 7 cases of rethrombosis instead of anticoagulant treatment (1 KRASwt and 6 KRASm). KRASwt seems to be a protective factor in the development of VTE (OR 0, 55; CI 95% 0, 18-1, 71). The most common entity were VTE of splenoportomensenteric axis (16 pts), followed by pulmonary embolism, EP, (7 pts), deep venous thrombosis, DVT, (4 pts) EP + DVP (3 pts), thrombosis associated with central venous catheter (3 pts) and other locations (2 pts). There were no differences in VTE location between KRASwt and KRASm. The median overall survival (OS) was 12, 82 months (CI 95%: 7, 87-17, 78). It was higher in KRASwt (26 months; CI 95%: 12, 21-40, 48) than in KRASm (9, 8 months; CI 95%: 6, 07-13, 65). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0, 001). Conclusions: In our cohort, the prevalence of VTE is higher than de prevalence described in the literature and was greater in KRASm population. OS was significantly larger in KRASwt.

scholarly journals Cisplatin, Cetuximab, and Radiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer: A Retrospective Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. CMO.S18682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prakash Peddi ◽  
Runhua Shi ◽  
Binu Nair ◽  
Fred Ampil ◽  
Glenn M. Mills ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Efficacy of cisplatin versus cetuximab with radiation in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) was evaluated. A total of 96 patients with newly diagnosed LAHNC treated at our institution between 2006 and 2011 with concurrent radiation and cisplatin (group A, n = 45), cetuximab (group B, n = 24), or started with cisplatin but switched to cetuximab because of toxicity (group C, n = 27) were reviewed. Chi-square test, analysis of variance, and log-rank test were used for analysis. The three groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for median age, T stage, albumin levels, hemoglobin levels, performance status, and comorbidities. A complete response (CR) was seen in 77%, 17%, and 67% of patients ( P < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between groups A and C. The median OS for groups A and C was not reached (>65 months), even though it was significantly longer than median OS for group B (11.6 months; P ≤ 0.001). The 2-year OS in groups A and C is significantly higher than that in group B (70% for groups A and C, 22% for group B). There is no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between groups A and C. The median PFS for these groups was not reached (>62 months), and is significantly longer than that for group B (4.3 months; P ≤ 0.001). The 2-year PFS of group A (67%) and group C (76%) was significantly longer than that of group B (20%). Cisplatin with radiation appears to be more efficacious even in suboptimal dosing than cetuximab with radiation in LAHNC but the two groups were not well matched.

Phase II neoadjuvant docetaxel/cisplatin followed by concurrent cisplatin/radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6059-6059
Author(s):  
M. S. Kandil ◽  
H. S. Alnasser ◽  
S. A. Bandey ◽  
A. S. Almutairy ◽  
F. A. Ammar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Impaired Hearing ◽  
Partial Responder ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Grade One

6059 Background: Neoadjuvant cisplatin/docetaxel are active agents for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (LANPXCA). The efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant cisplatin/docetaxel followed by concurrent cisplatin with radiotherapy are explored in a phase II trial. Methods: From Jan 2003 to Jan 2005; 23 patients with LANPXCA stage III, IVA, IVB, (AJCC 2002), were treated with 3 cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel 60mg/m2, 1 hour IV infusion D1 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2, 2 hours IV infusion D1 with prophylactic GSCF as 5μg/kg sc D3–7,(recycle D22). This was followed by 2 cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, 2 hours IV infusion D1 , (recycle D22), concurrently with radiotherapy aiming at 70Gy / 35 fractions / 7 weeks. The median follow up was 27.9 months (18.3–47.3). Results: The median age was 38 years (16–68) and male to female ratio was 7.66:1. Neck mass 95.7%, neck pain 73.9%, nasal obstruction 65.2%, , headache 56.5%, impaired hearing 52.2%, and epistaxis 52.2% were the commonest symptoms. All patients had G3 squamous cell carcinoma. The majority of patients were stage IV 52.2% while 47.8 % were stage III. Grade one ECOG performance status was the commonest 52.2% while 47.8% were G2. The treatment was tolerable with commonest G3 acute toxicities were dysphagia 43.4% , and oral mucositis 8.7%. The commonest G3 late toxicities were dry mouth 17.4% and impaired hearing 13%. Complete remission was achieved in 22/23 patients 95.7% while 1/23 patients 4.3% was partial responder. Failure sites include; Distant; liver and/or bone 8.7%, local; skull base 4.3% or local and distant 4.3%.The Kaplan Meyer 47 month disease free survival was 82.61% while the 47 month overall survival was 91.3%. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant docetaxel / cisplatin followed by concurrent Cisplatin with radiotherapy is an effective and tolerable outpatient treatment for LANPXCA. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Pemetrexed versus gefitinib versus erlotinib in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer by retrospective analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19103-e19103
Author(s):  
E. Cho ◽  
J. Hong ◽  
S. Kyung ◽  
Y. Kim ◽  
S. Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Folate Supplementation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Previously Treated

e19103 Background: The standards in 2nd-line therapy with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were erlotinib or pemetrexed as well as docetaxel. To evaluate the efficacies and safeties of pemetrexed, gefitinib, and erlotinib in previously treated NSCLC we analyzed the datas retrospectively. Methods: Eligible patents were 1) histologically confirmed pretreated advanced (stage IIIB or IV) NSCLC, 2) with at least one measurable lesion, 3) age over 18 years, 4) performance status (PS) 0–2, and 5) should never experience other two drugs as previous therapy. Patients of pemetrexed group received IV infusion of 500mg/m2 pemetrexed mixed with normal saline every 3 weeks with vitamin B12 and folate supplementation. Patients of gefitinib group received gefitinib 250mg PO daily and of erlotinib took erlotinib 150mg PO daily. Cycles of IV pemetrexed or taking PO drugs were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: we analyzed 57 patients (pemetrexed; 20, gefitnib; 20, and erlotinib; 17). The response rates were 5.3%, 25.0%, and 12.5% (P=0.22), and the disease control rate were 5.3%, 40.0%, and 50.0% respectively (P<0.01). Median progression-free survival (PFS) of pemetrexed, gefitinib, and erlotinib were 1.7, 3.5 and 4.4 months (P<0.01) and median overall survival (OS) were 5.6, 21.8 and 21.5 months respectively (P=0.04). In subgroup analysis, patients with non-squamous carcinoma, smokers and good PS (0 or 1) showed longer PFS and OS in gefitinib and erlotinib compared with in pemetrexed. All of these agents showed mild and tolerable toxicity. Conclusions: In retrospective analysis, the patients with gefitinib or erlotinib had longer PFS and OS than pemetrexed, eventhough there was no significant difference for response rate in three group. These results have to confirm by large randomized prospective study because the sample size was small and it was not randomized. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Polymorphisms of thymidylate synthase as prognostic factor in rectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 433-433
Author(s):  
V. Arrazubi ◽  
J. Suarez ◽  
D. Guerrero ◽  
K. Cambra ◽  
M. L. Gomez Dorronsoro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Thymidylate Synthase ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Tumour Regression ◽  
The Difference

433 Background: Neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (ChT) plus radiotherapy (Rt) is a standard approach for locally advanced rectal cancer. Polymorphisms of thymidylate synthase (TS), the target for fluoropyrimidines, are recognized prognostic factors in colon cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the polymorphisms of TS in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant ChT plus Rt. Methods: We studied one-hundred consecutive patients with stage II/III rectal cancer between November 2001 and March 2009. Patients underwent surgery 6-8 weeks after neoadjuvant Rt (5,040 cGy) plus fluoropyrimidine-based ChT. DNA was extracted from paraffin embedded biopsies. TS1494del6 and 5′-28bp repeat +G/C SNP polymorphisms were determined. Results: Sixty-seven percent were men and median age was 67 years. ypT stage was: T0 9%, T1 2%, T2 27%, T3 60% and T4 2%; 32% had locoregional adenopathies. The median follow-up was 45 months and relapse occurred in 20% of patients. Polimorphisms could be determined in 98% of pt: -6bp/-6bp 10%, - 6bp/+6bp 39%, +6bp/+6bp 51% and 2R/2R 72%, 2R/3R 21%, 3R/3R 6%. The grade of pathological tumour regression was not associated with polymorphisms. Relapses occurred in 40% of patients -6bp/-6bp, 22% of patients -6bp/+6bp and 21% of patients +6bp/+6bp. The difference in disease- free survival (DFS) between the first and the third groups was stadistically significative (p=0.049). No relation between 5′-28bp repeat +G/C SNP polymorphism and DFS was found. Conclusions: Our data suggest that the TS1494del6 polimorphism may be an important prognosis factor in rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document