Presentation and Management of Liraglutide-Related Pancreatitis: Systematic Review of Case Reports

Abstract Background: Liraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1 agonist) aimed towards promoting glucose-dependent insulin secretions. This medication is an emerging treatment option for the management of obesity through promoting satiety. However, there are a growing number of cases noting adverse effects of liraglutide. Of note, liraglutide has been seen to elevate serum amylase and lipase levels among users, and therefore promoting acute pancreatitis. Moreover, the overall presentation of liraglutide-related acute pancreatitis can be variable. The aim of this study is to determine qualitative patterns of presentation and meta-analysis of lab changes among acute pancreatitis patients on liraglutide. Methodology: Systematic review of the literature was performed on MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for liraglutide-related acute pancreatitis case studies, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist. Meta-Analysis performed using Stata. Results: Twenty-one patient cases were identified then contingently evaluated for acute pancreatitis based on presentation, labs, and treatment outcomes. Within the pancreatitis cases, the average age of onset was 59 ± 16.5 (male = 58 ± 24.5; female = 56 ± 24.6). Upon qualitative review, 14.3% of patients were asymptomatic but showed elevated serum amylase and lipase levels following liraglutide administration (p < 0.05). Among the symptomatic group, there was variation in the duration of liraglutide administration and reported compliance. There was no significant difference among treatment regimes between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. Conclusion: Longer duration of liraglutide treatment without dose adjustment was notable to show elevated rises in both serum amylase and lipase. However, the variation of patient symptoms cannot be determined through the duration of treatment. Patient demographics do not seem to play a role in acute pancreatitis episodes. Future studies ought to focus on larger patient samples to further develop an understanding of treatment duration, presentation, and management of acute pancreatitis management after liraglutide administration.

Download Full-text

Predictive Performance of Serum S100B Versus LDH in Melanoma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.772165 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Eszter Anna Janka ◽

Tünde Várvölgyi ◽

Zoltán Sipos ◽

Alexandra Soós ◽

Péter Hegyi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Study Protocol ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Elevated Serum ◽

Predictive Performance ◽

Discriminative Ability ◽

Serum S100b ◽

Risk Of Death ◽

Melanoma Patients

BackgroundCurrently, no consensus on the use of blood tests for monitoring disease recurrence in patients with resected melanoma exists. The only meta-analysis conducted in 2008 found that elevated serum S100B levels were associated with significantly worse survival in melanoma patients. Serum LDH is an established prognostic factor in patients with advanced melanoma.ObjectiveTo compare the discriminative and prognostic ability of serum S100B with that of serum LDH in patients with melanoma.MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis were reported in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42019137138).ResultsA quantitative analysis of data from 6 eligible studies included 1,033 patients with cutaneous melanoma. The discriminative ability of serum S100B at identifying disease relapse [pooled Area Under the ROC (AUROC) 78.64 (95% CI 70.28; 87.01)] was significantly greater than the discriminative ability of serum LDH [AUROC 64.41 (95% CI 56.05; 7278)] (p=0.013). Ten eligible studies with 1,987 patients were included in the risk of death analysis. The prognostic performance of serum S100B [pooled estimate of adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.78 (95% CI 1.38; 2.29)] was independent but not superior to that of serum LDH [HR 1.60 (95% CI 1.36; 2.29)].LimitationsA relatively small number of articles were eligible and there was considerable heterogeneity across the included studies.ConclusionsSerum biomarkers may provide relevant information on melanoma patient status and should be further researched. Serum S100B is a valid marker for diagnosis of melanoma recurrence.Systematic Review RegistrationThe study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42019137138).

Download Full-text

Close Reduction Percutaneous Pinning (CRPP) versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Gartland Type II and III: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Journal Of The Indonesian Medical Association ◽

10.47830/jinma-vol.71.4-2021-389 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 71 (4) ◽

pp. 187-193

Author(s):

Putu Astawa ◽

Made Agus Maharjana ◽

Surya Adisthanaya ◽

Made Winatra Satya Putra ◽

Agus Suarjaya Putra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Case Reports ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Fixed Effect Model ◽

Cosmetic Outcome ◽

Type I ◽

Type Ii ◽

Supracondylar Humerus Fractures ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Humerus Fractures

Introduction: Displaced supracondylar fracture in children is a challenging injury that may result in impaired functional and cosmetic outcome if not well-treated. Utilization of Closed Reduction and Percutaneus Pinning (CRPP) increased for this pathology, some authors believe ORIF results better anatomical reduction and lower rate of loss of reduction. Study aims to compare CRPP and ORIF for pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture. Method: Systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA guideline. Inclusion criteria were age <18 years old, comparing CRPP and ORIF for Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Gartland Type II, II.Studies of one surgical technique, Gartland type I, case reports were excluded. For meta-analysis, 6 studies were included and fixed effect model used to pool the result. In each study, mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for dichotomous outcomes using Review Manager. Result: Total of 252 patients aged 0-15 years old were included. CRPP more often performed than ORIF. Satisfactory outcomes measured by Flynn’s criteria were achieved in 87.74% in CRPP and 86.73% in ORIF patient group, indicating significant difference (Heterogeneity, I2 = 23%; WMD, 1.26; 0.58 to 2.73; P =0.56). Conclusion: Current systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures, ORIF offers a comparable functional and cosmetic outcome compared to CRPP.

Download Full-text

Drug Use and Postoperative Mortality Following Valve Surgery for Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Clinical Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/cid/ciy1064 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 69 (7) ◽

pp. 1120-1129 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Ryan Hall ◽

Michael Shaughnessy ◽

Griffin Boll ◽

Kenneth Warner ◽

Helen W Boucher ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Infective Endocarditis ◽

Drug Use ◽

Injection Drug Use ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Postoperative Mortality ◽

Valve Surgery ◽

Injection Drug ◽

Significant Difference

AbstractBackgroundInfective endocarditis (IE) often requires surgical intervention. An increasingly common cause of IE is injection drug use (IDU-IE). There is conflicting evidence on whether postoperative mortality differs between people with IDU-IE and people with IE from etiologies other than injection drug use (non–IDU-IE). In this manuscript, we compare short-term postoperative mortality in IDU-IE vs non–IDU-IE through systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsThe review was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Publication databases were queried for key terms included in articles up to September 2017. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohorts, or retrospective cohorts that reported on 30-day mortality or in-hospital/operative mortality following valve surgery and that compared outcomes between IDU-IE and non–IDU-IE were included.ResultsThirteen studies with 1593 patients (n = 341 [21.4%] IDU-IE) were included in the meta-analysis. IDU-IE patients more frequently had tricuspid valve infection, Staphylococcus infection, and heart failure before surgery. Meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in 30-day postsurgical mortality or in-hospital mortality between the 2 groups.ConclusionsDespite differing preoperative clinical characteristics, early postoperative mortality does not differ between IDU-IE and non–IDU-IE patients who undergo valve surgery. Future research on long-term outcomes following valve replacement is needed to identify opportunities for improved healthcare delivery with IDU-IE.

Download Full-text

Modified Jobe Versus Docking Technique for Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Outcomes

The American Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/0363546520921160 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 49 (1) ◽

pp. 236-248

Author(s):

Austin M. Looney ◽

David X. Wang ◽

Christine M. Conroy ◽

Jake E. Israel ◽

Blake M. Bodendorfer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Ulnar Nerve ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Ulnar Collateral Ligament ◽

Likelihood Method ◽

Collateral Ligament ◽

Ulnar Nerve Transposition ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Nerve Transposition

Background: The modified Jobe and docking techniques are the most common techniques used for elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction. Previous systematic reviews have suggested that the docking technique results in superior outcomes as compared with the Jobe (figure-of-8) technique. However, these included results from earlier studies in which the flexor-pronator mass (FPM) was detached and an obligatory submuscular ulnar nerve transposition was performed. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to compare the outcomes and return-to-play (RTP) time between the docking and figure-of-8 techniques for UCL reconstruction. We hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in the proportion of excellent outcomes between techniques when the FPM was preserved and no obligatory submuscular ulnar nerve transposition was performed. We also hypothesized that there would be no significant difference in RTP time between techniques. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This study was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. In the primary analysis, techniques were compared in random effects models by using the restricted maximum likelihood method, with weighted effect sizes calculated as the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformed proportion of excellent outcomes for variance stabilization and with summary effects estimated from the inverse double-arcsine transformation per the harmonic mean of the sample sizes. Mean RTP times for techniques were compared in a separate model. Results: There were 21 eligible articles identified, with results for 1842 UCL reconstructions (n = 320, docking; n = 1466, figure-of-8). Without controlling for the effects of flexor-pronator detachment and submuscular ulnar nerve transposition, a significantly larger proportion of excellent outcomes was observed with docking reconstruction (86.58%; 95% CI, 80.42%-91.85%) than with figure-of-8 reconstruction (76.76%; 95% CI, 69.65%-83.25%; P = .031); however, there was no significant difference between techniques when controlling for FPM preservation or detachment with submuscular nerve transposition ( P = .139). There was no significant difference between techniques in time to return to sports ( P = .729), although no reconstructions with FPM detachment and submuscular ulnar nerve transposition were available for RTP time analysis. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the proportion of excellent Conway Scale outcomes or RTP time between the docking and modified Jobe techniques for UCL reconstruction when the FPM was preserved and routine submuscular ulnar nerve transposition was not performed.

Download Full-text

Repurposing of drugs for Covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.1101/2020.06.07.20124677 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Pinky Kotecha ◽

Alexander Light ◽

Enrico Checcucci ◽

Daniele Amparore ◽

Cristian Fiori ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Clinical Improvement ◽

Case Reports ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Case Series ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Control Group ◽

Significant Difference

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the data currently available regarding the repurposing of different drugs for Covid-19 treatment. Participants with suspected or diagnosed Covid-19 will be included. The interventions being considered are drugs being repurposed, and comparators will include standard of care treatment or placebo.MethodsWe searched Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, clinical trial registration site in the UK(NIHR), Europe (clinicaltrialsregister.eu), US (ClinicalTrials.gov) and internationally (isrctn.com), and reviewed the reference lists of articles for eligible articles published up to April 22, 2020. All studies in English that evaluated the efficacy of the listed drugs were included. Cochrane RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tool were used to assess study quality. This systematic review adheres to the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol is available at PROSPERO (CRD42020180915).ResultsFrom 708 identified studies or clinical trials, 16 studies and 16 case reports met our eligibility criteria. Of these, 6 were randomized controlled trials (763 patients), 7 cohort studies (321 patients) and 3 case series (191 patients). Chloroquine (CQ) had a 100% discharge rate compared to 50% with lopinavir-ritonavir at day 14, however a trial has recommended against a high dosage due to cardiotoxic events. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown no significant improvement in negative seroconversion rate which is also seen in our meta-analysis (p=0.68). Adverse events with HCQ have a significant difference compared to the control group (p=0.001). Lopinavir-ritonavir has shown no improvement in time to clinical improvement which is seen in our meta-analyses (p=0.1). Remdesivir has shown no significant improvement in time to clinical improvement but this trial had insufficient power.DiscussionDue to the paucity in evidence, it is difficult to establish the efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of Covid-19 as currently there is no significant clinical effectiveness of the repurposed drugs. Further large clinical trials are required to achieve more reliable findings. A risk-benefit analysis is required on an individual basis to weigh out the potential improvement in clinical outcome and viral load reduction compared to the risks of the adverse events. (1-16)

Download Full-text

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Hyponatremia in Lung Cancer Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-104861/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Eszter Bartalis ◽

Marin Gergics ◽

Benedek Tinusz ◽

Mária Földi ◽

Szabolcs Kiss ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Prognostic Significance ◽

Small Cell ◽

Cancer Type ◽

Lung Cancer Patients ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Background The prevalence of hyponatremia is highly variable among lung cancer patients. It is also an important predictive factor, according to numerous studies. However, its prevalence and prognostic significance in subgroups of lung cancer patients, e.g. in small cell and non-small cell lung cancers (SCLC and NSCLC, respectively), have not yet been evaluated in a meta-analysis.Methods We report this systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2009) Statement. We have registered our meta-analysis and review’s protocol to the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, with the following registration number: CRD42020167013. A systematic search was done in the following sources: MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, a WHO Global Health Library. We extracted the effect measure for each outcome as the relative risk (RR) with the related 95% confidence interval (CI). Results We identified a total of 8127 potentially eligible studies and we included 25 studies in our evaluation. The prevalence of hyponatremia in lung cancer patients varied between 3% and 56.1% with an average of 23% without any significant differences between the following subgroups: cancer type (p=0.780), gender (p=0.223), age (p=0.773), ECOG state (p=0.317) and the extent of disease (p=0.999). Hyponatremia was more consistently an independent prognostic factor in NSCLC than in SCLC. The overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in hyponatremic compared to normonatremic patients at 10 months (RR: 0.59, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.74, p<0.001) and at 20 months (RR: 0.44, 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.59, p<0.001), with worse survival rates in NSCLC than in SCLC (27% vs 42%) (p<0.001). If hyponatremia was corrected, OS at 10 months was 1.83 times higher than in the uncorrected hyponatremia group (95% CI, 1.37 to 2.44, p<0.001), but at 20 months no statistically significant difference could be found between these subgroups (p=0.067).Conclusions Low serum sodium levels have a negative impact on mortality at 10 and 20 months, which is more pronounced among NSCLC patients. The correction of hyponatremia has a positive effect on OS rates at 10 months, but this advantage disappears by 20 months.

Download Full-text

Nasogastric nutrition is efficacious in severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

British Journal Of Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s0007114514002566 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 1769-1778 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Deirdre M. Nally ◽

Enda G. Kelly ◽

Mary Clarke ◽

Paul Ridgway

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Acute Pancreatitis ◽

Side Effects ◽

Disease Severity ◽

Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Delivery Rate ◽

Rate Reduction ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Significant Difference

In patients with severe acute pancreatitis (AP), enteral nutrition is delivered by nasojejunal (NJ) tube to minimise pancreatic stimulation. Nasogastric (NG) feeding represents an alternative route. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of NG feeding. Secondary objectives were to compare the NG and NJ routes and assess the side effects of the former. The primary endpoint was exclusive NG feeding with delivery of 75 % of nutritional targets. Additional outcomes included change to total parenteral nutrition (TPN), increased pain or disease severity, vomiting, diarrhoea, delivery rate reduction and tube displacement. Among the retrieved studies, six were found to be eligible for the qualitative review and four for the meta-analysis. NG nutrition was received by 147 patients; exclusive NG feeding was achieved in 90 % (133/147). Of the 147 patients, 129 (87 %) received 75 % of the target energy. In studies where all subjects received exclusive NG nutrition, 82 % (seventy-four of the ninety patients) received >75 % of the intended energy. Compared with NJ nutrition, there was no significant difference in the delivery of 75 % of nutritional targets (pooled risk ratio (RR) 1·02; 95 % CI 0·75, 1·38.) or no increased risk of change to TPN (pooled RR 1·05; 95 % CI 0·45, 2·48), diarrhoea (pooled RR 1·28; 95 % CI 0·62, 2·66), exacerbation of pain (pooled RR 1·10; 95 % CI 0·47, 2·61) or tube displacement (pooled RR 0·44; 95 % CI 0·11, 1·73). Vomiting and diarrhoea were the most common side effects of NG feeding (13·3 and 12·9 %, respectively). With respect to the delivery of nutrition, 11·2 % of the patients required delivery rate reduction and 3·4 % dislodged the tube. Other side effects included elevated levels of aspirates (9·1 %), abdominal distension (1·5 %), pain exacerbation (7·5 %) and increased disease severity (1·6 %). In conclusion, NG feeding is efficacious in 90 % of patients. Further research is required to optimise the delivery of NG nutrition and examine ‘gut-rousing’ approaches to nutrition in patients with severe AP.

Download Full-text

Weekend effect in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PeerJ ◽

10.7717/peerj.4248 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 6 ◽

pp. e4248 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Pei-Ching Shih ◽

Shu-Jung Liu ◽

Sung-Tse Li ◽

Ai-Chen Chiu ◽

Po-Chuan Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Variceal Bleeding ◽

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Weekend Effect ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Upper Gastrointestinal

AimTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the weekend effect on the mortality of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding(UGIB).MethodsThe review protocol has been registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD42017073313) and was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We conducted a search of the PUBMED, COCHRANE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases from inception to August 2017. All observational studies comparing mortality between UGIB patients with weekend versus weekday admissions were included. Articles that were published only in abstract form or not published in a peer-reviewed journal were excluded. The quality of articles was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We pooled results from the articles using random-effect models. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the chi-square-basedQ-test andI2test. To address heterogeneity, we performed sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Potential publication bias was assessed via funnel plot.ResultsEighteen observational cohort studies involving 1,232,083 study patients were included. Weekend admission was associated with significantly higher 30-day or in-hospital mortality in all studies (OR = 1.12, 95% CI [1.07–1.17],P < 0.00001). Increased in-hospital mortality was also associated with weekend admission (OR = 1.12, 95% CI [1.08–1.17],P < 0.00001). No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed between patients admitted with variceal bleeding during the weekend or on weekdays (OR = 0.99, 95% CI [0.91–1.08],P = 0.82); however, weekend admission was associated with a 15% increase in in-hospital mortality for patients with non-variceal bleeding (OR = 1.15, 95% CI [1.09–1.21],P < 0.00001). The time to endoscopy for weekday admission was significantly less than that obtained for weekend admission (MD = −2.50, 95% CI [−4.08–−0.92],P = 0.002).ConclusionsThe weekend effect is associated with increased mortality of UGIB patients, particularly in non-variceal bleeding. The timing of endoscopic intervention might be a factor that influences mortality of UGIB patients.

Download Full-text

Coronavirus Disease-19-associated Acute Pancreatitis: Report of Three Cases and Review of Case Reports

Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences ◽

10.3889/oamjms.2021.6064 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (C) ◽

pp. 63-69

Author(s):

Fahmi Yousef Khan ◽

Theeb Osama Sulaiman ◽

Arun Prabhakaran Nair ◽

Mohamed Elmudathir Osman

Keyword(s):

Acute Pancreatitis ◽

Normal Limit ◽

Serum Amylase ◽

Epigastric Pain ◽

Case Reports ◽

Good Condition ◽

Elevated Serum ◽

Nausea And Vomiting ◽

Severe Epigastric Pain ◽

Pcr Test

BACKGROUND: Reports on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated with acute pancreatitis continue to emerge. In this series, we present three cases of acute pancreatitis associated with COVID-19 with no obvious etiology. CASE REPORTS: The first case was a 47-year-old man who presented with severe abdominal periumbilical pain, preceded by fever and dry cough. Based on a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and elevated serum amylase and lipase >3 times the upper normal limit, the diagnosis of COVID-19 and acute pancreatitis were established. The next case was a 57-year-old man with confirmed COVID-19 who developed severe epigastric pain radiating to the back and was associated with nausea and vomiting. His serum amylase and lipase were elevated >3 times the upper normal limit confirming the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. The third case was a 31-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with a few hours of severe epigastric pain radiating to the back associated with nausea and vomiting. Two days before his presentation, he had a runny nose and fever. A combination of serum amylase and lipase elevation, >3 times the upper normal limits, and a positive COVID-19 PCR test were obtained concurrently, confirming the diagnosis of COVID-19 associated acute pancreatitis. All patients were admitted to the Mesaieed Hospital COVID-19 facility and received treatment for COVID-19 according to our local guidelines, while acute pancreatitis was treated conservatively. All three patients were discharged in good condition. CONCLUSION: This case series suggests a possible correlation between COVID-19 and acute pancreatitis.

Download Full-text

Pediatric asthma control during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

10.22541/au.162699252.29324612/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Ze Yang ◽

Xiang Wang ◽

Xigang Wan ◽

Menglei Wang ◽

Zonghua Qiu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Asthma Control ◽

Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽

Case Reports ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Impact

Background: During the current ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, studies had reported that patients with asthma would experience increased asthma-associated morbidity because of the respiratory virus SARS-CoV-2 infection, based on experience with other respiratory viral infections. However, some studies suggested that there was no apparent increase in asthma related morbidity in children with asthma, it is even possible that due to reduced exposures due to confinement, such children may have improved outcomes. In order to understand the impact of Covid-19 on asthma control in children, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to find literature from December 2019 to June 2021 related to Covid-19 and children’s asthma control, among which results such as abstracts, comments, letters, reviews and case reports were excluded. The level of asthma control during the COVID-19 pandemic was synthesized and discussed. Results: A total of 20456 subjects were included in 7 studies. Random effect model is used to account for the data. Compared to the same period before the COVID-19 pandemic, asthma exacerbation, asthma admission, emergency room visit reduced a lot. The outcome of use of inhaled corticosteroids and Beta-2 agonists shows no significant difference. Conclusion: Compared to the same period before the COVID-19 pandemic and the measures in response to it, the level of asthma control has been significantly improved. We need to understand the exact factors leading to these improvements and find methods to sustain it.

Download Full-text