Developing a Clinical Prediction Score: Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Integer Scores to Statistical Regression Models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vigneshwar Subramanian ◽  
Edward J. Mascha ◽  
Michael W. Kattan
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Prediction Score ◽  
Statistical Regression ◽  
Clinical Prediction

scholarly journals Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Soybean Plant Density Using UAV and Satellite-Based Remote Sensing

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 2548
Author(s):  
Luthfan Nur Habibi ◽  
Tomoya Watanabe ◽  
Tsutomu Matsui ◽  
Takashi S. T. Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Variability ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Plant Density ◽  
Density Measurement ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Detection Algorithm ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Soybean Plant ◽  
Climate Data

The plant density of soybean is a critical factor affecting plant canopy structure and yield. Predicting the spatial variability of plant density would be valuable for improving agronomic practices. The objective of this study was to develop a model for plant density measurement using several data sets with different spatial resolutions, including unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery, PlanetScope satellite imagery, and climate data. The model establishment process includes (1) performing the high-throughput measurement of actual plant density from UAV imagery with the You Only Look Once version 3 (YOLOv3) object detection algorithm, which was further treated as a response variable of the estimation models in the next step, and (2) developing regression models to estimate plant density in the extended areas using various combinations of predictors derived from PlanetScope imagery and climate data. Our results showed that the YOLOv3 model can accurately measure actual soybean plant density from UAV imagery data with a root mean square error (RMSE) value of 0.96 plants m−2. Furthermore, the two regression models, partial least squares and random forest (RF), successfully expanded the plant density prediction areas with RMSE values ranging from 1.78 to 3.67 plant m−2. Model improvement was conducted using the variable importance feature in RF, which improved prediction accuracy with an RMSE value of 1.72 plant m−2. These results demonstrated that the established model had an acceptable prediction accuracy for estimating plant density. Although the model could not often evaluate the within-field spatial variability of soybean plant density, the predicted values were sufficient for informing the field-specific status.

scholarly journals Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Mechanical Properties for Polyamide 2200 (PA12) in Additive Manufacturing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivanna Baturynska
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Tensile Modulus ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Elongation At Break

Additive manufacturing (AM) is an attractive technology for manufacturing industry due to flexibility in design and functionality, but inconsistency in quality is one of the major limitations that does not allow utilizing this technology for production of end-use parts. Prediction of mechanical properties can be one of the possible ways to improve the repeatability of the results. The part placement, part orientation, and STL model properties (number of mesh triangles, surface, and volume) are used to predict tensile modulus, nominal stress and elongation at break for polyamide 2200 (also known as PA12). EOS P395 polymer powder bed fusion system was used to fabricate 217 specimens in two identical builds (434 specimens in total). Prediction is performed for XYZ, XZY, ZYX, and Angle orientations separately, and all orientations together. The different non-linear models based on machine learning methods have higher prediction accuracy compared with linear regression models. Linear regression models have prediction accuracy higher than 80% only for Tensile Modulus and Elongation at break in Angle orientation. Since orientation-based modeling has low prediction accuracy due to a small number of data points and lack of information about material properties, these models need to be improved in the future based on additional experimental work.

scholarly journals Risk Assessment Models for Wheat Fusarium Head Blight Epidemics Based on Within-Season Weather Data

2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. D. De Wolf ◽  
L. V. Madden ◽  
P. E. Lipps
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Relative Humidity ◽  
Fusarium Head Blight ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Predictor Variables ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Head Blight ◽  
Logistic Regression Models

Logistic regression models for wheat Fusarium head blight were developed using information collected at 50 location-years, including four states, representing three different U.S. wheat-production regions. Non-parametric correlation analysis and stepwise logistic regression analysis identified combinations of temperature, relative humidity, and rainfall or durations of specified weather conditions, for 7 days prior to anthesis, and 10 days beginning at crop anthesis, as potential predictor variables. Prediction accuracy of developed logistic regression models ranged from 62 to 85%. Models suitable for application as a disease warning system were identified based on model prediction accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and availability of weather variables at crop anthesis. Four of the identified models correctly classified 84% of the 50 location-years. A fifth model that used only pre-anthesis weather conditions correctly classified 70% of the location-years. The most useful predictor variables were the duration (h) of precipitation 7 days prior to anthesis, duration (h) that temperature was between 15 and 30°C 7 days prior to anthesis, and the duration (h) that temperature was between 15 and 30°C and relative humidity was greater than or equal to 90%. When model performance was evaluated with an independent validation set (n = 9), prediction accuracy was only 6% lower than the accuracy for the original data sets. These results indicate that narrow time periods around crop anthesis can be used to predict Fusarium head blight epidemics.

scholarly journals Role of a clinical prediction score in a chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension rule-out strategy

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1702576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remedios Otero ◽  
Laurent Bertoletti ◽  
Alfonso Muriel ◽  
Carmine Siniscalchi ◽  
Carmen Jimenez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Prediction Score ◽  
Clinical Prediction ◽  
Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Rule Out

scholarly journals Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict the Mechanical Properties of Polyamide 2200 (PA12) in Additive Manufacturing

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1060
Author(s):  
Ivanna Baturynska
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Tensile Modulus ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Elongation At Break

Additive manufacturing (AM) is an attractive technology for the manufacturing industry due to flexibility in its design and functionality, but inconsistency in quality is one of the major limitations preventing utilizing this technology for the production of end-use parts. The prediction of mechanical properties can be one of the possible ways to improve the repeatability of results. The part placement, part orientation, and STL model properties (number of mesh triangles, surface, and volume) are used to predict tensile modulus, nominal stress, and elongation at break for polyamide 2200 (also known as PA12). An EOS P395 polymer powder bed fusion system was used to fabricate 217 specimens in two identical builds (434 specimens in total). Prediction is performed for XYZ, XZY, ZYX, and Angle orientations separately, and all orientations together. The different non-linear models based on machine learning methods have higher prediction accuracy compared with linear regression models. Linear regression models only have prediction accuracy higher than 80% for Tensile Modulus and Elongation at break in Angle orientation. Since orientation-based modeling has low prediction accuracy due to a small number of data points and lack of information about the material properties, these models need to be improved in the future based on additional experimental work.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document