scholarly journals The Value of Perioperative Chemotherapy for Patients With Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zhou ◽  
Anqiang Wang ◽  
Jingtao Wei ◽  
Ke Ji ◽  
Zhongwu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Radical Gastrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Rare Type ◽  
Propensity Score Matching Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgery First

BackgroundHepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare type of gastric cancer, but the role of perioperative chemotherapy is still poorly understood. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the associations between perioperative chemotherapy and prognosis of HAS.MethodWe retrospectively analyzed patients with locally advanced HAS who received radical surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital between November 2009 and October 2020. Patients were divided into neoadjuvant chemotherapy-first (NAC-first) group and surgery-first group. The relationships between perioperative chemotherapy and prognosis of HAS were analyzed using univariate, multivariate survival analyses and propensity score matching analysis (PSM).ResultsA total of 100 patients were included for analysis, including 29 in the NAC-first group and 71 in the surgery-first group. The Her-2 amplification in HAS patients was 22.89% (19/83). For NAC-first group, 4 patients were diagnosed as tumor recession grade 1 (TRG1), 4 patients as TRG 2, and 19 patients as TRG 3. No significant difference in prognosis between the surgery-first group and the NAC-first group (P=0.108) was found using PSM analysis. In the surgery-first group, we found that the survival rate was better in group of ≥6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy than that of <6 cycles (P=0.013).ConclusionNAC based on platinum and fluorouracil may not improve the Overall survival (OS) and Disease-free survival time (DFS) of patients with locally advanced HAS. Patients who received ≥6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy had better survival. Therefore, the combination treatment of radical gastrectomy and sufficient adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with locally advanced HAS.

scholarly journals Adjuvant chemotherapy is an additional option for locally advanced gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy: a retrospective control study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Chen ◽  
Chenghai Zhang ◽  
Zhendan Yao ◽  
Ming Cui ◽  
Jiadi Xing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Radical Gastrectomy ◽  
D2 Lymphadenectomy ◽  
D2 Gastrectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background This study compared the long-term efficacy of different durations of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Methods We retrospectively identified 428 patients with stage II–III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy between 2009 and 2016. Patients were divided into four groups according to the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy, including 0 week (no adjuvant, group A), 20 to 24 weeks (completed 7–8 cycles every 3 weeks or 10–12 cycles every 2 weeks, group B), and 12 to18 weeks (completed 4–6 cycles every 3 weeks or 6–9 cycles every 2 weeks, group C), and less than 12 weeks (received up to 3 cycles every 3 weeks or 5 cycles every 2 weeks, group D). The chemotherapy regimens included XELOX, SOX, and FOLFOX. 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. Results The 5-year OS rates for groups A, B, C, and D were 52.3, 73.7, 72.0, and 53.3%, respectively, and the 5-year DFS rates were 50.0, 68.0, 65.4, and 50.0%, respectively. OS and DFS were higher in group B than in groups A and D. Similarly, patients in group C were more likely to have higher OS and DFS than those in groups A and D. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in OS and DFS between groups B and C. The multivariate analysis confirmed with high statistical significance the efficacy of complete courses of adjuvant chemotherapy, and, among them, the similar impact of 4–6/6–9 and 7–8/10–12 cycles, resulting in similar HRs vs Group A (0.52 and 0.42, respectively). Conclusions To reduce toxicity and maintain efficacy, XELOX or SOX chemotherapy regimens administered for 4–6 cycles every 3 weeks or FOLFOX regimen for 6–9 cycles every 2 weeks might be a favorable option for patients with stage II–III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy. Prospective multicenter clinical trials with adequate sample sizes are necessary to verify these findings.

scholarly journals Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients with Optimal Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojie Feng ◽  
Hongmin Chen ◽  
Lei Li ◽  
Ling Gao ◽  
Xupeng Bai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Optimal Number ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Optimal Response ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background. Few studies investigated the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in patients with optimal response to neoadjuvant CT (NACT), and an optimal number of treatment cycles for these patients remains unknown. Methods. A total of 261 Chinese patients with FIGO stage Ib2–IIb cervical cancer who showed an optimal response to NACT were included after radical surgery (RS), and the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients treated with different cycles of postoperative adjuvant CT were compared. Results. We found that patients treated with different cycles of postoperative adjuvant CT were significantly better than those without further therapy. The multivariate analysis showed that postoperative adjuvant CT was an independent prognostic factor for DFS. However, there was no significant difference in the DFS and OS between patients who had 3 cycles of adjuvant CT and those with 6 cycles. Further analysis revealed a significant association of 6 cycles of adjuvant CT with increased risk of leukopenia, nausea/vomiting, and rash. Conclusion. These data suggest that additional 3 cycles of adjuvant CT after NACT + RS may improve the clinical outcome of optimal responders in terms of DFS, OS, and drug toxicity.

scholarly journals Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy Improved the Prognosis in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients With Optimal Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojie Feng ◽  
Hongmin Chen ◽  
Lei Li ◽  
Ling Gao ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Optimal Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

BackgroundFew studies investigated the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in patients with optimal response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and an optimal number of treatment cycles for these patients remains unknown.MethodsA total of 261 Chinese patients with FIGO stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer who obtained an optimal response to NACT were included after radical surgery, and the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of these patients treated with different cycles of postoperative ACT were compared using the Log-rank test and multivariate analysis.ResultsWe found that the prognosis of optimal responders treated with postoperative ACT was significantly better than those without further adjuvant therapy. The multivariate analysis showed that postoperative ACT was an independent prognostic factor for DFS. However, there was no significant difference in the DFS and OS between patients who had three cycles of ACT and those with six cycles. Further analysis revealed a significant association of six cycles of ACT with the risk of leukopenia, nausea/vomiting, and rash.ConclusionOur data suggest that additional three cycles of ACT after surgery may improve the clinical outcome of optimal responders in terms of DFS, OS, and drug toxicity.

Completion and toxicity rates of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients previously treated with neoadjuvant therapy and resection.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 609-609
Author(s):  
C. R. Oxner ◽  
S. Choi ◽  
M. J. Hein ◽  
D. Lim ◽  
S. Shibata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Previously Treated

609 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after rectal cancer surgery. Yet the success and complication rates of this adjuvant treatment are poorly studied. The purpose of this study is to determine the success rate and define the toxicity profile of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients previously treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Study design is a retrospective review of patients from December 2002-December 2007 from the City of Hope database. Data is available with 66 patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemo radiation and resection. Data points analyzed included demographics, chemotherapy-related toxicity and survival. Results: Adjuvant chemotherapy was started in 35/66 (53%) of patients. In 31 cases chemotherapy was not given because of patient refusal or physician preference. 9 patients were lost to follow-up. Follow-up ranged from 9-59 months with median follow-up of 27 months. In the 26 patients with adequate follow up there were a total of 165 episodes of toxic events 3a grade 1. Most of the events were mild to moderate grade 1-2. In 10 patients (28%) 22 major toxicities 3a grade 3 episodes were observed. The median Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) showed no significant difference in patients before and after adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.071). The rates of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival were 100%, 90%, and 60%, respectively; corresponding disease-free survival was 88%, 83%, and 69% respectively. Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that only a fraction of rectal cancer patients previously treated with neoadjuvant CRT complete a full course of adjuvant chemotherapy. Future studies will help confirm these preliminary findings and generate an outcome comparison between patients receiving and not receiving adjuvant therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma survival outcomes relative to completion of perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT): A single-center retrospective analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 224-224
Author(s):  
Michael J Allen ◽  
Osvaldo Espin-Garcia ◽  
Elan David Panov ◽  
Lucy Xiaolu Ma ◽  
Chihiro Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Small Population ◽  
Tumour Regression ◽  
World Population ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference

224 Background: Perioperative FLOT is standard-of-care for locally advanced resectable gastric and gastroesophageal (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Completion of perioperative chemotherapy (8 cycles) is potentially jeopardised by significant toxicity and intolerance. Only 46% of patients completed all cycles in the initial phase 2/3 trial (FLOT-AIO). We sought to determine the rate of treatment completion in a real-world population and any subsequent impact on survival of incomplete treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma patients treated with perioperative FLOT at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto between September 2017 and July 2020 was performed. The rate of perioperative FLOT administration, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was analysed, with outcomes compared between patients that completed perioperative FLOT and those that didn’t. Results: 32 patients were identified as receiving neoadjuvant FLOT. Mean age was 61.5y, 26 (81%) were male and 29 (91%) were non-Asian. All patients were ECOG 0-1. The median number of neoadjuvant cycles was 4. 29 (91%) had surgery (2 = disease progression; 1 = declined surgery). 10 (34%) patients had minimal/nil response upon resection (College of American Pathologists Tumour Regression Grading (TRG) Score 3), 5 of whom received adjuvant FLOT whilst 5 did not (p0.28). 10 (34%) patients did not receive adjuvant FLOT, 18 (62%) did and 1 received 8 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nil demographic differences were observed between ‘yes’ and ‘no’ adjuvant FLOT groups. The reasons for not having adjuvant chemotherapy were: metastatic disease diagnosed post-operatively (n = 2), TRG Score 3 (n = 4), patient declined further chemotherapy (n = 1), reduced performance status and/or toxicity (n = 2), and the patient requiring treatment for a second malignancy (n = 2). 10 (34%) patients completed perioperative chemotherapy. Median DFS was 12.5m (95% CI 7.9-12.5) for ‘no’ FLOT’ and was not-reached for ‘yes’ FLOT (p = 0.29). 18m DFS was 50% (95% CI 27-93) v 81% (95% CI 64-100) respectively. The median OS for ‘no’ adjuvant FLOT was 16.7m (95% CI 11.5-16.7) with 5 deaths. Zero deaths due to malignancy had occurred at 23.3m in those who received adjuvant FLOT (p0.00164). 1 death in the ‘yes’ group occurred due to interstitial lung disease. Conclusions: In our small population size 34% of patients completed perioperative FLOT. Whilst nil statistically significant difference was observed in mDFS, an improved mOS was observed in those that received adjuvant FLOT suggesting an importance in receiving the maximum number of cycles of chemotherapy. Given the challenges of administering adjuvant FLOT future trials into the feasibility and efficacy of 8 cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT should be considered.

Systematic review of adjuvant therapy for early stage (epithelial) ovarian cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Winter-Roach ◽  
L. Hooper ◽  
H. Kitchener
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Well Differentiated ◽  
Platinum Chemotherapy

A systematic review and meta analysis has been undertaken in order to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy following surgery for early ovarian cancer. Trials reported since 1990 have been of a higher quality enabling a meta analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy vs adjuvant radiotherapy and a meta analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy vs observation. There was no significant difference between radiotherapy and chemotherapy, though these comprised studies which demonstrated considerable heterogeneity. Chemotherapy did confer significant benefit over observation in terms of both overall and disease free survival. Except for women in whom adequate surgical staging has revealed well differentiated disease confined to one or both ovaries with intact capsule, platinum chemotherapy should be offered to reduce risk of recurrence.

Phase II trial of perioperative chemotherapy + avelumab in locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: Preliminary results.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4046-4046
Author(s):  
Thierry Alcindor ◽  
Touhid Opu ◽  
Arielle Elkrief ◽  
Farzin Khosrow-Khavar ◽  
Carmen L. Mueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

4046 Background: Perioperative chemotherapy improves cure rate in locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA), and immune checkpoint inhibitors are active at the metastatic stage. This trial tests the hypothesis that the addition of avelumab to perioperative chemotherapy will increase the major pathologic response (MPR) rate in comparison with historical controls. Methods: Phase II study of avelumab + chemotherapy (docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU or mDCF) given every 2 weeks for 4 cycles before and after surgery. Main inclusion criteria: GEA, cT3 and/or cN+, M0, WHO PS 0-1. Main exclusion criteria: use of immunosuppressants, serious autoimmune disease, daily intake >10 mg prednisone. Staging studies: CT, PET-CT, endoscopic ultrasound, diagnostic laparoscopy. Surgical resection: D2 lymphadenectomy, en-bloc esophagectomy for type I/II gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors. Aim of the study: MPR as defined as tumor regression grades 0-1 (modified Ryan scheme); as per hypothesis, this experimental regimen will result in a 20% rate of MPR, compared with 7% with chemotherapy alone. Simon 2-stage design: if less than 2 MPR are seen in the first 16 patients, the study will be closed. The study hypothesis cannot be rejected if at least 6 MPR are seen in the first 50 patients. All adverse effects are prospectively recorded per CTCAE guidelines in patients who have received at least one treatment cycle. Survival rates are calculated with Kaplan-Meier method. Preliminary results are presented since the study has met its primary endpoint. Results: Feb 2018-Feb 2020: 28 patients enrolled (25 M/3 F, age 45-78). Location: GEJ (23), stomach (5). Staging: cT3 (25), cT4 (1), cN+ (20). Biomarkers expression: mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss (3/28); PD-L1(clone 73-10) expression in 1% (TPS) or more of tumor cells seen in 12/28 samples, and >10% in 6 patients. Grade 3 toxicity: stomatitis (2/28); nausea (2/28); vomiting (1/28); diarrhea (1/28); hypothyroidism (1/28); arthralgia (3/28); neutropenia (1/28). Grade 4 toxicity: pneumonia (1/28); neutropenia (2/28). Postoperative 30-day mortality: 0%. One patient was excluded from efficacy analyses for M1 staging; 27 patients underwent surgery, 26 with R0 (96%). Six cases (22%) show MPR: 3 grade 0 (11%) and 3 grade 1 (11%) tumor regressions. No correlation was seen between MMR proteins or PD-L1 expression and tumor regression. With a median follow-up of 1.5 years (range 0.4-2.5), the disease-free survival rate is projected to be 0.92 (95% CI 0.83-1.00) at 12 months and 0.77 (95% CI 0.58-1.00) at 24 months. Conclusions: The combination of mDCF chemotherapy with Avelumab demonstrates a promising safety and activity profile. Ongoing laboratory investigations are underway to correlate our findings with tumor molecular features before exposure to treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03288350.

scholarly journals Differences in the outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer prescribed by physicians in different disciplines: a population-based study in Taiwan

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e021341
Author(s):  
Cheng-I Hsieh ◽  
Raymond Nien-Chen Kuo ◽  
Chun-Chieh Liang ◽  
Hsin-Yun Tsai ◽  
Kuo-Piao Chung
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Multiple Primary Cancers ◽  
Positive Surgical Margin ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Significant Difference

ObjectivesOne feature unique to the Taiwanese healthcare system is the ability of physicians other than oncologists to prescribe systemic chemotherapy. This study investigated whether the care paths implemented by oncologists and non-oncologists differ with regard to patient outcomes.SettingData from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Database were linked to identify patients with colon cancer who underwent colectomy as first treatment within 3 months of diagnosis and adjuvant chemotherapy between 2005 and 2009.Participants and methodsPostoperative patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy were included in this study. The exclusion criteria included patients with stage IV disease, a positive surgical margin and early disease recurrence. Among the patients presenting with multiple primary cancers, we also excluded patients who were diagnosed with colon cancer but for whom this was not the first primary cancer. The variables included sex, age, comorbidities, disease stage, chemotherapy cycle and changes in treatment regimen as well as the specialty of treatment providers and their case volume. Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to examine differences in outcomes in the matched cohorts.ResultsWe examined 3534 patients who were prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy by physicians from different disciplines. In terms of 5-year disease-free survival, no significant difference was observed between the groups of oncologists or surgeons among patients with stage II (90.02%vs88.99%) or stage III (77.64%vs79.99%) diseases. Patients who were subjected to changes in their chemotherapy regimens presented recurrence rates higher than those who were not.ConclusionsThe discipline of practitioners is seldom taken into account in most series. This is the first study to provide empirical evidence demonstrating that the outcomes of patients with colon cancer do not depend on the treatment path, as long as the selection criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy is appropriate. Further study will be required before making any further conclusions.

scholarly journals Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy combined with intracavitary brachytherapy achieved the equivalent survival compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 714-718
Author(s):  
Hao Yu ◽  
Linlin Zhang ◽  
Dapeng Li ◽  
Naifu Liu ◽  
Yueju Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract Objectives The current study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) combined with intracavitary brachytherapy (ICRT) in cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk. Methods We analyzed the medical records of 558 patients who were submitted to radical surgery for Stage IB-IIA cervical cancer. A total of 172 of those 558 patients were considered intermediate-risk according to the GOG criteria. Among those 172 patients, 102 were subjected to CT combined with ICRT (CT+ICRT) and the remaining 70 patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). The 3-year disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and complications of each group were evaluated and analyzed. Results No significant difference was observed in 3-year DFS or OS of the patients submitted to CT+ICRT and CCRT. Importantly, the frequencies of grade III to IV acute complications were significantly higher in patients submitted to CCRT than in those treated with CT+ICRT (Hematologic, P = 0.016; Gastrointestinal, P = 0.041; Genitourinary, P = 0.019). Moreover, the frequencies of grade III–IV late complications in patients treated with CCRT were significantly higher compared with CT+ICRT-treated patients (Gastrointestinal, P = 0.026; Genitourinary, P = 0.026; Lower extremity edema, P = 0.008). Conclusions Postoperative adjuvant CT+ICRT treatment achieved equivalent 3-year DFS and OS but low complication rate compared to CCRT treatment in early stage cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk.

scholarly journals The prognosis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a propensity score-based analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zhou ◽  
Anqiang Wang ◽  
Sheng Ao ◽  
Jiahui Chen ◽  
Ke Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Radical Gastrectomy ◽  
Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Propensity Matching

Abstract Background : To investigate whether there is a distinct difference in prognosis between hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach ( HAS) and non-hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (non-HAS) and whether HAS can benefit from radical surgery. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed 722 patients with non-HAS and 75 patients with HAS who underwent radical gastrectomy between 3 November 2009 and 17 December 2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to eliminate the bias among the patients in our study. The relationships between gastric cancer type and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. Results : Our data demonstrate that there was no statistically significant difference in the OS between HAS and non-HAS {K-M, P=log rank (Mantel-Cox), (before PSM P=0.397); (1:1 PSM P=0.345); (1:2 PSM P=0.195)}. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the 1-, 2-, or 3-year survival rates between patients with non-HAS and patients with HAS (before propensity matching, after 1:1 propensity matching, and after 1:2 propensity matching). Conclusion : HAS was generally considered to be an aggressive gastric neoplasm, but its prognosis may not be as unsatisfactory as previously believed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document