scholarly journals SUN-LB74 Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS) for the Assessment of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk Prediction

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Delia Ciardo ◽  
Francesco Conversano ◽  
Paola Pisani ◽  
Sergio Casciaro

Abstract Introduction Fragility bone fractures impact patient’s quality of life and worldwide healthcare systems: accurate technologies and device are required in order to early diagnose and monitor the effect of osteoporosis on a mass-population basis. Several studied have analysed the pros and cons of the numerous technologies available nowadays for the diagnosis and monitoring of bone health, highlighting the need of further tools able to better define and estimate bone strength and to predict the risk of fracture [1]. Objectives The aim is to assess the state of the art about Radiofrequency Echographic Multi-Spectrometry (REMS). Methods A review of the available literature was performed, considering full papers, reviews and abstracts on REMS published before January 31th 2020. Results REMS has been recently presented by an ESCEO consensus paper as a valuable technology for osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk estimation [1]. It is based on the automatic processing of the raw unfiltered signals obtained with an ultrasound scan, thus overcoming the main drawback of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and computed tomography (CT)-based technologies [2]. Moreover, REMS scans are performed at axial skeleton reference sites, i.e. lumbar spine [3] and femoral neck [4], differently from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technology, which is usually applied to peripheral sites [3]. Clinical performance has been confirmed by a multicentre clinical trial enrolling over 1900 Caucasian women, demonstrating a high correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) estimated by REMS and DXA. In addition, high performance in terms of precision and intra- and inter-operator repeatability of REMS have been assessed [6]. Prospective studies have demonstrated the predictive ability of incident fragility fractures [7] and the high concordance with DXA in terms of measured BMD in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and pre/post-menopause [8, 9]. Conclusions REMS is an innovative approach for the early diagnosis, short-term monitoring of osteoporosis and risk fracture prediction. The available data envisaged for further applications in paediatric patients, pregnant women and patients at risk of secondary osteoporosis (e.g., diabetic, nephropathic, oncological patients). The EchoS system, a device implementing the REMS technology, has recently received the approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). References 1. Diez-Perez et al. Aging Clin Exp Res 2019;31(10):1375–89 2. Iwaszkiewicz & Leszczyński. Forum Reumatol 2019;5(2):81–8 3. Hans & Baim. J Clin Densitom 2017;20(3):322-3 4. Conversano et al. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015;41:281–300 5. Casciaro et al. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016;42:1337–56 6. Di Paola et al. Osteoporos Int 2018;30:391–402 7. Adami et al. Ann Rheum Dis, vol.78, supp.2, 2019, p.A928 8. Bojincă et al. Exp Ther Med 2019;18(3):1661-68 9. Kirilova et al. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 2019; 16(1):14-17

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2096926
Author(s):  
Sophia D. Sakka ◽  
Moira S. Cheung

Osteoporosis in children differs from adults in terms of definition, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment options. Primary osteoporosis comprises primarily of osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), but there are significant other causes of bone fragility in children that require treatment. Secondary osteoporosis can be a result of muscle disuse, iatrogenic causes, such as steroids, chronic inflammation, delayed or arrested puberty and thalassaemia major. Investigations involve bone biochemistry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan for bone densitometry and vertebral fracture assessment, radiographic assessment of the spine and, in some cases, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) or peripheral QCT. It is important that bone mineral density (BMD) results are adjusted based on age, gender and height, in order to reflect size corrections in children. Genetics are being used increasingly for the diagnosis and classification of various cases of primary osteoporosis. Bone turnover markers are used less frequently in children, but can be helpful in monitoring treatment and transiliac bone biopsy can assist in the diagnosis of atypical cases of osteoporosis. The management of children with osteoporosis requires a multidisciplinary team of health professionals with expertise in paediatric bone disease. The prevention and treatment of fragility fractures and improvement of the quality of life of patients are important aims of a specialised service. The drugs used most commonly in children are bisphosphonates, that, with timely treatment, can give good results in improving BMD and reshaping vertebral fractures. The data regarding their effect on reducing long bone fractures are equivocal. Denosumab is being used increasingly for various conditions with mixed results. There are more drugs trialled in adults, but these are not yet licenced for children. Increasing awareness of risk factors for paediatric osteoporosis, screening and referral to a specialist team for appropriate management can lead to early detection and treatment of asymptomatic fractures and prevention of further bone damage.


2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie E Cusano ◽  
Mishaela R Rubin ◽  
Barbara C Silva ◽  
Yu-Kwang Donovan Tay ◽  
John M Williams ◽  
...  

Abstract Context High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) is a noninvasive imaging technology that can provide insight into skeletal microstructure and strength. In asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), HRpQCT imaging has demonstrated both decreased cortical and trabecular indices, consistent with evidence for increased fracture risk. There are limited data regarding changes in HRpQCT parameters postparathyroidectomy. Objective To evaluate changes in skeletal microstructure by HRpQCT in subjects with PHPT after parathyroidectomy. Design We studied 29 subjects with PHPT (21 women, 8 men) with HRpQCT at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postparathyroidectomy. Main Outcome Measures Volumetric bone mineral density, microarchitectural indices, and finite element analysis at the distal radius and tibia. Results At both the radius and tibia, there were significant improvements in total, cortical, and trabecular volumetric bone density as early as 6 months postparathyroidectomy (24-month values for total volumetric bone density, radius: +2.8 ± 4%, tibia: +4.4 ± 4%; P < 0.0001 for both), cortical thickness (radius: +1.1 ± 2%, tibia: +2.0 ± 3%; P < 0.01 for both), and trabecular bone volume (radius: +3.8 ± 5%, tibia: +3.2 ± 4%; P < 0.0001 for both). At both sites, by finite element analysis, stiffness and failure load were improved starting at 6 months postparathyroidectomy (24-month values for failure load, radius: +6.2 ± 6%, tibia: +4.8 ± 7%; P < 0.0001 for both). Conclusions These results provide information about skeletal microarchitecture in subjects with PHPT followed through 2 years after parathyroidectomy. Estimated bone strength is improved, consistent with data showing decreased fracture risk postparathyroidectomy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Link

The radiologist has a number of roles not only in diagnosing but also in treating osteoporosis. Radiologists diagnose fragility fractures with all imaging modalities, which includes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrating radiologically occult insufficiency fractures, but also lateral chest radiographs showing asymptomatic vertebral fractures. In particular MRI fragility fractures may have a nonspecific appearance and the radiologists needs to be familiar with the typical locations and findings, to differentiate these fractures from neoplastic lesions. It should be noted that radiologists do not simply need to diagnose fractures related to osteoporosis but also to diagnose those fractures which are complications of osteoporosis related pharmacotherapy. In addition to using standard radiological techniques radiologists also use dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) to quantitatively assess bone mineral density for diagnosing osteoporosis or osteopenia as well as to monitor therapy. DXA measurements of the femoral neck are also used to calculate osteoporotic fracture risk based on the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score, which is universally available. Some of the new technologies such as high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and MR spectroscopy allow assessment of bone architecture and bone marrow composition to characterize fracture risk. Finally radiologists are also involved in the therapy of osteoporotic fractures by using vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and sacroplasty. This review article will focus on standard techniques and new concepts in diagnosing and managing osteoporosis.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Clynes ◽  
Nicholas C Harvey ◽  
Elizabeth M Curtis ◽  
Nicholas R Fuggle ◽  
Elaine M Dennison ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction With a worldwide ageing population, the importance of the prevention and management of osteoporotic fragility fractures is increasing over time. In this review, we discuss in detail the epidemiology of fragility fractures, how this is shaped by pharmacological interventions and how novel screening programmes can reduce the clinical and economic burden of osteoporotic fractures. Sources of data PubMed and Google Scholar were searched using various combinations of the keywords ‘osteoporosis’, ‘epidemiology’, ‘fracture’, ‘screening’, `FRAX’ and ‘SCOOP’. Areas of agreement The economic burden of osteoporosis-related fracture is significant, costing approximately $17.9 and £4 billion per annum in the USA and UK. Areas of controversy Risk calculators such as the web-based FRAX® algorithm have enabled assessment of an individual’s fracture risk using clinical risk factors, with only partial consideration of bone mineral density (BMD). Growing points As with all new interventions, we await the results of long-term use of osteoporosis screening algorithms and how these can be refined and incorporated into clinical practice. Areas timely for developing research Despite advances in osteoporosis screening, a minority of men and women at high fracture risk worldwide receive treatment. The economic and societal burden caused by osteoporosis is a clear motivation for improving the screening and management of osteoporosis worldwide.


2019 ◽  
Vol 180 (6) ◽  
pp. R213-R232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Eller-Vainicher ◽  
Alberto Falchetti ◽  
Luigi Gennari ◽  
Elisa Cairoli ◽  
Francesco Bertoldo ◽  
...  

An underlying disease affecting bone health is present in up to 40 and 60% of osteoporotic postmenopausal women and men respectively. Among the disorders leading to a secondary form of osteoporosis, the endocrine diseases are highly represented. A frequent finding in patients affected with an endocrine-related forms of bone disease is that the skeletal fragility is partially independent of the bone density, since the fracture risk in these patients is related more to a reduction of bone quality than to a decrease of bone mass. As a consequence, bone mineral density evaluation by dual-X-ray absorptiometry may be inadequate for establishing the risk of fracture in the setting of the endocrine-related forms of osteoporosis. In the recent years, several attempts to non-invasively estimating bone quality have been done. Nowadays, some new tools are available in the clinical practice for optimising the fracture risk estimation in patients with endocrine disorders. The aim of this review is to summarise the evidence regarding the role of the different imaging tools for evaluating bone density and bone quality in the most frequent forms of endocrine-related osteoporosis, such as obesity, diabetes, acromegaly, thyrotoxicosis, primary hyperparathyroidism, hypercortisolism and hypogonadism. For each of these disorders, data regarding both the current available tools and the future possible new techniques for assessing bone fragility in patients with endocrine diseases are reported.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27) ◽  
pp. 3705-3714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Saylor ◽  
Richard J. Lee ◽  
Matthew R. Smith

Skeletal morbidity is a prominent burden to men with advanced prostate cancer throughout the natural history of the disease. Bone metastases can cause pain and greatly elevate the risk for fractures and other structural complications. Distinct from the problem of metastases, treatment-related osteoporosis and associated fragility fractures are potential complications of androgen-deprivation therapy. Bone-targeted therapies for prostate cancer have therefore been the focus of considerable research and drug development efforts. The osteoclast is a validated therapeutic target in the management of prostate cancer. Osteoclast inhibition with zoledronic acid (a bisphosphonate) or with denosumab (a monoclonal antibody to RANK ligand) reduces risk for skeletal events in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Osteoclast inhibition with any of several bisphosphonates improves bone mineral density, a surrogate for osteoporotic fracture risk. Denosumab and toremifene (a selective estrogen receptor modulator) have each been shown to reduce osteoporotic fracture risk among men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy. Beta-emitting radiopharmaceuticals reduce pain due to metastatic disease. Investigations involving alpha-emitting radium-223, endothelin-A receptor antagonists atrasentan and zibotentan, proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase (SRC) inhibitor dasatinib, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib (XL184) are ongoing in clinical trials and are also discussed.


2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet Compston

Bone quality describes aspects of bone composition and structure that contribute to bone strength independently of bone mineral density. These include bone turnover, microarchitecture, mineralisation, microdamage and the composition of bone matrix and mineral. New techniques to assess these components of bone quality are being developed and should produce important insights into determinants of fracture risk in untreated and treated disease.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-25
Author(s):  
Kathleen F. Janz

Of all the lifestyle strategies for increasing bone strength during the growing years, physical activity is one of the most efficacious. This commentary highlights two exceptional 2016 publications addressing bone strength in children and adolescents with an eye toward reduced fracture risk later in life. The first by Weaver et al. was selected due to its comprehensive approach to understanding bone development. The second by Mitchell et al explores a new field of inquiry, that is, genetic-environment interaction as represented by bone mineral density-lowering alleles and high-impact physical activity. It is a first look at future precision medicine as it may pertain to pediatric bone strength.


2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Kannu ◽  
Areej Mahjoub ◽  
Riyana Babul-Hirji ◽  
Melissa T. Carter ◽  
Jennifer Harrington

Background and Objectives: Plastin 3 (PLS3) mutations are associated with an X-linked osteoporosis. Here we describe two new families with novel mutations, including one with a whole gene PLS3 deletion, and review the literature on 9 previously reported cases. Results: Hemizygous male carriers presented with multiple peripheral bone fractures, low bone mineral density (BMD), and vertebral compression fractures. Heterozygous female carriers did not have a history of fragility fractures, although 1 individual presented with low BMD. Apart from greyish-tinged sclera, no other extraskeletal features of osteogenesis imperfecta were identified. Histomorphometry from a transiliac bone biopsy in one of our index patients demonstrated significantly low trabecular bone volume with increased bone turnover. Bisphosphonate treatment was associated with a reduction in the fracture rate and increased bone density. Conclusion: Hemizygous mutations in PLS3 may cause a monogenic form of X-linked osteoporosis presenting in childhood with a nonspecific phenotype. No characteristic ocular, dental, or joint abnormalities are defined. When genetic testing is undertaken to investigate for primary causes of bone fragility, we suggest PLS3 be included in order not to miss this diagnosis.


Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic T Beith ◽  
Marwan Bukhari

Abstract Background A body mass index (BMI) of less than 19 is a known risk factor for the development of osteoporosis and thus increases the propensity of one having a fragility fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) referrals are aided by the FRAX™ tool, which contains BMI in order to calculate the ten-year fracture risk. We aimed to investigate the effect of percentage body fat on risk of fracture referred for BMD estimation. Methods Between June 2004 and October 2015, patients were referred for bone mineral density (BMD) estimation in a scanner in the North West of England. All patients were referred with all FRAX™ indications including rheumatoid arthritis, excess alcohol, steroids, family history of fracture and secondary osteoporosis. The cohort was divided into quintiles of ascending body mass percentage. Logistical regression was then applied before adjusting for age at scan, gender and total left BMD comparing patients with a fracture and those that had not. Results 35,759 patients were referred for scanning during the period. 22,765 (63.66%) were referred for BMD estimation and had body fat percentage measured. Mean age at scan was 63.16 (SD 12.86) and 18,961 (88.29%) of the cohort were females. 8,072 (35.46%) had a fracture. More fractures were seen in higher quintiles of percentage body fat, 1,693 (20.97%) compared to 1,580 (19.57%) in females (p = <0.05). Predictors shown in the Table 1 below adjusted for age at scan, gender and total left BMD. Logistical regression of the quintiles after adjustment shows statistical significance in quintiles 3, 4 and 5 as well as for age at scan and total left BMD. Other predictors did not shows statistical significance p > 0.05. Conclusion Our study of 22,765 patients referred for BMD estimations opposes current literature on the effect of BMI on fragility fractures. The data shows that increasing percentage body fat in associated with an increased propensity of fragility fractures in those with BMI as a FRAX™ indicator. Currently percentage body fact is not featured in the FRAX™ tool and further work needs to be done to show the relationship between fracture risk and percentage body fat. Disclosures D.T. Beith: None. M. Bukhari: None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document