scholarly journals The STARS Phase 2 Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gaboxadol in Angelman Syndrome

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011409
Author(s):  
Lynne M. Bird ◽  
Cesar Ochoa-Lubinoff ◽  
Wen-Hann Tan ◽  
Gali Heimer ◽  
Raun D. Melmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Global Impression ◽  
Angelman Syndrome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Morning Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Evening Dose ◽  
Acid Type ◽  
Dosing Regimens

Objective:To evaluate safety and tolerability and exploratory efficacy endpoints for gaboxadol (OV101) compared with placebo in individuals with Angelman syndrome (AS).Methods:Gaboxadol is a highly selective orthosteric agonist that activates γ-subunit–containing extrasynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors. In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial, adolescent and adult individuals with a molecular diagnosis of AS were randomized (1:1:1) to 1 of 3 dosing regimens for a duration of 12 weeks: placebo morning dose and gaboxadol 15 mg evening dose (qd); gaboxadol 10 mg morning dose and 15 mg evening dose (bid); or placebo morning and evening dose. Safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study. Prespecified exploratory efficacy endpoints included adapted Clinical Global Impression–Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) scales which documented the clinical severity at baseline and change after treatment, respectively.Results:Eighty-eight individuals were randomized. Of 87 individuals (aged 13–45 years) who received at least 1 dose of study drug, 78 (90%) completed the study. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate, and no life-threatening AEs were reported. Efficacy of gaboxadol, as measured by CGI-I improvement in an exploratory analysis, was observed in gaboxadol qd vs placebo (p = 0.0006).Conclusion:After 12 weeks of treatment, gaboxadol was found to be generally well tolerated with a favorable safety profile. The efficacy as measured by the AS-adapted CGI-I scale warrants further studies.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class I evidence that, for individuals with AS, gaboxadol is generally safe and well tolerated.

scholarly journals Randomized, controlled trial of lasmiditan over four migraine attacks: Findings from the CENTURION study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Messoud Ashina ◽  
Uwe Reuter ◽  
Timothy Smith ◽  
Judith Krikke-Workel ◽  
Suzanne R Klise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Statistical Testing ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Common Teaes

Background We present findings from the multicenter, double-blind Phase 3 study, CENTURION. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of and consistency of response to lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine across four attacks. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to one of three treatment groups – lasmiditan 200 mg; lasmiditan 100 mg; or a control group that received placebo for three attacks and lasmiditan 50 mg for either the third or fourth attack. The primary endpoints were pain freedom at 2 h (first attack) and pain freedom at 2 h in ≥2/3 attacks. Secondary endpoints included pain relief, sustained pain freedom and disability freedom. Statistical testing used a logistic regression model and graphical methodology to control for multiplicity. Results Overall, 1471 patients treated ≥1 migraine attack with the study drug. Both primary endpoints were met for lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg ( p < 0.001). All gated secondary endpoints were met. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was highest during the first attack. The most common TEAEs with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, and nausea; these were generally mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions These results confirm the early and sustained efficacy of lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg and demonstrate consistency of response across multiple attacks. Trial Registration Number: NCT03670810

scholarly journals 1477. A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Cefepime Combined with the Novel Extended Spectrum β-Lactamase Inhibitor Enmetazobactam in Hospitalized Adults with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (cUTI) Including Acute Pyelonephritis (AP)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S539-S539
Author(s):  
Yehuda Carmeli ◽  
Philipp Knechtle ◽  
Jeff Hardenberg ◽  
Mathias Knecht
Keyword(s):  
Study Drug ◽  
Generation Cephalosporin ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Extended Spectrum ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Tract Infections

Abstract Background Third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has been classified as critical priority pathogens. The novel extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) inhibitor enmetazobactam (formerly AAI101; EMT) in combination with cefepime (FEP) is currently being developed as a carbapenem-sparing treatment of serious Gram-negative infections in settings with a high prevalence of 3GC-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. We report here the results from a phase 2 study that assessed safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of FEP-EMT in patients with cUTI/AP. Methods Forty-five patients were enrolled in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind study of hospitalized adults with cUTI/AP. Patients received dosing regimens of FEP or FEP-EMT IV therapy q8h by 2 hours infusion (table) for 7 to 10 days with a 28-day follow-up. Efficacy was evaluated in the microbiological-modified ITT (µMITT) population. Safety was monitored in patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Clinical cure was designated as the resolution of cUTI symptoms present at study entry. Plasma and urine PK were determined from all patients. Results The study drugs were well tolerated in each cohort, with similar % adverse events and no new or unexpected safety concerns (table). Two discontinuations were due to allergic dermatitis. The microbiological- and clinical responses at test-of-cure for the combined FEP-EMT group were 83.3% (20/24) and 95.8% (23/24) compared with responses in the combined FEP group of 73.3% (11/15) and 93.3% (14/15), respectively (table). The most common baseline pathogens were Escherichia coli (66.7%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.1%): 28.2% of isolates produced ESBLs with eradication rates for the combined FEP-EMT group of 85.7% (6/7) and for the combined FEP group of 75.0% (3/4). FEP and EMT PK were best described by a 2-compartment, linear PK model. Both agents exhibited half-lives of 2.3 hours. Creatinine clearance had a significant covariate effect on FEP and EMT, consistent with predominant renal excretion of both agents. Conclusion Results from this phase 2 study justify advancement to phase 3 studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FEP-EMT in patients with cUTI/AP. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

The Effect of Oral Niacinamide on Plasma Phosphorus Levels in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 562-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel O. Young ◽  
Steven C. Cheng ◽  
James A. Delmez ◽  
Daniel W. Coyne
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Dialysis ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Phosphate Binders ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phosphorus Levels ◽  
Plasma Phosphorus

Background Hyperphosphatemia remains a significant problem for patients requiring dialysis and is associated with increased mortality. Current treatment options include dietary restriction, dialysis, and phosphate binders. Treatment using the latter is frequently limited by cost, tolerability, and calcium loading. One open-label trial found niacinamide to be effective at decreasing serum phosphorus values in hemodialysis patients. Niacinamide may effectively reduce phosphorus levels in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients already receiving standard phosphorus-lowering therapies. Methods An 8 week, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of niacinamide to reduce plasma phosphorus levels in PD patients. Patients had to demonstrate a baseline phosphorus value > 4.9 mg/dL. Patients were randomized to niacinamide or placebo and prescribed 250 mg twice daily, with titration to 750 mg twice daily, as long as safety parameters were not violated. Phosphate binders, active vitamin D, and cinacalcet were kept constant during the study. The primary end point was change in plasma phosphorus. Secondary end points included changes in lipid parameters. Results 15 patients started on the study drug (8 niacinamide, 7 placebo) and 7 in each arm had at least one on-study phosphorus measurement. The niacinamide treatment group experienced an average 0.7 ± 0.9 mg/dL decrease in plasma phosphorus and the placebo-treated group experienced an average 0.4 ± 0.8 mg/dL increase. The treatment effect difference (1.1 mg/dL) was significant ( p = 0.037). No significant changes in high- or low-density lipoproteins or triglycerides were demonstrated. Two of the 8 patients randomized to the niacinamide treatment arm had to withdraw from the study due to drug-related adverse effects. Adverse effects may limit the use of niacinamide in PD patients. Conclusion Niacinamide, when added to standard phosphorus-lowering therapies, resulted in a modest yet statistically significant reduction in plasma phosphorus levels at 8 weeks. [ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00508885 (ClinicalTrials.gov)]

Intravenous dexketoprofen vs placebo for migraine attack in the emergency department: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Cephalalgia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faruk Gungor ◽  
Kamil Can Akyol ◽  
Mustafa Kesapli ◽  
Ahmet Celik ◽  
Adeviye Karaca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Allocation Concealment ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Migraine Headaches

Objective Migraine is a leading headache etiology that frequently presents to the emergency department (ED). In the present study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of dexketoprofen in aborting migraine headaches in the ED. Methods This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in an ED of a tertiary care hospital using allocation concealment. Patients were allocated into two arms to receive the study drug; 50 mg dexketoprofen in 50 ml saline and 50 ml saline as placebo. Change in pain intensity was measured by the visual analog scale at baseline, both at 30 and 45 minutes after the study medication was administered. Rescue medication requirement and pain relapse were also recorded by a telephone follow-up at 48 hours. Results A total of 224 patients (112 in each group) were included into the final analysis. Mean age of the study participants was 37 ± 11 (SD) and 25% ( n = 56) of them were male. The median pain improvement at 45 minutes for patients receiving dexketoprofen was 55 (IQR: 49 to 60) and 30 (IQR: 25 to 35) for those receiving placebo. The mean difference between the two groups at 45 minutes was 21.4 (95% CI: 14.4. to 28.5). Rescue drugs were needed in 22.3% of patients who received dexketoprofen compared to 55.4% in patients who received placebo (dif: 33.1%; 95% CI: 20% to 45%). There were no adverse events reported in either group during the study period. Conclusion Intravenous dexketoprofen is superior to placebo in relieving migraine headaches in the ED. It may be a suitable therapy with minimum side effects in patients presenting with a migraine headache to the ED.

scholarly journals 2226. Impact of Prior and Concomitant Antibacterial Therapy on Outcomes in the ASPECT-NP Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) vs. Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S760-S760
Author(s):  
Richard G Wunderink ◽  
Christopher Bruno ◽  
Ignacio Martin-Loeches ◽  
Marin Kollef ◽  
Jean-Francois Timsit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibacterial Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Drug Susceptibility ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background NP is a frequent healthcare-acquired infection associated with high mortality; rising resistance rates among causative Gram-negative pathogens require new treatment options. In the randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial, C/T (at double the initially approved dose) was noninferior to MEM for ventilated NP in both primary and key secondary endpoints. Here we evaluate the impact of prior and concomitant Gram-negative antibacterial therapy on outcomes in that trial. Methods Mechanically ventilated patients with ventilator-associated or hospital-acquired pneumonia were randomized 1:1 to 3 g C/T or 1 g MEM, both by 1-h IV infusion every 8 hours for 8–14 days. Patients could receive ≤24 hours of active antibacterial therapy within ≤72 hours prior to first dose; longer durations were permitted in case of prior treatment failure (i.e., signs and/or symptoms of the current episode of ventilated NP persisted/worsened despite ≥48 hours of treatment). At sites with MEM-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa rates ≥15%, patients could optionally receive up to 72 h of adjunctive empiric aminoglycoside (amikacin was recommended) until study drug susceptibility was confirmed. Primary and key secondary endpoints, respectively, were 28-d all-cause mortality and clinical response at test of cure (TOC; 7–14 days after the end of therapy) in the intent to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients). Results In the C/T arm, 285/362 (79%) ITT patients received prior systemic Gram-negative therapy and 103/362 (28%) received adjunctive aminoglycoside, compared with 288/364 (79%) and 112/364 (31%) patients, respectively, in the MEM arm. In the microbiologic ITT population, causative pathogens in patients failing prior therapy at the time of enrollment (C/T 15%, MEM 11%) were mainly Klebsiella spp (33%), P. aeruginosa (17%), Escherichia coli (14%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (8%). Mortality and cure rates were comparable between C/T and MEM regardless of receipt of prior systemic or adjunctive Gram-negative therapy (table). Conclusion Prior and adjunctive Gram-negative antibacterial therapy did not affect the relative efficacy of C/T (at the 3-g dose) vs. MEM in these high-risk patients with Gram-negative ventilated NP. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the safety and tolerability of a nutritional Formulation in patients with ANgelman Syndrome (FANS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna L. Herber ◽  
Edwin J. Weeber ◽  
Dominic P. D’Agostino ◽  
Jessica Duis
Keyword(s):  
Angelman Syndrome ◽  
Ketone Bodies ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
The Body ◽  
Metabolic Efficiency ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Carbohydrate Consumption ◽  
Gastrointestinal Health ◽  
Glucose Levels ◽  
Beta Hydroxybutyrate

Abstract Background Ketogenic and low-glycemic-index diets are effective in treating drug-resistant seizures in children with Angelman syndrome. Cognition, mobility, sleep, and gastrointestinal health are intrinsically linked to seizure activity and overall quality of life. Ketogenic and low-glycemic diets restrict carbohydrate consumption and stabilize blood glucose levels. The ketogenic diet induces ketosis, a metabolic state where ketone bodies are preferentially used for fuel. The use of exogenous ketones in promoting ketosis in Angelman syndrome has not been previously studied. The study formulation evaluated herein contains the exogenous ketone beta-hydroxybutyrate to rapidly shift the body towards ketosis, resulting in enhanced metabolic efficiency. Methods/design This is a 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study to assess the safety and tolerability of a nutritional formula containing exogenous ketones. It also examines the potential for exogenous ketones to improve the patient’s nutritional status which can impact the physiologic, symptomatic, and health outcome liabilities of living with Angelman syndrome. Discussion This manuscript outlines the rationale for a study designed to be the first to provide data on nutritional approaches for patients with Angelman syndrome using exogenous ketones. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03644693. Registered on 23 August 2018. Last updated on 23 August 2018.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of a Nutritional Formulation in Patients with Angelman Syndrome (FANS): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna L. Herber ◽  
Edwin J. Weeber ◽  
Dominic P. D’Agostino ◽  
Jessica Duis
Keyword(s):  
Angelman Syndrome ◽  
Ketone Bodies ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
The Body ◽  
Metabolic Efficiency ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Carbohydrate Consumption ◽  
Gastrointestinal Health ◽  
Glucose Levels ◽  
Beta Hydroxybutyrate

Abstract Background Ketogenic and low glycemic index diets are effective in treating drug resistant seizures in children with Angelman syndrome. Cognition, mobility, sleep, and gastrointestinal health are intrinsically linked to seizure activity and overall quality of life. Ketogenic and low glycemic diets restrict carbohydrate consumption and stabilize blood glucose levels. The ketogenic diet induces ketosis, a metabolic state where ketone bodies are preferentially used for fuel. The use of exogenous ketones in promoting ketosis in Angelman syndrome has not been previously studied. The study formulation evaluated herein contains the exogenous ketone beta-hydroxybutyrate to rapidly shift the body towards ketosis, resulting in enhanced metabolic efficiency. Methods This is a 16 week, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled crossover study to assess the safety and tolerability of a nutritional formula containing exogenous ketones. It also examines the potential for exogenous ketones to improve the patient’s nutritional status which can impact the physiologic, symptomatic, and health outcomes liabilities of living with Angelman syndrome. Discussion This manuscript outlines the rationale for a study designed to be the first to provide data on nutritional approaches for patients with Angelman syndrome using exogenous ketones. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03644693; Registered on 23 August 2018. Last Updated on 23 August 2018.

Patient-Controlled Methylphenidate for Cancer Fatigue: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (13) ◽  
pp. 2073-2078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
Vicente Valero ◽  
Larry Driver ◽  
Loren Shen ◽  
Jie Willey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Assessment System ◽  
Research Nurse ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Fatigue Score ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of patient-controlled methylphenidate as compared with placebo in cancer patients with fatigue, as measured by the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F). Patients and Methods Patients with a fatigue score of at least 4 on a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = no fatigue, 10 = worst possible fatigue) and hemoglobin level of at least 10 g/dL were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5 mg methylphenidate or placebo every 2 hours as needed (maximum of four capsules a day), for 7 days. Patients completed a daily diary including study drug record and fatigue intensity. A research nurse telephoned patients daily to assess toxicity and fatigue level. All patients were offered open-label methylphenidate for 4 weeks. FACIT-F and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) were assessed at baseline, and days 8, 15, and 36. The FACIT-F fatigue subscore on day 8 was considered the primary end point. Results Of 112 patients randomly assigned, 52 patients in the methylphenidate and 53 in the placebo group were assessable for analysis. Fatigue intensity improved significantly on day 8 in both the methylphenidate and placebo groups. However, there was no significant difference in fatigue improvement by FACIT-F (P = .31) or ESAS (P = .14) between groups. In open-label phase, fatigue intensity maintained low as compared with baseline. No significant toxicities were observed. Conclusion Both methylphenidate and placebo resulted in significant symptom improvement. Methylphenidate was not significantly superior to placebo after 1 week of treatment. Longer study duration is justified. The role of daily telephone calls from a research nurse should be explored as a palliative care intervention.

scholarly journals Prophylactic metformin after antenatal corticosteroids (PROMAC): a double blind randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesrine Gek Shan Hong ◽  
Peng Chiong Tan ◽  
Maherah Kamarudin ◽  
Siti Zawiah Omar
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Blood Sugar ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Common Adverse Effect ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Normal Pregnancy ◽  
Antenatal Corticosteroids ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Maternal Hyperglycemia

Abstract Background Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are increasingly used to improve prematurity-related neonatal outcome. A recognized and common adverse effect from administration of antenatal corticosteroid is maternal hyperglycemia. Even normal pregnancy is characterized by relative insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. Treatment of maternal hyperglycemia after ACS might be indicated due to the higher risk of neonatal acidosis which may coincide with premature birth. Metformin is increasingly used to manage diabetes mellitus during pregnancy as it is effective and more patient friendly. There is no data on prophylactic metformin to maintain euglycemia following antenatal corticosteroids administration. Methods A double blind randomized trial. 103 women scheduled to receive two doses of 12-mg intramuscular dexamethasone 12-hour apart were separately randomized to take prophylactic metformin or placebo after stratification according to their gestational diabetes (GDM) status. First oral dose of allocated study drug was taken at enrolment and continued 500 mg twice daily for 72 hours if not delivered. Six-point blood sugar profiles were obtained each day (pre- and two-hour post breakfast, lunch and dinner) for up to three consecutive days. A hyperglycemic episode is defined as capillary glucose fasting/pre-meal ≥ 5.3 mmol/L or two-hour post prandial/meal ≥ 6.7 mmol/L. Primary outcome was hyperglycemic episodes on Day-1 (first six blood sugar profile points) following antenatal corticosteroids. Results Number of hyperglycemic episodes on the first day were not significantly different (mean ± standard deviation) 3.9 ± 1.4 (metformin) vs. 4.1 ± 1.6 (placebo) p = 0.64. Hyperglycemic episodes markedly reduced on second day in both arms to 0.9 ± 1.0 (metformin) vs. 1.2 ± 1.0 (placebo) p = 0.15 and further reduced to 0.6 ± 1.0 (metformin) vs. 0.7 ± 1.0 (placebo) p = 0.67 on third day. Hypoglycemic episodes during the 3-day study period were few and all other secondary outcomes were not significantly different. Conclusions In euglycemic and diet controllable gestational diabetes mellitus women, antenatal corticosteroids cause sustained maternal hyperglycemia only on Day-1. The magnitude of Day-1 hyperglycemia is generally low. Prophylactic metformin does not reduce antenatal corticosteroids’ hyperglycemic effect. Trial registration The trial is registered in the ISRCTN registry on May 4 2017 with trial identifier 10.1186/ISRCTN10156101.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document